Austin Calvert (@_AustinCalvert_) header
Austin Calvert (@_AustinCalvert_) profile picture

aggressively curating (see reposts) current: @superhuman Past: @copy_ai @futurism Watch my videos below 👇

New York City
Joined November 2011
Photo by Austin Calvert (@_AustinCalvert_)Photo by Austin Calvert (@_AustinCalvert_)Photo by Austin Calvert (@_AustinCalvert_)Photo by Austin Calvert (@_AustinCalvert_)Photo by Austin Calvert (@_AustinCalvert_)Photo by Austin Calvert (@_AustinCalvert_)Photo by Austin Calvert (@_AustinCalvert_)Photo by Austin Calvert (@_AustinCalvert_)Photo by Austin Calvert (@_AustinCalvert_)Photo by Austin Calvert (@_AustinCalvert_)
Austin Calvert retweeted
If you know who knows whom, who trusts whom, and what people are looking for, you can build an entirely new graph that can move itself.
3
1
17
2,889
Austin Calvert retweeted
Sex is great but have you ever seen your warm path to anyone you want to meet?
115
34
17
2,087
552,279
Austin Calvert retweeted
Facebook built the friends graph. LinkedIn built the professional graph. Agents need a new one: the access graph. Who can actually get you to whom. Soon you won't reach people yourself. Your agents will, by asking the agents of the people you trust. Your next investor, hire or customer will come through that. Starting today, Gigi brings the access graph to the agents you already use (ChatGPT, Claude, Instinct, Muse, Dots, Grok, etc). You can now ask them: → "Find me access to customers to sell my product to." → "Find me intros to these 25 angels." → "Who can get me to Sam Altman?" They come back with the friend who can make each intro. You choose who to ask. Your agents could already find anyone. Now they can get you access to the people you want.
58
58
29
789
225,025
Austin Calvert retweeted
Not money, not time - but attention.
“The real currency of life is attention What you choose to pay attention to And what you do about it” - @naval THE REAL CURRENCY OF LIFE OUT NOW
260
721
84
6,656
297,634
Austin Calvert retweeted
give a man a tool, and he'll get to work. give a man a way to build his own tools, and building tools becomes his work.
61
108
32
1,275
45,027
Austin Calvert retweeted
Truth-seekers take feedback from nature (planes have to fly), free markets (customers have to buy), or competition (militaries have to win). Consensus-seekers take feedback from people (actors want fans, academics want honors, politicians want votes, journalists want status).
419
2,279
257
14,892
837,980
Austin Calvert retweeted
at this point i suspect i would rarely if ever work for a non founder led company. you just notice the differences way too much. the job turns out to be less about the actual work & more around the work surrounding the work which truly does a number if you actually want to build & launch great things.
24
16
5
458
20,587
Austin Calvert retweeted
perfect cognitive style for the Agent Age: 1.ADHD-level context-switching capabilities + 2. extremely high agency/drive + 3. ability to keep a long time horizon managerial bird's eye view on goals but you usually only get 2 of them at once
13
3
30
1,840
Austin Calvert retweeted
i hate apple’s voice dictation so much. my god, how is it still this horrendous? this should’ve been one of the *first* things they fixed with the new siri. voice is becoming one of the most important input interfaces for computing yet apple still can’t reliably turn speech into text.
110
11
7
607
40,358
Austin Calvert retweeted
There is only one plot in economics.
9
23
6
198
10,699
Austin Calvert retweeted
this is actually a really fun interview question to determine product sense. just ask someone what the future of email looks like, & if their answer is anywhere near building yet another email client, you have to likely question their product instincts. the entire point of a paradigm shift is to rethink which products should exist, not simply recreate the old ones with some ai sprinkles. email is a database roughly speaking, claude already has access to it & it has i/o too. if anything every service will simply have an email address that you can use through the same chat interface, even then it's likely a bit confusing anyway. if my claude has its own email address as a vector for others whom i interact with to send, it'd be nice in many cases but also this introduces all sorts of other challenges, you'd have to think about what messages matter, spam, etc. stuff that gmail solved. so you're inventing wheels that do not need to be.
I bet @AnthropicAI launches a GMAIL and OUTLOOK killer next... CLAUDE MAIL coming.
48
13
8
733
81,179
Austin Calvert retweeted
Horoi 0.2.0 is out. The left sidebar is now collapsible and shows labels and CURIs on hover; the search works better and as a filter. Also improved deployment and UX.
Horoi is an open-source tool for generating ontology documentation. The ontology diagram is generated from the ontology file, and text from the term labels and terms' cURIs on hover. The rest is the usual term cards, just prettier. github.com/kvistgaard/horoi
1
7
114
5,677
Austin Calvert retweeted
c̵o̵n̵t̵e̵x̵t̵ ̵e̵n̵g̵i̵n̵e̵e̵r̵i̵n̵g̵ ̵h̵a̵r̵n̵e̵s̵s̵ ̵e̵n̵g̵i̵n̵e̵e̵r̵i̵n̵g̵ goal engineering
243
57
57
811
86,533
Austin Calvert retweeted
Warren McCulloch, the father of neural networks, talks AI in 1962.
69
381
41
1,941
145,234
Austin Calvert retweeted
Replying to @popflavius
Nothing very fancy/complictaed. They all share an agents.md where 3 things are defined per workspace=agent 1. Sources to watch (eg Slack channels to read) 2. Part of the brain relevant and that they can write to 3. Section of the to do list they own But for me the workspace=topic structure is important to define where the works lives. If I want to work on legal, I open the legal workspace. It has only relevant context for the running session, its own subagents, etc. The orchestrator is a task manager and helps me prioritize and launch some of the task to the relevant workspace.
3
1
10
686
Austin Calvert retweeted
I've changed how I work over the last few weeks. I now have one lead agent for each area of focus, running all the time, and a chief of staff agent that oversees them. Each lead manages its own sub-agents that write code, test it, chase reviews, and coordinate with team members. Everything I need to decide or review comes into one prioritized queue, a simple local web app. Each product review includes screenshots and a video demo of the feature. I clear the queue in batches, mostly by voice and keyboard shortcuts. The leads also bring back ideas I hadn't considered. Working from one queue, instead of switching between dozens of chats, has cut a lot of mental overhead. The system keeps learning my preferences and distilling my judgment into a "Brian brain," so its recommendations and first drafts get better before they reach me. The goal is fewer corrections per change. Every change still goes through the same human review and security checks. It is eliminating tasks, not human judgment. What an exciting time to push the frontier of productivity, especially as we build the economy for agents (agentic finance). We should all keep pushing in this direction.
871
481
431
10,269
1,646,747
honey wake up a new ui pattern just dropped
We launched Hark on iMessage and RCS today. We came up with the idea to use an animated sticker to communicate the status of the task instead of sending extra messages. Fun to design a unique interaction on this surface.
2
1
4
368
Austin Calvert retweeted
ever since I was a little kid I wanted to argue with a robot and call it productivity
2
1
27
1,132
Austin Calvert retweeted
Nikesh Arora's Strategy for Building a $268 Billion Company: The fastest way to build a giant business is to sell more products to the customers you already have. And the fastest way to get those products is to acquire companies rather than build everything yourself. Nikesh realized two important things when he became CEO of Palo Alto Networks: 1. The biggest companies sell many products to the same customers. It's much easier to grow revenue by selling additional products to customers who already know and trust you than by constantly finding new customers. 2. Building great products takes 4–7 years. If Palo Alto Networks wanted to expand quickly, it couldn't build every new product from scratch. The solution was to acquire companies that had already spent years developing great products. Nikesh explains his thinking in this clip. This part is awesome: Nikesh Arora: If you look at the largest businesses, there's Microsoft's enterprise business or Salesforce, or take the largest businesses, they sell a lot to the same customer. That was the insight. I'm like, well, if we’re going to be big at Palo Alto, we've got to find a way of selling a lot to a customer. We only had one thing to sell. So you go knock on the door, you knock on 20 doors, you spend all the time, and 15 people say, "I'm sorry, I don't need it, I already have it," you're stuck with five. If you knock on a door, you have a truck behind you saying, "What do you want? Do you want this? You don't want this? You want this? You want this?" It's like, the world's your oyster. What can I get you? Armed with that insight, I'm like, well, we need to figure out a way that we can find adjacencies to our business, which the customers will trust to buy from us, so that we can keep expanding what we sell to customers, so we can go serve the top 10,000 customers in the world and increase the amount of money you can get for them. You only get that if you earn their trust, you only get that if your shit works, you only get that if it's best in class, because nobody wants to buy the second best product in cybersecurity. It kind of sucks. So customers want to buy the best which means we’ve got to be the best. Now that's one part of the insight. The other one of the insight is, which is still true, it takes four to seven years to build a good technology product. It doesn't matter who you are, what you are, where you are. Whether it's an Uber, it's YouTube, it's Facebook, it's Google search, it took four to seven years, sometimes longer, to build a useful product that the customers found exciting and interesting. That's true in enterprise as well. So I just joined this company. We don't have a large product pipeline. It's gonna take me four to seven years to build new products. What am I gonna do? David Senra: Acquire them. Nikesh Arora: That's right.
14
40
5
341
40,927