Econ x AI @ Google. Book on nuclear fusion, 'The Star Builders', out now with S&S/W&N. Views my own.

Joined June 2012
🌟The Star Builders (#TheStarBuilders) is out now!🌟 It tells the extraordinary story of #nuclearfusion ⚛️ Find it in the: ⭐️ UK & Commonwealth, from @wnbooks: weidenfeldandnicolson.co.uk/… ⭐️ US & rest of world, from @ScribnerBooks: simonandschuster.com/books/T… Look out for the covers:
12
24
6
91
Scientific fields where claims are more empirically testable have more equal citation distribution
11
33
10
203
38,263
Arthur Turrell retweeted
We are offering 10,000 scientists the highest usage tier in Google Antigravity free of charge for 6 months. Please apply! forms.gle/WvmBbPvRbpKG1BPn9
Gemini 4 Argon is now globally available. Built to solve your hardest problems from start to finish, the model brings frontier capabilities across coding, enterprise workflows, and cyber defense.
134
333
56
3,027
300,149
Arthur Turrell retweeted
New essay for the @GoogleDeepMind Institute with James Manyika on AI x Science, "Bending the Curve of Discovery". While accelerating existing scientific practices is certainly useful, the real promise of AI is its potential to act as an invention of a method of invention (IMI) a la Griliches--e.g., the microscope or statistical inference--which would unlock questions and whole modes of discovery that were previously beyond human reach. Today, LLMs and specialized models like AlphaFold act as economic complements. LLMs handle analysis, coding, and writing, while specialized tools handle domain-specific predictions. Most handoffs between them run through the scientist. What may the future of science look like? LLMs orchestrating those handoffs automatically--prompting specialized models, auditing outputs, and looping until either the question is answered or a non-automated stage is reached (e.g., wet lab testing). The scientist's role shifts from running each step to designing this loop. We saw a glimpse of this workflow with Anthropic’s enzyme discovery a few weeks ago, and we're seeing this in our own work too. This raises foundational epistemic questions: 1. What will scientific understanding look like when discoveries are made by black-box models whose output is increasingly difficult to interpret? 2. How do we extract underlying mechanisms, not just outputs, as science becomes more automated? What will theory look like? 3. If AI automates the writing and junior lab work, how do we train the next generation of scientists to push the frontier? 4. What will motivate scientists in this epistemic reality? There's an economics angle too. Hypothesis generation gets cheap, so bottlenecks move downstream to verification and to choosing which questions are worth asking. Realizing AI’s full potential will take investment in infrastructure and institutional reform--making this as much an organizational challenge as a technical one We don't have the answers yet, and I'd love to hear what others think. Paper here: bit.ly/ai-in-science
21
79
9
453
79,136
🧐
(so if it's about selection into top institutions by brilliant researchers you have to believe we're REALLY good at PhD admissions ;)
2
453
Markdown is the lingua franca of AI docs: this is an excellent move by @GoogleWorkspace colleagues 👏
We are making Markdown files work natively across Google Drive and Docs. You can now preview .md files in Drive, open them in Docs, edit them, comment on them, and collaborate without converting the file into a Google Doc!
1
7
560
New version of "Nowcasting using regression on signatures", so time for a 🧵 Take messy, mixed-frequency, gappy economic data, treat it as a continuous path, compute its 'signature', do regression. That's it. But you may wonder: why did we use such heavy mathematical machinery?
2
3
1
21
85,019
Arthur Turrell retweeted
Really cool to see (well, hear!) our AI in Science work mentioned in this excellent podcast as an example of good research! Paper link here: arxiv.org/abs/2609.28504
How is AI changing the nature of economic research? And how should we think about the AI labs' output? New ep of The Economics Show with Soumaya Keynes, feat. @AraKharazian (Ramp), @PeterMcCrory (Anthropic) and my brilliant @FT colleague @JBurnMurdoch pod.fo/e/67c394
3
27
1,673
Arthur Turrell retweeted
Is AI turbocharging science? Nice @FT coverage of our AI x Science paper. When you look at adoption & impact comprehensively you often find that complementarities & equilibrium effects offset some AI productivity gains - deployment in complex systems is complicated!
3
4
1
24
4,979
Arthur Turrell retweeted
Come work with us!
We're hiring a Research Scientist in AI & Economics on the AI x Economy team @Google! Come study how AI is changing the economy. Work with folks like James Manyika, Fabien Curto Millet, @alexolegimas, @AnuMadgavkar, Zanna Iscenko, @m_codreanu, @JMateosGarcia, @RMaria_drc, @andrewjkoh, @arthurturrell and an amazing slate of external collaborators. Publish what you find. Link below:
4
18
145
26,587