is the financial computer still in the room with us? 😂
GG @beniaminmincu
keep blocking people and habe your admeens banning people on TG
but it's fine since "@MultiversX is not for crypto people" 😂😂
aDAMNonX retweeted
Every washed KOL in Singapore is in a Kast van funded by my Kast points that the team rugged
great work guys 😂
teapawt.net/ethentree/status/21047…
Full cycle achieved as an $EGLD holder
Same question asked on $XMN and got banned
This is the proof that @beniaminmincu
used your money to fund his business that is not related to crypto
Welcome to computer finance era 🤡
Replying to @beniaminmincu
how does that reflect back to elrond-erd-2:native?
also this sounds like a new story that will never have an impact on the ecosystem, like all the previous ones
share numbers, business partners, and answer the first question
If you an active @StellarOrg user or DeFi power user then you need to try out @XoxnoNetwork protocol
XOXNO Lending is live on Stellar in beta mode.
@StellarOrg needs a money market that matches the network.
We built one. A hub-and-spoke design: one pool, isolated hubs, configurable risk params per spoke.
Tek is tekking + bullish on dev mindset
If you are using AI to build stuff you should definitely look into p0.systems/
if you are not devving, you can grab a bag and benefit of the upside $P0
Put your money where your mouth is @beniaminmincu @lucianmincu
Asta daca mai plătesc ofc, au antecedente de a “uita” sa plătească hackathons/winners etc.
Deja au trecut months de la finalizarea BON, pe lângă ca sunt niște săraci alocând $50k pentru minim 20 critical si peste 100 other issues while industry standard e 50k and even more per critical nu shared across all 😅
aDAMNonX retweeted
if @blknoiz06 did it with solana:9cRCn9rGT8V2imeM2BaKs13yhMEais3ruM3rPvTGpump I was thinking we can revive MVX with $BOBER
but then
is there anyone left?
this is what you get (a game 😂) when you have nothing else to show & a noob in charge of mArKeTiNg & communication
a network upgrade hyped for over 1 year & delayed, a missing CEO and other networks that already ship better tech together with partnerships, volumes, users, etc
why do resources are still allocated towards xLaunchpad / xSpotlight? LOL
Replying to @s_stanculeanu
5/ Misc
- Shipped an xExchange release with multiple fixes
- Pushed security and performance updates across xLaunchpad, xSpotlight and the Assets dApp
- Migrated dApps and SDKs to sdk-dapp v5
Remember when @beniaminmincu met with Charles a while ago? 😂 maybe he learned a thing or two
This quoted post is unavailable.
aDAMNonX retweeted
We’re excited to @BuildOnStellar and enter the next stage of our growth🔥
@StellarOrg is building real momentum, from DTCC’s tokenization plans to @MoneyGram $MGUSD launch.
But on-chain DeFi remains underserved.
That’s where XOXNO will create real value: better UX, stronger lending infrastructure, and a new architecture for on-chain finance.
revolutionary post
now explain how projects in the ecosystem that were forced to be listed in pair with $EGLD got rekt & their price was dragged down even if they paid ton of money & were listed on CEXs in pair with $
wen open space w the community?
double standards much?
Decouple, minimizing correlation, standing on our own terms
For most of its history, this market has moved as one body. When Bitcoin rose, everything rose with it. When Bitcoin fell, even the strongest networks fell too, regardless of what their teams had built, shipped, or proven. That gravitational pull made it easy to forget a simple truth: not all crypto is the same, and not all of it should be priced as though it were.
The last six to twelve months brought the cost of that into focus. Growth stalled. Headwinds settled across the ecosystems. And too often, the value of real work was decided by forces no builder could influence. We do not believe that is the future MultiversX is building toward, and we are no longer willing to leave EGLD's story to be written by Bitcoin.
As we approach the Supernova genesis moment, we are taking deliberate steps to decouple EGLD from its direct correlation to BTC. We are clear-eyed about what this means: no team commands a market by decree. What we can do, and what we intend to do, is build, communicate, and position EGLD so that it is judged on its own terms, not on what Bitcoin happens to be doing on any given day. This means taking steps to delist some EGLD/BTC direct pairs, and give more proactive signal space to EGLD itself.
We believe EGLD's value belongs where its contribution is greatest: in the throughput, the finality, the adoption, and the real-world utility of the network itself. Those are the things we control. Those are the things we are pouring ourselves into. And those are the things that, over time, earn an asset the right to stand on its own.
Supernova is more than a launch. It is the moment we stop being treated as a passenger in someone else's story, and begin being weighted on our own merits. We are choosing decoupling, independence because we believe it is where MultiversX and EGLD have always belonged. To Supernova, and beyond.
are you proud of yourself @lucianmincu @beniaminmincu @SasuRobert ?
build and they will come / best tek / best stack it's worthless if you don't offer what comes along with it
you live in your own bubble heads while everyone that lost money and TIME on this chain got rekt
Replying to @bnistordev
Another reason I stepped away is that I wanted to build.
I wanted to code, develop, and create things. But I did not want to keep building inside an ecosystem where, after six months or a year of work, maybe making five euros is the only realistic outcome.























