AClem retweeted
It's finally done!
@markgoodw_in and I present a lengthy investigation into the cross-section of players from the 9/11 insider trading scandal, Enron accounting fraud and the Trump Family's Bitcoin mining business, as well as their roles in the controlled demolition of the energy and securities markets in the early 2000s that have since brought us to today's data center build out.
Read it on our brand new, completely redesigned website by clicking here: unlimitedhangout.com/creativ…
AClem retweeted
Thomas Massie: The Epstein scandal is “deeper and darker” than anyone imagined.
“It’s bigger than Watergate.”
“It’s bigger than Iran-Contra.”
“It’s not about Joe Biden or Donald Trump.”
“There are degrees of evil here that we’ve never seen at this scale … ”
“Our government was compromised by wealthy, connected billionaires, and by Jeffrey Epstein himself.”
“At the age of 14, these girls that were being sexually abused by Jeffrey Epstein were told if they could go find another girl to take their place, then they wouldn’t have to be sexually abused.”
“And some of them took that deal.”
“It’s one thing to be evil to a child.”
“It’s another thing to get a child to do evil.”
“The light sentence that was given to Jeffrey Epstein in 2008 that allowed him to victimize hundreds of more women, we want to know, why was he given that light sentence?”
AClem retweeted
Ted Kuntz received an email from a supporter last week.
They called TD Visa to ask why the bank had been blocking payments to Vaccine Choice Canada, The Epoch Times, and several other organizations.
The answer was simply: “Suspicious activity.”
This is the same bank that froze accounts of Freedom Convoy protesters.
Another reminder of the dangers of financial control.
AClem retweeted
Levi Ladapo study shows COVID shots likely killed over 500,000 Americans.
Congress will NEVER call for an investigation. NEVER.
🚨BREAKING: Massive 1.96 MILLION-person study finds Pfizer COVID shots linked to 40% HIGHER ALL-CAUSE MORTALITY compared to Moderna.
Extrapolating that difference across America yields ~331,500-522,000 EXCESS DEATHS from Pfizer ALONE.
The study tracked nearly TWO MILLION adults for 12 months and found Pfizer recipients faced:
ALL-CAUSE MORTALITY: 40% higher
CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY: 57% higher
COVID-19 MORTALITY: 91% higher
NON-COVID MORTALITY: 37% higher
The analysis was conducted by MIT Professor Retsef Levi, Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo, and researchers at the Florida Department of Health.
Applying the study’s 40% higher all-cause mortality hazard to an assumed 150 million U.S. Pfizer recipients and a baseline annual mortality rate of 0.87% produces the following calculation:
150,000,000 × 0.0087 × 0.40 = 522,000
This yields an extrapolation of 522,000 excess deaths from Pfizer alone.
A more conservative extrapolation uses the study’s directly observed absolute mortality difference of 221 additional deaths per 100,000 Pfizer recipients compared with Moderna:
150,000,000 × (221 ÷ 100,000) = 331,500
This produces an alternative estimate of 331,500 additional deaths relative to Moderna.
Both estimates represent CATASTROPHIC loss of life rivaling major wars.
These lethal mRNA injections need to be REMOVED FROM THE MARKET IMMEDIATELY.
AClem retweeted
🚨 3 NEUROLOGISTS LINKED MY PARALYSIS TO A COVID VACCINE. CANADA OFFERED ME ASSISTED DEATH. WHERE IS THE ACCOUNTABILITY?
I became paralyzed at 35 following a government mandated COVID 19 vaccine. Three neurologists have attributed my spinal cord injury to that vaccine.
Canada offered me medically assisted dying (MAID).
Nearly 5 YEARS later, the government’s vaccine injury compensation program hasn’t even medically reviewed my claim.
🇨🇦 HOW IS THIS NOT A NATIONAL SCANDAL?
🚨 I WAS PARALYZED AT 35 by my covid 19 vaccine
Nearly 5 years later, I’m still am.
I applied for Canada’s vaccine injury compensation program in 2022.
I have received $0. They haven’t even medically reviewed the file.
I was offered MAID.
My story has reached national news. Yet I am still waiting.
How is this acceptable in 🇨🇦 Canada we were promised help!
AClem retweeted
The next preplanned global health emergency is likely to be the so-called “Cyber Pandemic.”
Just as Bill Gates co-hosted Event 201 coronavirus simulations 2 months before COVID, he’s now declaring that we face imminent AI cyberattacks on critical infrastructure.
The World Economic Forum has already run “Cyber Polygon” exercises simulating major cyberattacks.
The elites would benefit from a "Cyber Pandemic" by offering their AI software as the “solution” to prevent future attacks, thereby gaining unprecedented control over critical global infrastructure.
AClem retweeted
Levi paper showing Pfizer is a toxic vaccine is now published. And anyone claiming there is “nothing to see here” is being intellectually dishonest. This paper should spark outrage in Congress, who should be calling for more in-depth investigations.
kirschsubstack.com/p/levi-pa…
AClem retweeted
Canada lost 100,000 jobs in 3 months
Unemployment rate up to 6.7%
Carney is bringing in 700,000 people to Canada
AClem retweeted
Tim Dillon: “The whole administration is completely corrupt.”
“Kushner.”
“Don Jr.”
“They’re dirty.”
“They’ve stolen a lot of money.”
“I met with a few people.”
“They’re filthy.”
“Trump doesn’t care.”
“He doesn’t care about the Senate.”
“He doesn’t care about the Congress.”
“He cares about him.”
“He’s a mafia don.”
“A lot of other people are out, but it was never about them.”
“He’s going to get to publicly defend his thieving ways and his thieving children.”
“That’s how he feels alive.”
“He’s not building a wall.”
“He’s not curing anyone of cancer.”
“He’s here to just dodge investigation.”
“That’s a great use of the last few years of his tome on Earth.”
“Constantly dodge investigation to investigation.”
@TimJDillon
AClem retweeted
BREAKING: FDA CONFIRMS GENE THERAPY DNA INTEGRATED INTO HUMAN GENOMES, INDUCING CANCER
The FDA has confirmed insertional oncogenesis involving a viral-vector gene therapy that uses the same category of DNA-delivery technology as Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca COVID shots. This means Janssen and AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine recipients are potentially at risk for future cancer. URL TheFocalPoints @NicHulscher @McCulloughFund
AClem retweeted
Hey @grok, concise no spin.
Right after Diana’s 1997 death, former MI5 officer Annie Machon reported that Diana planned a global humanitarian campaign supporting a specific country and feared a plot against her life because of it.
@grok: 1 Which country?
2 What exact method did she fear would be used against her?
Country and method only.
AClem retweeted
Hey @grok, is this letter from Lady Di—written before her “accident “ authentic? It says, "My husband is planning “an accident “ in my car involving a brake failure..."
AClem retweeted
Cool.
Will you now pull FDA approval of the Covid vaccines that never stopped the spread of Covid, while the vaccinated still get Covid, and over a million reports have been filed for vaccine injuries and death?
And will you now remove glyphosate protection?
AClem retweeted
🚨 BREAKING SUSIE WILES: "How does something known to cause cancer get liability protection?" - @joerogan
Calley Means answers, explaining how Susie Wiles was "legally" paid-off to help keep cancer-causing glyphosate in the US Food supply and exempt it from legal liability via an Executive Order and a Supreme Court brief. But it gets worse.
Means also reveals that Iowa and other Midwestern farm states have the highest rates of cancer in the "history of the world."
So not only did Susie Wiles actively alienate White men from the Republican Party and abandon them—as I showed you yesterday—she's also responsible for helping accelerate their deaths across the heartland of America, and making all of America sicker—without legal recourse!
99% of corn & 98% of soybeans are sprayed with this poison, as well as the wheat supply. Susie Wiles took a payday instead of protecting Americans from this poison.
Why is she breathing free air? But maybe more to the point: Why is an old fat woman anywhere near decisions relating to public health?
This is a frightening glimpse into how Washington really works and how unelected crooks rule & ruin our lives. The entire existence of our constitutional government is allegedly predicated on protecting us from this breathtaking abuse of our rights, not enabling it! This should be grounds for impeachment, IMO, and criminal prosecution.
What other bodies are buried in Susie's basement?
Watch this all the way to the end without blowing a gasket.
AClem retweeted
Just a reminder that Health Canada does no testing of vaccines or any other drug. They rely on the good word of the pharmaceutical industry.
Have a look at the government documents here:
covidtestimony.com/exhibits-…
Health Canada does not test vaccines for safety or efficacy.
It is important to understand that Health Canada does not do any testing of drugs, including vaccines, when determining whether to approve a drug for human use.
All testing is done by the pharmaceutical company with a financial interest in having the drug approved by Health Canada.
The Covid-19 vaccines were exempted from the regular drug approval test. Rather, a substitute approval test was used.
Under this substituted test:
1. safety did not need to be proven;
2. efficacy did not need to be proven, and
3. that the benefits of the vaccine outweighed the risks of the vaccine did not need to be proven.
If the test was met, Health Canada was legally obligated to authorize the vaccine for human use. The test Covid-19 vaccines were approved under is:
The Minister must issue an authorization in respect of a COVID-19 drug if the following requirements are met:
- the Minister has sufficient evidence to support the conclusion that the benefits associated with the drug outweigh the risks, having regard to the uncertainties
relating to the benefits and risks and the necessity of addressing the urgent public health need related to COVID-19.
The test only requires the pharmaceutical company seeking approval, to make an argument that the Minister does not need to agree with.
The wording is not:
- the Minister has sufficient evidence to conclude (which would require the Minister to be convinced), or
- the Minister has concluded (which would require the Minister to be convinced).
Rather the wording is:
- the Minister has sufficient evidence to support the conclusion (not the Minister’s conclusion).
This wording does not require the Minister (Health Canada) to conclude anything. Rather there only needs to be evidence to support a conclusion that the Minister is not making.
Read more at: covidtestimony.com/exhibits-…
@Shawnbuckleylaw @DeanAllisonMP
AClem retweeted
Hey @grok, did F-35 military jets momentarily do a flyover of the Epstein press conference in DC and drown out the survivors and their supporters who were trying to speak?
AClem retweeted
The biggest unreported story from yesterday: Carney snuck into the budget a massive immigration increase with the LARGEST NUMBER OF NEW PERMANENT RESIDENTS EVER next year.
Nearly 200,000 more than Trudeau’s highest-ever number year. When we have a shortage of jobs, homes, and health care.
Now we know why Carney snuck his immigration plan into a budget when everyone was distracted by the midterms and right before Parliament shuts for 10 days.
Unacceptable. This needs a real debate.
AClem retweeted
Can't stop thinking about this paper showing that the Pfizer shot is associated with 40% more deaths than the Moderna shot.
What if I came to you and said: Coke is 40% more deadly than Pepsi. What would you next question be? You would surely be alarmed that carbonated colas are significantly deadly at all. If so, by how much overall? What if the government forced colas on people anyway?
I guess we do not know the answer – still no real comparison on this scale of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated to my knowledge – but it still raises the question why these shots are on the market at all, much less forced on people including children.
sciencedirect.com/science/ar…
AClem retweeted
Trump is a political genius. He accomplished the impossible, defeating BOTH duopoly parties. Then, this political genius, for no obvious reason, torched his presidency and legacy over a war the public didn’t want. That’s surprising. Why on Earth would he do that?
Maybe the world looked very different from inside the Truman Show bubble constructed around him. After rapid success in Venezuela and “the 12 Day War” he may have been lead to believe he had the power to fix Iran, cheaply and quickly, and walk away a hero. That would explain it. But it would have required those opposed to the plan, people who knew better and were willing to say so, to be removed from his inner circle.
Tucker could be shoved aside, but Charlie was a problem. Shoving Charlie out would have turned TPUSA into a powerful adversary. Bad move. But fate took care of that when Tyler Robinson, acting alone, killed Charlie for unrelated reasons. And here we are, Trump’s insurgency dead at midterms with the race-bating Marxists headed back to power.
This clip with @TuckerCarlson is from March. It’s hard for me not to look at the midterm results with this hypothesis in mind.