I've seen this photo used repeatedly to point out how poor the UK was back then, but these were better living standards than almost everywhere outside of the US, Canada, and Australia. I think the only large non-Anglo country who were better off than the UK of the 1960s was FRG.
Crowdsourcing this: Does anyone have a good write up or systematic explanation for why Iranian decision making is so bad and can't self-correct?
The entire PC hardware and gaming community is in full blown denial of the AI boom and think that the whole thing is a scam.
Iranians think there's a partisan Democrat-GOP difference in US foreign policy and that some congressmen getting elected will change things somehow.
A bit ridiculous that Europe is valorizing itself as this wholesome chungus reddit continent when it was fighting colonial wars into the 70s, had highly militarized societies right up until 1991, dismembered Serbia in the late 90s etc
Revisionist history levels of falsification
I don’t think Europeans fully appreciate what is happening to the European Union right now.
The EU is under an extraordinary, multi-front assault, both from outside and from within. And I struggle to think of another period in its history when so many powerful actors had an interest in weakening it simultaneously.
Russia has spent years waging hybrid warfare against Europe. Weaponised migration, sabotage, cyberattacks, coordinated disinformation campaigns, bot networks and political interference. The objective is clear: undermine trust in democratic institutions, deepen social divisions and weaken European unity.
China has different motivations, primarily economic and geopolitical. A fragmented Europe is easier to pressure, easier to negotiate with individually and less capable of defending its economic interests.
And then there is the United States. Perhaps the most disturbing development of all.
Under Trump and MAGA, a country that helped rebuild the old continent and then spent decades supporting European integration now has an administration openly hostile to much of what the EU represents. Its own National Security Strategy even calls for cultivating resistance to Europe’s current political direction.
Think about that for a moment.
Meanwhile, within Europe, parts of the far right and far left amplify these divisions, whether through ideological alignment, political opportunism or outright sympathy for authoritarian regimes.
This doesn’t mean Russia, China and MAGA are all following some jointly coordinated master plan. They don’t have to. Their interests increasingly overlap, and Europe’s internal divisions make their work considerably easier.
What makes this particularly alarming is what is actually at stake.
For all its flaws, the EU remains one of the world’s most consequential projects built around liberal democracy, the rule of law, individual freedoms and cooperation between nations.
At a time when authoritarianism is gaining ground and even longstanding democracies are showing disturbing tendencies, that matters enormously.
Europe is far from perfect. Its bureaucracy, indecision and inability to act decisively are real problems. But the answer cannot be to retreat into 27 competing nation-states, each too small to meaningfully influence a world increasingly dominated by continental powers.
Quite the opposite.
Europe needs deeper integration, stronger common institutions, genuine strategic autonomy and the political courage to defend its interests and values.
Because fragmentation is precisely what so many external actors want.
And perhaps that’s the central irony of our time: people are being deliberately manipulated into believing that the reverse is true — that national identity and sovereignty can only be protected by weakening European cooperation. In reality, a divided Europe is less sovereign, less secure and far easier for outside powers to pressure. Therefore the very thing that will make Europe stronger is the thing its adversaries are working hardest to prevent.
A united Europe is a geopolitical power. A divided Europe is a collection of countries waiting to be played against one another.
tsundere Bismarck femboy…
Seeing foreigners fall for this piece of left slopulist engagement bait is a recurring classic along with other hits like the classroom sizes thing
You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more
lol @ people pretending to enjoy classical culture rather than mass market prolestuff. It's all a LARP.
I bet you didn't read The Odyssey; you watched the movie instead.
You didn't read Journey to the West; you prefer Dragonball Z.
You don't like caviar. You like burgers.
And you know what? It's fine! Culture that isn't modernized just turns into an antique museum piece. An indicator of stagnation rather than vibrancy. The Classics are classic because at the time, nothing better had been written or produced. But now we live in industrial civ.
The lesson here is that SV hypebeasts don't understand econ at all, and make the typical mistake of applying their field's folk wisdom to macroeconomics. People who work in econ adjacent professions, namely small businessmen and financial analysts, suffer from the same issue.
Fascinating: the Transatlantic establishment is now deep into building the lore for a parallel perceptual reality where the US has abandoned Europe to make out with Russia, all because of some volumetrically tiny diesel deal that doesn’t matter.
Replying to @samagreene
Europe has to move beyond Stubbian rhetoric, compelling as it may be. The debate over whether the US is aligned with Russia is irrelevant. The US is sufficiently misaligned with Europe that European policy can no longer be predicated on assumptions of US goodwill.
/END
These journalists are fighting ghosts! Nobody in the Transatlantic establishment believes in or cares about realism/Mearsheimer or any worldview except being a hardline pro-Western hegemony chauvinist type aka neocon. The Blob won! So why are they still bringing him up? Puzzling.
This quoted post is unavailable.
Been thinking that the most apt analogy is the Soviets manipulating China as a captive actor to resist Japan from 1937-1945 and then the US in Korea in 1950-1953.
Both KMT and CPC at the time both understood what the USSR had done. Played a huge role in the Sino-Soviet split.
Replying to @WarMonltor
No he’s not. The U.S. is still using Ukraine to further their own strategic interests of overextending Russia, and they have no incentive to stop. Any disagreements regarding Starlink and oil deals with Russia are minor and massively exaggerated.
Ukraine was never an ally of the U.S. America uses them as a proxy and doesn’t care about what happens to them, as long as the war is able to continue.
Obviously Ukraine is not 20thC China so any Ukrainian turn against the US is inconsequential. And Ukrainian nationalism, egged on by the West, is still only barely aware of the sheer degree that it's been manipulated, believing instead the West is just being genuine liberals.












