siddharth

If an Indian girl has to choose between a 5'5" tidda with abs and a 6 foot tall Pakistani chad, she'd pick the tall Pakistani every single time.

cannot believe im 26 and yet my mother enrages me so much i turn into a crying teenager

'i am saying it being a keralite' yup, 'bhat' sounds like a very native keralite name

I feel visceral rage at anyone who tells people to give up, regardless of circumstances.

ai bubble pops and those graphics cards gonna be less than a big mac

Gemini 4 Carbon is our next frontier model. It’s state-of-the-art across cybersecurity and long-horizon capabilities.

ti's why i say that india's propaganda is just rich indians making a mockery out of dumb hindutvatards. the thing youve got to know about paki women is that the avg paki woman is a hitlerite when it comes to india, indians, & hinduism.

The article by "Ibn-e-Khaldun Bharati" is a case study in how Indian liberalism disciplines those who refuse its catechisms. It piles up adjectives—Islamist, anti-secular, reductionist, conservative to target muslim intellectuals instead of properly refuting their arguments. The central charge is that Sharjeel Imam calls the Constitution fascist, labels secularism a trap, and denounces democracy. Constitution is not infallible . And what is the liberal soft sanghis response -how dare he? The Constitution is sacred. It is the ark of the covenant. To criticize it is to be anti-national, anti-democratic, anti-everything. Constituion is a document—a historically specific juridical text produced by a Constituent Assembly dominated by lawyers, landlords, and the professional middle classes, at a moment when the Indian bourgeoisie was consolidating its rule after independence. Constitution treats a landless labourer and a billionaire equally. And this is precisely one of the problem. The Constitution treats them equally in the sense that it confers on both the same formal rights the right to property, the right to contract, the right to equal protection of the laws. But a landless labourer and a billionaire do not enter the juridical sphere on equal footing. The Constitution's formal equality is the alibi for this outcome. allows the state to say: "We are not discriminating; we are simply applying the law equally to all." But the law itself is structured to protect the interests of the propertied classes, because it emerged from a settlement in which those classes were dominant. The liberal who worships the Constitution is, whether he knows it or not, worshipping the form of equality that conceals the reality of exploitation. He is worshipping the juridical abstraction that allows the state to claim neutrality while presiding over a society of radical inequality.. Also the charge that Imam "labels secularism a trap". Why is this even scandalous in the first place check the historical record? The word "secular" was inserted into the Constitution in 1976, during the Emergency, by a government that had suspended civil liberties and jailed its opponents. Since then, it has functioned as a label that allows the state to claim neutrality while presiding over communal violence. The Congress presided over anti-Muslim pogroms in Gujarat, Bhagalpur, and elsewhere; the BJP has perfected the machinery of pogrom. Each time, the state's "secular" credentials are deployed to insulate it from accountability. Sharjeel Imam challenged the political invisibility of Indian Muslims. We all know how these parties treat muslims as vote bank. He raised uncomfortable questions about constitution , so called secularism . If he doesn't fit into your narrative of " good muslim " where he needs to worship constitution doesn't mean his opinion can be discarded . Have some shame @ShekharGupta

When we talk about cultural compatibility it’s not some hypothetical issue. What we can and cannot do in public, or even in private, is informed by our cultural upbringings. If you’re raised in a culture that views killing and eating cows as a sin, an evil, then having smoke from its cooking waft into your house is not only annoying and unpleasant, but deeply offensive. That culture is incompatible with one that enjoys grilling. There isn’t really a compromise here. One side will get what they want and the other won’t. It is a win-lose situation. The more you import different culture, the more of this conflict you create.

pro-tip: don't mention the recent AI math results to Opus 5.5 if you want it to prioritize something other than downloading those results and looking at them

Fitting since Ravana was the OG rebel against the tyranny of the Aryan lords!

Make sure to inform everyone you know that the migrant gangs and their Antifa allies are also rioting in Milan, Italy tonight Building are vandalized and fires are set in front of Milan Cathedral (the Duomo)

I suspect that one of the biggest reasons why almost no one pursued LLMs despite GPT-2's overnight success was surprisingly simple: almost no one was excited to work on language even at OpenAI, people didn't want to leave their cool game environments behind

mad as hell at the function as per usual

“how my gujju bf plays garba” why the fuck do u have a gujju bf

Saw a video of an Indian student in the USA being arrested for shoplifting at a Target and the first thing she said to defend herself was, "I am from a good family." Very strange behavior.

my brain: so about this Malfoid thing me: no. absolutely not my brain: what if Dracina had been triplets and there were 3 of her. different romantic routes in a visual novel me: brain we are not doing this my brain: "the Malfoids of Reversality"