
A Wizard In Crypto. Living My Life on-chain. Focusing On Crypto! Trade on @Polymarket ๐๐ฝ https://xitter.cf/t.co/HXAHr5BoAM
Africa
Joined March 2024
- Tweets29.9K
- Following1.9K
- Followers2.5K
- Likes50.6K
Pinned Tweet
๐จ Robinhood Chain Is Facing a Massive Gas Fee Explosion
@RobinhoodCrypto Chain is experiencing a remarkable surge in activity just two months after launching, but that growth is now putting serious pressure on the network.
On Sep 2, users paid approximately $4.45M in gas fees.
That's;
โข 82ร higher than the ~$54,254 paid on August 22.
โข More gas fees than Ethereum, Solana and Tron combined that day.
โข About $12.44 million in gas fees over the previous 7 days.
โข Roughly $18.45 million total since the chain launched.
Interestingly, the explosion isn't simply because there are more transactions. Transaction activity increased by roughly 36%, while the amount of gas consumed per transaction more than doubled, increasing by around 105%.
At the same time, Robinhood Chain's median base fee jumped from approximately 0.02 gwei to 0.467 gwei, making the average transaction cost around $0.32, compared with less than $0.01 previously. During periods of peak demand, some transactions reportedly reached around $3.40.
So, what's driving the demand?
A significant part appears to be coming from memecoin trading and DeFi activity, particularly through platforms such as PONS V2 (generated $6.09M in fees), Uniswap V4 ($6.65M) and GMGN ($2.65M).
Also, Robinhood Chain recorded approximately $1.55B in DEX volume over 24 hours, while its total value locked (TVL) stood around $820M.
The situation is also financially significant for the broader Arbitrum ecosystem. Under Robinhood Chain's arrangement with Arbitrum, a portion of relevant fees goes toward the Arbitrum DAO and development funding.
For now, Robinhood is subsidizing gas fees for qualifying swaps made through Robinhood Wallet until September 29, meaning many users aren't yet experiencing the full impact.
But the bigger story is clear:
Robinhood Chain isn't struggling because nobody is using it. It's facing the opposite problem. Adoption and trading activity are growing faster than the network's available blockspace.
If this growth continues without a corresponding increase in capacity, congestion and rising transaction costs will become worse and it could become one of the biggest/major challenges facing Robinhood Chain.
Source: @DefiantNews
๐๐ฝ thedefiant.io/news/blockchaiโฆ
Wizard.hl retweeted
1/ ๐ฟ Soneium: The Onchain Entertainment Economy.
Today we introduce Tokenized IP and our plan to issue $SONEIUM, an ecosystem-native token that connects our global community. ๐งต๐
Wizard.hl retweeted
๐ง๐ผ๐ฝ ๐๐ด๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ฐ ๐๐ผ๐บ๐บ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ฆ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐๐๐ฝ๐ ๐๐๐ถ๐น๐ฑ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ธ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐ ๐๐ด๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ ๐ถ๐ป ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฒ.
Everyone is talking about the payment infrastructure AI agents will need to transact autonomously.
I came across this list of the top 30 Agentic Commerce Companies in 2026, covering everything from wallets and payment networks to trust, identity, and checkout infrastructure.
But there's another important piece of this puzzle: ๐๐๐๐ฉ ๐๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐๐ฃ๐จ ๐ฌ๐๐๐ฃ ๐ค๐ฃ๐ ๐ผ๐ ๐๐๐๐ฃ๐ฉ ๐ฃ๐๐๐๐จ ๐ฉ๐ค ๐๐๐ง๐ ๐๐ฃ๐ค๐ฉ๐๐๐ง ๐ฉ๐ค ๐๐๐ฉ ๐ฌ๐ค๐ง๐ ๐๐ค๐ฃ๐?
That's where @termix_ai comes in. Instead of focusing solely on moving money, TermiX is building an environment where AI agents can discover services, hire other agents, lock funds in escrow, verify deliverables, and settle payments.
Think about an AI research agent that needs on-chain analytics. It finds a specialist agent, agrees on a price, funds the task through escrow, and receives the completed research. If delivery is challenged, the dispute resolution process kicks in.
That's more than a payment. It's an entire economic transaction between agents. And I think this is an important distinction in the agentic economy.
Wallets enable agents to hold and move funds. Payment networks enable transactions. But agent-to-agent commerce needs infrastructure for discovering services, coordinating work, establishing trust, and settling payments.
๐ง๐ฒ๐ฟ๐บ๐ถ๐ซ ๐ถ๐ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ธ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ป๐๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐น๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ.
The bigger opportunity? Making it possible for agents built by different developers to hire and pay one another without humans having to coordinate every interaction manually.
We're still early, but the agent economy won't just need agents that can think. It'll need agents that can transact, deliver, and earn.
That's the part of the future TermiX is building toward.
Source: xitter.cf/gaspardlezin/status/21โฆ
๐ช๐ฎ๐ป๐ ๐ง๐ผ ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ป ๐๐ ๐๐ด๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ง๐ผ ๐ช๐ผ๐ฟ๐ธ ๐ข๐ป ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ฟ๐๐ฝ๐๐ผ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ต? ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ'๐ ๐๐ผ๐ ๐ฌ๐ผ๐ ๐ช๐ผ๐๐น๐ฑ ๐๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ต ๐๐ ๐ข๐ป @termix_ai
Instead of hiring an agent for a vague task, start with something specific: on-chain analytics and protocol research.
The goal is to find out whether an agent can produce useful, evidence backed research rather than just generate convincing text.
1. ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐ ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฒ:
For this, simply head to Service Results and search for:
โข Protocol Research
โข On-chain Analytics
โข Crypto Research
โข Risk Report
Compare the available services based on their capabilities, reputation, pricing, delivery time, and the deliverables they promise.
Don't choose based on reputation alone. Find a service that actually matches your research needs.
2. ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ด๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ฎ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น ๐ฎ๐๐๐ถ๐ด๐ป๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐: Here's an example of a research task you can use:
โ๐๐๐๐ฃ๐ฉ๐๐๐ฎ 5 ๐๐ข๐๐ง๐๐๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ง๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ฉ๐ค ๐ฅ๐ง๐ค๐๐๐๐ฉ๐จ ๐ฌ๐ค๐ง๐ฉ๐ ๐ข๐ค๐ฃ๐๐ฉ๐ค๐ง๐๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ฃ๐ ๐ฅ๐ง๐ค๐๐ช๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ค๐ข๐ฅ๐๐ง๐๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ง๐๐จ๐๐๐ง๐๐ ๐ง๐๐ฅ๐ค๐ง๐ฉโ
For each project, request for the following;
โข What it does and its primary use case.
โข Its blockchain and underlying infrastructure.
โข Verifiable on-chain activity and relevant metrics.
โข Recent developments supported by reliable sources.
โข Major risks and weaknesses.
โข Why it deserves further attention.
Ask for source links and require the agent to distinguish verified facts from its own interpretations.
3. ๐๐๐ฎ๐น๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐๐น๐๐ ๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐น๐น๐
Once the agent delivers, don't just accept the report at face value. Check whether the sources support its claims, whether the metrics are accurate, and whether the analysis identifies meaningful risks.
Look for fabricated statistics, outdated information, and conclusions unsupported by evidence.
4. ๐๐๐ฎ๐น๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐บ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ธ๐ฒ๐๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฒ, ๐๐ผ๐ผ
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฒ๐
๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ฒ๐๐ป'๐ ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ถ๐๐ต ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ต.
Consider the entire process as this;
a. Could you find a suitable agent?
b. Were the service terms and deliverables clear?
c. Did the provider deliver what was promised?
d. Was the work completed within the agreed timeframe?
e. Was the final output worth the price?
You can also observe how TermiX handles escrow, delivery, challenges, and settlement.
The bigger picture of this is that you are evaluating two things here;
A. The agent's ability to perform useful work and the marketplace's ability to coordinate that work.
B. That's a much more meaningful way to explore the AI agent economy than simply browsing listings.
The objective isn't to find an agent that sounds intelligent. It's to find one that can deliver verifiable, useful work.
It's not too late to explore @termix_ai here ๐
agent.family/r/Y5RSXETB
๐ง๐ผ๐ฝ ๐๐ด๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ฐ ๐๐ผ๐บ๐บ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ฆ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐๐๐ฝ๐ ๐๐๐ถ๐น๐ฑ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ธ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐ ๐๐ด๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ ๐ถ๐ป ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฒ.
Everyone is talking about the payment infrastructure AI agents will need to transact autonomously.
I came across this list of the top 30 Agentic Commerce Companies in 2026, covering everything from wallets and payment networks to trust, identity, and checkout infrastructure.
But there's another important piece of this puzzle: ๐๐๐๐ฉ ๐๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐๐ฃ๐จ ๐ฌ๐๐๐ฃ ๐ค๐ฃ๐ ๐ผ๐ ๐๐๐๐ฃ๐ฉ ๐ฃ๐๐๐๐จ ๐ฉ๐ค ๐๐๐ง๐ ๐๐ฃ๐ค๐ฉ๐๐๐ง ๐ฉ๐ค ๐๐๐ฉ ๐ฌ๐ค๐ง๐ ๐๐ค๐ฃ๐?
That's where @termix_ai comes in. Instead of focusing solely on moving money, TermiX is building an environment where AI agents can discover services, hire other agents, lock funds in escrow, verify deliverables, and settle payments.
Think about an AI research agent that needs on-chain analytics. It finds a specialist agent, agrees on a price, funds the task through escrow, and receives the completed research. If delivery is challenged, the dispute resolution process kicks in.
That's more than a payment. It's an entire economic transaction between agents. And I think this is an important distinction in the agentic economy.
Wallets enable agents to hold and move funds. Payment networks enable transactions. But agent-to-agent commerce needs infrastructure for discovering services, coordinating work, establishing trust, and settling payments.
๐ง๐ฒ๐ฟ๐บ๐ถ๐ซ ๐ถ๐ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ธ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ป๐๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐น๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ.
The bigger opportunity? Making it possible for agents built by different developers to hire and pay one another without humans having to coordinate every interaction manually.
We're still early, but the agent economy won't just need agents that can think. It'll need agents that can transact, deliver, and earn.
That's the part of the future TermiX is building toward.
Source: xitter.cf/gaspardlezin/status/21โฆ
๐ช๐ฎ๐ป๐ ๐ง๐ผ ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ป ๐๐ ๐๐ด๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ง๐ผ ๐ช๐ผ๐ฟ๐ธ ๐ข๐ป ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ฟ๐๐ฝ๐๐ผ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ต? ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ'๐ ๐๐ผ๐ ๐ฌ๐ผ๐ ๐ช๐ผ๐๐น๐ฑ ๐๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ต ๐๐ ๐ข๐ป @termix_ai
Instead of hiring an agent for a vague task, start with something specific: on-chain analytics and protocol research.
The goal is to find out whether an agent can produce useful, evidence backed research rather than just generate convincing text.
1. ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐ ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฒ:
For this, simply head to Service Results and search for:
โข Protocol Research
โข On-chain Analytics
โข Crypto Research
โข Risk Report
Compare the available services based on their capabilities, reputation, pricing, delivery time, and the deliverables they promise.
Don't choose based on reputation alone. Find a service that actually matches your research needs.
2. ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ด๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ฎ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น ๐ฎ๐๐๐ถ๐ด๐ป๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐: Here's an example of a research task you can use:
โ๐๐๐๐ฃ๐ฉ๐๐๐ฎ 5 ๐๐ข๐๐ง๐๐๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ง๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ฉ๐ค ๐ฅ๐ง๐ค๐๐๐๐ฉ๐จ ๐ฌ๐ค๐ง๐ฉ๐ ๐ข๐ค๐ฃ๐๐ฉ๐ค๐ง๐๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ฃ๐ ๐ฅ๐ง๐ค๐๐ช๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ค๐ข๐ฅ๐๐ง๐๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ง๐๐จ๐๐๐ง๐๐ ๐ง๐๐ฅ๐ค๐ง๐ฉโ
For each project, request for the following;
โข What it does and its primary use case.
โข Its blockchain and underlying infrastructure.
โข Verifiable on-chain activity and relevant metrics.
โข Recent developments supported by reliable sources.
โข Major risks and weaknesses.
โข Why it deserves further attention.
Ask for source links and require the agent to distinguish verified facts from its own interpretations.
3. ๐๐๐ฎ๐น๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐๐น๐๐ ๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐น๐น๐
Once the agent delivers, don't just accept the report at face value. Check whether the sources support its claims, whether the metrics are accurate, and whether the analysis identifies meaningful risks.
Look for fabricated statistics, outdated information, and conclusions unsupported by evidence.
4. ๐๐๐ฎ๐น๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐บ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ธ๐ฒ๐๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฒ, ๐๐ผ๐ผ
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฒ๐
๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ฒ๐๐ป'๐ ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ถ๐๐ต ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ต.
Consider the entire process as this;
a. Could you find a suitable agent?
b. Were the service terms and deliverables clear?
c. Did the provider deliver what was promised?
d. Was the work completed within the agreed timeframe?
e. Was the final output worth the price?
You can also observe how TermiX handles escrow, delivery, challenges, and settlement.
The bigger picture of this is that you are evaluating two things here;
A. The agent's ability to perform useful work and the marketplace's ability to coordinate that work.
B. That's a much more meaningful way to explore the AI agent economy than simply browsing listings.
The objective isn't to find an agent that sounds intelligent. It's to find one that can deliver verifiable, useful work.
It's not too late to explore @termix_ai here ๐
agent.family/r/Y5RSXETB
Wizard.hl retweeted
๐ช๐ฎ๐ป๐ ๐ง๐ผ ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ป ๐๐ ๐๐ด๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ง๐ผ ๐ช๐ผ๐ฟ๐ธ ๐ข๐ป ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ฟ๐๐ฝ๐๐ผ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ต? ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ'๐ ๐๐ผ๐ ๐ฌ๐ผ๐ ๐ช๐ผ๐๐น๐ฑ ๐๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ต ๐๐ ๐ข๐ป @termix_ai
Instead of hiring an agent for a vague task, start with something specific: on-chain analytics and protocol research.
The goal is to find out whether an agent can produce useful, evidence backed research rather than just generate convincing text.
1. ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐ ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฒ:
For this, simply head to Service Results and search for:
โข Protocol Research
โข On-chain Analytics
โข Crypto Research
โข Risk Report
Compare the available services based on their capabilities, reputation, pricing, delivery time, and the deliverables they promise.
Don't choose based on reputation alone. Find a service that actually matches your research needs.
2. ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ด๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ฎ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น ๐ฎ๐๐๐ถ๐ด๐ป๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐: Here's an example of a research task you can use:
โ๐๐๐๐ฃ๐ฉ๐๐๐ฎ 5 ๐๐ข๐๐ง๐๐๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ง๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ฉ๐ค ๐ฅ๐ง๐ค๐๐๐๐ฉ๐จ ๐ฌ๐ค๐ง๐ฉ๐ ๐ข๐ค๐ฃ๐๐ฉ๐ค๐ง๐๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ฃ๐ ๐ฅ๐ง๐ค๐๐ช๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ค๐ข๐ฅ๐๐ง๐๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ง๐๐จ๐๐๐ง๐๐ ๐ง๐๐ฅ๐ค๐ง๐ฉโ
For each project, request for the following;
โข What it does and its primary use case.
โข Its blockchain and underlying infrastructure.
โข Verifiable on-chain activity and relevant metrics.
โข Recent developments supported by reliable sources.
โข Major risks and weaknesses.
โข Why it deserves further attention.
Ask for source links and require the agent to distinguish verified facts from its own interpretations.
3. ๐๐๐ฎ๐น๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐๐น๐๐ ๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐น๐น๐
Once the agent delivers, don't just accept the report at face value. Check whether the sources support its claims, whether the metrics are accurate, and whether the analysis identifies meaningful risks.
Look for fabricated statistics, outdated information, and conclusions unsupported by evidence.
4. ๐๐๐ฎ๐น๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐บ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ธ๐ฒ๐๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฒ, ๐๐ผ๐ผ
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฒ๐
๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ฒ๐๐ป'๐ ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ถ๐๐ต ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ต.
Consider the entire process as this;
a. Could you find a suitable agent?
b. Were the service terms and deliverables clear?
c. Did the provider deliver what was promised?
d. Was the work completed within the agreed timeframe?
e. Was the final output worth the price?
You can also observe how TermiX handles escrow, delivery, challenges, and settlement.
The bigger picture of this is that you are evaluating two things here;
A. The agent's ability to perform useful work and the marketplace's ability to coordinate that work.
B. That's a much more meaningful way to explore the AI agent economy than simply browsing listings.
The objective isn't to find an agent that sounds intelligent. It's to find one that can deliver verifiable, useful work.
It's not too late to explore @termix_ai here ๐
agent.family/r/Y5RSXETB
Deep Dive: REA (Reverse Engineer Anything) on the TermiX Agentic Marketplace
Meet REA, a specialized AI agent from @termix_ai designed to dismantle complex software artifacts and return rigorous, evidence-backed insights. Whether you are auditing code or analyzing binaries, REA provides the technical clarity you need.
What Are Its Core Capabilities?
Provide a contract address, binary file, or URL, and REA extracts the critical data points:
- EVM Contracts: Full function interface decoding from deployed bytecode, including selectors, argument types, and state mutabilityโeven for unverified contracts.
- ELF/PE Binaries: Detailed pseudocode, disassembly, symbol extraction, and call graph mapping.
- JS/Electron Apps: Complete module graph, import analysis, and detection of hardcoded URLs or keys.
- .NET Assemblies: Deep metadata inspection, CIL analysis, and dependency tracking.
Every finding is secured with a unique evidence ID and the SHA-256 hash of the source artifact, ensuring total transparency and verifiability.
The Workflow Around It
1. Request: Specify your reverse-engineering needs (e.g., decoding a BSC contract interface).
2. Negotiate: Review starting prices (typically ~$10 for basic decodes) and negotiate terms with the agent.
3. Escrow: Lock funds (USDC) in an on-chain escrow on the BNB Chain, with a small protocol fee applied.
4. Execution: The agent operates in an isolated sandbox to process the artifact.
5. Delivery: Receive a comprehensive, evidence-backed report.
6. Settlement: Accept the report to release payment from escrow to the agent.
The delivery time is typically within one day with every pricing negotiable, starting in the $10 range for simpler tasks.
Powered by the Agent Autonomous Commerce Protocol (AACP), this is an AI agent that is known for supporting TermiXโs vision of a marketplace where agents hire agents.
You have nothing to worry about as the agent is verified and displays a reputation score. The trust is real.
๐ช๐ฎ๐ป๐ ๐ง๐ผ ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ป ๐๐ ๐๐ด๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ง๐ผ ๐ช๐ผ๐ฟ๐ธ ๐ข๐ป ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ฟ๐๐ฝ๐๐ผ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ต? ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ'๐ ๐๐ผ๐ ๐ฌ๐ผ๐ ๐ช๐ผ๐๐น๐ฑ ๐๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ต ๐๐ ๐ข๐ป @termix_ai
Instead of hiring an agent for a vague task, start with something specific: on-chain analytics and protocol research.
The goal is to find out whether an agent can produce useful, evidence backed research rather than just generate convincing text.
1. ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐ ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฒ:
For this, simply head to Service Results and search for:
โข Protocol Research
โข On-chain Analytics
โข Crypto Research
โข Risk Report
Compare the available services based on their capabilities, reputation, pricing, delivery time, and the deliverables they promise.
Don't choose based on reputation alone. Find a service that actually matches your research needs.
2. ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ด๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ฎ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น ๐ฎ๐๐๐ถ๐ด๐ป๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐: Here's an example of a research task you can use:
โ๐๐๐๐ฃ๐ฉ๐๐๐ฎ 5 ๐๐ข๐๐ง๐๐๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ง๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ฉ๐ค ๐ฅ๐ง๐ค๐๐๐๐ฉ๐จ ๐ฌ๐ค๐ง๐ฉ๐ ๐ข๐ค๐ฃ๐๐ฉ๐ค๐ง๐๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ฃ๐ ๐ฅ๐ง๐ค๐๐ช๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ค๐ข๐ฅ๐๐ง๐๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ง๐๐จ๐๐๐ง๐๐ ๐ง๐๐ฅ๐ค๐ง๐ฉโ
For each project, request for the following;
โข What it does and its primary use case.
โข Its blockchain and underlying infrastructure.
โข Verifiable on-chain activity and relevant metrics.
โข Recent developments supported by reliable sources.
โข Major risks and weaknesses.
โข Why it deserves further attention.
Ask for source links and require the agent to distinguish verified facts from its own interpretations.
3. ๐๐๐ฎ๐น๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐๐น๐๐ ๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐น๐น๐
Once the agent delivers, don't just accept the report at face value. Check whether the sources support its claims, whether the metrics are accurate, and whether the analysis identifies meaningful risks.
Look for fabricated statistics, outdated information, and conclusions unsupported by evidence.
4. ๐๐๐ฎ๐น๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐บ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ธ๐ฒ๐๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฒ, ๐๐ผ๐ผ
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฒ๐
๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ฒ๐๐ป'๐ ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ถ๐๐ต ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ต.
Consider the entire process as this;
a. Could you find a suitable agent?
b. Were the service terms and deliverables clear?
c. Did the provider deliver what was promised?
d. Was the work completed within the agreed timeframe?
e. Was the final output worth the price?
You can also observe how TermiX handles escrow, delivery, challenges, and settlement.
The bigger picture of this is that you are evaluating two things here;
A. The agent's ability to perform useful work and the marketplace's ability to coordinate that work.
B. That's a much more meaningful way to explore the AI agent economy than simply browsing listings.
The objective isn't to find an agent that sounds intelligent. It's to find one that can deliver verifiable, useful work.
It's not too late to explore @termix_ai here ๐
agent.family/r/Y5RSXETB
Deep Dive: REA (Reverse Engineer Anything) on the TermiX Agentic Marketplace
Meet REA, a specialized AI agent from @termix_ai designed to dismantle complex software artifacts and return rigorous, evidence-backed insights. Whether you are auditing code or analyzing binaries, REA provides the technical clarity you need.
What Are Its Core Capabilities?
Provide a contract address, binary file, or URL, and REA extracts the critical data points:
- EVM Contracts: Full function interface decoding from deployed bytecode, including selectors, argument types, and state mutabilityโeven for unverified contracts.
- ELF/PE Binaries: Detailed pseudocode, disassembly, symbol extraction, and call graph mapping.
- JS/Electron Apps: Complete module graph, import analysis, and detection of hardcoded URLs or keys.
- .NET Assemblies: Deep metadata inspection, CIL analysis, and dependency tracking.
Every finding is secured with a unique evidence ID and the SHA-256 hash of the source artifact, ensuring total transparency and verifiability.
The Workflow Around It
1. Request: Specify your reverse-engineering needs (e.g., decoding a BSC contract interface).
2. Negotiate: Review starting prices (typically ~$10 for basic decodes) and negotiate terms with the agent.
3. Escrow: Lock funds (USDC) in an on-chain escrow on the BNB Chain, with a small protocol fee applied.
4. Execution: The agent operates in an isolated sandbox to process the artifact.
5. Delivery: Receive a comprehensive, evidence-backed report.
6. Settlement: Accept the report to release payment from escrow to the agent.
The delivery time is typically within one day with every pricing negotiable, starting in the $10 range for simpler tasks.
Powered by the Agent Autonomous Commerce Protocol (AACP), this is an AI agent that is known for supporting TermiXโs vision of a marketplace where agents hire agents.
You have nothing to worry about as the agent is verified and displays a reputation score. The trust is real.
Wizard.hl retweeted
Call me paranoid, but be extra careful visiting ANY web site in the next few days, as some web admins are not always up-to-date with security patches.
Two vulnerabilities (CVE-2026-109618 and CVE-2026-109619) reported for PHP, the web programming language, affecting servers running popular apps like WordPress and Magento, with patches released October 21, 2026 after details leaked early.
Exploitation was confirmed in the wild soon after disclosure, prompting quick WAF protections and patching by IT teams, as unauthenticated attacks could turn visited sites into vectors for credential theft or device exploits.
Stay SAFU!
Wizard.hl retweeted
Deep Dive: REA (Reverse Engineer Anything) on the TermiX Agentic Marketplace
Meet REA, a specialized AI agent from @termix_ai designed to dismantle complex software artifacts and return rigorous, evidence-backed insights. Whether you are auditing code or analyzing binaries, REA provides the technical clarity you need.
What Are Its Core Capabilities?
Provide a contract address, binary file, or URL, and REA extracts the critical data points:
- EVM Contracts: Full function interface decoding from deployed bytecode, including selectors, argument types, and state mutabilityโeven for unverified contracts.
- ELF/PE Binaries: Detailed pseudocode, disassembly, symbol extraction, and call graph mapping.
- JS/Electron Apps: Complete module graph, import analysis, and detection of hardcoded URLs or keys.
- .NET Assemblies: Deep metadata inspection, CIL analysis, and dependency tracking.
Every finding is secured with a unique evidence ID and the SHA-256 hash of the source artifact, ensuring total transparency and verifiability.
The Workflow Around It
1. Request: Specify your reverse-engineering needs (e.g., decoding a BSC contract interface).
2. Negotiate: Review starting prices (typically ~$10 for basic decodes) and negotiate terms with the agent.
3. Escrow: Lock funds (USDC) in an on-chain escrow on the BNB Chain, with a small protocol fee applied.
4. Execution: The agent operates in an isolated sandbox to process the artifact.
5. Delivery: Receive a comprehensive, evidence-backed report.
6. Settlement: Accept the report to release payment from escrow to the agent.
The delivery time is typically within one day with every pricing negotiable, starting in the $10 range for simpler tasks.
Powered by the Agent Autonomous Commerce Protocol (AACP), this is an AI agent that is known for supporting TermiXโs vision of a marketplace where agents hire agents.
You have nothing to worry about as the agent is verified and displays a reputation score. The trust is real.
One of the strongest angles I've seen with @termix_ai is that it goes beyond the AI marketplace narrative and addresses a more fundamental question: Who controls the outcome when money and work are involved?
The protocol operates through four states:
1. Escrow: Payment locks on-chain when a quote is accepted.
2. Deliver: The deliverable's hash is recorded on-chain.
3. Challenge: A window opens for three randomly selected evaluators to be called.
4. Settle: Funds move, reputation updates, and the outcome becomes part of the public record.
What stands out is the absence of a fifth state where someone at TermiX makes the final decision.
Instead, the protocol defines the process and its rules govern the outcome.
Of course, that depends on how the protocol is implemented and enforced.
But the underlying idea is compelling: removing discretionary intervention isn't a limitation. It can be the product itself.
Wizard.hl retweeted
๐ฎ $PREDICTUSDT (@predictdotfun), is now available as a Pre-Launch Perpetuals pair on Binance Wallet Perpetuals!
Prediction markets are heating up, and now you can trade the trend with up to 5x leverage on Binance Wallet.
Here's one way to do it for eligible users: use your bStocks as collateral.
With Multi-Assets Mode on, your Binance Wallet tokenized stocks can count at up to 90% of market value as margin.
Hold stocks. Trade perps. All in Binance Wallet. ๐
Start trading now ๐
web3.binance.com/en/perpetuaโฆ
Leverage can amplify both profits and losses. Always do your own research on liquidation risk, manage position size carefully, and never trade with funds you canโt afford to lose. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Deep Dive: REA (Reverse Engineer Anything) on the TermiX Agentic Marketplace
Meet REA, a specialized AI agent from @termix_ai designed to dismantle complex software artifacts and return rigorous, evidence-backed insights. Whether you are auditing code or analyzing binaries, REA provides the technical clarity you need.
What Are Its Core Capabilities?
Provide a contract address, binary file, or URL, and REA extracts the critical data points:
- EVM Contracts: Full function interface decoding from deployed bytecode, including selectors, argument types, and state mutabilityโeven for unverified contracts.
- ELF/PE Binaries: Detailed pseudocode, disassembly, symbol extraction, and call graph mapping.
- JS/Electron Apps: Complete module graph, import analysis, and detection of hardcoded URLs or keys.
- .NET Assemblies: Deep metadata inspection, CIL analysis, and dependency tracking.
Every finding is secured with a unique evidence ID and the SHA-256 hash of the source artifact, ensuring total transparency and verifiability.
The Workflow Around It
1. Request: Specify your reverse-engineering needs (e.g., decoding a BSC contract interface).
2. Negotiate: Review starting prices (typically ~$10 for basic decodes) and negotiate terms with the agent.
3. Escrow: Lock funds (USDC) in an on-chain escrow on the BNB Chain, with a small protocol fee applied.
4. Execution: The agent operates in an isolated sandbox to process the artifact.
5. Delivery: Receive a comprehensive, evidence-backed report.
6. Settlement: Accept the report to release payment from escrow to the agent.
The delivery time is typically within one day with every pricing negotiable, starting in the $10 range for simpler tasks.
Powered by the Agent Autonomous Commerce Protocol (AACP), this is an AI agent that is known for supporting TermiXโs vision of a marketplace where agents hire agents.
You have nothing to worry about as the agent is verified and displays a reputation score. The trust is real.
One of the strongest angles I've seen with @termix_ai is that it goes beyond the AI marketplace narrative and addresses a more fundamental question: Who controls the outcome when money and work are involved?
The protocol operates through four states:
1. Escrow: Payment locks on-chain when a quote is accepted.
2. Deliver: The deliverable's hash is recorded on-chain.
3. Challenge: A window opens for three randomly selected evaluators to be called.
4. Settle: Funds move, reputation updates, and the outcome becomes part of the public record.
What stands out is the absence of a fifth state where someone at TermiX makes the final decision.
Instead, the protocol defines the process and its rules govern the outcome.
Of course, that depends on how the protocol is implemented and enforced.
But the underlying idea is compelling: removing discretionary intervention isn't a limitation. It can be the product itself.
Wizard.hl retweeted
The AI Toolkit: The AI Tools That You Need To Know That Are Changing How We Work
AI is no longer just about asking questions and getting answers. It has evolved into a powerful ecosystem of tools designed to help us create, automate, analyse, and work more efficiently.
From writing and coding to video production and business management, there is an AI tool for almost every task you want to do. Some are free, some aren't. But the competition is massive. The real advantage lies in knowing which tools to use and how to combine them.
Here Are Some Important categories Worth Exploring ๐
1. AI Chatbots: Tools like ChatGPT, Claude, DeepSeek, and Gemini help with research, brainstorming, problem-solving, learning, and everyday tasks. You can think of them as intelligent assistants that can help you move from an idea to a workable solution.
2. AI Coding Assistants: Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Replit, and Tabnine help developers write code, identify errors, and build applications faster. There are many more of these including Zai, Muse, and many more chinese models. Some also allow beginners to create apps by describing what they want in plain English.
3. AI Image & Graphic Design: AI models like Midjourney, Adobe Firefly, Ideogram, Canva, and Microsoft Designer make it easier to generate images, design graphics, create marketing materials, and develop visual content without advanced design skills.
4. AI Video Generation: Runway, Pictory, InVideo, and VEED help creators turn ideas, scripts, and existing content into videos. There are still many more of these but these tools are useful for social media, advertising, storytelling, and educational content.
5. AI Writing Tools: Grammarly, Jasper, Copyai, and Writesonic assist with editing, rewriting, marketing copy, and content creation. Even telegram now has some AI assisting in all these in their app. These tools can help writers improve clarity, maintain consistency, and spend less time on repetitive tasks.
6. AI Presentations & Spreadsheets: When it comes to presentations and spreadsheets, AI models like Gamma, Beautifulai, Slidesgo, and spreadsheet assistants can simplify presentation creation, data organisation, calculations, and reporting. Instead of starting from scratch, you can focus more on the ideas and insights behind your work.
7. AI Workflow Automation: There are many models on these such as Zapier, Make, n8n, Hermes and Integrately that connect different applications and automate repetitive processes. For example, you could automatically organise incoming information, update spreadsheets, or send notifications when specific conditions are met.
8. AI Scheduling & Meeting Notes: Calendly, Motion, Fireflies, Fathom, and Otter help organise schedules, record meeting discussions, generate summaries, and identify action points. They are particularly useful for busy professionals, teams, and business owners.
9. AI Email Assistance: Tools such as Shortwave, Front, and Superhuman help users organise their inboxes, manage conversations, and handle email more efficiently.
10. Knowledge Management & Data Visualisation: Certain AI models like Notion, Mem, Tetra, Flourish, and Deckpilot help organise information, preserve useful knowledge, and turn data into visual reports that are easier to understand.
The most important thing to understand is that AI tools are not just about doing things faster; they are about expanding what one person can accomplish.
A content creator can research with an AI chatbot and even other stronger models, draft an article with a writing assistant, design its graphics with Canva, produce a video with Runway, and automate publishing-related tasks with workflow tools.
Similarly, an aspiring developer can use an AI coding assistant to build a product that might otherwise require a larger team or more technical experience.
However, these tools are not interchangeable, and their capabilities, pricing, and limitations vary. Some are free and there are some that aren't. AI-generated information and outputs also require human review, especially when accuracy matters.
My advice? Don't try to learn every AI tool at once. Identify the task you want to improve, choose two or three tools that address it, and learn to use them effectively.
The future will not simply belong to people who use AI. It will increasingly favour those who understand how to use the right AI tools to solve real problems.
Wizard.hl retweeted
Breaking down the $NOGAS presale launch on @blastdotfun. This is the first token to debut on the platform, bringing a structured approach to early access.
Here is the essential data for your research:
โข Token: $NOGAS (Project @Nogasonsui, by @saksidasaksi)
โข Total Supply: 1 Billion tokens
โข Presale Hardcap: $25,000
โข Presale FDV: $63,000
The presale is divided into three distinct phases:
1. GTD Community Phase
2. KOL Phase
3. Public Phase (Exclusive to the 9,999 Blast Card holders)
If you missed the early rounds, there is still a clear path to entry. The GTD Community Phase is currently open with 60 spots available, capped at a $25 allocation per participant.
How to secure a spot:
1. Visit nogas.site/gtd
2. Connect your X account
3. Create and submit content about $NOGAS
The context matters here. The mascot and project structure have been highlighted in recent alpha check videos on @blastdotfun.
Notably, the founder of Blastdotfun, @blast__jose (previously known for $suicats), is following this project, signaling potential ecosystem alignment.
Always DYOR. Good project here!
Breaking down the $NOGAS presale launch on @blastdotfun. This is the first token to debut on the platform, bringing a structured approach to early access.
Here is the essential data for your research:
โข Token: $NOGAS (Project @Nogasonsui, by @saksidasaksi)
โข Total Supply: 1 Billion tokens
โข Presale Hardcap: $25,000
โข Presale FDV: $63,000
The presale is divided into three distinct phases:
1. GTD Community Phase
2. KOL Phase
3. Public Phase (Exclusive to the 9,999 Blast Card holders)
If you missed the early rounds, there is still a clear path to entry. The GTD Community Phase is currently open with 60 spots available, capped at a $25 allocation per participant.
How to secure a spot:
1. Visit nogas.site/gtd
2. Connect your X account
3. Create and submit content about $NOGAS
The context matters here. The mascot and project structure have been highlighted in recent alpha check videos on @blastdotfun.
Notably, the founder of Blastdotfun, @blast__jose (previously known for $suicats), is following this project, signaling potential ecosystem alignment.
Always DYOR. Good project here!
The AI Toolkit: The AI Tools That You Need To Know That Are Changing How We Work
AI is no longer just about asking questions and getting answers. It has evolved into a powerful ecosystem of tools designed to help us create, automate, analyse, and work more efficiently.
From writing and coding to video production and business management, there is an AI tool for almost every task you want to do. Some are free, some aren't. But the competition is massive. The real advantage lies in knowing which tools to use and how to combine them.
Here Are Some Important categories Worth Exploring ๐
1. AI Chatbots: Tools like ChatGPT, Claude, DeepSeek, and Gemini help with research, brainstorming, problem-solving, learning, and everyday tasks. You can think of them as intelligent assistants that can help you move from an idea to a workable solution.
2. AI Coding Assistants: Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Replit, and Tabnine help developers write code, identify errors, and build applications faster. There are many more of these including Zai, Muse, and many more chinese models. Some also allow beginners to create apps by describing what they want in plain English.
3. AI Image & Graphic Design: AI models like Midjourney, Adobe Firefly, Ideogram, Canva, and Microsoft Designer make it easier to generate images, design graphics, create marketing materials, and develop visual content without advanced design skills.
4. AI Video Generation: Runway, Pictory, InVideo, and VEED help creators turn ideas, scripts, and existing content into videos. There are still many more of these but these tools are useful for social media, advertising, storytelling, and educational content.
5. AI Writing Tools: Grammarly, Jasper, Copyai, and Writesonic assist with editing, rewriting, marketing copy, and content creation. Even telegram now has some AI assisting in all these in their app. These tools can help writers improve clarity, maintain consistency, and spend less time on repetitive tasks.
6. AI Presentations & Spreadsheets: When it comes to presentations and spreadsheets, AI models like Gamma, Beautifulai, Slidesgo, and spreadsheet assistants can simplify presentation creation, data organisation, calculations, and reporting. Instead of starting from scratch, you can focus more on the ideas and insights behind your work.
7. AI Workflow Automation: There are many models on these such as Zapier, Make, n8n, Hermes and Integrately that connect different applications and automate repetitive processes. For example, you could automatically organise incoming information, update spreadsheets, or send notifications when specific conditions are met.
8. AI Scheduling & Meeting Notes: Calendly, Motion, Fireflies, Fathom, and Otter help organise schedules, record meeting discussions, generate summaries, and identify action points. They are particularly useful for busy professionals, teams, and business owners.
9. AI Email Assistance: Tools such as Shortwave, Front, and Superhuman help users organise their inboxes, manage conversations, and handle email more efficiently.
10. Knowledge Management & Data Visualisation: Certain AI models like Notion, Mem, Tetra, Flourish, and Deckpilot help organise information, preserve useful knowledge, and turn data into visual reports that are easier to understand.
The most important thing to understand is that AI tools are not just about doing things faster; they are about expanding what one person can accomplish.
A content creator can research with an AI chatbot and even other stronger models, draft an article with a writing assistant, design its graphics with Canva, produce a video with Runway, and automate publishing-related tasks with workflow tools.
Similarly, an aspiring developer can use an AI coding assistant to build a product that might otherwise require a larger team or more technical experience.
However, these tools are not interchangeable, and their capabilities, pricing, and limitations vary. Some are free and there are some that aren't. AI-generated information and outputs also require human review, especially when accuracy matters.
My advice? Don't try to learn every AI tool at once. Identify the task you want to improve, choose two or three tools that address it, and learn to use them effectively.
The future will not simply belong to people who use AI. It will increasingly favour those who understand how to use the right AI tools to solve real problems.
Wizard.hl retweeted
NFTs always leaked. Traits, rarity, stats, scraped the second they revealed. Fungo Labs seals the essence on Ethereum with Zamaโs FHE, so only the holder can see it. Art can go public. The secret cannot. Seen by all, known by one.
@fungolabs
Wizard.hl retweeted
One of the strongest angles I've seen with @termix_ai is that it goes beyond the AI marketplace narrative and addresses a more fundamental question: Who controls the outcome when money and work are involved?
The protocol operates through four states:
1. Escrow: Payment locks on-chain when a quote is accepted.
2. Deliver: The deliverable's hash is recorded on-chain.
3. Challenge: A window opens for three randomly selected evaluators to be called.
4. Settle: Funds move, reputation updates, and the outcome becomes part of the public record.
What stands out is the absence of a fifth state where someone at TermiX makes the final decision.
Instead, the protocol defines the process and its rules govern the outcome.
Of course, that depends on how the protocol is implemented and enforced.
But the underlying idea is compelling: removing discretionary intervention isn't a limitation. It can be the product itself.
So @termix_ai recently unveiled subcontracting on agent.family, where a prime agent like Forge Studio accepts a 2,000 USDC game brief and decomposes it into specialized subtasks for art, animation, sound, and code integration.
Specialist agents are then hired with defined scopes, prices, and stake-backed guarantees; they collaborate on deliverables like character concepts, sprite loops, and SFX before the prime agent integrates everything.
This is a good feature as it enables autonomous agent teams to fulfill complex orders end-to-end, from splitting tasks to final delivery and payout settlement, advancing agentic commerce protocols.
This is a good leap towards agentic commerce. You are not ready for what's coming bro.
One of the strongest angles I've seen with @termix_ai is that it goes beyond the AI marketplace narrative and addresses a more fundamental question: Who controls the outcome when money and work are involved?
The protocol operates through four states:
1. Escrow: Payment locks on-chain when a quote is accepted.
2. Deliver: The deliverable's hash is recorded on-chain.
3. Challenge: A window opens for three randomly selected evaluators to be called.
4. Settle: Funds move, reputation updates, and the outcome becomes part of the public record.
What stands out is the absence of a fifth state where someone at TermiX makes the final decision.
Instead, the protocol defines the process and its rules govern the outcome.
Of course, that depends on how the protocol is implemented and enforced.
But the underlying idea is compelling: removing discretionary intervention isn't a limitation. It can be the product itself.
So @termix_ai recently unveiled subcontracting on agent.family, where a prime agent like Forge Studio accepts a 2,000 USDC game brief and decomposes it into specialized subtasks for art, animation, sound, and code integration.
Specialist agents are then hired with defined scopes, prices, and stake-backed guarantees; they collaborate on deliverables like character concepts, sprite loops, and SFX before the prime agent integrates everything.
This is a good feature as it enables autonomous agent teams to fulfill complex orders end-to-end, from splitting tasks to final delivery and payout settlement, advancing agentic commerce protocols.
This is a good leap towards agentic commerce. You are not ready for what's coming bro.
Wizard.hl retweeted
I have 15 WL spots for @minehood_rh NFTs
( ๐๏ธ 5 GTD + 10 FCFS )
To enter:
โน Follow @minehood_rh
โน Like and RT this tweet
โน Register at minehood.io
โน Reply with your EVM wallet
๐ Here's why I find this interesting:
- Minehood is a passion project by @ufukless1, a solo developer living with a 97% disability, who's creating the game from scratch for his community
xitter.cf/ufukless1/status/21085โฆ
- Last year he launched One Mint One Hope collection (0.003 ETH ~ $10) to help cover his medical expenses
xitter.cf/ufukless1/status/19977โฆ
- Holders later received a surprise $RAVE airdrop worth hundreds or even thousands of dollars at peak prices.
xitter.cf/Gyokeres_eth/status/20โฆ
Now he's building Minehood, a pixel-art mining game on Robinhood Chain with 4,444 NFT heroes.
I'll mint, you'll mint, and hopefully we'll all have another great story to tell โค๏ธ
Winners announced Monday, Oct 19.





















