Arie Hordijk retweeted
In November 2025, Sky News Arabia asked me for an interview. I rarely speak to Arabic-language media, but the producers kept insisting, telling me they admired my courage. So I made an exception.
Obviously, the interviewer challenged my support for Israel. Her main complaint was that I never "criticize Israel." I asked her to be specific. She said Israel is behind all of our problems in the region.
I told her that political Islam is behind our problems. Then I asked her: what would you do if you were in a park and heard someone scream "Allahu akbar"? I answered for her: "You'd run. Like I would." Islamists thrive where there is widespread ignorance, ignorance fed by poverty, and poverty caused by bad governance and corruption. That is the fertile ground they recruit from. Israel did not create it.
When she ran out of arguments, she reached for the classic: Ben Gvir. Even when Ben Gvir "desecrates" Al-Aqsa, she said, I don't criticize Israel.
I told her that as far as I'm concerned, no Jew desecrates Al-Aqsa. The Temple Mount is the holiest site in Judaism. Jerusalem isn't named even once in the Quran. And I have gone up with Jews myself, so I've seen with my own eyes how they "storm" Al-Aqsa. What circulates in Arab media is lies. Jews enter through a separate gate. Israeli police have stopped them from bringing prayer books so as not to offend Muslims. They don't go into the mosque (why would they?). They pray at the site, and because that offends Muslims, it gets called "desecration." I am offended on behalf of the Jews.
Many Jews in Israel also criticize Jews who pray on the Temple Mount. They give many reasons, but I've come to see that underneath it all, most of them are afraid. They don't want Jews praying there because they fear provoking Muslims. Even those who know the desecration claims are absurd would rather appease than confront.
I grew up in the Arab world, and I know where appeasement leads: the bully grows bolder, and the bullied keep giving more away. I refuse to play that game. That is why more and more Israelis now call me "Ben Gvir." Sometimes it hides contempt. Mostly it hides fear.
Needless to say, they never aired the interview.
Arie Hordijk retweeted
Shaimaa Rabah is a newly elected councilwoman in Deir al-Balah, central Gaza Strip, and a member of Fatah, who was part of a limited set of local municipal elections inside Gaza back in April. After Al Jazeera aired a documentary featuring exclusive footage from Hamas’s al-Qassam Brigades about the life of slain military leader Mohammed al-Deif, Shaimaa Rabah shared a Facebook post condemning what she viewed as the glorification of Hamas, which she blamed for Gaza’s devastation. She described the program as “a rich meal of animal feed for the Muslim Brotherhood” and criticized Al Jazeera’s efforts to portray Hamas as heroic despite the destruction and suffering that followed its rule and the 10/7 terror attack.
In response, Hamas and its supporters pressured members of Shaimaa Rabah’s clan with a wave of threats and harassment to compel her to delete the post and issue a public apology, which she did. Even that has not satisfied her critics, who are now demanding her resignation from the Deir al-Balah municipal council, arguing that her status as the council’s first elected woman does not entitle her to disparage the memory of those they regard as “martyrs.”
This episode is a reminder to those who believe elections can produce meaningful political change while Hamas retains effective control over Gaza. Democracy is not the foundation of a free society but the product of one. It depends on the prior existence of independent civil institutions, a free press, freedom of expression, and mechanisms for holding power accountable.
I have shared this concern with Dahlan-affiliated Fatah reformists, EU officials, Arab ministers, and others who advocate elections as a solution to the Palestinian Authority’s legitimacy crisis and the search for an alternative to Hamas. In today’s Gaza, any non-Hamas voice can be rapidly silenced, making meaningful reform, let alone a challenge to the entrenched “resistance” narrative, nearly impossible.
Before any credible democratic process can take place, Hamas’s system of control must be dismantled. Until then, the most realistic path forward is a transitional administration focused on restoring basic services and rebuilding a truly free civil society while removing the coercive structures Hamas and its patrons have spent decades creating.
Deze Spaanse Palestijnse slaat de spijker op de kop. Heel scherp en helemaal waar.
Hola, soy palestino. 🇵🇸
Y como la honestidad es poco común en mi política, permítanme confesar algunas cosas.
1947. La ONU me ofreció un estado. Junto a Israel. Fronteras, independencia, reconocimiento. Dije que no. Mis líderes prometieron que la guerra "arrojaría a los judíos al mar". En cambio, lo perdí todo y lo llamaron catástrofe. No porque no me ofrecieran un estado, sino porque lo rechacé.
1948–2025. Los estados árabes podrían haberme integrado, dado derechos, pasaportes, dignidad. En cambio, me encerraron en campos de refugiados durante generaciones, para que siguiera siendo un arma contra Israel. Construyeron palacios para ellos y cárceles para mí. Me usaron como propaganda, no como personas.
1967. Tras otra guerra perdida, podría haber construido un estado en Cisjordania y Gaza. En cambio, insistí en "ni paz, ni reconocimiento, ni negociaciones". Tres noes. Cincuenta años después, sigo sin Estado. Resulta que el rechazo no paga el alquiler.
Oslo, década de 1990. Israel dijo: «Intentémoslo». Me dio autonomía. Armas para la policía. Miles de millones en ayuda. ¿Qué hicieron mis líderes? Robaron el dinero, armaron milicias y lanzaron una intifada. Atentados suicidas en lugar de escuelas. Cohetes en lugar de fábricas.
Gaza, 2005. Israel se fue por completo. Sin colonos, sin soldados. Tuve la oportunidad de convertir Gaza en un Singapur mediterráneo. Voté por Hamás. La convirtieron en Mogadiscio junto al mar. ¿Miles de millones en ayuda? Túneles, cohetes y palacios para sus líderes, mientras mi gente come comida enlatada en la oscuridad.
¿Democracia? No he tenido elecciones en casi 20 años. Hamás mata a los disidentes en Gaza. Fatah los encarcela en Cisjordania. Mis líderes cancelan elecciones porque están demasiado ocupados luchando por el poder.
Religión. En lugar de construir un futuro, pongo a clérigos en televisión enseñando a los niños a odiar a los judíos. Glorifico a los "mártires" que hacen estallar autobuses. Crío a mis hijos con canciones de sangre y fuego en lugar de libros y ciencia. Cambio la esperanza por la guerra santa.
Mundo árabe. Los regímenes árabes me llaman "hermano". Pero pregúntenles cuántos palestinos pueden vivir libremente en Líbano, Siria, Egipto o Kuwait. Me excluyen, pero celebran mi muerte, porque mi muerte es su excusa.
Absurdo. Sigo diciendo que quiero "construir un estado". E irónicamente, justo al lado está Israel: el vecino que construyó una democracia próspera, una potencia tecnológica, granjas en el desierto, ciudades de polvo. Sin petróleo, sin riqueza infinita, solo coraje. Podría haber aprendido, copiado, colaborado. En cambio, elegí la envidia y la rabia.
Obsesión antijudía. Podría haber aceptado a los judíos como vecinos. Podría haber dicho: "Dos naciones, dos estados". En cambio, repito: "Del río al mar". En lugar de exhibir el honor, la hospitalidad y la rica cultura árabe, mostré solo la cultura de la espada: la ira, el extremismo y la sangre. En lugar de gritar salaam (paz) a los israelíes, grité muerte a los judíos. Y luego finjo sorprenderme cuando los israelíes no confían en mí, cuando están enojados, decepcionados y convencidos de que no quiero coexistencia en absoluto.
Responsabilidad. Culpo a Israel de todo. Siempre. ¿Mis líderes roban miles de millones? Culpa de Israel. ¿Hamás dispara cohetes desde hospitales? Culpa de Israel. ¿Glorifico la muerte más que la vida? Culpa de Israel. La responsabilidad no es mi fuerte.
Soy palestino.
Podría haber construido una nación, muchas veces. Elegí el rechazo, la corrupción y la guerra sin fin. Podría haber vivido en paz con Israel, pero elegí vivir a la sombra de su destrucción.
Así que sí, soy una víctima. Pero con demasiada frecuencia, soy víctima de mis propios líderes, de mis propias decisiones y de mi propia negativa a abandonar el odio.
Y esa, querido lector, es la tragedia que nadie quiere admitir.
Arie Hordijk retweeted
Is there anyone who can help me launch a GoFundMe campaign to escape Gaza?
I am a journalist trapped in a small tent, living in fear and uncertainty, with no safe way out. I have lost so much to this war, and I am desperately trying to find a way to leave Gaza and have a chance at a normal life again.
I cannot do this alone. If you can help me create a campaign or connect me with someone who can, you could make the difference between remaining trapped and finally having a chance to live in safety. Please help me find a way out.
This man has been pleading to be evacuated from Gaza for months. His life is in danger. Is there no one in the whole world with the power to help him?
I fear that my life is in grave danger in Gaza in the days ahead. I cannot reveal the details publicly, but I am genuinely afraid of what may happen to me.
I am asking the international community, journalists, human rights organizations, and anyone with the power to help: Please help me evacuate Gaza before it is too late.
I do not want to become another name on a list of the dead. I want the chance to survive, to live in safety, and to continue my life beyond this war. Please do not wait until something happens to me to take my situation seriously.
There are certainly reasons to become islamophobic.
#ICYMI: British Islamic Content Creator Muhammad Saifullah: If I Were the PM, I Would Execute Homosexuals, Stone Adulterers & Torture Apostates to Death; Osama Bin Laden Represented Islam and Defended His Country; Israelis Are Worse Than Cockroaches, Jews Are Evil Satanic People
Arie Hordijk retweeted
After the Green Party's "Zionism is Racism" vote, the Leader of Haringey Council, which is controlled by the Greens, wrote to various Synagogues in the borough to "reassure" them.
I want to show you Highgate Synagogue's reply. I believe it is worth reading in its entirety.
Synagogue rejects Green council leader’s attempt to ‘reassure’ them after “Zionism is Racism” vote
jewishnews.co.uk/synagogue-r…
Arie Hordijk retweeted
As a Muslim Arab, I am disgusted and heartbroken by what I saw across Western cities on October 7, 2026: people celebrating the October 7, 2023 massacre. Glorifying the murder, rape, and kidnapping of civilians is morally bankrupt, inhumane, and a disgrace to humanity. This wasn’t an ISIS or Al-Qaeda camp. This was in Western cities: people openly celebrating a massacre carried out by the filthy Muslim Brotherhood terrorists of Hamas against Jewish children, women, and civilians from all around the world in Israel. Utterly shameful.
How did we reach a point where this needs to be explained? An eight-month-old baby was kidnapped. Women were raped. Children were murdered. Families were slaughtered. Human beings were dragged from their homes.
No cause justifies this.
No country justifies this.
No grievance justifies this.
Nothing justifies raping a woman. Nothing justifies kidnapping a baby. Nothing justifies murdering innocent people.
And to see people in Western cities celebrating, glorifying, excusing, romanticising, or sanitising this horror in the name of “democracy” and “freedom of speech” is beyond disgusting.
It is morally bankrupt. Shameful. Depraved. Inhumane. Heartless. Indefensible.
What breaks my heart most is that we are even having this conversation.
When did rape require a political explanation?
When did kidnapping babies become something to celebrate?
When did massacring Jews become something people could cheer for in the streets and still pretend they were standing for humanity?
There is nothing progressive about celebrating barbarity. There is nothing courageous about glorifying terrorism. There is nothing democratic about cheering a massacre.
This is not humanity. This is a moral disgrace.
And the fact that anyone can celebrate such suffering should make every decent human being, Muslim, Christian, Jewish, or otherwise, feel both heartbroken and furious.
I said it before: I wish all pro Palestine activists would listen to this insider/expert and take him seriously. You really don't help the Palestinian people by supporting Hamas. Really, you don't!
Is Hamas Becoming a Global Identity Vehicle? Support for Hamas has morphed into a transnational phenomenon that is not just about being “pro-Palestine.” Instead, Hamas and what it represents have become a form of rebellious identity expression and a vessel for a sprawling mix of grievances: ideological, economic, cultural, and psychological. Its jihadist violence is being repackaged as a catch‑all outlet for anti‑Western, anti‑capitalist, anti‑white, and antisemitic politics. Whether it is leftism or Islamism, the “resistance” narrative that Hamas ostensibly represents has become quite a normalized interpretation of how to think about October 7 and the past two decades in Gaza, while erasing Palestinian agency, responsibility, and accountability. The inability to truly understand the complexities and actual details of the Israel and Palestine conflict is why so many support Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, and the Iranian regime, all of whom are somehow seen as correcting or challenging white-centric dominance and colonialism.
The third anniversary of October 7 exposed the scale of this shift. Large crowds in American and European cities used the worst day for Jews since the Holocaust and the most disastrous day in Palestinian history to flaunt their support for violent Islamist extremism. To understand the extent to which the “pro-Palestine” industrial complex has mutated and created out-of-control monsters, consider how incredibly damaging and self-sabotaging the pro-Hamas rallies and actions were. They deliberately chose to brand the Palestinian cause as inseparable from the bloodshed, hostage‑taking, and fascistic jihad of 10/7. These Western pro‑Hamas demonstrators are erasing any distinction between Palestinians and a terror organization that has devastated Palestinian society far more than it ever harmed Israelis. Their behavior naturally triggers an instinctive backlash: a hardening of attitudes, a dismissal of Palestinian suffering, and a collapse of sympathy for legitimate Palestinian grievances.
Compounding the problem is the statistically confirmed fact that large segments of the Arab, Muslim, and Palestinian diaspora communities have been unable or unwilling to counter this trend. Some have joined it outright, embracing the “resistance” narrative or hiding behind slogans like “this didn’t begin on October 7” to avoid confrontation with the anti‑Zionist machinery that dominates the “pro‑Palestine” space and to not be called “Zionists” or “traitors” by other members of the community.
With diaspora communities paralyzed, universities compromised, and basic civic norms eroded, national‑level responses are now essential. Support for Hamas remains strong three years after October 7 and is growing more entrenched. Think ahead five or ten years: persistent economic strain, deeper ideological radicalization, and expanding networks of Islamist and far‑left extremism. What happens when those marching for Hamas begin entering governments, militaries, financial institutions, and other levers of power? What happens when already‑radicalized youth, with no off‑ramps, continue believing the West, Jews, and Zionists are their mortal enemies? Even if a tiny fraction – less than one‑tenth of one percent – turn to violence, the resulting instability could eclipse that of ISIS and al-Qaeda combined.
A coordinated national strategy is overdue – not to suppress legitimate debate on Israel and Palestine, but to draw firm boundaries and stop tolerating the intolerable.
This video shows just a small sample of pro-Hamas rallies in major US and European cities two days ago, on October 7.
Hear! Hear!
🔥 RARE MOMENT OF TRUTH AT UNITED NATIONS: As world leaders used the UN podium to condemn Israel, we invited courageous Yemeni journalist @JustLuai to tell the truth: “Our problem in the Middle East is neither Israel nor the Jews. It is the Islamist dictatorships.”
Dear pro-Palestine activists, please listen to this Palestinian guy and take his words seriously.
Hamas’s October 7 attack against Israel began with more than 4,000 rockets fired from across the Gaza Strip: residential blocks, neighborhoods, farms, refugee camps, near schools, markets, and medical facilities – every layer of civilian life turned into a launch grid. Gazans had no say in any of it. Launchers were hidden underground or by brushes, trees, or shrubs, without consent; only Hamas operatives knew the locations to maintain maximum operational security. Some rocket tubes and racks were reused while others were disposable.
In the ensuing hours, days, and months, Israel then struck the launching points which were detectable using Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities, with predictable and often lethal consequences for nearby civilians. Worse, Hamas and PIJ rockets malfunctioned at staggering rates: roughly 15 to 20% fell inside Gaza, killing Palestinians in incidents that were almost never acknowledged as cases of “friendly fire.” People will debate Israel’s response endlessly, and there is a real and substantive conversation to be had – I have been a proponent of this debate myself. But International Humanitarian Law (IHL) is unambiguous: civilian sites lose protection once used for military purposes. The below video captures one of the many initial rocket salvos on 10/7 launched from a residential neighborhood and the recording Gazans stating that "we're gonna eat sh*t after this."
So I ask again for the millionth time: when will anyone in the self‑described “pro‑Palestine” space confront Hamas for compromising the safety of Gazans and essentially turning them into defenseless, unwilling, and unconsenting targets/participants in its war of choice that it started against Israel on October 7? Who gave Hamas that right to sacrifice tens of thousands of Palestinian Muslim and Christian lives? How dare the pro-Hamas activists in the Western world who celebrate the "resistance" turn a blind eye to this most horrific and scandalous fact while pretending to be “pro-Palestine”? Where are the Arab, Palestinian, and Muslim-American groups, organizations, community spaces, and those who proclaim to care about Gazans from this crime against the Palestinian people?
Accountability will come for Hamas’s crimes and for those who chose silence — in this life and in the next.
وَقِفُوهُمْ ۖ إِنَّهُم مَّسْئُولُونَ
"And stop them, for they must be questioned." As-Saffat (37:24)
Arie Hordijk retweeted
Three years after the catastrophic day Hamas unleashed on Israelis and on the Palestinian people in Gaza, the majority of the “pro-Palestine” industrial complex still refuses to utter a single word of condemnation or assign any responsibility to the Islamist terror group that destroyed the Gaza Strip and triggered the most calamitous chapter in modern Palestinian history.
Today alone, I have seen dozens of posters and announcements for rallies, protests, and a so-called “week of rage.” Endless groups across the Western world, including the United States, whether community-based, campus-based, nonprofit, or cultural, are celebrating and commemorating “three years of resistance and genocide.” In almost comical language, many declare October 7 as the beginning of genocide in Gaza while making no mention of the bloodshed, murder, beheadings, torture, mutilation, burning people alive, executions, sexual assault, and hostage taking that initiated the disaster which befell the Palestinian people.
It is as if Israeli and Jewish lives are invisible. As if civilians were not slaughtered in their homes while they slept. As if partygoers were not massacred. As if the attack was not entirely unprovoked while a ceasefire was in place between Israel and Hamas. It is a complete erasure of cause and effect and a refusal to grasp that choices and actions produce consequences.
I have yet to see a mainstream Arab, Palestinian, or Muslim American organization, let alone prominent “pro-Palestine” academics, journalists, community groups, or notable individuals, issue a statement acknowledging Hamas’s responsibility and culpability for the devastation inflicted on Gaza. Even within the imbalance of power and the overwhelming suffering caused by Israeli decisions, there is still ample space to acknowledge the humanity of Israeli victims and the injustice of what happened to them. More importantly, there is immense space to speak honestly about the horrendous damage caused to Palestinians by the Jihadi fascism of Hamas, which has devastated Gazans over the two decades of its rule.
Three years later, Israelis, Jews, and Zionists are commemorating the anniversary while engaging in introspection, critique, and calls for accountability for leaders, security services, and other political players. In contrast, instead of using the grim third anniversary of October 7 to learn and evolve, significant elements of the “pro-Palestine” industrial complex remain one of the most embarrassing and backward hate-driven movements in contemporary political activism.
This is not a real pro-Palestine movement. It is a virulent anti-Israel bloc built on ignorance, mob mentality, open sympathy for terrorism, and sabotage of the Palestinian people’s legitimate pursuit of freedom and prosperity. Its regressive and poisonous rhetoric will not evolve into anything constructive. It should be treated with contempt, stripped of relevance, and isolated until it collapses and makes room for a serious effort that actually cares about Palestinians rather than the fantasies of wannabe revolutionaries.
Dat was inderdaad een hoopvol verhaal. Ik heb het boek meteen besteld.
Replying to @HenriBontenbal
In Trouw las ik het hoopvolle verhaal van Maoz Inon en Aziz Abu Sarah. De Israëliër Maoz Inon verloor zijn ouders op 7 oktober. De Palestijn Aziz Abu Sarah verloor zijn broer door marteling in een Israëlische gevangenis. (6/8)
Arie Hordijk retweeted
June 21, 2004: UN Secretary General Kofi Annan condemns 1975 resolution equating Zionism with racism. “Let us acknowledge that the UN's record on antisemitism has at times fallen short of our ideals... I am glad that it has since been rescinded.”
Today: @TheGreenParty adopts it.
Arie Hordijk retweeted
I’m going through a severe depression, especially as October 7 approaches—the worst day of my life.
I am exhausted from everything Gaza has put me through. I honestly don’t know how much longer I can endure these conditions.
Is there no country, organization, or person willing to help evacuate me from this hell?
I swear to you, I am going through extremely difficult circumstances. I desperately need help getting out of Gaza.
😮🫢
This is important 🚨 Woman who left Islam says she goes to coffee shops in New York City and exposes they are giving out free Qurans to Americans to convert them to Islam
She has the Quran and shows it’s a heavily edited version that’s been “made for Western audiences” that literally lies about Islam and makes it much more appealing
“The problem with this Quran is that it is meant to target a Western audience. And when you read through this Quran, it is heavily sanitized, and it has notes and commentaries that interpret verses, and it is like heavily, heavily sanitized.
So when you're reading a problematic verse, it will interpret it the way it is not supposed to be interpreted, but it is targeting specifically a Western audience.
So you as an American, when you pick up this copy and when you start reading it and when you start reading the notes, you will be shocked. You will be like, oh, I was wrong about Islam. This is actually a great religion. I didn't know that's what it meant. I was lied to”
But she explains how it’s written is all a lie and written as propaganda for Americans to convert to Islam
“When you are an average American who doesn't know anything about Islam or has never traveled to the Middle East, you are a target. If you pick up this book, if you go on ChatGPT, if you go even on TikTok and search these things, Islam is going to be painted in a completely different picture, in a completely different way. That's why there's so many people white people who are converting to Islam because they're not getting the full truth”
The differences are WILD. In this version of the Quran being given out in America they removed the part that lets men discipline women with physical force. It removed the part where it tells Muslims to kill nonbelievers. The jizya which is the nonbeliever tax in Islam, it’s framed as optional, which is a lie. The examples go on and on and I’ll include them at the end
They are mass indoctrinated Americans into Islam by giving them fake Quran books
Arie Hordijk retweeted
Replying to @NYCMayor
Dear Mr. Mamdani,
As a fellow Muslim who has studied these subjects deeply, I believe antisemitism will be minimized when we stop treating Israel as something entirely separable from the history, identity, and heritage of the Jewish people.
My dear brother in Islam, the prophets, kings, and heroes of the Children of Israel mentioned in the Quran belonged to the people of Israel. Jesus said of Nathanael: “Here truly is an Israeli in whom there is no deceit.”
Modern-day Israel exists in a land with a profound historical connection to the ancient kingdoms of Israel and Judah.
In my view, an educated Muslim should have no problem acknowledging Israel’s existence or recognizing the Jewish people’s ancient connection and sovereignty to that land.
We can recognize Palestinian suffering and aspirations, without denying Jewish history or the Jewish connection to the Land of Israel.
I believe trying to completely separate Israel from the question of antisemitism is part of the problem, not the solution.
May the God of Israel, whom King David (a prophet and king revered in Islam) praised, guide all of us toward truth, understanding, and peace.
Yours,
Loay
Arie Hordijk retweeted
Unlike @AbdulElSayed, I’m an Arab who is actually from Israel. My family lived through the establishment of the state of Israel and what he calls the “Nakba.” The Holocaust was nothing like the events of the “Nakba” where my grandfather was told to flee by Arab leaders (not Jews) so the Arabs could “defeat the Jews.” He refused, and all the Arab residents who stayed were given citizenship. Those who fled, a large number by choice, were not permitted to return, as often happens in war. That is a catastrophe, a “nakba” of their own making. But there was no choice in the Holocaust, there was no citizenship for those who stayed. You are intentionally comparing a war and a genocide. They are not the same.
Your vile attempt to co-opt the largest massacre of the Jewish people in history, the systematic murder of six million people simply because they were Jews, for your own dystopian pro-terror Muslim Brotherhood agenda is despicable. I see through you Abdul. You may be able to fool Western Americans with your garbage, but we know who you really are.
یا کذاب ابن کذاب
Arie Hordijk retweeted
Everyone posts the same Bill Clinton clip from Camp David in 2000, and I understand why. It is a clean story and it is easy to share. But then the replies start. “You cannot trust Clinton”. “He is American. He is pro-Israel”. “That is not the full picture”.
Well then here is Hosni Mubarak, the former president of Egypt, sitting in Cairo and talking about something most people on here have never even heard of. The Mena House conference in 1977. Years before Clinton, and years before the 2000 summit everyone argues about.
He says they held a conference there and the Palestinians refused to participate. It wasn’t some complicated diplomatic disagreement. They simply would not even come. He says that every time there was an opportunity they wasted it, and that if they had taken the document that was already on the table and actually negotiated over it, the region would not be in the disaster it is in now.
That document, in his account, included the withdrawal of Israeli forces from the West Bank and Gaza. The argument was not even whether Israel would leave. The argument was who would control security during the transitional period. Jordanian and Palestinian forces? Israeli and Palestinian forces? Other Arab forces? He says the Israelis did not mind negotiating those points.
Egypt signed a peace agreement and was insulted for it.
Then he says the line that should bother people more than any American speech. For fifty years they repeatedly said NO.
They said NO After 1948. They said NO After 1967.
He says they will keep saying no until there is nothing left to bargain over.
This is not an Israeli spokesman and it is not the White House. This is an Egyptian president telling you the walkout did not begin in 2000. It was already a habit long before that.

































