Azuma (@azuma_eth) header
Azuma (@azuma_eth) profile picture

@OdailyChina 全职作者,鸵鸟姿态扛单中

Joined March 2018
Photo by Azuma (@azuma_eth)Photo by Azuma (@azuma_eth)Photo by Azuma (@azuma_eth)Photo by Azuma (@azuma_eth)Photo by Azuma (@azuma_eth)Photo by Azuma (@azuma_eth)Photo by Azuma (@azuma_eth)Photo by Azuma (@azuma_eth)Photo by Azuma (@azuma_eth)Photo by Azuma (@azuma_eth)
现在一周随便开两单,拿个几百分轻轻松松,做其他平台的对冲效率也够高 还是邀请制,暂时不卷: app.bulk.trade/ref/AZUMA-1
Airdrops are dead But I finally found one that COULD pay me 6 figures @bulktrade is giving 30% of its token supply to users (think Hyperliquid) I'll show you how AURA distributed so far: - Pre-deposits: 1M × 14 weeks = 14M - Retroactive: 500K - BulkSOL: 1.1M - Trading: 1M × 7 weeks = 7M Total: ~22.6M AURA Pre-deposits are over. Now it's all trading: 1M AURA a week. How much AURA will exist? Rumor: they want 6 months of mainnet. - 16 weeks left × 1M = 16M - Buffer for campaigns or a longer season: +20M That's ~59M. I round up to 70M to stay conservative. What could 1 AURA be worth? $50M FDV = $0.21 $100M FDV = $0.43 $200M FDV = $0.86 $500M FDV = $2.14 $1B FDV = $4.29 Perp DEXs usually launch at higher FDVs. Even bearish, I think 1 AURA lands at $0.50–$1. What does farming cost? Trading normally (no wash trading), I pay ~$0.08–$0.15 per AURA. The math: $0.10 cost vs $0.50–$1 value = 5–10x (As long as you don't give it all back trading) With code FABIANO you earn 1.1x AURA These are estimates built on assumptions. Final allocation, total AURA and launch FDV decide everything
87
“几乎每次发声,都似乎把一位怀孕的女性推到危机最前线” 老徐是真心疼他的白月光🫡
我真心不想在竞争对手遭遇危机的时候批评他们。我真正希望的是,我们能够与他们携手合作,共同提高安全标准,更好地保护整个加密行业。 但我不得不说,那位自称已经不再管理币安的“币圈首富”(你们真的相信吗?)最近接受的采访,实在让我感到恶心。 整场采访充斥着胡说八道和误导性言论。他似乎在淡化自身应承担的责任,甚至试图通过贬低传统银行的安全性,为自己的失败寻找借口。 在这样一场危机中,我们本应看到的是责任担当和行业领导力。但这场采访给人的感觉,却是在不断推卸责任、转移焦点。 这绝不是我们这个行业需要的领导力。 自从事件发生以来,这位“币圈首富”似乎就一直停不下来: 1. 社交媒体上最活跃的人之一。 在整场危机期间,他可以说是币安相关人士中在社交媒体上发声最多、最活跃的一个。 2. 还有时间和马斯克吵架。 在如此严重的安全危机期间,他居然还有精力与 Elon Musk(@elonmusk)争论 SpaceX 股票投资的问题。 3. 反复强调“只有2%的资金流出币安”。 仿佛这个数字就能回答大家对平台安全性的根本质疑。 4. 继续开展营销活动吸引用户存款。 即使危机仍在持续,吸引新资金流入的营销活动也没有停止。 5. 试图暗示传统银行的安全性更差。 一个自称专业的加密行业领导者,怎么能做出如此具有误导性的比较?传统银行与加密交易所面对的威胁模型、攻击面以及安全事故的后果,都存在根本性差异。脱离这些背景进行简单比较,是极其不负责任的。 6. 几乎每次发声,都似乎把一位怀孕的女性推到危机最前线。 而自己则反复加上同一句免责声明:“我已经不管理币安了。” 与此同时,整个加密行业却在为这场危机付出代价: 1. 比特币价格据报道从约81,000美元跌至75,000美元。 市场在动荡中遭受了明显冲击。 2. 数十亿美元的杠杆仓位遭到清算。 市场波动引发了大规模的强制平仓。 3. 整个加密行业的公信力可能再次受到重创。 传统资本市场、机构投资者以及全球监管机构,可能因此对整个行业的安全性和可信度产生更深的疑虑。 经历了这一切,他们所谓的“多层安全防御体系”,如今看起来越来越像一个笑话。 我们的行业需要的,不是更多的借口,不是更多的公关话术,而是真正的合作、真正的责任担当,以及切实有效的用户资产保护和安全标准建设。 少一些推卸责任,少一些营销包装,多一些真正的安全投入和行业协作。 这才是我更愿意投入时间和精力去推动的事情。 即使是竞争对手,我也真心希望我们能够携手把这件事做好。
58
属于是把饭喂到嘴里了
Given the current XAU perp funding, if you short perp and long swap on @variational_io, then close it before swap pair funding distribution, then reopen after swap market reopen, (1 cycle per day) you can basically farm vari points for free
50
perp dex赛道一个比一个有格局啊 extended空投30%(含官方做市团队靠交易积分拿的1.738%),tge全额解锁,且只有空投部分在tge时处于实际流通状态
1
71
bulk的美股终于来了 简单看了下,当前在variational一侧多mu,空sndk;bulk一侧多snkd,空mu,暂时还有一定的费率差 看好费率开单的话,基本可以抹平手续费和点差磨损,属于无损拿积分了 variational:omni.variational.io/?ref=OMN… bulk:app.bulk.trade/ref/AZUMA-1
ITS STOCK SZN 🔥️️️️️️ Memory Monday! Our first TradFi markets are live. Two memory chip giants, up to 10x leverage: $SNDK $MU Trade now -> app.bulk.trade/ref/STOCKSZN
105
Been seeing a lot of FUD on @variational_io. A lot of the FUD misses the point. About users not getting the best prices. About this and that. I don't like meaningless bantering. I like to see facts and data. The all-in execution costs for RWAs is actually gearing better and better from what I can see on rwa.perpetualpulse.xyz/ by @hansolar21. A lot of things on Vari are still being built out. As a non-technical user myself there will be a lot of things and decisions I will not understand about. But i know it's going to be exciting. gVAR.
2
1
33
1,144
Bulk终于要上美股了 体感下来这应该是市面上统一保证金引擎做的最好的perp dex之一,同样的波动爆仓风险会更低 刷var、arcus、lighter rh的可以考虑用较少的本金在这里做对冲,资金效率会更高一些 目前还是邀请制,想玩的可以走下边的链接,会有积分速率加成 app.bulk.trade/ref/AZUMA-1
2
2
126
我们没有安全问题啊😭 之前没回应,是因为上周我们自己的苹果开发者账号在主体切换过程中出了点操作问题,导致 App 被苹果商店暂时下架。目前已经和苹果官方沟通了,正在重新发版审核,预计下周上线。 本来想着这事不涉及政策、合规或者安全问题,就不专门发声明了,等下周 App 恢复更新上架再跟大家同步。 没想到刚好碰上友媒的安全事件,导致大家误以为我们的 App 有安全问题,只好澄清一下。 Odaily App 没有安全风险。部分用户收到的系统提示是因为被下架产生的,给大家造成不必要的担心,实在抱歉啊🙏
声明:Odaily未被DarkSword攻击影响,App不存在安全风险 昨日,律动 BlockBeats 遭受网络攻击,导致网页端出现异常。与此同时,部分 Odaily App 用户收到了苹果系统的安全提示,引发市场误解,认为 Odaily 同样受到攻击影响。 对此,我们正式声明:Odaily 未被 DarkSword 攻击影响,App 亦未受到此次安全事件影响。 实际原因是,Odaily App 因苹果开发者账号相关问题,于上周被暂时下架。我们已与苹果官方沟通并推进问题解决,目前正处于新版本审核及恢复上架流程中。由于近期 App Store 审核排队量较大,预计将于下周完成更新并重新上架。 需要强调的是,此次下架属于公司自身开发者账号主体调整引发的操作性问题,与监管政策、业务合规、App 内容及平台安全均无关联。 部分用户收到的提示,系苹果系统针对应用状态发出的通知,与 DarkSword 攻击或 Odaily App 自身安全问题无关。由于两起事件发生时间接近,造成了不必要的误解。 Odaily App 目前正常运行,现有用户可继续正常使用。此次事件不涉及 Odaily 安全问题或因 DarkSword 攻击导致的安全风险。 感谢广大用户及合作伙伴的关注与信任。后续 App 上架更新进展,我们将及时同步。 odaily.news/zh-CN/newsflash/…
6
1
9
1,100
声明:Odaily未被DarkSword攻击影响,App不存在安全风险 昨日,律动 BlockBeats 遭受网络攻击,导致网页端出现异常。与此同时,部分 Odaily App 用户收到了苹果系统的安全提示,引发市场误解,认为 Odaily 同样受到攻击影响。 对此,我们正式声明:Odaily 未被 DarkSword 攻击影响,App 亦未受到此次安全事件影响。 实际原因是,Odaily App 因苹果开发者账号相关问题,于上周被暂时下架。我们已与苹果官方沟通并推进问题解决,目前正处于新版本审核及恢复上架流程中。由于近期 App Store 审核排队量较大,预计将于下周完成更新并重新上架。 需要强调的是,此次下架属于公司自身开发者账号主体调整引发的操作性问题,与监管政策、业务合规、App 内容及平台安全均无关联。 部分用户收到的提示,系苹果系统针对应用状态发出的通知,与 DarkSword 攻击或 Odaily App 自身安全问题无关。由于两起事件发生时间接近,造成了不必要的误解。 Odaily App 目前正常运行,现有用户可继续正常使用。此次事件不涉及 Odaily 安全问题或因 DarkSword 攻击导致的安全风险。 感谢广大用户及合作伙伴的关注与信任。后续 App 上架更新进展,我们将及时同步。 odaily.news/zh-CN/newsflash/…
10
5
5
11
7,777
所有人!感受!——上手 Binance AI Pro,用问答带你过一遍 🤖 Q:从哪里开始? A:币安 App 首页 → Binance AI 图标 → 「Get more with AI Pro」横幅 → 聊天里说出你的想法。 Q:它会给我什么? A:「策略画布」——可编辑的可视化工作流。每一步都能点开检查、修改,先用模拟盘跑,代码检查通过后再决定是否实盘。 Q:实盘环节谁说了算? A:你。策略必须经你明确批准才能实盘;跑在专属、隔离的 AI 策略账户;只有你能手动转入资金,AI Pro 不能自行转移;随时可暂停、调整、撤销权限;策略逻辑变更需再次批准。 Q:需要编程基础吗? A:不需要。大白话即可,网页端/币安 App 直接用。 你最感兴趣的是什么玩法?分享你的体验吧 👇 #币安AI #Binance
你不能 7×24 小时在线,但你的工作流可以 ⚡ 只需说出你的需求,AI Pro 就能帮你规划、测试,等你确认后一键启动 ✅ 点击了解👉:binance.com/zh-CN/support/an…
1
2
42
简单算下Variational的积分价值。 空投比例已经确定是32%了,且会按积分比例空投,所以现在只剩下两个变量:一是FDV,二是积分总量。 先看FDV,这个可以通过Polymarket上的估值概率分布来测算。 参考两种算法: 如果采用中位数估值(Median FDV),大概落在 15.3 亿美元; 如果采用隐含期望估值(Expected FDV)办法,大概会落在 18.5 亿美元; 所以目前市场已博弈出来的估值区间大概就收敛在 15.3 亿 - 18.5 亿美元。 再来看积分总量,原本第三季度结束积分计划的话,总量大概是915万分,但现在延长后,每周会继续放出15万分。 如果 TGE 在第四季度较早阶段进行,最终积分总量可能在 930 万至 1000 万左右;如果持续到第四季度末,最终积分总量可能接近 1100 万。 取上述估值区间,计算结果如下: 假如FDV 15.3 亿,1000 万积分,单积分大概49刀; 假如FDV 15.3 亿,1100 万积分,单积分大概44.5刀; 假如FDV 18.5 亿,1000 万积分,单积分大概59.2刀; 假如FDV 18.5 亿,1100 万积分,单积分大概53.8刀; 总结下,按照当前预测市场给出的估值,单积分的理论价值大约在44.5至59.2刀。 提前恭喜各位暴富!
4
7
489
Azuma retweeted
Did anyone actually read the SEC Exemptive Relief letter for Tokenized Securities? I read the 60 pages today, and the carveout is incredibly limited. Considering the celebrations on X, I thought it would contain something useful, but imo there isn't demand for the model proposed / nor is any incumbant already meeting the requirements as written. I haven't seen anyone properly breakdown what it actually says, so here are the most important parts with my commentary: 1. Permissioned Participants Only. Tokenized Security Venues (TSVs) can "facilitate the permissioned trading of tokenized NMS stock using innovative automated market makers." The key word is "permissioned." It's mentioned multiple times throughout the letter. Permissioned means whitelists, whereby both the LPs and traders are known, KYC'ed and KYB'ed. Onchain stock AMM liquidity/execution is already terrible, and that's without limiting to permissioned entities. Who is actually going to provide liquidity into these permissioned venues? It's not market makers. Market makers prefer CLOBs because they are more capitally efficient. Market makers also prefer bilateral trading via single dealer platforms (or as the cryptonatives call them propAMMs). There is limited supply side liquidity for permissioned AMMs. It's either permisionless AMMs or permissioned structures other than AMMs. 2. What is a Tokenized Security Venues (TSV)? A TSV "brings together buyers and sellers of Tokenized NMS Stock by: (1) providing one or more AMM Liquidity Pool(s) for permissioned participants to interact and agree to terms of a trade and (2) setting standards for persons to access trading on such AMM Liquidity." By this definition, Hyperliquid's CLOB model would not count for exemptive relief. Hyperliquid Spot (not perps) does ~50% the daily volume of Uniswap. But, to put things in perspective, Hyperliquid only has 70 spot pairs(!!). It's obvious, there will be tighter execution and better discovery on CLOB models like that of Hyperliquid. We need permissioned CLOB or propAMM structures included in the definition. In fact, as I'll get to below, the SEC even calls out the fact that AMMs lack best execution protections... whcih could easily be implemeted in CLOB structures! 3. What counts as a Tokenized NMS Stock? First, a Tokenized NMS Stock must be registered with the SEC. Second, a Tokenized NMS Stock "does not include securities where a third party issues a crypto asset representing its own security that provides synthetic exposure to an underlying security, such as a tokenized linked security or a tokenized security-based swap." To be clear, none of the permissionless representations of stocks today are SEC-registered securities @RobinhoodCrypto @coinbase @binance @Ondo @xStocksFi etc. The fact that they are not, means nothing in this letter pertains to them. To be clear, it does NOT mean that these models are inferior (in fact I would argue the opposite, but that's outside this scope.) Lastly, a Tokenized NMS Stock can only trade against "another Tokenized NMS Stock, a non-security crypto asset (e.g., a payment stablecoin issued by a permitted payment stablecoin issuer), or a tokenized money market fund." The phrasing is vague here to me, does "non-security crypto asset" include memecoins??? 4. Lack of Consumer Protections and Risks with AMMs In the US, investors are given best execution protections. Without these protections, market makers can provider inferior execution and manipulate spreads at investors expense. These protections are part of Reg NMS. Alarmingly, the SEC says consumers will NOT have these protections in TSVs: "A TSV could not comply with the requirements of Regulation NMS without significant modifications to its trading model, which may adversely impact TSV Participants." Why are we going down the AMM path? Without these protections, who is going to participate on the demand side? As mentioned above, we have severely limited the supply side, now we are effectively saying to consumers, "Spreads will be wide, good luck." You know what can easily abide by Reg NMS? CLOBs like that of Hyperliquid. With both supply and demand sides hamstrung, we're setting ourselves up for failure. But on a positive note.... 5. The SEC recognizes the benefits of Blockchains! TSVs "offer the potential to benefit investors by enabling investor self-custody, around-the-clock trading, fractional ownership of shares, and near instantaneous settlement.... The use of such technology may also lower operating, recordkeeping, and transaction costs, and improve efficiencies." 6. Long list of Requirements to become a TSV Pages 36-46 are a long list of requirements TSVs must make publicly, including things like, "a TSV must consent to examinations of its books and records by the Commission staff at any time" and "at least 30 calendar days before operating, a TSV must publish a copy of a notice (“Notice”) prominently on its publicly available website." 7. Issuer Protections, Remember AMC / Robinhood?! We all remember the AMC debacle. The SEC is giving AMC exactly what they asked for: required issuer permission for the tokenized security to exist. "If [AMC] provides... written notice to the TSV that it objects to a Tokenized NMS Stock... the TSV cannot make such Tokenized NMS Stock available for trading on the TSV." This line reads almost directly from the AMC incident: "An issuer of the underlying NMS stock may be concerned about the risk of maintaining its shareholder register related to onchain transfers or the potential price dislocation or adverse effects on the price of the underlying NMS stock, particularly given that prices disseminated by an AMM Liquidity Pool are most likely based only on the ratio of the quantities of assets in that liquidity pool." Yet another reason to prefer CLOBs where the prices are not directly linked to a single pool which could be mispriced. 8. Tokenized Stocks must have the Same Benefits Tokenized stocks must have "a right to receive the same dividends... a right to exercise the same voting rights... and a right to receive the same share of the residual assets of the company upon liquidation." Great stuff! Investors in tokenized representations should get everything (and more!) than they would in the traditional form. 9. Extremely High Volume Limits and Other Controls The limits the SEC has set for volume are sky high. The "volume of Tokenized NMS Stock Traded... cannot exceed 0.25 percent of the average daily share volume during the prior month in the relevant NMS stock as reported by an effective transaction reporting plan". The TSV must pause trading" For reference, even the permissionless versions of these tokenized equities are doing less than 0.001% of the volume. Remember today, there are only $3 bn in tokenized equities. The market is $70 trillion. ---------------------------------------------------- Expect a formal comment letter submitted to the @SECGov from myself and @glider__ soon.
26
12
3
139
16,261
在30b能买到Kalshi的情况下,很难想到有什么必要去15b买polymarket
1
134
Circle 和 Coinbase 的分销协议,就这么毫无波澜的续签了 Circle 创始人兼首席执行官 Jeremy Allaire 在今晚的财报电话会上表示:“我们与 Coinbase 的协议已按现有条款完成续约,确保了 USDC 继续在 Coinbase 的所有产品体系中占据核心地位。同时,我们也期待与更多战略契合的合作伙伴达成分销协议。”
1
1
1
209
华尔街对CRCL估值分歧这事挺火,扒了下各家分析师的战绩: 大摩这位(看空到38),判断准确率60%,平均单笔回报3.1%,华尔街分析师排名2607/12405 瑞穗这位(看空到45),准确率53%,平均回报6.8%,排名1544 TD这位(看多到82),准确率43%,平均回报-3.4%,排名11680(倒数725) 信谁你们选吧……
2
259
要梭就梭有梦想的团队!
This Post is from a suspended account. Learn more
162
我说过,没人比我更懂詹姆斯😎
Poly上留队概率已经掉到了1%,没人比我更懂詹姆斯😂
210
查了下Circle的Form 4 这位强调“长期股价”的Circle总裁,自去年第一次卖股以来已累计10次减仓,合计套现约3077万美元 且同期从未有过任何加仓操作😂😂😂
Circle is the first digital assets firm in American history to attain a de novo federal trust bank license. On @FoxBusiness, Circle President Heath Tarbert discussed what this milestone means for USDC, regulatory clarity, and the future of trusted stablecoin infrastructure.
1
214