I'm a husband, father of two, and a risk management professional.
Ames, IA
Joined March 2007
- Tweets26.5K
- Following435
- Followers459
- Likes14.6K
Kurt Beyer retweeted
Opinion: We Tried Republican, Then We Tried Democrat, Then We Tried Republican, Then We Tried Democrat, Then We Tried Republican. Is It Time We Try Democrat? buff.ly/ZlV2abF
Kurt Beyer retweeted
“Whoever loves his life loses it, and whoever hates his life in this world will keep it for eternal life.” John 12:25
Love your eternal life with God more than your earthly life with friends.
The incoming Democrat civil war will be interesting!
Top Democrat strategist Van Jones,
One of Obama’s former aides during his presidency
Released this message to #Michigan on #AbdulElSayed
#Midterms
Kurt Beyer retweeted
This reads as "lol, it turns out TPUSA is a lot less effective when you assassinate its charismatic leader"
Which is certainly not what Jonah meant, but it is what the left celebrates every time they make fun of Kirk's death.
Yes, people are this dumb
Six days before the election, more than two dozen Trump strategists logged onto a private video call. The mood was grim. The talk turned to cyanide. “Do you want the white pill first, or the black pill first?" @ShaneGoldmacher @jonathanvswan @maggieNYT nytimes.com/2026/11/04/us/po…
Kurt Beyer retweeted
Tariffs and ballrooms and caulking mall pools
Big marble arches encrusted with jewels
Renaming oceans and great lakes and streams
These are a few of my favorite things
I'm just glad that this election, which I will now claim to have predicted, verified that all of my previously-held biases were in fact true and correct
Kurt Beyer retweeted
There is a very interesting mismatch between the elections for *candidates*, which effectively yielded a massive and historic sweep for the Democrats, and the *ballot initiatives*, almost all all of which yielded conservative outcomes, even in the deep blue states (but not VA).
Making baseless claims regarding election fraud used to be a casus belli on the left. Guess not anymore
Kurt Beyer retweeted
Probably a Halloween costume or something but I feel like people would be more chill about this if every tweet celebrating the assassination of Charlie Kirk didn’t have 300K likes.
Kurt Beyer retweeted
1. Colorado insists on creating culture-war clashes and losing at the Supreme Court. As Justice Alito pointed out in this morning's argument, St. Mary Catholic Parish will be the fourth case in recent years where that's happened, after Masterpiece Cakeshop, 303 Creative, and Chiles v. Salazar. When there are copious preschools available for families whose beliefs don't comport with Catholic teachings, why insist on cramming progressive orthodoxy down the throats of religious minorities? A majority of justices is just not going to approve that, regardless of more abstruse discussions over the meaning of strict judicial scrutiny (which laws incidentally burdening religious liberty in 40 states and the federal government have to survive to comply with their Religious Freedom Restoration Acts). Colorado is insisting on a strange and false notion of plurality. We should instead allow a thousand preschools to bloom, with everyone sitting "in safety under his own vine and figtree"—to quote George Washington's 1790 letter to the Jews of Newport, Rhode Island. As Justice Kavanaugh said, "what are we even doing here?"
Kurt Beyer retweeted
Idiot King Forgets To Cancel Election buff.ly/fucHxZ4
If society doesn't punish violence, it will get more of it
“I SHOULD HAVE KILLED HER WHILE I HAD THE CHANCE”
“IVE BEEN TO A MENTAL HOSPITAL AND ILL GO BACK IF I GET TO KILL HER”
Deranged Abdul supporter says after having just attacked @basedinmalibu at UMich
Kurt Beyer retweeted
Yesterday the NYT published a list of what was alleged to be over 500 Michigan “Jewish leaders” supporting El-Sayed. The point of doing so was to paint a narrative that he has strong Jewish support in MI.
But did the NYT do any vetting to the list?
A quick skim and you notice it includes names like “Jack Mehoff”. I happen to know that one of the names is someone deceased. A majority of the signatories don’t even use their full names, just a last initial, so it’s impossible to confirm these are even real people or Jewish.
Why would they publish a story about a completely unreliable list with random names on a google sheet? Because the point was the narrative.
