Award-winning, award-nominated, frequently award-adjacent comics person. Writer of IN YOUR SKIN, first issue out April 22, 2026.

Pune, India
Joined March 2008
My website/blog: adityab.net/ Instagram: instagram.com/adityabidikar Newsletter: buttondown.email/adityab Currently not looking for comics lettering work. If you need to get in touch directly, email is aditya(at)adityab(dot)net.
3
14
19,760
Aditya Bidikar retweeted
lmao this entire Mieville interview is great
3
21
2
344
14,137
Aditya Bidikar retweeted
Anne Carson on Hesitation in The Paris Review
6
188
12
1,336
53,775
NEVER deleting this app, never leaving this site
11
72
5
816
16,814
I mean, this is what all live-streaming is. And most podcasts. They’re your real-life imaginary friends.
Might be the meanest thing anyone has said about the show thus far
8
942
My cover for ZATANNA #10, out in January!!! This one was a lot of fun!!!! ☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️
18
334
5
2,423
16,282
Again recalling this conversation @davidgraeber recounted having with ‘an economist from one of the Bretton Woods institutions’
The thing about Google clearing a forest in Finland without permits is that they decided that whatever fine they might face is worth it. It doesn’t cost them as much as not getting the land cleared. Because like ALL things, if the punishment is a fine, it isn’t really illegal for rich people.
2
312
5
1,442
43,260
Aditya Bidikar retweeted
1
107
981
6,068
Aditya Bidikar retweeted
I've always wondered about the white subway tile that's used so extensively in Jarman's set design; I interviewed Mark Kermode about the 'Devils' re-release, and this is what he told me:
Derek Jarmen’s sets are the biggest winner of the new restoration. I’ve seen this movie before a couple of times, but seeing this new transfer on the big screen I almost said “Oh my god” out loud a couple of times when it cut to an establishing shot of the sets.
7
145
2
1,360
28,503
Aditya Bidikar retweeted
“holmes and fielder fucked” “seyfried and fielder fucked” but we havent even considered a new and exciting possibility
30
1,147
26
34,573
791,978
If you are struggling with anxiety, listen to this piece. Within about 30 seconds, your breathing will begin to change. It is the silence between the notes that calms the body.
148
1,942
125
10,584
491,246
Aditya Bidikar retweeted
YOU CAN SEE EVERYTHING?
16
1,446
9
16,557
97,368
Aditya Bidikar retweeted
👇👇👇 Good time to post this again ;)
DEICIDIUM FOC this weekend! A little while back, I said that I believe a reader who samples your work will go on to support it w orders in the long run. I genuinely think that. So look The book's gorgeous. 24 pages free to read through IGN below. I hope you'll order! <3
4
11
210
3,524
Aditya Bidikar retweeted
Happy 85th, Diana
10
1,086
2
8,153
40,387
Like Nolan said in that video, just because you recognise a trope doesn’t mean the trope doesn’t have a function. All of these movies (and F for Fake, for that matter) are doing different things using this structure.
Remember when Sarah Polley made Stories We Tell, supposedly about a paternity question in her family history, but it actually turned out to be a meta-documentary about truth, narrative, and subjectivity? Or when Banksy made Exit Through the Gift Shop, which at first seemed to be about street artist Thierry Guetta but in the end turned out to be a meta-documentary about truth, art, and subjectivity? Remember when Rodney Ascher made Room 237, nominally about hidden meanings in The Shining, but really about truth, narrative, and subjectivity? Would you believe me if I told you that You Can See Everything is only superficially about Elizabeth Holmes, that actually it's a meta-documentary about truth, narrative, and subjectivity? Let’s set aside the fact that Amanda Seyfried shows up to atone for her Hulu biopic and that her plotline is copied from The Act of Killing, which itself stole its main gimmick from some Cambodian guy’s movie about the Khmer Rouge. Here we have another postmodern prestige doc which either can't find something to say about its subject or thinks having a subject is gauche, so it throws up its hands and settles for a thematic focus on "unknowability" instead—not out of necessity, not because it’s about the Zodiac Killer and they can’t find him, but just because they think that kind of abstraction is high-minded. Every cliche is here: The filmmaker deliberately entangled with his subject, the film happily exposing its own artifice (because only dolts who believe in “objectivity” would try to hide that), the reflexive, flamboyantly meta structure which I guess is supposed to feel truth-coded, or remind you of truth and untruth in some way. Letterboxd users, who learned in college that truth is hopelessly mired in perspective, certainly appreciate these decisions and feel the movie is a “hall of mirrors,” but I found it boring and legible. I’ve already seen Capturing the Friedmans, Tabloid, F for Fake, Letter From Siberia, etc. I already know about “subjectivity.” I actually discovered it when I was a child and I began to experience the world. So yes, this is another The Ambiguity Is The Point movie. That’s why it's titled You Can See Everything—because you can’t. And that’s why some of the posters show Elizabeth Holmes but kind of blurry, because it’s about truth, which is also blurry. And if you think that’s mind-blowing then you will probably like the movie. Personally, I think the filmmakers are confusing an empirical problem with an epistemic one, so actually their theming doesn't line up, because a lot of their questions are in fact quite "knowable," but whatever
5
12
313
12,037
Aditya Bidikar retweeted
We’re opening a research preview of Claude Duet, a new app where Claude works as a proactive agent. It comes to you with what needs your attention, completes tasks you ask of it, keeps working when you step away, and checks with you before it acts on your behalf.
33
138
13
2,806
159,117
Aditya Bidikar retweeted
Absolute Wonder Woman sketch in Clip on my iPad. Trying to do more iPad sketching lately. This is a WIP for a Kickstarter commission.
6
94
1
1,634
10,207
I've only just discovered the story of Jack Barth, the original creator of Yesterday, and Christ alive, it's one of the most grotesquely ironic stories I've ever encountered in the film industry. For those unfamiliar with it, Barth was a struggling screenwriter who conceived an ingenious premise: a musician wakes up in a world where The Beatles never existed, realises he's the only person who remembers their songs, and starts passing them off as his own. Barth wrote the screenplay, originally titled Cover Version. After decades of trying to break into the film industry, he finally sold it. Enter Richard Curtis. Curtis rewrote the screenplay, transforming Barth's rather melancholy examination of artistic failure into a crowd-pleasing romantic comedy. Curtis received sole screenplay credit, while Barth was left sharing a story by credit with the considerably more famous writer. Now, Barth agreed to this arrangement. That's important. But what happened afterwards is what makes the whole business so bloody unpleasant. Curtis subsequently described receiving little more than a one-sentence premise, despite Barth's original screenplay containing several remarkably specific elements that survived into the finished film, including the elderly John Lennon and the Harry Potter gag. Barth has argued that his contribution was systematically minimised, leaving him struggling to convince people that he created the story in the first place. And here's where the irony becomes so vicious that Kafka himself would probably have rejected it for being too fucking obvious. In Barth's original version, the protagonist DOESN'T become enormously successful. He possesses the greatest collection of songs in popular music history and STILL struggles to make it. It's a story about the cruel indifference of artistic success. About how creative talent and commercial recognition are frequently separated by circumstances beyond an artist's control. Then Barth watches his own creation become an international hit, with another writer receiving the lion's share of the acclaim. And now, six years after Barth publicly complained about the whole miserable business, Yesterday is becoming a West End musical. Judging by his reaction today, the news appears to have come as something of a surprise to him. Fucking hell. I appreciate that contracts exist. I appreciate that Curtis substantially rewrote the film. I even appreciate that Barth received payment and agreed to the credits. But there's something profoundly depressing about an industry that can take a struggling writer's original screenplay, turn it into a multimillion-pound success, and leave that writer feeling practically invisible. And now the machinery is apparently gearing up to do it all over again, this time with jazz hands. As for Richard Curtis, a gigantic FUCK YOU.
20
120
6
1,058
74,333
Aditya Bidikar retweeted
GREEN LANTERN: DOOMED COSMOS. An Elseworlds coming from me and @KyleHotz in January. After the Order of St Dumas conquered Earth and took their crusade to the stars, only the Green Lantern Corps stand between them and universal domination... comic-watch.com/news/green-l…
39
217
103
1,357
85,788