NotYourDoctor (@_NotYourDoctor) header
NotYourDoctor (@_NotYourDoctor) profile picture

• Not mainstream • Not alternative • Not unqualified • Not disinterested in your wellbeing ... just ... Not Your Doctor 😉

Ireland
Joined April 2024
Photo by NotYourDoctor (@_NotYourDoctor)Photo by NotYourDoctor (@_NotYourDoctor)Photo by NotYourDoctor (@_NotYourDoctor)Photo by NotYourDoctor (@_NotYourDoctor)Photo by NotYourDoctor (@_NotYourDoctor)Photo by NotYourDoctor (@_NotYourDoctor)Photo by NotYourDoctor (@_NotYourDoctor)Photo by NotYourDoctor (@_NotYourDoctor)Photo by NotYourDoctor (@_NotYourDoctor)Photo by NotYourDoctor (@_NotYourDoctor)
As ever Denise offers insights others miss. Her unique take on the Minnesota Coronary Experiment is worth a gander if you have firm views on seed oils etc. (one way or t'other)
The Minnesota Coronary Experiment is a really bad study and I wish it would fall off its pedestal. It did find that people whose cholesterol dropped had higher death rates, but it also found that high blood pressure and smoking were associated with lower mortality (which was oddly ignored in the 2016 Ramsden re-analysis). If we trust the cholesterol finding as legit/generalizable, we'd have to somehow defend high blood pressure and smoking as being protective too. Lest we be pickin' cherries. The much more likely reality is that 1) the data got whacky because so many participants were lost to follow-up (83%!) and didn't have their mortality data included in the final analysis, and 2) the patient population itself was a confounder. The vast majority were residents of state mental hospitals, which at the time were largely schizophrenics, which is a condition well-linked to disordered PUFA metabolism. Ditto for other psychiatric conditions people would have been committed for back then. Probably one of the worst populations you could choose to selectively pour a bunch of linoleic acid into; they have unique vulnerabilities to excess omega-6 and tend to have low baseline omega-3 and low antioxidant status that would just get worsened through the type of trial diet given. On top of that, the study didn't document or report on antipsychotic use, and a lot of the first-generation antipsychotics (the ones available during that era) are now known to have caused cardiovascular problems and sudden death. This was one of the issues in the Finnish Mental Hospital study (medication use was unevenly distributed across the two hospitals) and could easily have been a problem in the MCE too, but we can't know for sure because again, not documented. Mystery variables are really unfortunate in this case. The Sydney Diet-Heart Study isn't much better; everybody raised their linoleic acid intake from baseline, the control diet wasn't actually controlled, and participants tended to spontaneously change other health-related behaviors (smoking, drinking, etc.) after they enrolled. The only truly excellent study from that era, as far as pure seed oil/linoleic acid trials go, is the LA Veterans Trial. I think that one gets ignored in favor of lower-quality trials because it doesn't initially look like a clean win for either camp (less cardiovascular disease deaths for the seed oil group, but more cancer deaths; if you want to tout one of those findings you have to acknowledge the other one too). After spending way too much time trying to make sense of the data though, I really don't see a plausible way to blame the excess cancer deaths on seed oils (working on a blog post on this), so the best and longest trial of that era really does come out in favor for seed oils. Which I know lots of people don't like to hear. If data feels emotionally triggering then it's probably a good time to examine whether we're looking for the truth or whether we're looking for confirmation of a favored narrative.
1
43
Never sure how this kinda work gets funded but this one is oddly cute ...
People standing at the bottom of a hill with a friend judged it less steep than people standing alone. The longer they'd known their friend, the less steep it looked. A good metaphor for life: even the hardest challenges can feel easier with a good friend by your side.
1
50
Whatever about one's politics, interesting comments from Dr Vinay here on the "powerful headwinds" he & colleagues in the "MAHA" movement continue to face when attempting a range of long overdue bipartisan policy reforms in the areas of pharma, food & agriculture. Vested interests don't readily divest themselves of power & wealth.
Calley Means' Explosive Revelations
1
54
Great post on the use of AI lasers to delouse commercially reared salmon. Yep! "We now live in a world where AI lasers do pest control on your dinner". Thank God for that!
Norway now has more than 2,000 underwater AI laser robots shooting lice off its salmon they're made by a company called Stingray, and they already guard more than 50 million salmon and trout 24/7 the reason is sea lice, tiny parasites that latch onto salmon and feed on them as few as 11 can kill a small fish, and one pen can hold 150,000 salmon the usual fix is pumping the fish out and blasting them with warm water or water jets to knock the lice off but the handling is so rough that Norway's fish health report ranks it the top cause of death in full-grown farmed salmon so instead, Stingray puts a robot inside the pen that hunts lice one at a time, all day: > two cameras watch every salmon that swims past > AI checks two frames to make sure it's really a louse > then a green laser fires from up to 2 meters away > the salmon's scales reflect the beam, so the fish swims off fine and the louse is dead we now live in a world where AI lasers do pest control on your dinner lmao
1
89
Interesting paper. On the importance of "scientific taste". Grounded specifically in nutritional science mind you, not science generally as the below retweet implies.
Technology can increase the power of science. Scientific taste determines where that power should be directed. doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-nutr…
1
1
2
508
NotYourDoctor retweeted
One eye drop a day could allow people to ditch glasses forever. The FDA has approved VIZZ, the first eye drop of its kind to literally fix near vision. After about age 40, the lens inside the eye stiffens, and reading a menu or a phone gets harder. It's called presbyopia, and it affects almost everyone eventually. In 2025 the FDA approved VIZZ, a once-a-day eye drop made by LENZ Therapeutics that uses a drug called aceclidine. It works by shrinking the pupil to under 2 millimeters, creating a pinhole effect that brings close objects into focus without blurring distance vision. In clinical trials with hundreds of adults, near vision improved within 30 minutes and the effect lasted up to 10 hours. Earlier drops like Vuity mainly worked by squeezing the muscle that focuses the eye, which could cause brow aches and dimmer distance vision. VIZZ acts mostly on the pupil instead, and the company reported no serious treatment-related side effects across more than 30,000 days of use. That said, the drops don't cure presbyopia, since the effect wears off each day, and they need a prescription. Also, in trials about one in five users had eye irritation, 16% noticed dimmer vision and 13% had headaches, mostly mild and brief. Even so, for millions of people tired of hunting for their readers, it's a real new option worth asking an eye doctor about. source: LENZ Therapeutics. (2025, July 31). LENZ Therapeutics announces U.S. FDA approval of VIZZ (aceclidine ophthalmic solution) 1.44% for the treatment of presbyopia [Press release].
61
268
33
1,471
95,389
Max's post below is marvellous. Muscle maxxing meds on the way! Reminds of a fave hypothetical Q of mine for bigtime gym bros & gals .. Be honest ... IF you could choose between keeping on lifting for the rest of your days fully certain that it would forever produce zero difference of any kind in how your body looks and feels to the touch (but you'd retain all other benefits re mood, energy, sleep etc.) OR you could swallow a pill and you'd have any amount of muscle gains you might wish for but you'd have to promise to never lift again ... Which would you pick ... Tricky huh? Max explains below why the latter choice may shortly no longer be a crazy hypothetical! :)
3
151
On 13th December 2026, folic acid will be mandated in non-wholemeal flour in UK including imported and organic flour. On 14th December 2026, the House of Commons will debate that unethical and unsafe law.
145
962
44
1,925
40,072
Cancer diagnoses in England hit record high of more than 1,000 people a day “According to the latest cancer registration statistics, more than 373,000 people were diagnosed with cancer in England in 2024, the highest figure on record. On average, NHS England diagnosed 1,021 people a day with cancer in 2024, up from 972 a day in 2023.” theguardian.com/society/2026…
62
178
31
410
133,318
NotYourDoctor retweeted
NEW Study: - Adolescent exposure to Prozac in females leads to increased anxiety-like behaviors in adulthood (in mice.) "The present findings strengthen the growing consensus that increasing serotonergic tone during the juvenile stage of development, via FLX [Prozac] administration, results in abnormal emotional and anxiety-like behaviors in adulthood." "These findings add to the growing body of evidence that pharmacological manipulation of the serotonergic system across development results in persistent, unintended behavioral changes. Importantly, these findings have translational implications, as clinical studies have reported persistent sexual dysfunction in adult women with a history of adolescent SSRI exposure, including FLX [Prozac]. Although the present study does not directly address sexual function, the convergence of persistent behavioral alterations across preclinical and clinical studies highlights the potential for adolescent SSRI exposure to mediate long-term unforeseen side effects across multiple domains of adult behavior. As such, our results underscore the importance of considering the persistent side effects of adolescent SSRI exposure, particularly in teenage girls, who remain understudied at both clinical and preclinical levels despite the higher prescription rates of FLX [Prozac] within this population." link.springer.com/article/10…
3
29
1
68
1,849
NotYourDoctor retweeted
🚨: Brain scans have revealed children living with unstable families (excessive, arguing, abusive and neglectful) have brain changes similar to combat soldiers after active duty.
2
26
2
87
2,617
Thinking about meniscus surgery? Don’t bother. 10-Year Study Finds Worse Outcomes After Surgery The long-term results paint a concerning picture. Patients who underwent partial meniscectomy did not experience better outcomes than those who had sham surgery. In fact, they tended to do worse. After a decade, these patients reported more knee symptoms and poorer function. They also showed greater progression of osteoarthritis and were more likely to need additional knee surgery compared to those who did not receive the actual procedure. sciencedaily.com/releases/20…
54
82
4
297
10,434
NotYourDoctor retweeted
The American College of Pediatricians just put out a 🔥🔥🔥 statement calling out all the major medical associations by name for pushing the gender transition craze on kids. They ask for these groups to "IMMEDIATELY stop the promotion of social affirmation, puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones and surgeries for children and adolescents who experience distress over their biological sex." The full @ACPeds statement ⬇️ "Therefore, given the recent research and the revelations of the harmful approach advocated by WPATH and its followers in the United States, we, the undersigned, call upon the medical professional organizations of the United States, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, the  Endocrine Society, the Pediatric Endocrine Society, American Medical Association, the American Psychological Association, and the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry to follow the science and their European professional colleagues and immediately stop the promotion of social affirmation, puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones and surgeries for children and adolescents who experience distress over their biological sex.  Instead, these organizations should recommend comprehensive evaluations and therapies aimed at identifying and addressing underlying psychological co-morbidities and neurodiversity that often predispose to and accompany gender dysphoria. We also encourage the physicians who are members of these professional organizations to contact their leadership and urge them to adhere to the evidence-based research now available.”
245
2,655
257
7,715
161,232
How the hell are we still discovering entirely new/unknown muscles in the human body even now? Amazing!
Two 19-year-old Tulane University sophomores discovered a previously unknown muscle attachment deep in the human hip during a routine cadaver lab session — a find so unusual that even their professor, a co-editor-in-chief of Gray's Anatomy, couldn't identify it. Dominic Roy and Cooper Bruce had been assigned to measure the fusion point between two well-known hip muscles when Roy spotted something unfamiliar on the other side of the iliac fascia. After an exhaustive search through medical literature and textbooks turned up nothing, the team confirmed it was a new anatomical discovery. The findings were recently published in the journal Clinical Anatomy. Full story here foxnews.com/health/college-s…
62
NotYourDoctor retweeted
A question I get from patients all the time is the classic: "is coffee good or bad?" I always answers it depends ... The interesting post below concerns individual variations in the main liver enzyme that deals with caffeine. So one could could run the genetic test to verify one's reactivity to coffee ... But there are generally clinical clues that might suggest it's not the best beverage to have lots of for a given person. "Idiopathic" hypertension is one clue. But even without that, it's generally a good guess that too much coffee doesn't usually "fast types": those who talk fast: and whose faces show a lot of dramatic micro-muscular expressivity
For roughly half the population, 2-3 cups of coffee a day was associated with 36% higher odds of a heart attack. The difference comes down to CYP1A2 — the liver enzyme that breaks down ~95% of the caffeine you drink. And this is not a rare genetic variation. Roughly 45-55% of the population carries at least one copy of the slow CYP1A2 variant, meaning they're classified as slow metabolizers. About 10% have two copies — the slowest clearance of all. Caffeine’s half-life averages around 5 hours. In fast metabolizers: 2 to 4 hours. In slow metabolizers: 6 to 10 hours or more. A landmark study published in JAMA in 2006 compared 2,014 people who had a first nonfatal heart attack with 2,014 matched controls. Among slow metabolizers, compared with people drinking less than one cup a day: 1 cup a day — no increase in odds of heart attack. 2-3 cups — 36% higher odds. 4+ cups — 64% higher odds. A second study, from Italy in 2009, followed 553 young adults with mildly elevated blood pressure for a median of 8 years. Among slow metabolizers: 64.6% of coffee drinkers developed high blood pressure requiring treatment, vs. 47.8% of those who didn’t drink coffee. Urinary adrenaline told the same story — significantly elevated in coffee drinkers, but only in slow metabolizers. The authors’ recommendation followed the genotype directly. Slow metabolizers with prehypertension or hypertension: avoid caffeinated coffee. Roughly half the population is metabolizing caffeine slowly right now and has no idea.
1
59
So Russel ReBrand didn't quite work. Guilty on multiple counts. Remanded in custody pending sentencing on Monday. Guess he'll be praying with newfound intensity now.
RUSSEL BRAND CASE VERDICTS: ✅ Count 1: Rape In 1999, Brand raped a woman at a hotel during the Labour Party conference in Bournemouth. Verdict: NOT GUILTY ✅ Count 2: Attempted indecent assault In 2001, Brand attempted to indecently assault a woman at MTV’s offices in London by grabbing her arm and dragging her towards a men's toilet. Verdict: NOT GUILTY ✅ Count 3: Sexual assault In 2004, during a party at a bar in Soho, Brand grabbed a woman’s breasts. Verdict: GUILTY ✅ Count 4: Rape In 2004, during a party at a bar in Soho, Brand pulled a woman into a toilet and orally raped her. Verdict: NOT GUILTY ✅ Count 5: Sexual assault In 2005, Brand sexually assaulted a woman at Choice FM. Verdict: GUILTY ✅ Count 6: Rape From 2008 to 2009, Brand anally raped woman at his home in Hampstead Verdict: GUILTY ✅ Count 7: Sexual assault In 2009, Brand sexually assaulted a woman by putting his head in her lap, with his nose and mouth in her "vaginal area". Verdict: GUILTY
45
Intestting post from Dr Hannah here. Has psychiatry generally "replaced objective moral frameworks with individual self-reporting". And if so, is this a good thing?
The current debate around sex is a direct result of looking to medicine to define normal behavior and morality. Psychiatry has only one metric: Does this cause you distress or stop you from functioning? There's no lab test, no X-ray. So if a man spends all day consuming fetish porn, lives alone, and claims he "feels fine," psychiatry has to call him healthy. It’s the exact same logic as saying: Feminism is good, because she thinks the neagtive effects won't apply to her—ignoring the long-term reality of what actually brings a good life for everyone else. We've replaced objective moral frameworks with individual self-reporting.
1
61
NotYourDoctor retweeted
Creatine is known for building muscle and improving athletic performance. A new UCLA study just found it does something completely different: it powers the immune cells that direct your body's cancer-fighting response. Researchers at UCLA published findings in iScience showing creatine supplementation enhances dendritic cell function and suppresses tumor growth in preclinical models. The work identifies a metabolic bottleneck in cancer immunity and suggests creatine might help address it. What dendritic cells do Dendritic cells serve as coordinators of your immune system's response to cancer. They patrol tissues, capture pieces of tumor cells, and present those fragments to T cells in lymph nodes. This presentation activates T cells to recognize and attack cancer. Without functional dendritic cells, T cells never get properly instructed. The immune system fails to mount an organized response against tumors. Patients with more dendritic cells in their tumors tend to have better outcomes and more active immune responses. There is an energy problem in dysfunctional dendritic cells. Dendritic cells require significant energy to function. When they encounter danger signals from tumors, they activate, migrating to lymph nodes, ramping up production of surface molecules that interact with T cells, and secreting inflammatory signals. All of this requires ATP, the cellular energy currency. Inside tumors, dendritic cells face a hostile metabolic environment. Cancer cells consume available glucose and other nutrients aggressively. Immune cells competing for those same resources often lose out, leaving them energy-depleted and dysfunctional. Where does creatine fit in? Creatine functions as an energy buffer. Inside cells, an enzyme called creatine kinase adds a phosphate group to creatine, creating phosphocreatine. When ATP gets consumed during cellular work, phosphocreatine rapidly donates its phosphate back to regenerate ATP. This system is particularly important in tissues with high, fluctuating energy demands like muscle and brain. Athletes supplement with creatine to maintain ATP availability during intense exercise. The researchers found dendritic cells also rely on this system. When activated, dendritic cells dramatically upregulate expression of the creatine transporter, the protein that imports creatine into cells. Intratumoral dendritic cells showed especially high transporter levels compared to dendritic cells from spleens. So how did the team test their hypothesis? The team used two complementary approaches. First, they generated mice lacking the creatine transporter specifically in immune cells. Dendritic cells from these knockout mice showed impaired survival and activation when stimulated. They expressed lower levels of costimulatory molecules needed to activate T cells and produced fewer inflammatory cytokines. When these creatine-deficient dendritic cells were co-cultured with T cells, the T cells proliferated less, produced fewer effector molecules, and showed reduced activation markers. The dendritic cells couldn't effectively prime an immune response. Second, the researchers tested whether creatine supplementation could enhance normal dendritic cell function. Adding creatine to cell cultures improved dendritic cell survival and ramped up their activation. The cells displayed more surface proteins that signal readiness to interact with T cells and pumped out higher levels of inflammatory signaling molecules that coordinate immune responses. There were some interesting mechanistic findings as well. RNA sequencing revealed creatine supplementation activated energy-dependent inflammatory signaling pathways in dendritic cells. Metabolic profiling showed creatine-treated cells maintained higher ATP levels and increased phosphocreatine stores. The researchers directly measured ATP in dendritic cells. Cells lacking the creatine transporter showed significantly lower ATP levels after activation compared to normal cells. Creatine supplementation restored and even enhanced ATP availability. This ATP preservation appears critical for dendritic cell function. Many of the processes required for activation, including protein synthesis, trafficking of molecules to the cell surface, and cytokine secretion, are energy-intensive. When ATP drops, these functions fail. The tumor experiments were particularly fascinating. The team tested whether creatine supplementation could enhance anti-tumor immunity in mice bearing B16 melanoma tumors, an aggressive cancer model. Mice received either regular drinking water or water supplemented with creatine. Creatine-supplemented mice showed significantly slower tumor growth. Analysis of the tumor tissue revealed more activated dendritic cells with higher expression of maturation markers. These tumors also contained more activated T cells producing IFN-γ, a key anti-tumor cytokine. Importantly, the anti-tumor effect of creatine required functional dendritic cells. When the researchers depleted dendritic cells, creatine supplementation no longer suppressed tumor growth. This confirmed dendritic cells were the critical cell type mediating creatine's effects. Human relevance The researchers tested whether their findings applied to human cells. They generated dendritic cells from human blood monocytes and treated them with creatine. Human dendritic cells responded similarly to mouse cells: enhanced activation, increased costimulatory molecule expression, and improved capacity to stimulate T cell responses. This cross-species validation strengthens the translational potential. The creatine transporter and creatine kinase system are evolutionarily conserved between mice and humans. Key takeaways: • Dendritic cells upregulate creatine transporter expression when activated, especially in tumor environments • Creatine functions as an ATP buffer, maintaining energy availability during dendritic cell activation • Knockout of creatine transporter impairs dendritic cell survival, activation, and ability to prime T cell responses • Creatine supplementation enhances dendritic cell function in both mouse and human cells • Oral creatine supplementation suppressed melanoma tumor growth in mice through dendritic cell-dependent mechanisms • The effect was mediated by improved dendritic cell ATP levels and enhanced inflammatory signaling It's a super fascinating study for what it tells us about the role of creatine outside of musculoskeletal function. There are some limitations, however. The tumor experiments used a single cancer type in young, healthy mice. Whether creatine supplementation works across different tumor types, in aged mice, or in the context of existing immunotherapies remains untested. The creatine doses used in mouse drinking water translate to relatively high human equivalent doses, though still within the range commonly used by athletes (typically 3-5 grams per day). The study measured associations between creatine treatment and immune activation but didn't fully map all downstream mechanisms. Additional signaling pathways likely contribute. All experiments used syngeneic tumor models where mice develop cancer from transplanted tumor cells. Spontaneous tumor models or patient samples would provide additional validation. This work adds to emerging evidence that creatine plays immunomodulatory roles beyond its established effects on muscle and brain. Previous studies from other groups showed creatine enhances CD8 T cell function and polarizes tumor-associated macrophages toward anti-tumor phenotypes. The convergence across multiple immune cell types suggests creatine metabolism represents a general mechanism supporting anti-tumor immunity in metabolically challenging tumor environments. Dendritic cells represent a logical target for metabolic interventions. They're relatively rare in tumors but have outsized influence on whether productive immune responses develop. Enhancing their function could amplify downstream T cell responses. Current cancer immunotherapies focus heavily on T cells, particularly checkpoint inhibitors that release brakes on T cell activity. But those therapies depend on T cells already being properly activated. If dendritic cells fail at the initial priming step, checkpoint inhibitors have less to work with. Metabolic support for dendritic cells could complement T cell-directed therapies. The combination might prove especially valuable in immunologically cold tumors that lack robust immune infiltration. The practical advantage of creatine is accessibility. It's inexpensive, widely available, well-tolerated at typical doses, and has decades of safety data from use in athletes. The safety profile makes it a reasonable candidate for clinical testing. The next step is human trials examining whether creatine supplementation enhances immune responses in cancer patients, particularly those receiving immunotherapy. Endpoints would include dendritic cell activation markers in blood and tumors, T cell responses to tumor antigens, and clinical outcomes. The study provides proof of concept that targeting dendritic cell metabolism can enhance anti-tumor immunity and identifies creatine as a specific intervention worthy of further investigation.
7
44
10
253
35,923
Potassium deficiency seems to me to be the most common of all mineral deficiencies out there: and yet it's basically never mentioned by anyone.
Everyone talks about cutting sodium. Almost nobody talks about adding potassium. The evidence says the latter may be just as important, if not more. A WHO-commissioned meta-analysis pulled together 22 randomized trials and 1,606 participants. The headline number: in adults with high blood pressure, increasing potassium intake dropped systolic blood pressure by an average of 3.5 mmHg. In the subset of studies where intake reached 90 to 120 mmol per day (about 3,500 to 4,700 mg), the drop was 7.2 mmHg. Important caveat the meta-analysis flagged: this effect was only seen in people with hypertension. In normotensive adults, the BP change was not statistically significant. The same paper also notes there was no clean dose-response relationship established between the two effect sizes, since there were only two data points rather than a smooth curve. The mechanism is straightforward. Potassium does two things at once. It signals the kidney to excrete more sodium in urine by inhibiting a sodium reabsorption channel called NCC in the distal tubule. It also relaxes vascular smooth muscle directly by opening potassium channels in the arterial wall, which hyperpolarizes the muscle cells and reduces vascular tone. One ion works through two separate mechanisms. The stroke data is even more compelling. Across 11 cohort studies and 127,038 adults, higher potassium intake tracked with a 24% lower risk of stroke. That is association data, not RCT-grade causation, but it lines up with what the trials show for blood pressure. Now the intake gap. The 2019 National Academies set adequate intake at 2,600 mg per day for women and 3,400 mg for men. NHANES data puts the US adult average somewhere around 2,300 mg. Most people are below target, and the gap is bigger for women in absolute terms. Closing it is not complicated. One banana delivers about 420 mg. One baked potato with skin gives you 925 mg. One cup of cooked spinach is 840 mg. One cup of white beans is 1,190 mg. Adding one of those to an average day gets most adults into the target range. Cutting sodium is fine if you do it. Adding potassium does something on its own. Aburto et al., BMJ 2013 NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, 2024 USDA FoodData Central
1
4
126