I also forget that people are just posting here for the sake of having some sort of point scoring tit-for-tat commentary competition. And I've started blocking them too.
I sometimes forget just how deranged and insulting flat earthers can get after you have debunked them. It's a lesson for me though, I need to stop engaging with them.
9/11 - the date when flerfs change topic and demonstrate their lack of knowledge of aircraft and structural engineering rather than geometry and physics.
Whatever happened to the "Bloomberg is dead, I just one-shotted their whole ecosystem" posts?
Oh yes, that's right, it turns out they're full of shit.
With gravity on the other hand, it can be defined, measured and you can make predictions with it. What actually *is* gravity? Who knows - and it's not relevant. What is relevant is what it does and how it can be measured and how that allows us to make predictions.
Replying to @ChiseledTablet
Oh, that magical force. Got it. The one that you can't define, or produce any equations for, or make predictions with. That one.
Yet another flerf you cannot deal with some straight forward questions, and when they run out of answers...
Typical, rather than admit they're wrong they block you.
Oh well, their loss.
Replying to @ChiseledTablet @15Redstones
Naming a mechanism isn't explaining one. What are the wave frequencies, field strengths, and force equations? EM waves exert radiation pressure (F=I/c), far too weak for weight, and don't act on mass the way gravity does. A name isn't a derivation.



















