
I write about digital art (search for #artmiration). He/him. Mostly on Bluesky or Mastodon now (see link below). Art writer for @AtelierGenArt.
Hamburg, Germany
Joined July 2009
- Tweets16.9K
- Following2.4K
- Followers2.2K
- Likes31.9K
André 🎸🤘 retweeted
By suggesting the theme "Use software that is not intended to create art or images" for #genuary7, I was expecting a lot of creativity! And I wasn’t disappointed! 🤩
Here are some of the must-see contributions 👇
André 🎸🤘 retweeted
𝘗𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘍𝘭𝘰𝘸 opens 9/25 on feralfile.com and at NEORT++ in Tokyo! 🎉
Curated by Yusuke Shono and Alex Estorick, and presented in partnership with NEORT++, 𝘗𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘍𝘭𝘰𝘸 will feature work by a new generation of Japanese artists:
Shunsuke Takawo
Satoshi Aizawa
Saeko Ehara
mole^3
Misaki Nakano
Okazz
Senbaku
Kaoru Tanaka
Kazuhiro Tanimoto
ykxotkx
Channeling the experimental aesthetics of computer art pioneer Hiroshi Kawano, the exhibition explores the power of generative systems to capture a world in flux✨
@themassagejp
@AlexEstorick
@neort_io
@Takawo
@V_kaoru
@Sko_hr
@Satoshi_Aizawa
@KZ_LAB_E
@ykxotkx
@Senbaku
@molecubed
@Misaki_mofu
@okazz_
@RtClick_Save
@NORIWTS
André 🎸🤘 retweeted
BEING TENDER Part I
Hi. I’m Adam, and I’ve been running TENDER since starting it in January of 2022. It’s occurred to me that many people in the broader space don’t know TENDER, what I do here, how we work, what we’ve done, or why TENDER exists. Very understandable – as a one person team, there is a lot that inadvertently remains unsaid, and I end up prioritizing my work directly with artists over communicating as much on social media as I would like. Now I finally want to share in writing the things I get to say in conversation about TENDER – with this being the first of 5-10 long posts giving some definition to this whole endeavor.
Firstly, what the hell does the idea of “tender” have to do with art anyhow? What a strange name for a gallery! It is, and that little spark of strange is akin to the fun of introducing new, unexpected things to people - in our case art. This act of sharing, advocating for, and stewarding new generative art is what we’re about. A Tender is actually the name of a ship or vessel that shepherds other ships into port and onto bigger waters – they play an essential but supporting role. Tender is also a word for currency, an artifact created to hold value far greater than its mere material worth (hence the currency-inspired style of our TENDER Pass). While our focus is not on the monetary aspects of art collecting, we certainly believe in the immense value of art in our lives and are here to grow an appreciation of generative art until it holds significant culturally ubiquitous value.
So there’s a lot of meaning behind the name of this gallery, in addition to it simply sharing the feel of loving care I try to put into everything we do. The heart on our handle and in my gm’s isn’t some trite hug – it’s a symbol of our purpose and what we believe is the value of art itself… but more on that in the following posts of BEING TENDER ❤️
But actually - is TENDER a gallery at all?! It’s the best single-word description we have, but my preference is to think of it as the ‘gallery of the future’ instead – an atypical approach that is still taking shape, but seeks to combine the best of practices from the existing fine art gallery world, the design world, the web3 art ecosystem, and the occasional rethinking of things all together. There is a lot that we’ve done that I’m proud of, done in ways that I believe in – and many aspects of our practice that I’m excited to evolve, add, and deepen. Will be outlining thoughts on this as well.
As TENDER grows, the plan is to build a team of people as passionate about this art movement as I am… so talking about TENDER as ‘us’ and ‘we’ is partially a practice of preparation and manifestation. I am also highly collaborative and a bit self-effacing, so it’s my habit to talk about the teams, brands, and companies I’ve led over the years as a whole rather than taking individual credit. TENDER is no different, even when I am the one leading all collaborations, releases, our website, and more. This mentality is part of why the gallery doesn’t share my name. But yes, it’s just me. My personal twitter account got hacked two months ago and now is doing some dumb stuff, so I’ll be a bit more more direct and personal on this account, representing the strong opinions and convictions that drive everything TENDER is.
But I am not alone here. TENDER has had the incredible support of so many people in this ecosystem that I’m incredibly grateful for. From one of my oldest and best friends and collaborators @djdisdo helping launch and grow TENDER, to the tight group of about 25 ‘founding TENDERs’ who wrote the first editorials, shaped our practices, and helped onboard the wider community of TENDERs through our Pass. They also helped advocate for the amazing cohort of 60-some collaborating artists I’ve worked with so far… all of whom took a leap to work with someone with a small following and a mere promise of artistic rigor – starting in a time when nobody was doing collaborations and online gallery releases. All of these participants are a foundation to the countless other collectors, artists, founders, and advocates for everything we’ve done. Thank you!
I hope together we can grow this support much further – not for myself or TENDER, but for the benefit of the artists we work with and the new collectors we can expose to their work. Our belief, my belief : ) is that propelling the efforts and creations of these artists can lead to a broader recognition of the importance of this generative art movement.
If art is a reflection of the times its created within, then what more relevant and important movement could there be than one using the explosion of technologies – those continuing to reshape global society and culture – to create artistic systems that help birth artworks that represent the enduring chance and serendipity of life?!
With Love, Adam
shown: Pang #471 by TENDER x @abstractment (April 2022, the first ever TENDER Collaboration)
André 🎸🤘 retweeted
Coming to @fx_hash_ on Wednesday.
André 🎸🤘 retweeted
…
‘It's going to get worse before it gets better’
The name of this project is 1 year old, same as the initial sketch code
#generativeart #fxhash #tezos
André 🎸🤘 retweeted
A year ago I was lucky enough to have Torrent released as a Curated project on @artblocks_io. I couldn't be more grateful to Art Blocks for this opportunity and to all the collectors for their support. A life-changing day that I don't take for granted.
Here's a few favorites. A million thank yous. So much more to come. ❤️✨
André 🎸🤘 retweeted
This is a rant about pricing on tezos and what we mint and why. You will probably disagree with something I say if you read it. Tell me about it, and how I can shove my unthoughtful opinion up my ass, then unfollow me and encourage your friends to do the same. I'd prefer that to a like.
There are countless influences that have come to bear on the average price point of art sold on tezos. This rant aims to focus on one influence in particular and will largely ignore the brainwashing of 1 tezos= 1 tezos or the need to keep prices low to retain accessibility to a loyal support network of broke artists.
This rant will focus on the flooding of our marketplaces with daily low effort high aesthetic dribble. Images that represent only the creators exploration of a tool and the capability of those tools preying on the common perception that aesthetics=art are drowning out art created by people expressing actual concerns, desires, dreams, fears, wishes... it's dominating the airwaves.
To make matters worse, the fact that this work is so abundant makes it less appealing to everyone. Like warning signs at your work place, you quickly tune out the wall of ai replicants as the same thing you saw the day before, broken up only by a parade of MU tcg mints, and providing 0 art discovery.
The flood has decimated the demand for these products, and the access to quality text to img generators has increased, making the difference between buying this work and making it yourself a matter of prompting and minimal effort. Essentially you are selling laziness. You are being lazy and trying to earn money off of your limited knowledge of AI capabilities, leveraging that slight amount against the knowledge level of the masses. You are selling the product of that laziness and in turn allowing others to choose an easy and cheap route rather than learning to create the images themselves. That's what it boils down to IMO and why I don't mint raw ai outputs. It's not who I want to be as a creator, and it's not the effect I want to have on our marketplace.
By flooding the market with this sort of work, you kill demand with overwhelming supply. You create a dynamic that demands you mint MORE to make the same amount, which decreases your selectiveness when curating outputs, and decreases your available time to put any post ai work into them. It forces your prices lower to keep the sales going. It kills our average price point and changes perceptions of our culture here.
Why? If you are an artist, you ae driven to create. Is this satisfying that drive? Do you feel truly feel fulfilled and recognized and seen when you sell your images for .5 xtz? This is bottom feeder behavior.
Why are you minting and what do you want to be known for? I fully understand the need of artists to try to make a living from their art, but I don't understand the need to do it solely on tezos, or even solely on web3. It has become very easy to recognize who is here as an artists seeking an outlet, and who is here as an outlet seeking artists, and who is here to either play into or prey upon that dynamic. Every time you mint, you choose one of those roles, imo, and set the tone for the legacy you will be known for if you continue in this space.
Imo, we should be minting our journeys, but that doesn't mean we sell them cheap, or even at all. If we choose to seek compensation for our efforts here, it should be at a price we will feel proud to have earned. We should not be creating with the sole aim of earning money here, or we lose sight of art and start making products.
Tezos has a hard earned reputation as the superior art chain. As the attempt to draw eth users to our environment bear fruit, we will continue to be overrun with people seeking low effort profit over actual contribution to the marketplace or culture of art we have built. This will be good for price points... but will we still be the superior art chain?































