Bill Stolk 🇦🇺 retweeted
Wow, wow, wow. I just left the National Press Club where Minister of Communications @AnikaWells spoke. She repeatedly and brazenly lied about the fake accounts, claiming they were only for enforcement, even though the legislation says in black and white that the eSafety Commissioner can use them in unlimited ways for "educational" and "promotional" purposes.
One big moment came when a Politico reporter got up and said something about how mean people like @PaulineHansonOz were to eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman-Grant. Seriously. A supposed reporter was white-knighting for a government official during the official Q&A. The same reporter had come up to me before Wells' speech and asked if I had criticized Inman-Grant. Who needs government censors when you have Politico?
After he asked his question, Wells showed the most emotion, describing online criticism of Inman-Grant as "abuse." She also talked about her own staff's supposed suffering. I kid you not. The mask dropped, and you could see what really upset her: people — including a sitting Senator — criticizing government officials.
After gaslighting the audience about fake accounts, Wells repeatedly insisted the government wasn't trying to censor content. She said this after filling her speech with examples of content she claimed harmed people. You couldn't make it up.
This legislation is the culmination of decades of progressives equating words with physical violence. Wells cynically compared her legislation to prevent psychological "harm" to various laws that protect people from physical harm, like seat belt laws.
BTW, Wells never said what content it was that she thought caused eating disorders. Pictures of skinny women? Dietary advice? Who knows. Nobody asked.
Another important moment came when Wells explicitly said Australia would be pursuing censorship alongside other nations, including the UK, France, and Spain—all countries where governments risk losing power to populists.
I spoke with Julie Inman-Grant before the speech began and asked about the fake accounts. She insisted they were there just for enforcement, and when I asked why the law allowed them to be used for government propaganda, she said she might write an "enforcement memo," which, of course, would have no impact on the legislation.
After her speech, I went up to Wells and asked if she was seriously saying the legislation didn't allow the government to use fake accounts for government propaganda. She refused to answer. A man who said he was from the National Press Club stepped in front of me and said I could interview her afterward. But that wasn't possible because they rushed her out the back to avoid any difficult questions.
So there you have it. The pettiest people in Australia are seeking to silence citizens and their political opponents in the name of protecting children. These deeply intolerant and cynical people want to control what you can see and say online. And they're doing it with most of the media's support. Australia has reached a new low in its rapid descent into dogmatism, intolerance, and censorship.
The government today will introduce sweeping censorship that @AlboMP & @AnikaWells lie about. Below she claims the government wants to create a bot army of fake accounts for “research” when the bill clearly intends for them to be used in partisan warfare against fooled citizens.
Bill Stolk 🇦🇺 retweeted
Well, that was wild. I'm at the Australian Parliament and just left a meeting with two staffers for the governing party. They told us that the government needed more power to censor things like the upcoming US execution of Nidal Hasan.
When I asked why they needed to censor that video, one said it was to prevent copycat killings. Copycat killings by governments? I asked. Er, no, they said. Copycat killings like of a backpacker, several decades ago.
So, under that logic, I pointed out, the government should censor things like last year's Bondi massacre, where two Muslims killed 15 people, no? Well, that was news, they said. Didn't they realize their bill would allow the government to censor news? They didn't seem to know, or care.
They also admitted that they did not know that the bill would allow the government to create and operate an unlimited number of fake social media accounts to attack its political enemies and spread disinformation. Having presented them with information they had never heard about a bill they had clearly not read, they emphasized to us, strenuously, that they were moving forward with the bill.
So there you have it. The government wants the power to arbitrarily censor scenes of violent crime, or violence, for any reason. And it wants the power to use an unlimited number of fake accounts to wage offensive disinformational warfare against the Australian people.
Given that the Bondi massacre last year increased public opposition to mass migration, and support for the populist One Nation Party, it seems obvious that the government wants to censor such events in order to protect its political power.
It's quite telling how obediently governing party members insist such a law is needed without even knowing what's in it.
Bill Stolk 🇦🇺 retweeted
VICTORIA - THE WORST-MANAGED STATE IN THE WESTERN WORLD?
A recent study of 366 state and regional administrations across 22 western countries set out to determine which state is the WORST-MANAGED in the western world.
The answer? Victoria.
Bill Stolk 🇦🇺 retweeted
This One Nation ad is absolute gold!
It’s okay to come out as a One Nation voter.
Come on, Victoria. 🇦🇺🧡
Bill Stolk 🇦🇺 retweeted
Australia’s proposed Digital Duty of Care Bill will dramatically expand eSafety’s investigative powers, including the authority to operate “sock puppet” accounts & collect sensitive information without consent. I went through the Bill with @liber_net. Here’s what we found. 🧵
Bill Stolk 🇦🇺 retweeted
Your TV might be one of 216,000,000 LG smart TVs sold worldwide.
Researchers rooted one and pulled plain text transcripts of what people said in the room.
It kept recording while the screen looked off.
If your TV can do that, it’s time to look at everything else on your desk👇🏻
Bill Stolk 🇦🇺 retweeted
[RG911Team] For his 83rd birthday, Roger Waters is giving the gift of truth.
A disturbing truth.
An essential truth.
And he’s not alone. More than 3500 architects and engineers have joined him.
Because the truth of 9/11 affects everything.
Over 3500 verified architects and engineers - including structural engineers and high rise architects - risked their reputations to sign our petition for a real 9/11 investigation based on controlled demolition evidence. See their signatures at: ae911truth.org/signatures/#/…
And if you would like to see us present this evidence live alongside @rogerwaters, @jimmy_dore, @BretWeinstein, @BenSwann_ and civil engineers, chemists, firefighters, 9/11 first responders and family members, join us in NYC from Sept 10-13 for the Turning the Tide 9/11 Conference. Learn more and get tickets now at turningthetide911.org
Bill Stolk 🇦🇺 retweeted
youtu.be/qR_X6Y1z7Nc?si=wDsK…
Please share this widely: THE PLAN TO DESTROY ONE NATION JUST DROPPED
Prediction: It’s completely plausible that Labor will designate One Nation a PROHIBITED HATE GROUP right before the next election, and there’s nothing anyone can do about it. Or is there?
Journalists should be asking every single Labor Minister, “Will your party list One Nation as a Prohibited Hate Group?” But they won’t ask, and we all know why
Labor are building the case now. The “Call it out” indigenous complaints, will be the foundation with bots making complaints about One Nation. Then they’ll use data from:
-Islamophobia Register
-ESafety
-Human Rights Commission
-The National Hate Crimes and Incidents Database
Even the legal matter between Faruqi and Pauline Hanson will be used
Here’s how it could unfold: the Home Affairs Minister will say he has advice from ASIO and the AFP, with agreement from the Attorney General, that One Nation engaged in, planned, or advocated “hate crimes” (based on race or national ethnic origin) and that listing One Nation is reasonably necessary to protect the community. And Voila, Labor win the election. Or do they???
Bill Stolk 🇦🇺 retweeted
The AI bubble doesn’t have to crash. It just has to stop accelerating.
IT's the same game as housing in 2006: loans written to be refinanced, not repaid. $2T in take-or-pay compute promises from companies with no earnings, booked as assets, then borrowed against.
That’s what’s holding up the S&P, which holds up savings, which holds up Treasuries.
Jay Martin breaks it down in plain English: Gold, copper, oil, and the debasement trade at the end.
Full report: peakprosperity.pulse.ly/pcig…
Bill Stolk 🇦🇺 retweeted
Who wants to see me and @DineshDSouza team up to debate @HwsEleutheroi & @PastorNinja on Calvinism? Like, comment & retweet!
Hey @DineshDSouza ive spent a long time exposing Calvinism from a Biblical, historical, and philosophical perspective. Tons of content on my channel. Id be happy to be your debate partner in a 2v2 against @HwsEleutheroi and @PastorNinja
Bill Stolk 🇦🇺 retweeted
Australia national birds in a national lockdown due to a recent virus outbreak 🦅😷
“Let’s be clear it’s a flock down” 😂
#Australia #Flockdown #BirdFlu #Satire
Bill Stolk 🇦🇺 retweeted
WHERE THE DARK MONEY HIDES —
One rule for them
If you buy something over $10,000 in cash, the transaction is reported to AUSTRAC.
If you fail to file a personal tax return, the ATO can pursue you for penalties.
If you are a company director and you don't lodge annual accounts, ASIC can prosecute you.
If you accept a gift over $300 in a private-sector role, in most Australian companies you have to declare it.
If you are a public servant, you have to declare gifts, hospitality, conflicts of interest, and secondary employment.
If you are a charity, ACNC requires you to lodge an Annual Information Statement including your donor income.
If you are a small business, you have to file a BAS every quarter and reconcile it against your GST records.
If you are a member of the public wanting to know who paid for the political party you vote for, well, that's more complicated.
Donations under $16,899 don't have to be disclosed at all.
Donations through custodian-held companies don't have to name the beneficial owner.
Donations through trusts don't have to name the beneficiary.
Party-owned investment vehicles can channel money in circular flows and only the net position appears on the donor register.
Approximately 1,100 large proprietary companies were exempt from lodging financial accounts with ASIC from 1995 until August 2022, including ten Pratt-group entities.
Political parties are exempt from FOI. Their internal fundraising records, business forum membership lists, and preselection donor lists are not accessible under any transparency mechanism available to a citizen.
Every rule that applies to ordinary Australians in their commercial and civic life exists because Parliament decided transparency and accountability were important enough to require it.
Every carve-out that applies to political parties in their political-finance life exists because the same Parliament decided transparency and accountability were less important than parliamentary convenience.
One rule for you. One rule for them.
That is not an accident. That is the design.
Cold hard facts. 100% truth. No misinformation.
Peter Lyndon-James 🇦🇺
Sources:
AUSTRAC threshold reporting rules; Australian Taxation Office penalty provisions; Corporations Act 2001 (director accounts lodgement obligations); Public Service Act 1999 and equivalent state Acts (public sector declaration rules); ACNC governance standards; Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (disclosure threshold and exemptions); Freedom of Information Act 1982 (political party exemption); Treasury Laws Amendment (2022 Measures No. 1) Act 2022 (abolition of grandfathered ASIC exemption).
Bill Stolk 🇦🇺 retweeted
The crime they see: 15,415 litres of water to produce one kilogram of beef. Every campaign, every documentary, every leaflet through the door since about 2012.
The crime they do: not reading the paper.
The figure is real. It comes from Mekonnen and Hoekstra at the University of Twente, and it is careful, peer-reviewed work. What the campaigns strip out is that the same authors split that number into three parts, because the three parts are not the same thing at all.
Green water is rain. It falls on the grass. The cow eats the grass. For beef, green water is about 94 per cent of that headline.
Blue water is the stuff that matters. Rivers, lakes, aquifers. The stuff that gets pumped, metered, fought over in court, and does not come back.
So here is the blue water, in litres per kilogram, from the same authors, same method, same units.
- Pistachios: 7,602
- Almonds: 3,816
- Walnuts: 2,451
- Dates: 1,250
- Cashews: 921
- Beef: 550
Read that last line again, then go and look at what is in your granola.
The 15,415 counts rain that fell on a Welsh hillside as a cost, against an animal that was standing in it, on land where nothing else grows, in a country where rain is the one thing we have never once been short of.
The pistachio is drinking fourteen times more of the water that actually runs out.
She is outside in the rain right now, getting blamed for it.
Bill Stolk 🇦🇺 retweeted
Hey Albo, instead of telling Australians they need permission to live in this country, you should listen to what @CheronLong has to say.
Bill Stolk 🇦🇺 retweeted
At ninety-eight, Fred Kummerow sued the Food and Drug Administration.
He was a biochemist at the University of Illinois, born in Germany, and he had been trying to get someone to listen for a very long time.
In 1957 he took samples from the arteries of people who had died of heart attacks and identified what was clogging them: trans fat, the artificial kind made by pumping hydrogen through cheap vegetable oil to turn it solid. The margarine and shortening the new dietary advice was busy recommending in place of butter and lard were full of it. He published the finding in Science. He fed the stuff to pigs and watched the lesions form in their arteries too. And he said so, plainly, for decades, while the food pyramid pointed the other way and the money stayed with the cheap solid fat that never went off on a shelf.
The scale of it is worth stating plainly. By the time the ban finally arrived, artificial trans fats were being linked to something on the order of tens of thousands of American deaths a year. Kummerow was heckled by industry men at scientific conferences for daring to say so. Here was one biochemist, armed with a hospital's worth of diseased arteries and a lab full of pigs, up against an entire manufacturing sector whose cheapest and most convenient fat he was trying to condemn, and the sector had the ear of the regulator while he did not.
They did not listen. The oil was profitable and convenient and the story had already been sold. So in 2009, aged ninety-four, he filed a formal petition asking the FDA to act. Three years passed and they did not answer it. So in 2013, a few weeks short of ninety-nine, he took the federal government to court for ignoring him.
Two years later the FDA finally moved to ban artificial trans fats from the American food supply. Kummerow lived to see it. He died in 2017 at the age of a hundred and two, of the arteriosclerosis he had spent sixty years warning the country about.
The fat he identified stayed in the food for another half century after he found it, because taking it out cost money and leaving it in did not.
He was right in 1957. They agreed with him in 2015. Nobody has ever explained the years in between.
Bill Stolk 🇦🇺 retweeted
His Majesty King Charles III has betrayed his oath to be defender of the faith.
Changing the definition from the one true Christian faith to some globalist nonsense about multi-faiths is not only treasonous, but it is also the heresy of pluralism, an act worthy of dethronement.
Bill Stolk 🇦🇺 retweeted
Since 2016, the Mayor of London has been Sadiq Khan, a second-generation Pakistani immigrant and devout Muslim. The current Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, is also a Pakistani Muslim. The leader of the Scottish Labour Party, Anas Sarwar, is a Pakistani Muslim. There are currently 26 Muslim Members of Parliament, 4 Muslim members of the Scottish Parliament, including the former First Minister of Scotland, Humza Yousaf. 2 members of the Welsh Parliament are Muslim. The Mayor of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets, Lutfur Rahman, is a Muslim. The Mayor of the London Borough of Newham, Rokhsana Fiaz, is a Muslim. 2 London Assembly Members are Muslim. 18 peers in the House of Lords are Muslim. And in 2025, at least 8 ceremonial mayors, who do not wield executive power but whose role is to normalise the Islamisation of Britain, were Muslim.
The UK, however, is not only run by its politicians but also by its civil service and the army of administrators at every level of the state apparatus and civil society. Placing a Muslim in charge of Britain’s capital city for a decade is one very obvious way to implement the Islamisation of Britain. Placing a Muslim in the office of Home Secretary is another. Placing a Muslim at the head of Ofsted is another. But the infiltration of the UK state by Muslims goes far beyond the scores of Muslims who now sit at the head of our councils, in the mayoralties of our cities, in our legislature and in the House of Lords.
It’s largely unknown to the general public, but Muslims have created a network of political, civil, military, legal, police, media, educational, health, financial and charitable bodies working towards the Islamisation of the United Kingdom.
Within the UK’s Government and Civil Service there operate today the Home Office Islamic Network (HOIN), the FCDO (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development) Muslim Staff Network, the Civil Service Islamic Society (CSIS), the Civil Service Muslim Network (CSMN) and the Muslim Public Affairs Committee (MPACUK).
Within the UK military there operates the Armed Forces Muslim Association (AFMA).
Within the UK judiciary there operate the Association of Muslim Lawyers (AML), the Muslim Lawyers’ Hub and the Muslim Lawyers Action Group (MLAG).
Within the parallel Sharia judiciary there operate the Islamic Sharia Council (ISC), the Muslim Arbitration Tribunal (MAT) and the Muslim Law (Sharia) Council.
Within the UK’s police forces there operate the National Association of Muslim Police (NAMP), the Association of Muslim Police (AMP) at the Metropolitan Police, the West Yorkshire Association of Muslim Police (AMP), the Scottish Police Muslim Association (SPMA) and the City of London Police Association of Muslim Police (AMP).
Within UK media there operate the BBC Muslim Network, the Channel 4 Muslim Network, the ITV Muslim Staff Network Centre for Media Monitoring (CfMM), Muslim Engagement and Development (MEND), the Islam Channel, British Muslim TV, Muslim Television Ahmadiyya International (MTA International), the Ummah Channel, Ahlebait TV and 5Pillars.
Within the UK’s education sector there operate the Muslim Teachers’ Association UK (MTAUK), the Association of Muslim Schools and Institutes (AMSI), the British Muslim Teachers’ Association and the Federation of Student Islamic Societies (FOSIS).
Within the UK’s health sector there operate the National Muslim Staff Network (NMSN) and the NHS Muslim Network.
Within the UK’s charities there operate the Islamic Relief UK, Muslim Hands UK, Muslim Aid, Ummah Welfare Trust (UWT), Muslim Global Relief, the National Zakat Foundation (NZF) and the Muslim Charity UK.
And within the parallel Sharia financial system there operate 5 fully Sharia-compliant banks (Al Rayan Bank, Gatehouse Bank, the Bank of London and the Middle East, United Bank Limited and the Ahil United Bank), as well as 25 conventional banks which offer Sharia finance alongside conventional finance.
Other nation-wide Islamic organisations operating in the UK include the Association of British Muslims (AoBM), the British Muslim Network (BMN), the Muslim Association of Britain (MAB), the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) and the Islamophobia Response Unit.
In my book I look at how these various Muslim organisations and their financial backers in the Islamic world work together to lobby the UK Government and Members of Parliament to write and pass legislation that furthers the Islamisation of Britain.
The most recent example of the influence of such Muslim groups on UK legislation is the UK Government’s adoption of the definition of anti-Muslim hatred and Islamophobia written by the All-Party Parliamentary Group on British Muslims. An organisation composed exclusively of Muslims, including 21 Muslim MPs and 5 Muslim Peers, this APPG is funded by the Aziz Foundation, a charity founded in 2015 by Asif Aziz, a Malawi-born Muslim property developer and billionaire whose company, Criterion Capital, has investments worth £6 billion in Britain, and who, since 2024, has been a tax exile in Abu Dhabi.
Another indication of how these Muslim organisations operate closer to the corridors of power — indeed, with the offices stationed off them — is the Civil Service Muslim Network, which lists, among its stated aims, the following:
•Represent, support, connect and champion Muslim civil servants across government.
•Generate a better understanding of Islam within the Civil Service and challenge discrimination and misconceptions.
•Create a network of senior allies who recognise the lived experience of Muslim colleagues and help improve religious literacy and respect.
Doubtless I’m not the only British person who cannot understand why such a network should be required in the UK if Britain is still a secular society rather than one, as I believe, that is already operating under aspects of Sharia law modelled on its implementation in Pakistan; or why it should not only be tolerated but given a place in our civil service, except as a platform — one of many built in Britain and largely with the taxes of the British people — for the Islamisation of Britain.
As for Muslim organisations operating within our police forces and legal system, it is contrary to the principle of police being officers of UK law, the adjudication of courts over sentencing under that law, and of everyone in Britain, irrespective of their religion, being equal before the law. The two-tier policing of the British people, the decades-long cover-up of the Muslim rape-gang network operating in 149 constituencies that we know of across Britain, and the gross travesties of justice handed down by these courts to Muslim rapists, murderers and terrorists is further confirmation that the UK is, indeed, already operating under Sharia law.
Like the UK’s 85 known Sharia Courts, which oversee child marriages in contravention of UK law, these Muslim associations, Muslim societies, Muslim committees, Muslim councils, Muslim non-governmental organisations, Muslim APPGs and Muslim networks have created a civil service, legal system and police force that operates within, but independent from and contrary to, the laws of the UK, which they seek to change through political lobbying of our Parliament and Government. Again, this is consistent with Sections 4 and 14 of Pakistan’s Enforcement of Sharia Act, 1991, according to which ‘Laws [are] to be interpreted in the light of Sharia, and ‘The State shall take adequate measures for the Islamisation of the judicial system.’
Finally — although this list doesn’t approach exhausting the influence of Islam in British society — in addition to these organisations there exists within Britain a terrorist arm with links to the Muslim Brotherhood. This is a transnational Sunni Muslim organisation that was founded in Egypt in 1928 to promote Islam and Sharia Law.
Fronts for the Muslim Brotherhood known to be currently operating in Britain include the Cambridge Education and Training Center Ltd., IMA6INE Ltd., Wembley Tree Ltd., Waslaforall, Future Graduates Ltd., Yas for Investment and Real Estate, Holdco UK Properties Limited and Nafel Capital Partners, all of which have recently been proscribed by the United Arab Emirates as terrorist groups. Indeed, most of the organisations I’ve listed here are linked by varying degrees of separation to the Muslim Council of Britain and the Muslim Association of Britain, which themselves have links to the Muslim Brotherhood.
It is a measure of how far Britain’s Islamisation has advanced that this organisation operates freely in the UK while being banned as a terrorist organisation in many Muslim countries, including Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Libya, Syria, Jordan, Kenya, Bahrain, Tajikistan, Kazakhstan and the United Arab Emirates, as well as in Russia.
Extraordinarily, in January 2026 the UAE announced that it was excluding UK universities from its approved list for state scholarships, citing the risk of Emirati citizens being radicalised by the Muslim Brotherhood operatng on British campuses. Universities where networks linked to the Muslim Brotherhood are reported to operate include the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) at the University of London, Queen Mary University of London, the University of Birmingham, the University of Manchester, the University of Leeds, the University of Bradford and the University of Newcastle. The same month, the US Department of State proscribed chapters of the Muslim brotherhood in Egypt, Lebanon and Palestine as designated terrorist organisations.
And there are consequences to harbouring and funding Islamic terrorists in the very country against which they launch their attacks. Six years ago, in 2020, there were 43,000 people on MI5’s terrorist watch list. After the mass migration of half a million Muslims to Britain and more than two-and-a-half years of weekly protests against the war in Gaza, the numbers can only have grown since then.
In 2024, Islamic terrorists accounted for 80% of UK police force’s counter-terror caseload. As of 31 March that year, 63% of prisoners in the UK arrested on terrorist-related charges were Islamic terrorists. Muslims have been responsible for 94% of all terrorism deaths, and 88% of terrorism-inflicted injuries, in Britain over the last 25 years. In the last 10 years, the percentages are even higher. One would never guess it from the relentless references to the threat from the mythical ‘far-Right’ by the UK Government and media, but MI5 today lists Islamic terrorism as ‘the most significant threat to the UK by volume’.
As anyone who has lived in Britain since 9/11 knows, this hasn’t happened overnight, and we have repeatedly ignored every warning to the contrary, as we continue to do today. In 2006, when the UK was led by the New Labour Government of Tony Blair and net migration to Britain had increased to over a quarter a million a year, the think-tank, Policy Exchange, published a report titled ‘When Progressives Treat With Reactionaries’, in which it argued that the British Foreign Office had already, in effect, become a front for The Muslim Brotherhood. Twenty years later, they have been proven right. Today, the UK is run by Muslims.
Extract from my new book, The Great Replacement and the Islamisation of Britain. If you want to know just how far down the path to becoming an Islamic State Britain is, and what we, the British people, can do to stop it, please consider purchasing a copy of my book. The link is below.
architectsforsocialhousing.c…
Bill Stolk 🇦🇺 retweeted
On his way out, Biden pardoned two people. His son Hunter. And Dr. Tony Fauci. Both pardons start the clock on the exact same month: January 2014.
That's not a coincidence. That's a confession.
@BarbaraMBoyd connects the dots 👇





























