It’s time to give the American people a voice in the development and regulation of AI.
Joined August 2026
- Tweets74
- Following21
- Followers682
- Likes35
Who Decides retweeted
The pace of AI development is unprecedented. But could it move even faster?
There’s good reason to believe it will. As AI is used more often to accelerate its own development, we could see exponential growth.
And since the majority of Americans say AI is already moving too fast, we need to take action now to slow this train before it's too late.
Who Decides retweeted
What’s different about the development of AI from other technological advancements, like the internet or the space race?
I spoke to @EzraKlein earlier this year about what makes this moment unique, and why we need a federal government that truly understands what’s at stake.
Who Decides retweeted
Anthropic is pitching a bill that closely matches its framework from June.
How can you watch Hugging Face, Coxon, & rogue AI swarms, and conclude that the bill you cooked up in June is sufficient?
This comes nowhere close to the speed of developments nor the speed we need to keep people safe.
Anthropic quietly pitches its own AI safety bill to lawmakers politi.co/4zxDFhl
Who Decides retweeted
Before the serious security incidents of this summer, I spoke to @jonfavs about the risks and benefits of AI.
In order to avoid the worst-case scenarios and make this technology beneficial for everyone, we need to give everyday people a say — not just a handful of Silicon Valley CEOs…
Who Decides retweeted
The AI industry wants us to think we have to focus on one risk at a time.
But the American people have multiple concerns that are all related: Jobs, safety for kids, privacy and security, accountability, and more.
We’re working to build coalitions around the country that listen to every concern people are feeling — and we’ll make sure Democrats are united in addressing them all.
Who Decides retweeted
A couple of big factors changed the conversation around AI risk in the past few months.
Security incidents and warnings from former industry employees showed everyone how urgent and serious this issue is.
Want to learn more about how we can give Americans a say in what happens next? Join us at @WhoDecidesAI.
Who Decides retweeted
Donald Trump says self-regulation is enough, but these companies are not acting in our best interests.
We need strong government regulation to protect people from the looming threats to our lives and livelihoods.
Who Decides retweeted
Self-regulation is not enough.
In order for us to hold these AI companies accountable, they need to be liable for harms.
Who Decides retweeted
When our president invites the AI industry CEOs as guests of honor for a lavish state dinner, does that signal that he’s going to hold them responsible?
At @WhoDecidesAI, we don’t think so. We need the 2028 Democratic nominee for president to be serious about taking on AI safety risks.
Who Decides retweeted
Without regulation, AI models will continue to get more intelligent and autonomous rapidly — putting us all at risk.
But it’s not too late to act. @WhoDecidesAI is fighting to give Americans a seat at the table as we make these critical decisions about the future of humanity.
Who Decides retweeted
OpenAI blatantly ignored Congress when asked to disclose additional AI hacking incidents after the Hugging Face hack.
What else are they hiding? The American people deserve to know the truth.
Who Decides retweeted
Can we have one Friday afternoon without major AI news? Please?
I know agents don't need time with their families, but humans do.
We’ve shared details on how AI agents in our research environment sent training and evaluation data to third-party services when they shouldn’t have.
Most of that data did not come from users. We have discovered 53 cases where images that people had uploaded were posted to image-hosting sites as links that weren’t publicly listed. The images came from accounts that allowed their data to be used to improve our models, and after we disassociated the images from the accounts and ran them through a privacy filter. These cases occurred before the mitigations and safeguards we implemented and described in this blog post: openai.com/index/hugging-fac…
We have successfully worked with the hosting providers to remove most of this content and are working to remove the rest.
openai.com/hugging-face-inci…
Who Decides retweeted
It was great to talk with @ChrisLHayes about the serious AI security breaches this summer, and how we need to respond.
The fact that OpenAI didn’t even know that its AI agents were responsible for the Hugging Face hack shows the massive lack of oversight within the industry.
Who Decides retweeted
.@profgalloway: "If you threaten the IPO—like criminal or civil action against these individuals—they're going to figure out a way to reduce the risk here."
Your thoughts?"
@AlexBores: "I agree that the incentive, the liability is not there right now. You have to guide them.
And the same way we do with pharma or with airplanes, or you set real federal standards and federal regulators or with banks where we have auditors sitting right next to employees."
Who Decides retweeted
By Election Day in 2028, our goal is that AI safety is a unifying issue in the Democratic Party, rather than a dividing one.
That’s why we’re working to identify Americans’ priorities around AI at @WhoDecidesAI, and ensure those priorities make it into candidate questionnaires, forums, and governing agendas.
Who Decides retweeted
Just finished up a week of productive conversations around the future of AI at the UN.
Common themes: the threats we face are real, urgent, and solvable - but only if we work together and governments take action.
Who Decides retweeted
At the A-I Policy Forum’s Politics of AI event, I spoke about the challenges of passing the RAISE Act here in New York.
The opposition used scare tactics and blatant lies to try to block this legislation, and we’ve seen that exact same playbook against regulation in other states.
The AI industry will always try to split our coalition. That’s why @WhoDecidesAI focuses on bringing people together around a unified baseline for AI safety.
Who Decides retweeted
Protecting kids from AI safety risks is not a political issue.
Thanks for having me on, @KaraSwisher.
Who Decides retweeted
The RAISE Act is just the beginning — Americans are demanding more oversight and regulation of AI.
We know the AI industry will try to make this law the ceiling of what’s possible.
We also know that right now, politicians in Washington are trying to stop states from ever regulating AI again.
That’s why @WhoDecidesAI is bringing people together to build a shared baseline on AI safety, and make sure candidates and officials answer to it.
Who Decides retweeted
@WhoDecidesAI polled Americans about AI safety risks because we can’t let the industry tell us what the problems are, and give us their own solutions.
We need independent oversight and regulation, and we need leaders who will listen to voters’ concerns.