ECDO Theory is testing the boast of modern science: revealing it (just as Covid did) to be principally a self-congratulatory club activity and not a line of inquiry and discovery. ECDO is not pseudoscience. It is disciplined along well-established practices inside the scientific method - which I studied for 15 years before raising its first postulates: ECDO Theory offers a unified explanation for a wide range of observations about Earth's history, ancient monuments, geography, and climate, supported by empirical models, observed patterns, and reported successful predictions. Its scientific merit rests upon whether these findings can be independently verified and reproduced, not upon what conventional geophysics has yet to explain. Important uncertainties remain concerning the density of deep-Earth structures, the physical properties of Earth's core/constituents, and the forces that may act between the core and mantle. These uncertainties do not prove ECDO correct, but they do challenge theoretical objections that claim the mechanism is impossible - without first resolving those unknowns. ECDO does not, by virtue of being unconventional or unproven, meet the definition of pseudoscience. It advances testable propositions, offers empirical evidence for examination, and remains open to falsification. Its validity must ultimately be determined through evidence, independent testing, and sound epistemic analysis - not through appeals to scientific consensus, straw man pummeling, the jargon of fake skepticism, or the limitations of existing knowledge.