Vagyok Aki Vagyok

I already pointed out what parts are "inaccurate". You are clearly completely confused about geometry. You're just a #fakescientits #globetrottel clown! 1. You call arcs "circles" 2. You call circles "planes" 3. You claim the diameter of a sphere is a line on its surface.

Male Gargoyle Kimberley Guilfoyle 2) dude Kennedy with a triad claw

Of course. Here is GC between London and NYC:

1. That argument has nothing to do with the actual statement 😀 2. Even if it did, that's still flawed logic 🤷‍♂️ The logical breakdown of ACTUAL statement: P1: I climb higher P2: I can see further C: water is curving Cope, I guess! 😘

It’s showing you that the AMS was describing what you would see on the globe Earth.

So where’s the bottom of the ship? The “sinking” just means it appears to be at a lower position in your vision (so the ship appears closer than its true position, but not larger). It does NOT mean that light from the bottom doesn’t enter your eyes. Where’s the bottom?

Also. You are arguing with a bunch of code that holds no opinions or thoughts. It can't actually "admit" to anything. You might as well be shouting at an Wikipedia page for how much that achieves.

No public link found to a specific timestamped photo of Crown Seaways from Udsholt Strand with concurrent atmospheric data. Ship route distance and logo/hull heights are standard. Geometric drop for ~14 km at 4 m eye height is ~4.3 m on R=6371 km. Conditions inferred only from described sharp cutoff lacking mirage signs; no measured profiles available.