Pinned Tweet
Is pragmatism a sudden foreign concept to the new right? No, it's still there, it's just drowned out right now by two loud camps:
1. The die politely, compassionate conservative crowd that thinks "principle" means doing nothing forever.
2. The internet-radical crowd that thinks "revolution" means blowing up your own coalition and calling it strategy.
Both of them are allergic to pragmatism because pragmatism forces you to produce instead of just posture.
Pragmatism says:
Win midterms
Get a working majority
Codify policy
Rebuild institutional loyalty
Strip bureaucratic overreach
Reassert citizen sovereignty
Force the agencies back under control
Then you can talk about deeper reform
But everyone wants to skip steps and jump right to "final boss fight of history."
The Founders were not idealist philosophers who wrote pretty speeches and prayed over vibes. They were strategic, brutal pragmatists who negotiated, compromised, maneuvered, played factional politics, manipulated power centers, and then wrote down the principles to lock their gains in place.
Pragmatism is not weakness.
Pragmatism is how men who intend to win behave.
Right now, too many on the right think the choice is:
Pure ideological purity, or
Total compromise
Wrong. The real move is principled pragmatism.
Stick to the core:
Sovereignty comes from the people
Rights are inherent
Government is delegated authority
Consent is the basis of legitimacy
Then act strategically to build the conditions where those principles can function again.
We will either learn to operate with discipline, or we’ll lose to people who do.
That’s it.
Josh White 🇺🇸 retweeted
On 11/4/79, 47 years ago, Iranian students scaled the walls of the US embassy, disarmed a US Marine contingent (inflicting and suffering zero casualties) and took over the compound. They discovered that the entire second floor of the main building, the Chancery, consisted of wall-to-wall eavesdropping equipment. The entire Tehran communications system had been routed through the CIA-run US embassy!
Frantic CIA spooks managed to shred thousands of pages of documentary evidence of their crimes before they were taken hostage by the students, who subsequently, displaying astounding ingenuity and perseverance, successfully reassembled and published virtually all of the thousands of pages. The result is a 77-volume book series titled “Documents from the U.S. Espionage Den”.
The students kept the US occupation personnel incarcerated in their own “den of espionage” for 444 days, releasing them just a few minutes after Ronald Reagan—who defeated incumbent Jimmy Carter due to the hostage crisis—took the oath of office.
This notion that Iran is somehow "not our problem" is one of the most breathtakingly ignorant arguments to emerge from the 21st century.
Iran has been an American national security problem for nearly half a century, dating back to 1979, when the Carter administration abandoned a longtime strategic ally and failed to prevent the rise of a hostile Islamic theocracy.
Since then, the Iranian regime has spent decades sponsoring terrorism, destabilizing the Middle East, threatening our allies, and advancing its interests at the expense of American security.
You can legitimately debate the extent of American involvement. That's a matter of policy, prudence, and constitutional authority. But pretending Iran isn't our problem doesn't make it so.
Constitutional restraint is not strategic blindness. And America First has never meant America Oblivious.
Josh White 🇺🇸 retweeted
I don’t know why they got mad.
All I said was, I would rather lick dog shit off a razor blade than vote for a Democrat!
This notion that Iran is somehow "not our problem" is one of the most breathtakingly ignorant arguments to emerge from the 21st century.
Iran has been an American national security problem for nearly half a century, dating back to 1979, when the Carter administration abandoned a longtime strategic ally and failed to prevent the rise of a hostile Islamic theocracy.
Since then, the Iranian regime has spent decades sponsoring terrorism, destabilizing the Middle East, threatening our allies, and advancing its interests at the expense of American security.
You can legitimately debate the extent of American involvement. That's a matter of policy, prudence, and constitutional authority. But pretending Iran isn't our problem doesn't make it so.
Constitutional restraint is not strategic blindness. And America First has never meant America Oblivious.
Replying to @apexdecree @ConceptualJames
You’re being played by the same ideological rot that destroyed Iran in 1979, this time aimed at Israel. The left and the woke right are running the same playbook: whip up moral outrage, romanticize extremists, and pressure Western allies to self-sabotage under the illusion of “justice.”
Before 1979, Iran was modernizing fast, embracing Western values, expanding women’s rights, building infrastructure rivaling Europe, and transitioning toward a constitutional monarchy. But the radical Islamists rebelled, launching assassinations and terror campaigns. When the Shah cracked down, as any government would when faced with armed insurrection, the Western left painted him as a tyrant and the extremists as “freedom fighters.” The media echoed it, the protests followed, and Carter, cornered by moral exhibitionism, abandoned the Shah.
The result? Iran fell to the Ayatollahs, traded progress for repression, and became a global exporter of terror. And now, the same forces, the leftist agitators and their woke-right enablers, are trying to rerun that script with Israel. They undermine stability, empower extremists, and call it virtue. Then, as always, they’ll feign shock when the blood starts flowing.
Enjoy communism and the radical Islam that will sweep this nation. You did this to yourselves. Fuck everybody
I also posted this as a fucking warning. But not a mother fucker knows how to listen. That's why I quit posting it was going in one ear and out the fucking other.
Pragmatism time. @realDonaldTrump @PressSec @GOP @ScottPresler @HouseGOP @SenateGOP @SpeakerJohnson @LeaderJohnThune @BasedMikeLee @tedcruz @Jim_Jordan @JDVance
We’re less than a year out from midterms, and Congress has a brutally short window where it can actually govern before campaign season turns everyone into fundraising NPCs. Executive orders are great for speed, but they’re paper shields. The next Democrat, the next court, or the next “emergency” and they’re gone in a week.
If we don’t codify Trump’s core agenda into statute before midterms, we’re basically admitting we’re fine with it all being reversible.
Here’s what has to get locked in by law, not just left as Trump’s signature on an EO:
1. Border, sovereignty, and citizenship
Trump’s immigration and border orders finally treated mass illegal entry as what it is: an invasion and a national-security problem, not a sociology project. That includes:
– Declaring the border crisis and cartel networks a national-security threat, using the military to support border security, and tightening asylum back to what it was meant to be, not a catch-and-release conveyor belt.
– Realigning the refugee program so we aren’t importing other countries’ problems by the tens of thousands with no vetting or cultural buy-in.
– Cracking down on visa overstays, birthright abuse, and sloppy paths to citizenship so the value of citizenship actually means something again.
Congress’s job here is simple: turn those principles into statute. Mandatory E-Verify, real penalties for sanctuary jurisdictions, automatic removal for criminal aliens, fast-track deportation with due process that doesn’t drag on for ten years, and formal terrorist designations for cartels and their financial networks. Put it in black letter law so a future administration can’t just memo its way back to open borders.
2. De-weaponizing the federal government
Trump’s orders on “ending the weaponization of the federal government” and “restoring freedom of speech and ending federal censorship” are the blueprint. The bureaucracy, intel, and DOJ have been operating like a fourth branch with veto power over the people’s choice.
Codification means:
– A hard statutory ban on federal agencies coordinating censorship with platforms, “NGOs,” and cutouts. No more laundering viewpoint suppression through “private” partners.
– Tight limits on using national-security tools (FISA, NSLs, surveillance) in domestic political cases, with automatic disclosure and penalties when they’re abused.
– Real consequences for rogue prosecutors and lawfare: fee-shifting, personal liability in extreme cases, and strict venue rules so you can’t drag political enemies into hostile jurisdictions just to bleed them dry.
If Congress doesn’t write this into law, every EO on de-weaponization is one election away from being shredded.
3. Killing DEI and restoring merit
Trump signed orders yanking DEI, critical-theory garbage, and race/sex preferences out of the federal government and contracting. That needs to be nailed into statute:
– Ban DEI loyalty oaths, mandatory struggle sessions, and race-based hiring or promotion in federal agencies and federal contractors.
– Restore strict merit standards for hiring, grants, and promotions.
– Prohibit ideological litmus tests for security clearances, military promotion, or civil service positions.
If Republicans leave this at the EO level, the left will just flip the switch back to “equity” the minute they get power again.
4. The administrative state and Schedule F 2.0
Trump’s workforce and hiring EOs are about one thing: breaking permanent-insider rule.
Congress should:
– Put into law an expanded “policy-making” classification (Schedule F in spirit) so presidents can actually fire ideological saboteurs in key roles.
– Shrink and consolidate agencies through statute, not just task forces and memos.
– Lock in transparent rulemaking, strict cost-benefit requirements, and automatic sunset provisions on major regulations.
If you don’t codify this, the bureaucracy will wait out every reform and snap back the moment they smell weakness.
5. Tariffs, reshoring, and economic sovereignty
Liberation Day tariffs and the reciprocal tariff framework hit the heart of the problem: we gutted our own industrial base while pretending “cheap imports” were free money. Courts are already taking shots at some of those tariff EOs by claiming Trump stretched emergency powers too far. Fine. Then Congress needs to step in and do its actual job.
Congress should:
– Write a permanent reciprocal tariff statute: if you tariff us, we match or exceed it by law.
– Tie tariff policy to national-security sectors: steel, energy, tech, rare earths, critical minerals, food production.
– Protect and extend the pro-worker tax cuts (no tax on overtime, tips, Social Security, etc.) so domestic labor has a fighting chance against foreign wage-slave economies.
The combination of Liberation Day tariffs, reshoring, and targeted tax relief is already pulling capital and production back home. If Republicans don’t codify it, courts and globalists will neuter it piece by piece.
6. Energy independence and rejecting climate authoritarianism
Trump’s energy and environmental orders ripped up the fake “climate emergency” handcuffs.
Codification looks like:
– Statutory fast-tracks for pipelines, drilling, refining, nuclear, and grid improvements.
– Explicit bans on federal net-zero mandates that bypass Congress.
– Guardrails on agencies like EPA so they can’t unilaterally throttle entire sectors based on made-up “social cost of carbon” numbers.
Energy policy decides whether we’re a sovereign nation or a client state. Leave this at the EO level and the green cult will reverse it in a weekend.
7. Culture, speech, and basic reality
There are EOs aimed at defending women’s sports and spaces, restoring biological sex in federal definitions, and pulling radical gender ideology out of official policy. Those need to be turned into plain statutory language so no future bureaucrat can “reinterpret” biology with a memo.
Same with censorship: what Trump ordered by EO about federal speech policing needs to become a permanent line in the law, not just a temporary course correction.
Bottom line:
Congress has a narrow operational window before midterms where they can actually legislate instead of posture. The mission is not to invent brand new ideas, it’s to codify the mandate Trump already ran and won on:
Border and sovereignty
Lawful, accountable government
Merit over ideology
American production over global dependency
Energy independence
Reality over fashionable madness
If Republicans treat Trump’s executive orders as the finish line instead of the starting point for legislation, they will have wasted the clearest governing mandate in modern history.
We either translate this agenda into durable statute now, or we leave it all one election and one judge away from being erased.
Congratulations, we got full blown communism in America because nobody fucking listens. I said this last November 5th. And I tried to warn everybody.
Is pragmatism a sudden foreign concept to the new right? No, it's still there, it's just drowned out right now by two loud camps:
1. The die politely, compassionate conservative crowd that thinks "principle" means doing nothing forever.
2. The internet-radical crowd that thinks "revolution" means blowing up your own coalition and calling it strategy.
Both of them are allergic to pragmatism because pragmatism forces you to produce instead of just posture.
Pragmatism says:
Win midterms
Get a working majority
Codify policy
Rebuild institutional loyalty
Strip bureaucratic overreach
Reassert citizen sovereignty
Force the agencies back under control
Then you can talk about deeper reform
But everyone wants to skip steps and jump right to "final boss fight of history."
The Founders were not idealist philosophers who wrote pretty speeches and prayed over vibes. They were strategic, brutal pragmatists who negotiated, compromised, maneuvered, played factional politics, manipulated power centers, and then wrote down the principles to lock their gains in place.
Pragmatism is not weakness.
Pragmatism is how men who intend to win behave.
Right now, too many on the right think the choice is:
Pure ideological purity, or
Total compromise
Wrong. The real move is principled pragmatism.
Stick to the core:
Sovereignty comes from the people
Rights are inherent
Government is delegated authority
Consent is the basis of legitimacy
Then act strategically to build the conditions where those principles can function again.
We will either learn to operate with discipline, or we’ll lose to people who do.
That’s it.
Josh White 🇺🇸 retweeted
This is the white people redneck shit that I absolutely love
Fun for the whole family.
God damn these fucking people in Boise. The fuck is wrong with these God damn lights. It is complete bullshit that you got to set for five fucking rotations at every goddamn light.
Josh White 🇺🇸 retweeted
Dear @Dragonlady436 .....
I apologize.
Josh White 🇺🇸 retweeted
Replying to @WhiteJoshuaL
Exactly!
You can't complain that there's an alternative when you aren't producing enough as it is.
I get the worry if this was a LONG TERM program, but Trump himself said it's for like 3 months to give time for the ranchers' herds to finish growing and be ready for meat production.
Josh White 🇺🇸 retweeted
Anyone else think the purpose of electing these Radical Muslims to public office is to usher in Islam and eventually take over America?
I look at the political landscape and all the shit we have to deal withlike communism and islam. Imagine what our grandchildren will have to deal with when we are too old to give a fuck
Josh White 🇺🇸 retweeted
All of you anti-Trump people were complaining beef prices were too high a week ago. Now you're complaining that beef prices are going to be too low.
Which is it?
Do you not see how ridiculous you sound? When prices are high - you blame Trump. When he proposes something that will lower prices, you insist it will drive American cattle producers out of business - you blame Trump.
Serious question:
What do you want?
Do you want low beef prices? Do you want high beef prices? Do you want protectionism to protect American jobs? Do you oppose protectionism and prefer imports of immigrants and products to lower prices?
YOU CANNOT HAVE EVERYTHING. You have to pick.
What it sounds like is you JUST WANT SOMETHING TO COMPLAIN ABOUT AND CAMPAIGN ON, you don't actually have any solid positions on anything. You simply pick your stance any given day by "What is the opposite of what Trump is doing?" and "How can I blame Trump for something today?", which is a really lousy way to live.
Not only is it TDS cultism, it doesn't actually...fix anything. It's just you making YOURSELF perpetually miserable, and damaging your countrymen and country in the process.













