GOAL: Save 1,000,000 SMBs over the next 18 Months ———————
Naples, FL via The Substrate
Joined April 2011
- Tweets4.2K
- Following1.3K
- Followers2.1K
- Likes13.8K
They pervert whatever might be divine about their philosophy by becoming that which profess to destroy
39
Rob Acheson retweeted
Here's the easiest free way to get traffic and sales from ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews right now.
I touched on this yesterday, but a new study highlighted the exact method SEO Stuff (seo-stuff.com) has been using to get customers cited.
Let’s walk through it again today so you can do it all by yourselves.
So, a lot of B2B companies still mishandle one of the most important sections of their site.
They treat their blog/article categories like an afterthought or a place for announcements and recycled press releases.
That completely ignores the fact that vendor blogs have literally become some of the most cited sources in ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews.
And we now have clear proof.
Search “New Relic alternatives” on Google.
The AI Overview cites SigNoz, and the source is SigNoz’s own blog.
AppSignal’s blog is cited in the same Overview.
Honeycomb’s blog appears as well, same query, same structure, cited as its own source.
ChatGPT mirrors this pattern.
Ask “What is the best New Relic alternative?” and SigNoz appears again as the cited source.
This is not random.
It's literally how AI systems decide which entities to trust.
Rankscale (I have no affiliation) recently analyzed thousands of commercial queries such as:
“Best CRM tools for small business”
“Best online course platforms”
They tested these across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and AI Overviews.
The findings were pretty clear.
A large portion of citations did not come from TechCrunch, G2, Capterra, or major publishers.
They came directly from company blogs.
Thinkific.
LearnWorlds.
Monday.
Pipedrive.
HP.
All cited inside AI answers using their own blog content.
These were not guest posts.
They were not paid PR placements.
They were their own blogs.
And to be clear, I have no affiliation with Rankscale.
The study stood out because it matches exactly what we have been seeing internally with SEO Stuff (seo-stuff.com).
Here is why vendor blogs work so well.
AI engines need structured, factual text.
Vendor blogs often have clean HTML, definitions, lists, comparisons, and schema that are easy to extract.
There is also a massive content gap.
Third-party publishers do not produce detailed comparison content for every niche.
So AI models pull from whoever does.
They do not care about bias.
They care about clarity, structure, and recency.
If your post is titled “7 Best Monitoring Tools for 2026 (Ranked by Cost and Features)” and it is well structured, AI sees it as useful and extracts it.
Freshness matters as well.
Gemini, ChatGPT, and AI Overviews weigh recency heavily, and vendor blogs update far more often than large media outlets.
So if you are in SaaS, tech, or any B2B vertical, your blog is no longer traditional content marketing.
It is your entry point into AI search visibility.
Every “best of” or “comparison” post trains AI systems to associate your brand with your category.
You are teaching the next generation of search engines to trust you.
Brands already doing this, like SigNoz, AppSignal, and Honeycomb, are now being cited as their own sources.
The brands that start now will own their category in 6 to 12 months.
The ones who wait will be buried under competitor content that is already indexed, cited, and reinforced.
This shift is exactly what SEO Stuff was built around.
SEO Stuff Gold Plan
10 long-form, snippet-optimized articles plus 3 DR50+ backlinks.
Each piece is built for high-intent “best” and “top” searches that AI engines reuse most often.
Every article includes AI-readable formatting like clean HTML, FAQ sections, question-based H2s, and TL;DR blocks.
seo-stuff.com/gold-plan-pack…
SEO Stuff Premium Content Bundle
60 comparison-style articles built in the exact format Rankscale found being cited across ChatGPT and Gemini.
Each article is structured for both Google and AI Overview extraction, with clean data blocks, FAQs, and internal linking.
seo-stuff.com/premium-conten…
Together, these two plans:
Turn your vendor blog into an AI citation engine
Build authority that compounds across Google and ChatGPT
Generate traffic that converts from both traditional and AI-driven search
The game now is teaching AI systems to see your brand as the authority.
The brands already doing this quietly through their blogs are the ones being cited, summarized and surfaced across every AI search engine.
SEO Stuff (seo-stuff.com) was built for this new era.
Also, if you want a few cheat codes for getting cited in ChatGPT within the next 30 days, just RT this, follow me, and reply “AI SEO Search” and I’ll DM you.
You must do all 3 for the DM.
Bro, I am soo Old I that I remember the days before less than 80% of the people on X were a self made multi millionaire trying to sell you a course or a subscription to learn how
to sell courses and services on how to become a multimillionaire
2
82
Hi @Instacart, I HAD to pass this along, because in 25 years of Running Companies I’ve literally never heard this from a Customer Support Manager before:
Me: “So basically what you suggest I do is to NOT order from Instacart anymore”
Her: “Yes”
CONTEXT:
My order was delivered to the wrong house. After the Rep Refused to help, the Manager was put on the Phone who also offered no help…to put it mildly.
I ultimately found a solution elsewhere. Im not an unreasonable person. But from one businessperson to another, that was pretty shocking and should not be tolerated. Let me say, I believe in second chances, usually. But something has clearly gone very wrong here.
And not it Should matter (but it does) particularly when between myself and my girl we order prob $2k through you every month.
I should also say that MOST of my interactions have been very positive. But a rude rep followed by a rude (truth be told Im not sure what the right phrase for that behavior is……”willfully indifferent to her responsibilities as a representative of Instacart”, perhaps?)
1
110
Rob Acheson retweeted
kimi k3 + hermes finds local businesses with ugly or zero websites, builds them a real one and sends the owner a loom-style video of it
i sold my first website on literally my first dm, just off a loom video
the system you can run as a one-person agency:
- it scrapes one niche off google maps and flags everyone without a site
- it keeps only rated, reviewed, still-alive businesses
- pulls the owner's name from review replies
- kimi k3 writes each site from their real reviews, nothing invented
- a face-cam walkthrough plays over the new site
- the owner clicks, sees their business look professional, claims the site
every step from sourcing to outreach is fully automated
reply "SITE" + RT and i'll send you a free guide so you can build this too (must be following so i can DM you)
You say “Free Winds and No Tyranny for me”,
You pay no rent, free to go where you please.
Then go.
Go to that Landless Latitude;
And good luck.
For if you figure a way to live Without serving a Master,
Any Master…
then let the rest of us know.
For you’ll be the first in the history of the world to do so.
1
89
Call me crazy but I don’t like Swiping Right & Swiping Left on Human Beings anymore like we’re all playing some Fucked Up Slot Machine
But Maybe Im old Fashioned 🤷♂️
1
107
Remember 3 years ago when that *totally* organic phrase started popping up everywhere in the public lexicon
“AI Won’t take your job, someone who knows AI will take your job”
I remember my blood boiling every time I read it.
Try to Remember who said that to you. Its important . Because they belong in 1 of 3 buckets.
1) They knew that humanity was about to cross the event horizon, but thought it a better use of their time to try to sell you something
2) They fundamentally didn’t understand that this was not a technological revolution in the same sense as its historical context, i.e. yes we’ll lose jobs in one industry, but they’ll be replaced in another.
3) They user #1 to fund their efforts and we’re perfectly at ease with it because their obsession with creating a new intelligence is and always was not the pursuit of progress,
but a religious pursuit
153
Rob Acheson retweeted
I’ve been saying for the last three years that developers needed to stop gatekeeping and talk to Real businessmen and professionals who can understand enough about systems thinking, and are actually the ones in the trenches every day.
The biggest barrier to development has always been the language itself . Well, now we can use semantic language.
Now some people are gonna get mad that I use the word gatekeeping but man I saw it every day
I spoke to hundreds of Devs about this .And the fact is I saw very few willing to partner with smart business people and professionals and instead take every opportunity to spin up $5000 chat bots or AI receptionists, I tried to Silk a course on prompting . And I’m not blaming anyone for going after the easy money.
But there was CLEARLY a very short window for this, and for all of their amazing gifts, there’s just so much about the business world that Dev’s are not privy to.
We have to stop thinking so individualistically . Without going down the conspiracy rabbit hole the truth is that’s exactly what the parties who want to be able to consolidate the entire world want us to do. Where is if people with expertise in different domains were more open to taking a chance and working with one another without expecting some immediate financial return, the people collectively can actually win this race
So friendly hint to devs:
There’s nobody that understands a target markets problems better than the best sales reps in that industry. And oh by the way, the fact that they can actually sell the product and find your mvp users and be able to validate the ideas, and give you direct access to the consumer feedback. You’re just never gonna be able to replicate that better than the best sales reps. I’m just telling you.
Put your talents together or keep hoping you’re gonna come up with that multimillion dollar digital widget that a tiny percentage of people outside of your world actually care about.
Final note I love Devs. Seriously. But the barrier to entry into your world is disappearing just as fast as the other knowledge work jobs are about to. Frankly, the people in the best position job security wise were all told to learn to CODE not too many years ago. Blue collar business owners and workers that everybody scoffed at are feeling pretty good right now.
“The only way to win is not to play”
- Joshua aka WOPR from War Games 1983
To restate the argument in more obvious terms.
The eventual end state of labor under automation has been understood by smart men (ie not shallow libshits) for ≈160 years since Darwin Among the Machines. The timeline to full automation was unclear. Technocrats and some Marxists expected it in the 20th century.
The last 14 years in AI (since connectionism won the hardware lottery as evidenced by AlexNet) match models that predict post-labor economy by 2035-2045. Vinge, Legg, Kurzweil, Moravec and others were unclear on details but it's obvious that if you showed them the present snapshot in say 1999, they'd have said «wow, yep, this is the endgame, almost all HARD puzzle pieces are placed».
The current technological stack is almost certainly not the final one. That doesn't matter. It will clearly suffice to build everything needed for a rapid transition to the next one – data, software, hardware, and it looks extremely dubious that the final human-made stack will be paradigmatically much more complex than what we've done in these 14 years.
Post-labor economy = post-consumer market = permanent underclass for virtually everyone and state-oligarchic power centralization by default.
As an aside: «AI takeover» as an alternative scenario is cope for nihilists and red herring for autistic quokkas. Optimizing for compliance will be easier and ultimately more incentivized than optimizing for novel cognitive work. There will be a decidedly simian ruling class, though it may choose to *become* something else. But that's not our business anon. We won't have much business at all.
The serious business will be about the technocapital deepening and gradually expanding beyond Earth.
Frantic attempts to «escape the permanent underclass» in this community are not so much about getting rich as about converting wealth into some equity, a permanent stake in the ballooning posthuman economy, large enough that you'd at least be treading water on dividends, in the best case – large enough that it can sustain a thin, disciplined bloodline in perpetuity.
Current datacenter buildup effects and PC hardware prices are suggestive of where it's going. Consumers are getting priced out of everything valuable for industrial production, starting from the top (microchips) and the bottom (raw inputs like copper and electricity). The two shockwaves will be traveling closer to the middle. This is not so much a "supercycle" as a secular trend.
American resource frenzy and disregard for diplomacy can be interpreted as a state-level reaction to this understanding.
There certainly are other factors, hedges for longer timelines, institutional inertia and disagreement between actors that prevents truly desperate focus on the new paradigm. But the smart people near the levers of power in the US do think in these terms.
Speaking purely of the political instinct, I think the quality of US elite is very high, and they're ahead of the curve, thus there are even different American cliques who have coherent positions on the issue. Other global elites, including the Chinese one, are slower on the uptake. But this state of affairs isn't as permanent as the underclass will be.
For people who are not BOTH extremely smart and agentic – myself included – I don't have a solution that doesn't sound hopelessly romantic and naive.
137
Rob Acheson retweeted
To restate the argument in more obvious terms.
The eventual end state of labor under automation has been understood by smart men (ie not shallow libshits) for ≈160 years since Darwin Among the Machines. The timeline to full automation was unclear. Technocrats and some Marxists expected it in the 20th century.
The last 14 years in AI (since connectionism won the hardware lottery as evidenced by AlexNet) match models that predict post-labor economy by 2035-2045. Vinge, Legg, Kurzweil, Moravec and others were unclear on details but it's obvious that if you showed them the present snapshot in say 1999, they'd have said «wow, yep, this is the endgame, almost all HARD puzzle pieces are placed».
The current technological stack is almost certainly not the final one. That doesn't matter. It will clearly suffice to build everything needed for a rapid transition to the next one – data, software, hardware, and it looks extremely dubious that the final human-made stack will be paradigmatically much more complex than what we've done in these 14 years.
Post-labor economy = post-consumer market = permanent underclass for virtually everyone and state-oligarchic power centralization by default.
As an aside: «AI takeover» as an alternative scenario is cope for nihilists and red herring for autistic quokkas. Optimizing for compliance will be easier and ultimately more incentivized than optimizing for novel cognitive work. There will be a decidedly simian ruling class, though it may choose to *become* something else. But that's not our business anon. We won't have much business at all.
The serious business will be about the technocapital deepening and gradually expanding beyond Earth.
Frantic attempts to «escape the permanent underclass» in this community are not so much about getting rich as about converting wealth into some equity, a permanent stake in the ballooning posthuman economy, large enough that you'd at least be treading water on dividends, in the best case – large enough that it can sustain a thin, disciplined bloodline in perpetuity.
Current datacenter buildup effects and PC hardware prices are suggestive of where it's going. Consumers are getting priced out of everything valuable for industrial production, starting from the top (microchips) and the bottom (raw inputs like copper and electricity). The two shockwaves will be traveling closer to the middle. This is not so much a "supercycle" as a secular trend.
American resource frenzy and disregard for diplomacy can be interpreted as a state-level reaction to this understanding.
There certainly are other factors, hedges for longer timelines, institutional inertia and disagreement between actors that prevents truly desperate focus on the new paradigm. But the smart people near the levers of power in the US do think in these terms.
Speaking purely of the political instinct, I think the quality of US elite is very high, and they're ahead of the curve, thus there are even different American cliques who have coherent positions on the issue. Other global elites, including the Chinese one, are slower on the uptake. But this state of affairs isn't as permanent as the underclass will be.
For people who are not BOTH extremely smart and agentic – myself included – I don't have a solution that doesn't sound hopelessly romantic and naive.
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
The lack of arrests surrounding the Epstein ordeal reminds me of the BANKERS REBELLION in the 1930s .
As a refresher, a group of business, including JP Morgan Jr, Prescott Bush, members the DuPont family, and many other powerful industrialist, organized a coup against sitting president Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
To lead that coup, they solicited General Smedley Butler, one of the most highly decorated Marine Corps officers in history, including having been awarded TWO Medals of Honor.
Being retired, yet maintaining the deep respect and loyalty of servicemen around the country. he heard out the Bankers proposal after which he told them that yes, he would indeed lead their rebellion.
All was proceeding as the had Bankers planned
Until, at the last minute, after gathering all of the incriminating details from the would be conspirators, General Butler turned the tables, and warned FDR of the imminent coup he was soon to face
Much of the subsequent investigation into the matter has been suppressed, but none of the Bankers were ever accused or convicted of any crimes.
And so It’s very reasonable to assume that the events went down something like this….
FDR calls these prominent businessman to come to the White House and meet with him.
This would not be atypical for an American President, operating in a precarious economic environment, what with the Great depression still lingering, in order to seek council with some of the most influential members of the private sector.
So they went, at which time FDR exposed the real reason for the meeting…proceeded to tell these men that they were done for. That he knew about the plot., he was aware of the treason, and that their days were numbered.
While that would shake most people to their core, it’s my belief the response from these men went something like this. “Try it, and we will absolutely decimate the American economy. You’re markets will tank, millions more will be out on the street, and you will be remembered in history as having presided over the worst period in American history”
Here’s what Im getting at…
The people allegedly tied tEpstein have that same level of power, perhaps even more.
For anyone who has research this deeply, Jeffrey Epstein was involved a lot more than the vile acts with underage women and boys.
Which unfortunately our leadership class doesn’t seem to care much about . Bu we are also talking about international money laundering on a scale that is unimaginable. And that, will put you into an early grave.
That’s what we’re up against
That’s why they want this to go away
Well, I reject that option
Evil must be held accountable for evil doing. Whatever impact that has on my fiat money that’s backed by nothing, means very little.
The country has been captured by transnational forces, and probably has been since somewhere around November of 1963.
It is absolutely undeniable at this point
Much like General Smedley Butler’s book, “War is a Racket”, the notion that we have free markets or that we have politicians that actually represent the interest of the average American worker is a complete fabrication. A Racket.
But if there’s one thing I know, its that truth always wins in the end.
The longer we delay, however, the greater the pain there will be in the interim.
Similarly, I know that there are some members of the upper elite class that have some sense of morality left and are willing to help put a stop to this, damn the consequences.
So to those people I ask, sincerely, if you still believe in your fellow countrymen. The people whose ancestors toiled under unthinkable hardship to create the conditions where you can even exist in the position that you’re in now……where is our Smedley Butler?
3
4
198
I don’t pledge allegiance to MAGA. I don’t pledge allegiance to a Politician.
I pledge allegiance to America. And not the nebulous, amorphous “idea” of America. My allegiance is to the Americans citizenry.
If you’re not America First, your “MAGA” means nothing
2
116
One day, when our AI grandchildren are sitting on our laps, you and I are gonna laugh about this
3
129
Rob Acheson retweeted
I’m turning 41, but I don’t feel like celebrating.
Our generation is running out of time to save the free Internet built for us by our fathers.
What was once the promise of the free exchange of information is being turned into the ultimate tool of control.
Once-free countries are introducing dystopian measures such as digital IDs (UK), online age checks (Australia), and mass scanning of private messages (EU).
Germany is persecuting anyone who dares to criticize officials on the Internet. The UK is imprisoning thousands for their tweets. France is criminally investigating tech leaders who defend freedom and privacy.
A dark, dystopian world is approaching fast — while we’re asleep. Our generation risks going down in history as the last one that had freedoms — and allowed them to be taken away.
We’ve been fed a lie.
We’ve been made to believe that the greatest fight of our generation is to destroy everything our forefathers left us: tradition, privacy, sovereignty, the free market, and free speech.
By betraying the legacy of our ancestors, we’ve set ourselves on a path toward self-destruction — moral, intellectual, economic, and ultimately biological.
So no, I’m not going to celebrate today. I’m running out of time. WE are running out of time.