
CXO/Cofounder @EmpathyCo_, Advisor @ethicalallies, Privacy, Ethical AI, Search, Product Design, UX, SaaS, B2B, triathlete and proud donostiarra
London, England
Joined December 2008
- Tweets8.1K
- Following659
- Followers912
- Likes3.5K
Borja Santaolalla retweeted
‘The way we interact with search boxes has changed’: What GenAI and RAG mean for retailers.
We speak to @EmpathyCo_'s @borjasant about the rise in mission-driven queries, how brands can be found in answer engines, and what it means to build ethical AI.
econsultancy.com/ai-search-b…
Borja Santaolalla retweeted
#Signal is safe; it's reliable; it's private. Even more: it's cool. And it's growing. Models that do not rely on #sruveillance are possible, and better. More #privacy is coming. Wonderful interview with @mer__edith, by @a_greenberg. #AIEthics
wired.com/story/meredith-whi…
Borja Santaolalla retweeted
Here with my most admired @mmoreram and @rubenbaston announcing (Spanish) that Apisearch.io and Empathy.co join forces within the EmpathyHoldings.com ecosystem.
more to come!
La asturiana Empathy ha comprado el buscador de origen catalán Apisearch. Entrevisto a los protagonistas: sobre cómo se gestó la operación, qué planes tienen, pero de mucho más: cómo afecta la #GenAI a la UX y cómo imaginan el futuro del #ecommerce.
Enlaces: siguiente post ^^
Borja Santaolalla retweeted
I will give two reasons why you should wear a tie if you're in a formal business suit. 🧵
Replying to @dieworkwear
For us lay people, can you elaborate on why formal suits should never be worn without ties?
Borja Santaolalla retweeted
I really love the active discussion abt the role of ethics in AI, spurred by Google Gemini's text-to-image launch & its relative lack of white representation. As one of the most experienced AI ethics people in the world (>4 years! ha), let me help explain what's going on a bit.
Borja Santaolalla retweeted
"#OpenAI’s image generator DALL-E 3 will add #watermarks to metadata as more companies roll out support for standards from the Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity (C2PA)." A well designed product would've had these from the start. #AIEthics theverge.com/2024/2/6/240639…
Borja Santaolalla retweeted
Enjoining at this very second @borjasant Beatriz García Díaz and Jaime Smith speaking on AI decentralisation, #machinecustomer and the AI experience transformation in the light of #AIEthics, trust and #privacy
lnkd.in/eTAEVCbE
Borja Santaolalla retweeted
¡Los donostiarras no pueden parar de moverse de la emoción! La #tamborrada en su máximo esplendor cadenaser.com/euskadi/2024/0…
Borja Santaolalla retweeted
What spending tens of billions of dollars looks like. Took Tim Cook years, he bought many startups and visited many factories. History will judge his job, but I had a front-row seat on all this for years (wrote two books about Spatial Computing and a third about Metaverse) and I saw the work he put in, which most haven't really understood yet.
Apple Vision Pro pre-orders begin today! We’re so excited for you to experience spatial computing for the first time! apple.co/applevisionpro
Borja Santaolalla retweeted
For those wondering who the Third Party @Dropbox just gave everyone’s data automatically to, it’s Open AI.
Considering all the lawsuits Open AI has concerning illicit use of ill-gotten data, privacy breaches and data leaks this arrangement inspires 0 confidence.Bad move Dropbox.
Borja Santaolalla retweeted
Holy shit.
Just got off the phone with my dad. He had just spoken to "me" and was convinced I was in jail after a car accident and needed $10k bail. He was headed to the bank but decided to call me just in case (lucky I picked up, I'm in Japan). Fuck me.
Borja Santaolalla retweeted
I came to this conclusion sometime last year, and it was a little sad because I wanted so hard to believe in LLM mysticism and that there was something "there there."
Borja Santaolalla retweeted
¿Cómo funciona el capitalismo en su peor expresión? Guarda este tuit.🎯
Borja Santaolalla retweeted
Ever feel like history is repeating itself?
AskJeeves.com, 1999
Borja Santaolalla retweeted
En el hilo turras de hoy, tal y como comentamos, cerramos de momento la trilogía sobre construcción de confianza en el siglo XXI.
teapawt.net/Recuenco/status/171021…
Mañana cerramos, post hiato elegíaco de @mtascon, la trilogía sobre gestión de la confianza en el siglo XXI.
Borja Santaolalla retweeted
Vivimos rodeados de relatos y cada vez de más posibilidades de engañar a nuestros sentidos. Ganar la confianza de alguien y saber mantenerla será una skill diferencial en el siglo XXI.
Borja Santaolalla retweeted
In 2006, I was 1 of 4 designers on Google Search.
For 20 years, every search engine has copied Google.
Now ChatGPT, Bard + Claude look like Google's offspring - "better” search engines.
But last week signaled we're on the brink of a design revolution.
ChatGPT unveiled incredible new features.
These could give us the opportunity to completely shift how we interface with AI.
Here's the full story:
–––
When I was a designer on Google Search, all major search engines looked the same – Google, Yahoo, MSN Bing.
Google was the market leader with a heavily optimized UI that supported billions of dollars in ad revenue.
Naturally, it became THE way to show search results.
Its success made it illogical for Google to consider big UI changes.
And any changes they did make were just mirrored by everyone else.
So 20 years later, we’ve only seen incremental changes to search engine UIs.
–––
Today, we have consumer-ready LLMs (Large Language Models) freshly in our hands.
As consumer products, these are in their infancy.
We’re very early in understanding their capabilities and defining how people interact with them.
These are uncharted waters.
And yet ChatGPT, Bard, Claude etc. all chose a text-based input box — just like Google’s search box — as the core interface.
Why?
The input box is simple, versatile, and familiar.
- It’s simple to understand → you type your questions into the box.
- It’s versatile → the box can handle all sorts of questions/queries.
- The paradigm is super familiar → people immediately know how to use it.
Because of this, LLMs have essentially become “a better Google.”
–––
But last week’s ChatGPT announcements thrust open the doors to new possibilities.
ChatGPT is now multi-modal — it can see, hear, and speak.
These are the recent announcements from @OpenAI :
Voice: teapawt.net/OpenAI/status/17…
Photos: teapawt.net/OpenAI/status/17…
The example of ChatGPT explaining how to lower a bike seat was incredible.
But, it could be so much better!
The video showed you'll have to post multiple new photos to keep adding new information and to progress the conversation.
It was still a linear conversation centered around the text box.
But what if we rethought the interface to center around the image?
What if ChatGPT supported both images AND voice simultaneously?
Could we end up with a more immersive experience?
–––
How else could interacting with LLMs mimic IRL conversations?
Could we (or the AI) pinch to zoom or rotate the image?
Could we interact in real time with video?
What new possibilities open up with context being preserved over time?
–––
There is so much energy and excitement around what AI can do.
But we are limiting the potential by assuming the conversation box is the best interface.
Right now, designers have the chance to create truly novel interactions and bust through the 20+ year old search UI paradigm.
The ideas above are just to illustrate some potential options.
But they are also intended to spark a flame.
Now is the opportunity to be creative and explore divergent UIs.
What are the craziest, coolest, most creative UI ideas we can unleash?
LFG 🚀
ChatGPT can now see, hear, and speak. Rolling out over next two weeks, Plus users will be able to have voice conversations with ChatGPT (iOS & Android) and to include images in conversations (all platforms).
openai.com/blog/chatgpt-can-…
Borja Santaolalla retweeted
🔥 If you read one thing about AI this week, let it be Google’s leaked doc
“We have no moat, and neither does OpenAI”
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Per the source, the internal document is the opinion of a "researcher within Google" and not necessarily Google's view.
semianalysis.com/p/google-we-ha…




































