South Africa deserve a lot of credit for getting better in each game.
They are a welcome addition to the knockout stages.
They deviated from their typical play style in the first game as they shifted to a back 3 which didn't work in or out of possession (0 points).
Shifted to a back 4 in a 4-3-3 and played with more in-possession balance and more directness in the build-up against Czech's man-to-man press but lacked defensive clarity (1 point).
And against South Korea they maintained their in-possession balance in the 4-3-3 but improved their defensive clarity by sticking to a compact 4-4-2 and defending in a mid/low block with a big transitional threat (3 points).
The results have reflected the quality of the performances.
It was a real shame to see Broos go against the country's identity and DNA in the first game by shifting to a defensive system without the ambition to be proactive and to take the game to the opponent. Instead, they were overly pragmatic and lacked clarity with and without the ball.
As soon as they reverted to the identity of ambitious, technical, and dynamic football which has been created by the Mamelodi Sundowns in recent years, South Africa found success again.
But, the thing is, they did not do it in a 'naive' way. The Sundowns were often naive in the Club World Cup as they constantly tried to play out of man-to-man pressure by playing out from the back when the optimal solution is to find ways to quickly advance the ball into 1v1 situations high. Against Mexico, South Africa were guilty of this error once again, but they were much more direct and logical with their approach against Czech Republic and South Korea as they often played one pass short to lure the press on before playing direct to 1v1 situations high.
Plus, in the defensive moment, instead of going 'gung-ho', they played a compact and well-drilled 4-4-2 against a team that struggles to break the opponent down in open play and South Africa used their outlets to get up the pitch and to be a threat in counter-attacking moments.
Combine that with their typical bravery, ambition, dynamism, and short + sharp combination play in possession and you get a well-drilled and nicely balanced team.
The blueprint to success is clear so Broos should certainly stick with it going forwards. Canada are difficult opposition, but South Africa can go toe-to-toe with them if they maintain tactical balance and play with their typical level of bravery. Expecting a very fun round of 32 game.
🇿🇦👏
Bootman retweeted
The Bybit hack is officially the largest crypto heist in HISTORY.
$1.46B+ stolen and still counting. That's 16% of ALL previous crypto hacks COMBINED.
Here's what happened, what we know, and why this could change everything 🧵👇
Bootman retweeted
For any of you wondering why I don’t post about politics, this is why. Jason Copeland took a page out of the Huberman Lab podcast on “how to discuss a topic at multiple levels of granularity”… (and incidentally, nailed neuroanatomy).
ONN political analyst Jason Copeland is at The Big Map to break down why Trump and Harris are virtually deadlocked in a tight race for Pennsylvania resident Nick Camden.
Hi-Tech ONN Touchscreen Map Looks Inside Swing Voter’s Anatomy, Genome
ONN political analyst Jason Copeland is at The Big Map to break down why Trump and Harris are virtually deadlocked in a tight race for Pennsylvania resident Nick Camden.
Bootman retweeted
BREAKING: The storm surge for Hurricane Milton is expected to be 15 feet.
To give you an idea of how deadly this is, here's what 9 feet looks like:
xitter.cf/i/status/1843591864546…
BREAKING: Hurricane Milton is now a category 5 with 175 mph windgusts, the 4th strongest storm in Atlantic history.
xitter.cf/i/status/1843346669234…
Bootman retweeted
Roger Federer’s Commencement Address at Dartmouth yesterday might be the best speech he’s ever given.
Amazingly articulate, funny, full of wisdom. Made me laugh and tear up. I’m so very proud to have had him as my idol for the past two decades.
If you have 25 minutes to spare…
Bootman retweeted
Places on Earth that don't look real - thread 🧵
1. Namibia, where the desert meets the ocean
Bootman retweeted
South African players doing Ronaldo's celebration after eliminating Morocco who eliminated Ronaldo from the World Cup.
How can you not love AFCON
Bootman retweeted
We weren’t founded on perfection. We’re founded on the *pursuit* of a more perfect union. 🇺🇸
🔥WATCH THIS: @VivekGRamaswamy on the founding fathers being slave owners, understanding our own history, and the pursuit of a more perfect union.
#TheBreakfastClub
Bootman retweeted
Off for a bit of meditation… 🧘
#Namaste
Bootman retweeted
27 protocols I learned from @hubermanlab in 2023
Read this to change your life in 2024
THREAD
Bootman retweeted
I can't stop thinking about this question:
Are you willing to sprint when the distance is unknown?
In 2021, Georgia Tech strength coach Lewis Caralla delivered this epic speech to the football team.
If it doesn't get you motivated, you may need to check your pulse...
He opens with a few harsh truths:
• Winning isn't loyal to you
• Winning doesn't care about you
• Winning doesn't care how sore you are
• Winning doesn't care how hard you work
• Winning doesn't care how much sleep you get
But it's his question that stuck with me:
Are you willing to sprint when the distance is unknown?
The willingness to sprint with no clear view of the finish line is rare.
It requires two things:
1. A deep belief in one's self
2. A deep belief in the mission
If you have 1 but not 2, you won't be able to do it.
If you have 2 but not 1, you won't be able to do it.
You need both.
In my observation, the greatest things in life are accomplished when you're willing to sprint when the distance is unknown:
The sprint to care for your loved ones in their time of need.
The sprint to build something meaningful.
The sprint to serve others and create positive ripples in the world.
Goal: Find those rare things in life that you're willing to sprint for when the distance is unknown.
That, to me, is the definition of winning.
"And why chase winning? Because the only thing that's guaranteed in life if you don't chase it is losing."
Bootman retweeted
And now, the nit-picky history details/battle thread.
TL;DR Ridley Scott's Napoleon movie is probably, in all seriousness, worse for Napoleonic Warfare than The Patriot is for eighteenth-century warfare. I'm going to focus on military history here in this one. 1/25
































