Quick thoughts, because there’s a lot of copium out there, both from people who use AI and from people who don’t. An AI learns from its training data. Everything it produces comes from patterns it found there. Ask an AI for a random number between 0 and 10 (try it): there’s a very high chance it says 7. Humans do exactly the same when they want to sound random, so the bias is already in the data. Then the fine tuning that makes models helpful and pleasant pushes them even harder toward the most expected answer. That’s also why AI art from a basic prompt so often looks the same. Part of it is a product choice: models are tuned to please as many people as possible. Work on the prompt and you get something different... but the same patterns keep showing up. To be fair, AI can produce genuinely new things. AlphaGo’s move 37 surprised every Go master, and AI has found faster algorithms than the ones humans wrote. But that works where there’s a clear score to optimize and millions of attempts to test. In art, stories or music, there’s no “right answer” to aim for, and that’s exactly where AI struggles to step outside what it has already seen. And let’s be honest, humans recombine existing ideas too. The difference is that we choose what to break, with intent, taste and lived experience. Right now, creative jobs are actually among the first to be hit: illustration, background music, voice work. So no, simply being “a creative” won’t protect anyone. What will stay hard to replace, unless there’s a real breakthrough in how AI works (Hello @ylecun 🇫🇷🥖, and dont hesitate to correct me if i say something wrong), is the ability to bring a genuinely fresh vision. The writers, artists and musicians who do that will probably be the ones who stand out. Of course, making predictions about something that evolves this fast is risky. But for now, if you follow the trends, that’s where we’re heading (for better and for worse).

(sadly, claude was better than me on this one... and it's scary because yeah... i'm pretty good with network and code).

Answer : it's not on EVERY network system, but most of moderne game netcode work like that. You run your server at 30hz. A client run at 240hz. You send your data at 30hz. But client run many event, so for example, you do many thing between two net update, so you combine them in one, but still need to send the order, what happen, etc etc... the server receive them, combined, then execute them. It's necessary to have a good simulation on FPS, so someone at 240hz cost for example on average 4x someone at 30hz. It's totally normal, excepted, and something you want to simulate properly and at finest level your player on your server. On CS2 i believe this is not true anymore and cost are the same no matter who because they subtick on client, but that another story.