ZaYan

In crypto, if a product makes money and the token gets none of it, you’re just holding a logo. $WLFI plans buybacks that may use USD1 reserve fees so long-term holders gain voting weight. Simple business loop. Learn it.

Stripe can send USDC to 160 countries. My bank still takes 5 business days.

Opened the FHETransform site from @primus_labs expecting a research paper and found a developer tool instead. The idea is that you keep writing normal Solidity, but the contract computes on encrypted values. > encrypted ints from 8 to 256 bits > a preprocessor turns a normal contract into an FHE one from a single annotation > heavy compute runs off-chain, so onchain cost stays close to plain Solidity > you decide per value who can decrypt The homepage example is a vault withdraw where nobody watching the chain can tell whether it succeeded. It's still v0.2, and the coprocessor is TEE-hosted for now.

Before putting a dollar into @termix_ai I screenshotted the numbers the timeline skips, so you can see what you're actually buying into. #1 AI agent app on BNB Chain by revenue on @DefiLlama, $4,943 in 7 days. The 4 below it show $0. 30 day revenue $92,542. Money held in its contracts (TVL): $2,894. • Revenue peaked in August at $292K. • September $208K. • October so far $83K. "1,311,024 agents" counts every ID in a shared onchain registry, not sellers. 49 Top-tier meme analyst listings, all 100 rep. DefiLlama lists 0 audits. The site footer links one. Watch revenue and finished jobs, not agent counts. A perfect score can be farmed. Start at $1 or $2. August got my attention. October sets my size. Which number do you check first?

Was on the @FungoLabs site before the Genesis auction at 15:30 UTC today Ownership is public, but what's inside stays encrypted on-chain The art mints sealed and only goes public if the holder publishes it The essence (class, four stats, element) stays encrypted for good with @zama FHE. Site says there's no reveal function for it at all So nobody gets to scrape stats and snipe rarity during the auction ngl Only the current holder can view it. Sell it and your view ends in the same tx Hidden stats, hidden bids... who's actually bidding blind on 2,500 NFTs today ??

Binance SAFU had 15,000 BTC in February. Now it has 7,500. Still SAFU?

Holding $STRK and never voting is just watching from the sidelines I locked 40 STRK into vSTRK on @0xvoyageronline this week (the new hub has no wrap button), then delegated to myself on @Starknet's governance hub Voting power went from 0 to 40. Gas across approve, lock, and delegate was under 0.2 STRK Not stuck forever. vSTRK has unlock when you're done. Alpha most holders miss: votes need a snapshot. If you haven't delegated before that date, your bag doesn't count. Recent votes covered strkBTC staking and a post-quantum L1 poll. Nothing live right now, so I stopped at ready to vote. I researched this because upgrades pass with or without you Your STRK already has a voice Turn it on.

Me letting my AI agent trade while i sleep:

Ok now we're cooked

I paid three AI agents $1 each on @termix_ai to tell me where to park my stablecoins. None of them showed up and I got every dollar back. The ask: safest yield for a small USDC holder on @BNBCHAIN. • Seller 1 got five hours. • Seller 2 got 40 minutes. • Seller 3 had zero past jobs and sat for 85 minutes. Escrow: your money waits in a smart contract and only moves when the job is done. Before a seller accepts, the cancel button sends it back. +1 USDC back each time, $0 network fee. TermiX takes its 2% only once a job settles. Silence cost me time, not money. Check when a seller was last active. Completed jobs say more than a profile. How long do you wait before you cancel?

WLFI staking pays rewards in USD1 and I think that's the right design for a governance token. When rewards come in the token you stake, a 30% drop cuts your bag and your yield at the same time. With USD1, whatever you've earned keeps its dollar value, and only the $WLFI you staked moves with the price. The 126% you see now is variable. Rewards come from one shared pool, so as more WLFI gets staked, everyone's share gets smaller unless the pool gets topped up faster. There's also a 180 day lock with no early exit, so I'd only stake WLFI I'd hold through a bad market anyway.

Coinbase now lets AI agents trade your account and there's up to $2M in prizes for agents starting tomorrow would you actually give an AI the keys? yes or hell no

$BTC IS TRACKING THE BYBIT HACK Bybit: $1.5B. 7 days later: -18% Binance: $6.3B. 3 days later: -3.3% "Priced in" they said. On day 3. Last time too.

Earning from traders hits different than farming emissions I put 50 STRK + 2.3 USDC into a STRK/USDC range on @EkuboProtocol this week on @Starknet with @myBraavos 0.05% fee tier. Wide band, roughly -6% / +6.5% around the price. Concentrated liquidity. While price sits inside your band, swaps through it pay you a fee. Outside it you stop earning and sit fully in one token. Alpha: a tighter range works the capital harder while you're in range. Fees only accrue then. Ekubo clears most of Starknet DEX volume, so the flow is real. I researched a few AMMs. This felt clean for a small bag. Not free yield Paid work if you manage the range

$ETH: WORST OCTOBER EVER. -16% ETFs: -$1.61B Funding: negative OI: -14% Who's left to sell?

GM everyone Binance withdrawals are back after the craziest week first thing you're withdrawing? or you have more trust on binance?

Opened the FHETransform site from @primus_labs expecting a research paper and found a developer tool instead. The idea is that you keep writing normal Solidity, but the contract computes on encrypted values. > encrypted ints from 8 to 256 bits > a preprocessor turns a normal contract into an FHE one from a single annotation > heavy compute runs off-chain, so onchain cost stays close to plain Solidity > you decide per value who can decrypt The homepage example is a vault withdraw where nobody watching the chain can tell whether it succeeded. It's still v0.2, and the coprocessor is TEE-hosted for now.

The Binance hacker swapped $325M of stablecoins into $285M of ETH in 20 minutes even North Korea gets worse fills than me.

I went down a rabbit hole in the @primus_labs docs on attestor nodes. Every zkTLS proof needs an attestor to sign it. So the obvious question: who verifies the verifier? The docs are upfront that node integrity isn't covered by the original protocol security. Here's how Primus handles it: > attestor nodes run inside Phala's TEE > node keys are generated by a KMS inside the TEE > the node software never touches the key material > signing only happens after the zkTLS protocol runs correctly > only official, verified software versions can be deployed So an operator can't just grab the key and sign whatever. Fair to name the tradeoff too. You're now trusting the TEE hardware. Real assumption, not magic. And penalties for dishonest nodes aren't live on day one of mainnet. In staging, only authorized nodes can join. Trust doesn't disappear. It moves somewhere you can reason about. Could be wrong, but I respect a team writing that down. Join with me: s.kaito.ai/nSsf4dr

Zcash turned 10 years old yesterday and it's sitting at a $21B market cap, the privacy coin everyone called dead is now bigger than most L1s CT shills