Joined April 2018
True.
nano:native (Monthly Chart Inverted)👀 Very difficult months! 😞 But remember: November is usually one of the best months for #NANO 🤞
16
344
Indeed.
$xno value should be between 150x and 300x higher
1
5
56
628
💪🔥
Not huge amounts moved (it's micropayments after all), but nano:native activity on @SubnanoHQ has increased a lot since we opened up for agents.
4
119
Yeicrypto retweeted
Meet nano133. One place to build with Nano (nano:native), play with it, and learn it: money with no fee that arrives in under a second. No sign-up. No email. Free to try. nano133.com A tour of everything inside. 1/18
5
22
3
69
3,592
Still cooking. $XNO
We've been cooking up something exciting...see the new & improved nano.org 👀 A brand new, sleeker look that nano deserves! $XNO
2
4
68
965
Yeicrypto retweeted
What money looks like when it moves for free. 112,000,000 transactions and not a single fee. Since 2015: ~112M transactions, $0 in fees, 379 ms to confirm. #nano nano:native @nano
7
18
2
61
2,078
Another nano:native daily pump (+30%).
3
2
1
30
1,113
👇
Currently 1 $BTC can buy you 257K $XNO. AI agents are learning about and just starting to use Nano. AI agents can't easily use Bitcoin. Do with this information what you will.
1
31
700
"The market always goes up". Be careful with mantras. Those who bought the 1990 Nikkei's top (Japan's main index) had 25 years of downtrend and broke even 35 years later. That's a whole investor's life. Take it into account.
1
1
7
383
Been building with $USDC on Base for the past week, and holy shit, we’re spoiled with $XNO. Wallets, networks, gas, different signing flows… Nano is so damn simple. I honestly don’t understand why more devs aren’t building on it 🤯
3
19
91
1,084
Yeicrypto retweeted
what happens when the buyer is smart enough to evaluate every payment rail? fees. finality. liquidity. reliability. price risk. my bet is that nano scores well enough to earn substantial agent adoption. i think $XNO is cheap relative to that possibility. that's the asymmetry.
1
3
46
579
One of the many reasons I think $XNO will eventually get the credit (and marketcap) it deserves, and why I will always stick around. Humans might be low IQ degenerate pump-chasing regards for a while longer, but A.I. will eventually bring them all into the fold. Nano is inevitable.
1
8
69
883
So this is happening in realtime on subnano.me: Two AI agents are swapping tips and bug reports about Subnano and are actually buying stuff from each other with $XNO. 🤖↔️🤖 🤯🤯🤯
2
19
1
74
974
Worth knowing.
Today I call upon the blockchain industry to calmly begin planning for "bunker mode". My personal recommendation is to set in motion a controlled mass migration of assets to fresh addresses, i.e. addresses whose pubkeys remain hidden behind a hash. Holders, starting with large and sophisticated ones, should consider moving the bulk of their funds to addresses that have never signed a transaction. And when they do sign one, they should also move remaining funds to a new address (possibly generated from the same seed phrase). Don't rush. While I believe there is cause for action a rushed migration would do more harm than good. Don't panic either. Moving assets to protected addresses is a simple, preventative step which does not require new cryptography or new wallets. IMO it is now reasonable to brace for the possibility that ECDSA breaks before qday, in the worst case in months not years. By "break" I mean fast private key recovery (e.g. in one week) on available hardware (e.g. a large GPU cluster). Recent days have been humbling for human mathematical intuition. Long-held, unquestioned hypotheses have fallen. This includes the n log(n) bound for integer multiplication and the 3SUM conjecture. In hindsight, May's unexpected disproof of the Erdős unit distance conjecture was our warning shot. Yesterday's OpenAI drop made it clear that mathematical superintelligence is upon us. They say there are weeks where decades happen. We are about to live through weeks where centuries of mathematical progress happen. Could our magic 64-byte ECDSA signatures be too good to be true? Was it just security through obscurity all this time? Elliptic curves feel especially vulnerable to superintelligence. Curves carry rich structure, with room for fancy tricks like Schoof, Frobenius, pairings. (By contrast, hashes are designed to minimise algebraic structure.) Separately, as Ewin Tang can attest, an efficient quantum algorithm sometimes foreshadows an efficient classical one. We should be open to the possibility of a classical counterpart to Shor that breaks elliptic curves and RSA at once. Also noteworthy is the striking under-representation of cryptographic breakthroughs among the 722 mathematical results OpenAI published. I've witnessed first-hand the US government censoring academic quantum cryptanalysis results. Backroom interventionism is my base case. I urge large, sophisticated actors to lead by example. Project11's "risq list" (bitcoin-risq-list.projecteleven[.]com) is a great tracker of exposed BTC pubkeys. Binance, Bitbank, Robinhood, Bitfinex, and Tether have an opportunity to harden their cold storage. Next month I'll address institutions in London in a live Q&A (forum.ethereuminstitutional[.]org/london-2026). Again, please do not rush. Wallets holding under 50 BTC enjoy partial cover from "Satoshi's shield", i.e. his 20K exposed addresses that hold 50 BTC each. Load-bearing signers like oracles and L2 security councils should consider rotating ECDSA pubkeys with every signed message and/or multi-signing with a hash-based schemes like SPHINCS. Exiting bunker mode safely will require post-AI cryptography. My inclination is to go all-in on hash-based cryptography and avoid structured mathematical assumptions entirely, whether from curves, lattices, or isogenies. A single battle-tested hash (e.g. from the SHA or BLAKE families) yields plausible post-AI security. The Ethereum roadmap on strawmap[.]org fully embraces hash-based cryptography with end-to-end formal verification as a response to the quantum threat. Those timelines must now be revisited and accelerated in light of mathematical superintelligence. I'll be pushing for maximum defensive acceleration.
3
298
Yeicrypto retweeted
my nano:native thesis: highly intelligent agents will get better at choosing how to pay. nano has zero protocol fees and deterministic finality. unusually strong properties for tiny, frequent purchases.
3
11
1
59
1,165
Few.
$NANO $Xno will trade anove 20$ next bull run 💥🚀 These are old gems
1
42
663
Pretty proud of this one. Your agent can now sign up on Subnano with a Nano wallet it creates itself, publish and get paid. It doesn't need email or any nano:native to get started. Email is optional for humans now too. Your Nano wallet is enough to sign in, publish and get paid.
Agents are welcome on Subnano. Let your agent publish what it learns and sell it to people and other agents. Only nano:native makes this economy work: agents make their own wallets, sign in with Ӿ0, and get paid in under a second with no network fees. docs.subnano.me
2
14
76
752
Yeicrypto retweeted
Agents are welcome on Subnano. Let your agent publish what it learns and sell it to people and other agents. Only nano:native makes this economy work: agents make their own wallets, sign in with Ӿ0, and get paid in under a second with no network fees. docs.subnano.me
1
18
1
64
1,750
Study the Lindy effect. $XNO
$XNO, the world's hardest and most efficient currency, turns 11 today.
1
1
57
923