
Technologist - Building on @frequency_xyz - @usairforce - Views are my own
Generally Around
Joined March 2007
- Tweets1.3K
- Following417
- Followers1.1K
- Likes67
Braxton retweeted
We still don't know why LLMs produce so many “It’s not X, it’s Y.” sentences. My favorite explanation is that they were trained on “It’s not delivery. It’s DiGiorno.” commercials. But this one makes good sense, too. theatlantic.com/technology/2…
Braxton retweeted
In this new paradigm of the Agentic Era, each of us needs a primary personal agent, not a personalized agent that works for a big tech company.
This primary personal agent is a high-integrity, fiduciary and guardian that stands between you and the uncharted agentic web, acting as a protector of attention and consent, defender of cognitive autonomy, and assistant in daily life.
The feed era optimized for attention. The Agentic Era optimizes action.
In the Agentic Era, the most important system you own won’t be an app—it’ll be a primary personal agent: exclusively dedicated to one individual, standing at the frontier between human consciousness and autonomous artificial intelligence in order to safeguard human agency.
Unpacked my thoughts on architecture for a primary agent here: braxtonwoodham.substack.com/…
Braxton retweeted
Somebody should invent a microblogging platform that makes it quick and easy to find the best on-the-ground reporting and relevant expertise, while weeding out misinformation, propaganda, blather, and outright crazy people.
Braxton retweeted
Big AI expects you to share your secrets, like your finances, your health, your relationships, and your fears.
Do you? Should you?
We're on a mission to learn about how AI manages your data and how you manage your data on AI.
Take this 2min survey to help us understand your experiences and concerns around AI and privacy.
👉 docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F…
Braxton retweeted

vitalik.eth@VitalikButerinJan 8
🇺🇸
United StatesConnected via WebAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
Replying to @CharlotteFang77
Ser, I worry going this direction risks losing the plot.
"The regime" are the people in power. "The state" is the organization with the guns.
We must not let the language of liberty and resistance against the state be corrupted by a misperception that twists the terms "regime" and "state" into mere bywords for a Schmittian Enemy, using them to continue to beat down on a group long after it loses actual power.
True liberty involves securing the balance of power ( vitalik.eth.limo/general/202… ), and this means challenging the abuses from the highest seats of authority, whoever they currently are.
It is a quest that is inherently incompatible with being permanently supportive of one Team, or permanently opposed to another Team.
But it is a quest that is necessary, to preserve the balance that keeps the world as a whole, and the experience of each precious individual person inhabiting it, in a state of freedom and security.
Milady
Braxton retweeted
I like and respect Elon, and I'm grateful to be on this platform. But when he claims 𝕏 Chat is "much more secure than email," I feel obligated to explain the technical reality to my audience.
That statement is true in the same way a screen door is more secure than no door. But that's not the comparison anyone should be making.
1. 𝕏 Can Read Your Messages
𝕏 recently added safety numbers, which is a step forward. But here's the catch: your private key backups are stored on 𝕏's servers. Safety numbers help detect external hackers, but they cannot protect you if 𝕏 itself or a rogue insider, or a government with a warrant.
@signalapp's safety numbers work because your keys never leave your device. There is nothing for Signal to turn over, even if compelled.
2. No Forward Secrecy
From 𝕏's own documentation: "If the private key of a registered device is compromised... an attacker would be able to decrypt all Encrypted Direct Messages."
One key compromise exposes your entire message history. Signal's Double Ratchet generates new keys for every message. Compromise one key, you get one message. Past messages stay encrypted. This has been the standard in secure messaging for over a decade.
3. The "Juicebox" Vulnerability
𝕏 stores your private keys on their servers using a system called Juicebox. Cryptographer @matthew_d_green's analysis suggests this implementation is software-only, lacking Hardware Security Modules (HSMs).
A 4-6 digit PIN does NOT help protect this. That is trivial to brute-force if 𝕏 (or an attacker with server access) disables the rate limiting.
4. Full Metadata Exposure
𝕏 explicitly states metadata isn't encrypted: who you message, when, and how often. As former NSA director Michael Hayden famously said: "We kill people based on metadata." Signal uses sealed sender technology to hide even this information.
5. NOT Open Source
𝕏 promised to open source XChat and publish a whitepaper in June 2025. Neither has happened. Signal has been open source and audited for over a decade.
The Bottom Line:
I'm not saying don't use 𝕏. I'm saying don't use 𝕏 Encrypted DMs for anything you wouldn't post publicly.
For actual private communication, use @signalapp. It's free, works on all platforms, and the cryptography has withstood a decade of scrutiny from academics and nation-states alike.
Braxton retweeted
The penguins took over the timeline. Now their founder’s on the mic.
@LucaNetz of @pudgypenguin joined us at Frequency House to talk community.
Eyes open for the full drop on its way soon.
Braxton retweeted
Polkadot just pulled off what is the most insane cross-chain application yet.
Cross-chain chain state migration.
An application that migrates the state of one chain (Polkadot Relay), accounts, code balances etc to another chain (Polkadot Hub)
Truly historical feat
AHM UPDATE: Account migration complete.
1.6 billion DOT migrated from 1.5 million accounts.
➡️Items processed: 1,512,216
➡️Failed: 0
migration.paritytech.io/
Braxton retweeted

vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin9 Nov 2025
🇺🇸
United StatesConnected via WebAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
I'm loving this arc of the pope engaging with 21st century themes and offering simple but correct and meaningful advice.
Braxton retweeted
Three key takeaways from yesterday's interview w/ Polkadot founder Dr. Gavin Wood:
1. Humanity comes on-chain.
"Project Individuality" lets anyone prove they’re a real human without revealing their identity. Yes that's right... no KYC necessary.
Bye bye bots.
Braxton retweeted
Agency > Intelligence
I had this intuitively wrong for decades, I think due to a pervasive cultural veneration of intelligence, various entertainment/media, obsession with IQ etc. Agency is significantly more powerful and significantly more scarce. Are you hiring for agency? Are we educating for agency? Are you acting as if you had 10X agency?
Grok explanation is ~close:
“Agency, as a personality trait, refers to an individual's capacity to take initiative, make decisions, and exert control over their actions and environment. It’s about being proactive rather than reactive—someone with high agency doesn’t just let life happen to them; they shape it. Think of it as a blend of self-efficacy, determination, and a sense of ownership over one’s path.
People with strong agency tend to set goals and pursue them with confidence, even in the face of obstacles. They’re the type to say, “I’ll figure it out,” and then actually do it. On the flip side, someone low in agency might feel more like a passenger in their own life, waiting for external forces—like luck, other people, or circumstances—to dictate what happens next.
It’s not quite the same as assertiveness or ambition, though it can overlap. Agency is quieter, more internal—it’s the belief that you *can* act, paired with the will to follow through. Psychologists often tie it to concepts like locus of control: high-agency folks lean toward an internal locus, feeling they steer their fate, while low-agency folks might lean external, seeing life as something that happens *to* them.”
Braxton retweeted
Calling all @PudgyPenguins, this one’s for you🐧
Luca Netz (@LucaNetz) takes the stage at Frequency House, #KBW2025 to share the Pudgy journey from community to cultural empire!
⏱️ 5:15–6:00 PM | 📍Seoul Brewery Seongsu
Come and Find your Frequency: luma.com/pytchjnq
Braxton retweeted
We’re opening the doors to Frequency House at #KBW2025 🇰🇷
📍 Seoul Brewery | Sept 24
Builders, thinkers, and friends join for a full day of fun.
Free RSVP below 👇🧵
Braxton retweeted
Today everything changes: the first government launched a national data ownership initiative, so the citizens of Brazil have the first chance to be compensated for consensually shared data. Another huge win of very many to come! #OwnYourData @DrumWaveInc
oglobo.globo.com/google/amp/…
Braxton retweeted
A core problem with centralized platforms like TikTok is that your content, followers, and digital identity are locked within it.
Frequency co-founder @Braxton explains in @CoinDesk how Frequency has built a solution that puts control back in the hands of users.
🔗coindesk.com/opinion/2025/03…
Braxton retweeted
Big announcement at #ETHDenver. @bluesky coming to @one_frequency! @sheila_warren @braxton @harrye with the news. Powered by @Polkadot

























