"There's a reason why 2 people fight while thousands are watching."
How often do you avoid entering Setups that you preplanned or that fit your edge?
You think you won when you emotionally avoid a loss?
Thats basically the worst mindset you can build. It gets worse when you celebrate wins build on forced entries and gamble.
Why are you avoiding? Yes SL hit hurts more than a win makes you happy, but your emotions or the pain you don't take wont print you a single dollar.
Face the reality and accept that it hurts every single day and continue. Theres a reason why 2 people fight while thousands are watching.
Stop watching and start fighting. Taking pain is a skill that you can and have to learn.
ICT Deconstructed
Where Every Inner Circle Trader Concept Actually Came From drive.google.com/file/d/1U2n…
bigmaxo retweeted
"Discipline is everything".
"Risk management is everything"
No.
Those are mere requirements.
You need to be able to walk to go to school.
You need to be able to wipe your own ass before you go to school.
But walking and wiping your ass doesn't prepare you for what's being taught at school.
Analyze where your time is going 🧵
Everyone budgets their money and makes sure they're not wasting it.
But very few budget their time, even though it's the most valuable thing you have.
You get 960 waking minutes a day.
Use them with focus and intention, and you'll get more done and move closer to the life you actually want.
Start by tracking where your time is currently going. Then ask yourself:
1 - Which activities eat up most of your time?
2 - Which people around you cause you to waste the most time?
3 - What times of day are you most focused vs. most distracted?
bigmaxo retweeted
I've seen a lot of scammers in this space
But one who says thst I'm innocent and has a million fake bots
Sells 6fig mentorship
Puts out the most bearish tweet for stocks and crypto at 61k
😂😂😂
I got attacked by his minions
But this guy is the most self obsessed clown out there
This quoted post is unavailable.
wolf in sheeps clothing
it's comical to see how much effort that vicious scammers like @MartaVerse @moneytaura @AureaLuma go into to defend their public image so they can keep stealing money from innocent, naively ambitious people.
it's every single classic scammer playbook:
- change name
- dodge every credible argument with an evasive answer
- block everyone that asks a valid question (soooo many people have been blocked, it's hilarious)
- gaslight
there is no shortage of evidence showing how disingenuous she is, and no evidence suggesting that she is a successful trader, nor qualified to be giving ANY paid advice, let alone for $15000
idk how people can feel sympathy, tread lightly or defend these shameless, money-hungry retards who'll go to no lows to take money from honest people.
these scammers intentionally prey on the ambitious, semi-new trader who think endless theory knowledge will help pass them to profitability
the same as moneytaur, who can't even allow tags unless you pay
if you're still falling for these larps then i promise you, you are never gonna make it
..... $15000!!!!!!
even at her other consultation rate of $350, you could spend less money to see a qualified psychiatrist & pay for guidance from a VERIFABLE TRADER.... why would you pay to someone who can't even give you a single piece of evidence that they take money out the markets?
bare in mind, it's SO easy to fake a PnL, so easy to fake an equity curve, so easy to fake exchange numbers, not hard even to fake myFXbook profiles (as some of the bigger, more obvious larps flashing APs do)....
so you'd hope that at MINIMUM, the person you're paying can have a public track record of successful trades? or that they've really been trading for more than a few years? or that they weren't rugging a couple years back?
study @SaroTrades who has an X profile full of tips on how to spot these vicious LARPs
or go ask an AI about larpaverse if ur too lazy to do your own research into her track record before paying lmao
just stop being so naive and falling for people like this
unavailable
Took less than 10 mins to block
@MoneyTaura hmmmmmmmmmm
sometimes is jus easier to block than to make up gaslight defense story
inb4 muh past doesn’t define me
this is just from like 10 mins of scrolling her X @MartaVerse
wonder what her paid discord was like before she changed to a new twitter account @MoneyTaura
"There will be new crashes in the future, followed by another parabolic surge of positive X's, time after time again. Don't fall into the mind game that your missing out, cause your not. It's a 24/7 volatile market, go zoom out. Go touch grass. Go live life."
If your sidelined, do not chase. Even if we continue to surge up at this pace, just stay patient. You will eventually get a pullback into liquidity on something. Even if that pullback turns into a dip that keeps on dipping, if you manage it well, then it's at-least a good sustainable loss. A loss chasing large green candles that end up marking a top is not a good loss.
On this entire way up from 74k I posted MANY alt levels I wanted to enter spot on that never got the pullback. But I did get some. I did not chase once, I scanned several different charts finding good levels and eventually some finally came. Publicly, I entered several spot longs that are now in 30%-50% gains. That's all you need, just a couple good levels. Ya, some alts are up a lot more than that from earlier entries, but it's better than not profiting at all.
We are at the stage where moonboys and accounts that act like they nailed the bottom are actively talking down on those who were left sidelined. It gives not only FOMO vibes, but can make those watching others winning feel bad about themselves. Reminder, comparison is the thief of joy. Comparison is the thief of gratitude. Comparison is the thief of appreciation, self-worth, creativity & positive progress.
Most of these guys making fun of those sidelined, are making back their losses that incurred during the whole ride down. They are NOT making PROFITS, they are making up for LOSSES. If you sold the top, and secured profits from the 23' and 24' run then you should not be ashamed whatsoever because this game is not about winning, it's about surviving. Putting your capital in and being able to take it all out. Most can't ever do that, what you see on X is all fairy tales. Nobody is actually get rich right now, they are getting back all they lost since January.
There will be new crashes in the future, followed by another parabolic surge of positive X's, time after time again. Don't fall into the mind game that your missing out, cause your not. It's a 24/7 volatile market, go zoom out. Go touch grass. Go live life.
bigmaxo retweeted
How to trade a KLS
Trading a Key Liquidity Sweep (KLS) requires patience, confirmation, and disciplined risk management like every other setup I take. Once you’ve identified a valid potential KLS, you don’t immediately enter the trade once the swing was swept. Instead, you wait for the market to retest that swing and look for confirmation on the *same timeframe* in which the swing occurred. So, if the swing took place on the daily chart (1D+), you wait for a daily candle, effectively confirming that the breakout or breakdown was false. This confirmation gives more reliability to the idea that the KLS will hold and price is likely to reverse from that point.
My entry typically comes after this confirmation, and stop loss is ideally placed at the extreme end of the KLS swing, the high or low that swept liquidity. The logic here is simple: if the KLS is legitimate and respected, price should not revisit that peak. If it does, the KLS is likely to become unsuccessful and I’d want to be out of that trade.
However, there are times when the original stop loss placement for the key liquidity level, remains untouched after the swing was cemented after the reversal played out. In these cases, I might consider adjusting stop loss to a slightly, more conservative level, especially if I’m being a bit more aggressive with confirmation (EX: using a 4H confirmation for a HTF KLS). For instance, if placing your stop at the KLS swing gives a 5R (risk-to-reward) setup, but moving it slightly wider to a respected level like a valid fibonacci extension, fair value gap (FVG), or the base of a pole only reduces your R/R by less than 1R, it may be worth the conservative stop if your entry is aggressive (I don’t prefer this & don’t recommended for inexperience).
A more conservative and higher-probability approach to trading a KLS involves focusing not just on the sweep itself, but on the market structure that forms around it. Instead of immediately entering after confirmation of the KLS, you can wait for price action to stabilize and develop a clearer structure, momentum trading continuation setups through identifiable liquidity left behind inside the reversal.
One effective method is to navigate into lower timeframes after a KLS has been confirmed. As price reverses, it will often leave behind supply & demand zones, imbalances & hidden liquidity. These become potential areas for refined entries used as continuation. In this case, you base your entry, stop loss, and position sizing on the lower-timeframe setup, not the KLS, allowing for tighter risk while your target can still be based on the original higher-timeframe KLS idea, which creates a "moonshot" R/R.
Alternatively, if price enters a ranging phase after the KLS, especially on the lower timeframes, you can use the KLS as confluence for directional bias. Once the range stabilizes, you can aim for extended targets, using the higher-timeframe structure and KLS to justify a bigger move. A safer and more strategic way to trade KLS setups, giving the market time to prove its intention before you commit. It's a balanced approach that combines the power of higher-timeframe liquidity sweeps with the precision of lower-timeframe continuations.
bigmaxo retweeted
(KLS): Key Liquidity Sweep 🧵
A concept I made combining @Moneytaur_ logic with smart money market structure principles. This specific educational piece is part of Dune Capital, but since there is no other resources, I'm deciding to publicize this section/concept for all to learn.
“Whales like to take profit, where they have taken profit before”
A Key Liquidity Sweep (KLS) occurs when price makes a sharp move to take out a significant high or low inside a mitigated key liquidity level, before reversing. These sweeps often mark the beginning of major reversals, particularly macro double tops and double bottoms. Unlike simple swing failure patterns (SFPs) from ICT concepts, which can sometimes be misleading if no real liquidity was taken, a true KLS requires that liquidity has actually been swept, meaning not retail stop orders, but institutional resting orders at that level that are unfilled.
SFPs, on the other hand, are often just temporary manipulations, quick stop hunts followed by a retrace back into a key level before the trend continues, not a reversal. SFPs mean nothing, if there is no liquidity to be swept. A KLS is not a trap, it’s a purposeful move, engineered by market makers to refill remaining orders left behind at the key swing point. The more powerful the liquidity level that gets taken (for example, a optimal reversal level), the more powerful the KLS is likely to be and occur. These are the moments when major trend reversals often begin, marking macro double tops and bottoms.
But identifying a true KLS goes beyond just spotting a reversal at a key level. The reversal must leave behind a structural footprint, either a break of structure (BOS) on the same timeframe, or at the very least, a meaningful market structure shift (MSS) on a slightly lower timeframe (ex: 12H BOS confirming a HTF reversal from that key liquidity level). Without that structural confirmation, what looks like a reversal may just be a temporary pullback before price continues in its original direction.
Also study how much liquidity was taken during the original test of the key level: zoom into lower timeframes to inspect candle bodies, did they close within confirming mitigation of the level? How deep into the level do body closes go? These determine how much liquidity was taken from the reversal & how much potential institutional orders are remaining at the swing. If little to no lower TF bodies confirm the level, or less than 35% of the key level was taken, it’s likely a re-test of the level and not a KLS. Remember, the liquidity is within the swing, as it took it from the liquidity level. If that is not the case and there is still liquidity left within the key level to be taken, market makers are likely sending price to re-test the liquidity level or much lower to create a fresh new range.
This is my own optimized version of ICT’s SFP I have created, after 3+ years of using this concept. A concept that forecasts future double bottoms and double tops before they occur, when identified correctly. Allowing you to buy/sell before powerful reversals.
bigmaxo retweeted
"Show up often enough and eventually it will click".
"Don't quit".
Have you heard one of those before?
In trading it doesn't work like that.
I'll give you two reasons.
Number 1:
Showing up involves putting money on the line. Eventually you will run out of it because of accumulated losses. I believe you would agree that under these circumstances you shouldn't take a loan to be able to show up.
Number 2:
Practice doesn't make perfect. Practice makes permanent. If you don't work deliberately at exactly those things that you are lagging, you will not improve.
Your growth lies in the work that you are avoiding.
bigmaxo retweeted
The more dollars get pumped into the markets, the bigger the elites-induced event crafted to drain them later.
Liquidity in → narrative out → wealth transfer complete.
Yes, it’s great to see your bags pumping, but when the entire market's mooning without brakes, it's a setup.
In manipulated systems, major global events aren’t always random. They’re often the excuse the system uses to justify the inevitable crash it already planned.
It’s a double-edged sword: One side prints money, while the other takes it back, violently. Lives included.
































