Jeremy Bamber

We can see that the documents regarding the silencer have been altered to tie the device to the murders. Let’s have a closer look: Ann Eaton’s statement dated the 14.9.85, she refers to a “fleck” of red paint on the device. On the forensic report on the silencer dated 13.8.85, we can see we have a “red stain” in the gridded pattern. Somebody has gone back after and added / Paint = Mantelpiece at the Farm. This has not been initialled, so nobody knows who wrote that. Forensic report dated 25.9.85, we know have red paint flakes “crushed” into the knurled pattern of the silencer. We also have a multicoloured paint and varnish in there also. We also have more additions again not initialled, so nobody knows who wrote them. We have also got yellow tape on the silencer, adhered to it are red paint flakes. DI Ron Cook said he added this to protect the device from superglue fumes during his fingerprint tests. Interestingly, Cook also took a paint sample from the farm, this sample also contained multicoloured paint and varnish. As you can see, the paint increased as time went on. Additions were added to the report and not initialled. 41 years of injustice. Jeremy Bamber is innocent.

This document from Essex Police proves they searched the gun cupboard at WHF on the morning of the shootings. They didn’t find the silencer in there, yet the relatives claim they found the silencer in there 3 days after the shootings. Barbara Wilson, the farm secretary, was summoned to the house by the relatives on the day they discovered the device. Wilson told the New Yorker that she thought the find was “staged for her benefit.” 41 years of injustice! Jeremy Bamber is innocent. J4J!!

🚨🚨🚨New Guardian Article🚨🚨🚨 Brilliant work from @shattenstone theguardian.com/uk-news/ng-i…

On the 22nd of August 1985, DC Barlow, went to WHF and conducted unauthorised experiments. On that day, DC Barlow, noted the following about the downstairs shower room window, “no entry marks associated with the bathroom window.” This was also stated in early September 1985. This means the window had no damage as a consequence of the shootings on the 7th of August 1985. In fact, the damage to that window was not discovered until the 1st of October 1985. By that time, Essex Police had taken the catch off that window and re-attached it multiple times! Essex Police know full well, that the damage to that window was not caused by Jeremy on the night of the shootings. Here’s a passage from Essex Police’s meeting with Robert Boutflour. Essex Police fooling the public since 1985!

The jury at Jeremy’s trial were told that the adult victims had no marks on them indicating any defensive injuries. That was clearly a lie! Here’s Nevill’s arms. On the right, you can see several crescent shaped gouges to his arm that are fresh, new injuries. Why was this important evidence kept from the jury? Jeremy Bamber is innocent. How much longer does Jeremy have to suffer this obvious MoJ.

Let’s continue with the silencer evidence. Essex Police continue to obstruct justice? Essex Police have always maintained that one silencer was recovered from WHF. This was found by David Boutflour on the 10th of August 1985. We can now show another one was seized by DS Stan Jones on the day of the shootings. However, in September 1985, Assistant Chief Constable Peter Simpson appeared at a press conference. The resulting article quoted him as saying “ A silencer was recovered on the day of the shootings, but that doesn’t have to mean anything that is suspicious.” Essex Police now deny this happened. When Essex Police handed over a recording of this press conference to the CPS in 2002, something strange had happened. The beginning of the tape had been recorded over and half of the recording had been wiped. If A.C.C Simpson had not said this, why did Essex Police record over the half of the press conference? 41 years of deception! J4J!!

Colin Caffell had issues with Essex Police changing his statement. He was then told “don’t say anything about it in the witness box, you will cause all sorts of trouble if you do.” Here we have Glynis Howard saying she was unaware that Essex Police were changing her statements. This was regarding the silencer - The curious part is Essex Police didn’t need to change the reference number from SBJ/1 to DB/1 in the first instance. 5 different reference numbers are logged for the supposed same device. The silencer is tainted and shouldn’t have been allowed in evidence. Justice for Jeremy.

Having shared the brilliant Guardian article regarding the wounds to Sheila, this seems an opportune time to repost this. The silencer evidence had two parts. Firstly, a blood flake matching Sheila’s blood group was found in the device, and paint supposedly from the mantle shelf in the kitchen was adhered to the end of the device. Let’s have a deeper look at the paint evidence used against Jeremy at trial. It was alleged that Jeremy and Nevill had fought over the rifle in the kitchen at White House Farm. The sound moderator struck the mantle shelf and red paint was transferred to the sound moderator during this struggle. We can see however that the evidence used at trial is fraudulent. Below are a few pieces of evidence that show this. We can see that on the 25th of September 1985, multicoloured paint flakes were embedded in the knurled pattern of the sound moderator from the forensic report. Interestingly, on the 13th of August 1985, there was no multicoloured paint flakes on the sound moderator record on the forensic report. We can see in the photograph that the scratches supposedly made by the sound moderator were not deep enough to remove several layers of paint. These scratches have only just took the top layer off. We can also see that no debris or paint was on the floor under the mantle shelf on the morning of the shootings. We can clearly see that in the photograph. So where did the paint come from? We can see that Essex Police took a paint sample supposedly from the mantle shelf (under the yellow sticker in the photograph). We can see that this paint sample does incorporate the multicoloured paint that was supposedly stuck to the sound moderator after the 25th of September, but not on the 13th of August. We can also see that the paint sample consisted of 250 paint flakes some as big as 18mm. However, DI Ron Cook said the sample was only a “thumbnail size sample.” We can see in the photograph that the yellow sticker would have to be much bigger to accommodate such a large sample. Photographs now with the CCRC shows exactly where Essex Police got the paint from, and it wasn’t where they stated it was. Nobody has ever checked to see if the any paint was taken from under the yellow sticker. Jeremy Bamber is innocent! 41 years of injustice.

Following the two brilliant articles by the Guardian last week. I thought it would be wise to share the 1st article from the beginning of the year. This one focuses on the wounds to Sheila. Multiple forensic experts say Sheila was shot without a silencer on the gun. Completely dismantling the case against Jeremy Bamber. 41 years of injustice. theguardian.com/uk-news/ng-i…

More proof Essex Police are not being truthful about the phone calls they received on the night of the White House Farm tragedies. Thousands of documents remain hidden from Jeremy’s team. J4J. The Guardian 👇👇👇 Since the 2021 submission to the CCRC, more valuable evidence has been uncovered. After the trial, Drake ordered the Dickinson review, an internal inquiry by Essex police into what the Times called the “blunders, omissions and ineptitude” of the force’s early investigation into the murders. The review would examine, for example, why the crime scene was grossly contaminated; the destruction and mismanagement of vital evidence; and the timeline and call-log inconsistencies. The findings of the inquiry have never been made fully public. However, some documents from the review were released to Bamber’s lawyers in 2011 after a legal challenge. His defence team only recently discovered that the Dickinson review supports the 3.36am timing of Bamber’s call in its timeline of events on the day. It states that Bamber called West at 3.36am and, at 3.37am, “PS Bews, PC Myall & Saxby [were] at Witham. Receive telephone message from PC West. Despatched to White House Farm.” All these references are consistent with the first call to the police having been made by Nevill at 3.26am, officers being asked to attend White House Farm, then West taking a second call from Bamber at 3.36am.

Total disgrace. Justice for Jeremy Bamber!

🚨🚨🚨New Guardian Article🚨🚨🚨 More evidence of Jeremy’s innocence! The article includes new evidence from the 1986 post-trial Dickinson enquiry. Brilliant work again from @shattenstone theguardian.com/uk-news/ng-i…