Proud Englishman 🏴 willing to die or be imprisoned to secure my son’s futures. Restore Britain for the win 🇬🇧
Joined February 2026
- Tweets8.4K
- Following3.4K
- Followers3.1K
- Likes25.3K
The Brehon retweeted
Rubbish. Your bill is called the "English ETHNIC Identity Bill"
You criticised the flying of the English flag. Now you seek to deny the English their unique ethnicity, their ultimate & most intrinsic identity
Denying a group their ethnic heritage contributes to "cultural genocide" or "ethnocide" according to the 1944 definition
Polling shows that ALMOST ALL ethnic minorities in England still understand that "English" is a fundamentally ethnic identity to which they do not belong
It is only certain parts of the White British community - and activists like yourself - who seek to engage in ethnic erasure
Such a large percentage of White British people disagree with you, that it is dangerous to go down this needless path
Acts like yours are the reason for the growth of ethno-nationalism, not to mention political extremism. Their rise is a direct reaction to needless provocation from leftist elites
If one is born and raised in England, a person may be culturally English -- but that is wholly distinct and separate from being ethnically English. The two should not be conflated.
The two identities - ethnically English and culturally English - have happily co-existed for generations - with the historically tiny culturally English understanding their status and preferring to identity as civically and legally "British" rather than English.
This was done partly out of respect for the ethnic English, who accounted for 92% of the population of England as recently as 1991. But it was also because they naturally identified with their own ethnic group.
This is the only correct view. By way of illustration:
An Englishman born and raised in Japan, who was brought up in Japanese culture and who speaks Japanese with a flawless Japanese accent is clearly culturally Japanese -- but he remains ethnically English. That is an immutable characteristic.
In contrast with England, however, an immigrant to Japan can also be legally Japanese. Japan is a sovereign country of which he is a passport-holding citizen.
So this Englishman is culturally and legally Japanese but he is clearly not ethnically Japanese. I'd wager that 99%+ of Japanese people would agree with this - they'd say it was blindingly obvious
There is such an Englishman in Japan, actually. His name is Joshua Thomson, and he is a sensation for precisely this reason. He identifies as culturally Japanese but acknowledges he is not ethnically Japanese
But Englishness is an even more exceptional case. Unlike Japan, England is not a sovereign nation. It has no citizenship or passports. There is no nationality law.
One may be culturally English - as, say, the footballer Ian Wright is. But Ian Wright can no more be ethnically English than he (or anyone) can be legally English.
So that begs the question: what is the point of doing this?
What is behind this dangerous, provocative and completely unnecessary desire to erase / undermine English ethnicity, by far the most historically significant and consequential identity for creating the England we know and love?
Ethnic minorities are not calling for it. Poling shows that a mere 10% identify as English. The rest identify either as British or of the ethnicity of their ancestral homeland.
If anyone still believes the myth that the Liberal Democrats are a "centrist" party of "moderates" - falling somewhere between the Tories and Labour - this reprehensible policy by one of their MPs must surely blast it to smithereens.
Economically they may be more centrist than Labour - but culturally they are every bit as reckless and dangerous.
The Brehon retweeted
The more I read about the Russell Brand case, the more I start to doubt the accounts. Below are details of the r*pe charge Brand was convicted of, and they raise important questions:
The two (accuser and Brand) discussed anal sex before having it. She told Brand it was her “first time.” Her friend testified that the accuser admitted she had agreed to it, telling Brand to “be gentle.”
When a reporter first contacted the accuser about Brand following the Dispatches documentary, she said: “I’m not sure my story has much in it. I was an idiot, young and stupid, probably as much to blame.”
I’ve never liked Brand. I’ve always found him pretentious, crass and, as he has admitted himself, a complete degenerate and deviant. He was annoying when he was a revolutionary Communist, and when he was a ‘right-wing’ conspiracy theorist (strange how these charges occurred as soon as he switched political affiliations).
Having said that, none of these things mean Brand is a r*pist. Regardless of his past, going by his wife’s testimony, Brand has been a loving father to both his wife and children.
We need to ask ourselves the following questions:
What does it say about a system that convicts a father of young children of a charge where the evidence is lacklustre at best- with no physical or forensic evidence, simply hearsay- 20 years after the fact, but allows foreign rape gangs to roam free for decades, despite mountains of physical and forensic evidence?
Why have we become immune to the idea that, actually, yes, it is possible for women to lie?
Are we comfortable with setting a precedent that you can accuse any man of whatever you want and expect him to be punished, regardless of the evidence to hand?
Why do we charge independent journalists with contempt of court for reporting on cases, but not the mainstream press, who routinely bias juries via their reporting?
Modern British ‘justice’ has become a lynch mob, where public opinion, naïve juries and the media decide convictions. It is farcical.
To speak frankly, if you’re not brown and/or a woman, don’t expect justice and fair treatment in 2026 Britain.
The Brehon retweeted
Daily reminder that any sex you have can be used against you, twisted, and decades later result in a rape change based ONLY on one persons testimony that it happened.
In Batshit Bonkers Britain all penises need 24 hr bodycams to prove their innocence.
FREE RUSSELL BRAND
The Brehon retweeted
These are the five greatest achievements of the British.
One small island explained gravity, made war on the slave trade, built the machine age, gave the world its common language and governed the largest empire in history.
5. Science. Newton's laws, published in 1687, steered Apollo 11 to the Moon 282 years later. Faraday gave us electricity. Darwin explained life. Fleming's penicillin has saved an estimated 200 million lives.
4. Killing the slave trade. No great power had ever made war on it — until Britain. The Royal Navy boarded the slavers with cutlass and pistol, seized around 1,600 ships and freed 150,000 Africans.
3. The Industrial Revolution. Watt's engine, Arkwright's factory, Stephenson's railway, Brunel's iron ship. By 1850, one island made around half the world's iron and two-thirds of its coal.
2. The English language. 1.5 billion speakers. Every pilot on an international route must be certified in it. When the world talks to itself, it talks in ours.
1. The largest empire in human history. A quarter of the world's land. Parliaments, trial by jury and the common law — and when the British went home, nation after nation kept them.
They did not wait for the world to change. They went out and changed it.
Be proud to be British.
Our ancestors gave the world all five. Our children are rarely taught one of them with pride. I'm changing that, one story at a time, and I can't do it alone. Stand with me as a Guardian: thestoicenglish.com/guardian…
The Brehon retweeted
People of my generation should be very careful when they're crowing about sending young men to war against Russia, Iran or whoever else.
Our lifetimes have been almost entirely peaceful - we have not had to watch an entire generation of young men marched off to fight and die in a foreign land.
We have been blessed with peace.
Yet some of the loudest voices demanding conscription or the dropping of bombs are men who will never be asked to fight. They have profited from that peace, lived comfortable lives from that peace.
It's very easy to be brave with somebody else's blood on the line.
There are circumstances in which our nation must fight, but our aim must be to give young men a reason to believe in that fight, to give them a Britain worth defending.
Because millions of young white men are looking at a system that hates them, that has made them strangers in their own towns, that has decimated their industry?
Why on earth would they bleed for that?
I agree.
Our establishment has spent years alienating young white men and now they suddenly remember their value when they need those lads to fight their wars.
Restore Britain's duty is to give these young men a country worth fighting for, certainly NOT another endless foreign war to die in.
The Brehon retweeted
Grim news. Burnham has signed us up to 'time-bound' talks on a slavery apology. I have tabled a parliamentary motion calling for the opposite...
Here's what it demands.
- No apologies from the House of Commons for Britain's historical involvement in slavery.
- Not one penny in slavery reparations from British taxpayers.
- Official recognition and gratitude from these African/Caribbean nations for Britain's role in abolishing the slave trade and the sacrifices of Royal Navy sailors.
- Immediate termination of all British foreign aid, development assistance and taxpayer-funded grants to countries whose governments demand slavery reparations.
- A ban on UK visas for citizens of countries whose governments make such demands.
- An end to national self-flagellation over Britain's history, and pride in our country's contribution to abolishing the slave trade.
All MPs have been invited to support.
Not one has signed, so far.
We are not the same.
非洲那边为啥发展不起来？一个德国网友说了大实话，跟咱一个在非洲干了8年的中国工程师观察得一模一样。
这工程师刚去的时候，在营地钻井取水，你们猜挖多深？12米！清甜的地下水哗哗冒，40多号人吃喝带浇菜园子，绰绰有余。可你再瞅营地两公里外那个村子，一百多号人，常年靠一个浑浊泥坑取水，水里啥都有，孩子喝了天天拉肚子。
明明地下全是水，村里连口井都没有。工程队心善，说免费帮你们打井吧。结果村长开口了：'用公共土地钻井，得给面粉、食用油、汽水当补偿。'行吧，工程队咬咬牙答应了。
接着雇本地村民干活，给的工钱在当地算高的了。结果呢？干一会儿歇半天，受那个'传统作息'影响，根本推不动进度。最后工程师自己上手，十天给人家打出一口井，连取水工具都配好了。
刚建好那会儿，村民排队取水，高兴得跟啥似的。可没过多久，井口被树枝、石头、生活垃圾堵了。工程队免费给清了好几回，反复说保持卫生，没用！堵了再清，清了再堵。最后井彻底废了，村民跑来说：'再给我们打一口吧。'
我的天，还有更绝的——招本地工人修围栏，到点就收工，活没干完照样要全额工钱。有个年轻人接了个稳定供货的活儿，收入不错，结果赚够花的就停工，钱花完了再回来干。援助机构免费发种子教种地，人家倒好，种子不种，最后啥也没收着。
说白了，地下水资源不缺，外面援助也不少，可建好的水井、设施，因为没人维护，慢慢全荒废了。
The Brehon retweeted
Iran has cost the Republicans far more than anyone expected. It was a catastrophic mistake. And if Reform or the Tories were in charge, we would have gone to war right behind them. On day one, Restore Britain said no. It was not right for the British people, and we were absolutely right to draw that line in the sand.
The consequences of ANOTHER pointless Middle Eastern war have reached far into the homes of ordinary British families.
The price of petrol. The cost of heating. The weekly food shop. The mortgage. The small business struggling to pay its electricity bill. YOUR life has been made so much more expensive by THEIR war.
Every pointless escalation has made life more expensive for people who are already being squeezed from every direction.
For what? To what end? What has this war achieved? Absolutely nothing of worth.
Restore Britain said no.
Not because we support the Iranian regime. Obviously that is not the case.
But because the first duty of a British government is to protect Britain and its people.
And that very much includes protecting British families from the economic consequences of wars that are evidently and clearly not in our national interest.
When oil prices rise, families pay more to fill their cars. Those moving goods face higher diesel costs. Farmers pay more to operate their machinery. Businesses face rising transport and production bills.
Those costs do not stay at the petrol pump. That gets passed on. EVERYTHING gets more expensive.
It is always the same people who end up paying. It’s not the politicians making grand speeches about international leadership. It’s not the commentators demanding military action from the comfort of television studios.
It is British mums and dads trying to stretch the wage for a few extra days. It’s the pensioner frightened to put the heating on. The young couple wondering whether they can afford a home.
The small business owner calculating whether another increase in costs will finally force them to close.
They have been handed another bill for someone else’s war - a war backed by everyone on the right apart from Restore Britain.
Farage said this is the ‘right one’, and 'the gloves need to come off’. That is VERY easy to say from a GB News studio.
A Restore Britain government will put the interests of its own citizens before the approval of foreign leaders.
Britain does not need another foreign war. We tried that. It failed, over and over.
The abuse I received from Reform politicians for saying so was extreme.
They were wrong. The Tories were wrong. Restore Britain was right.
We need cheaper energy, affordable food, secure borders. We need to control inflation. We need to make our economy deliver for working men and women. THAT is our aim. Not getting dragged into another pointless foreign war.
Our loyalty is to the British people. Our responsibility is to British families. Our aim is to make life affordable again for our people.
And our answer to yet another unnecessary war was no, and remains no.
No more pointless foreign wars.
The Brehon retweeted
Danny Tommo was remanded in custody on the 25th September for popping an empty migrant boat
His trial has now been set for the 1st June 2027
That will be 249 days in prison without trial
He has been found guilty of no crimes
This is not justice
It's political persecution
The Brehon retweeted
The British Empire was the greatest work of human civilisation this world has ever seen. It outlawed the slave trade and then hunted it to extinction across every ocean on earth. It put the rule of law on six continents. It built the railway, the telegraph, the modern world. And when it left, India, Canada, Australia and fifty more kept the lot. That is not conquest. That is inheritance.
A quarter of the land on earth. A quarter of the people. Run from one wet island. Now ask what it did with that reach. Not what it took. What it built.
It built the law. Around a third of the world's people live under legal systems descended from English common law. The presumption of innocence. Trial by jury. A judge who can rule against the government and keep his job.
It built the machine age. The first intercity railway. The cable that joined Europe and America. By 1902 a telegraph ring circled the entire world, landing only on British soil.
It built the knowledge. Newton. Darwin. Faraday. Turing. Berners-Lee. The machine you are reading this on is, from the physics up, a British invention with foreign parts.
And it built a war on the slave trade. No great power had ever made war on the trade — until Britain did. Sixty years. Around 1,600 ships seized. Around 150,000 Africans freed. Around 2,000 British sailors dead doing it.
Then the thing that proves the case. Every empire before it ended in fire. This one chose to go — and the nations it freed kept the lot. The courts. The parliaments. The language. Then they formed a club with the country that had ruled them. Fifty-six members. Four of them were never British at all. Former French and Portuguese colonies asked to join.
Nobody applies to join the empire of a tyrant.
Was it perfect? No empire is. Fine. Now name the empire that did better. Name the one that bled for sixty years to end the slave trade. Name the one whose former subjects kept its courts. Name the one that packed up and went home.
There is one.
Nobody keeps the chains of a master. They keep the gifts of a builder. Fifty-six nations kept them. That is the verdict — and it was not ours. It was theirs.
Others apologise for our history. I tell it — properly, from the record, without the guilt. If that's what you want more of, stand with me: thestoicenglish.com/guardian…
#history #britishempire
The Brehon retweeted
The family of Henry Nowak have stated they fear that they had "been manipulated in our darkest hours".
"I fear that some decisions were made to try and protect the police and their reputation rather than help us as a family."
Just awful.
Those responsible must face prison.
The Brehon retweeted
On behalf of the British people, I would like to apologise for the slave trade. I am sorry we were the first great power in history to turn its guns on it. I am sorry it cost us around 2,000 sailors to free 150,000 people they would never meet. I am sorry the rest of the world took so long to follow.
Slavery did not begin with Britain. It is as old as civilisation. Babylon wrote it into law. Rome built an empire on it. The Vikings sold Englishmen through the slave market at Dublin. In 1625 Barbary corsairs took 60 men, women and children out of a Cornish church; by 1640 Parliament was told 3,000 to 5,000 English people were held in Algiers alone.
Every great power of the age took part in the Atlantic trade. Portugal and Spain for a century before an English ship did. Then the Dutch, the French — and the British, who in the eighteenth century carried more than anyone. That is the record. It is not disputed here.
Then a nation turned on the trade that had made it rich.
Wilberforce's bill was beaten year after year. On 25 March 1807 it passed. Then Britain did the part the critics never mention — it sent the Royal Navy to enforce it. The West Africa Squadron sailed in 1808, two ships for 3,000 miles of coast, and hunted slavers for nearly sixty years. Britain paid Spain and Portugal to open their ships to search. HMS Black Joke ran down the slaver El Almirante in 1829 and found 466 people in her hold.
Around 2,000 British sailors died doing it — most of fever, to free people they would never meet. 1,600 slave ships seized. 150,000 Africans set free.
In 1833 Parliament borrowed £20 million to end slavery across the Empire. The debt was not finally redeemed until 2015. The United States needed a civil war. Cuba held slaves until 1886. Brazil until 1888 — eighty-one years after Westminster voted.
Yes, we took part in the trade. Every power of the age did. None of them fought it like we did.
So yes. I will apologise. I am sorry it cost us so much. I am sorry the rest of the world took so long to follow.
That is not something you apologise for. That is something you teach.
#history #britishhistory #royalnavy #westafricasquadron
The Brehon retweeted
The cope is dead.
“We contribute.”
The chart is right there.
White households are the only ones in surplus.
Everyone else is a net fiscal drain.
That’s not a debate.
That’s the ONS.
You take more than you put in.
The numbers shut the claim down.
“We built Britain.”
No.
The English did.
Centuries of continuous settlement, law, industry and institutions on these islands before you arrived.
A passport or a birth certificate doesn’t rewrite that.
You didn’t build it.
You turned up later and started consuming it.
“If all the immigrants left the economy would collapse.”
The opposite.
Remove the net recipients and the people who still fund the system are better off.
The infrastructure, the NHS, the welfare, paid for by the historic population that remains the only group in credit.
You are not the engine.
You are the cost.
You’re staring at the government’s own data and still running the same script.
The Brehon retweeted
The incoming foreign wave of low-skilled mass settlement and citizenship must be reversed.
Restore Britain is today making these commitments to the British people.
- We will abolish Indefinite Leave to Remain entirely. No further ILR grants will be permitted.
- Revoke all existing ILR grants. A Restore Britain Parliament will legislate to terminate existing ILR permissions and, where appropriate, replace them with a system of time-limited visas, subject to the strict criteria contained in our immigration Red List. Those who don't meet that standard will leave. As previously stated, immigration from the third world into Britain will end.
- Entirely end the routine pathway from temporary visas to citizenship - living or working in Britain will no longer provide a route to naturalisation.
- Cancel naturalisation grants made from today onwards. We will introduce retrospective legislation to revoke every citizenship granted, as of today, under the existing immigration system. Put simply - the current naturalisation system has been subject to such widespread abuse and fraud, we no longer recognise it as legitimate. Following this, those individuals will again be subject to our Red List.
- Going further than that, Restore Britain will create a dedicated body to review naturalisation grants going back decades, audit original applications, investigate fraudulent citizenship awards, assess the contribution made to our country and pursue deprivation wherever appropriate grounds are established.
- There will be one exception to the proposed citizenship cancellation policy - citizenship obtained through marriage to a British citizen who was born in Britain with at least one parent also born in our country.
- And crucially - we will enforce immigration departures. Where individuals have no lawful right to remain under the replacement system, departure and removal requirements will be enforced.
Ending ILR is not enough. It will be too late - the consequence of ILR is citizenship, permanent citizenship. The staggering betrayal of the last Conservative Government must be undone.
The sheer scale of numbers is impossible to fully comprehend.
They will stay, they will claim benefits, they will live in social housing.
They will be naturalised.
They will get a passport.
They will become ‘British’.
Most importantly - they will vote.
It will cost us hundreds of billions. It will corrode our democracy. It will be the final end for our high-trust society.
It cannot be allowed to happen.
We will abolish ILR, end permanent settlement by default, and reverse the incoming wave of mass naturalisations.
A Restore Britain Government will undo the damage.
Not tolerate it, or manage it, or control it.
Undo it.
The Brehon retweeted
Hey @Grok List every country that improved after Whites became the minority.
The Brehon retweeted
I CHASED AN ILLEGAL MIGRANT SMUGGLER. THE FRENCH GENDARMES LET HIM ESCAPE.
Hardelot-Plage, France | 31 October 2026
This morning, during an illegal migrant boat crossing, I identified and confronted a suspected people smuggler.
I pursued him on foot and alerted waiting French gendarmes.
Their response?
They filmed him, made what I can only describe as a pathetic attempt to apprehend him, and ultimately failed to arrest him.
I WAS RUNNING AFTER A SUSPECTED SMUGGLER WHILE THE FRENCH GENDARMES STOOD FILMING.
This is the machinery behind Britain’s illegal Channel crossings. Criminal smuggling networks operating in plain sight, exploiting our borders and contributing to the erosion of Britain’s border security.
I witnessed it. I challenged it. I reported it.
And the suspected smuggler escaped.
How many more times must this happen before someone is held accountable?
Watch the footage. Judge the French gendarmes for yourselves.
The Brehon retweeted
For those that haven't been following the Tommy Robinson story... it's INSANE he was convicted of anything.
Back in August 2024 Tommy is on a family holiday in Cyprus posting about the riots, and the Daily Mail decides this is so important it sends a reporter and a photographer all the way to the island to find him, and according to Tommy they even took a photograph of his ex-wife, and then the story goes up and, as he told the jury, within hours people online were posting the name of the hotel he was staying at and telling others to head there, with his kids right there, so his family had to move to a different part of the hotel after he spoke to security, and he ended up leaving the hotel altogether...
...and so what does Tommy do?
He does the exact same thing back to them.
He finds out who wrote it, he hires investigators to locate them, he goes public with it and accuses one of the journalists of “doxxing my children’s location”, he rings one of them up and basically asks whether it would be OK if he did to them what they had done to him, which is literally the whole point, he’s holding up a mirror, and he told the court all he wanted was to question them on camera, the way reporters door-step people every single day, and that it was an attempt to bring the Daily Mail to the table, and even the prosecutor admitted none of it contained direct threats of violence, and yet the people who flew to another country to find him at his hotel are pretending they are the victims, and the man who found where they live and asked them how it feels is the criminal, and the jury couldn’t even agree, it was 10 to 2, and he’s going to be sentenced on December 16 for doing to the Daily Mail exactly what the Daily Mail did to him first, and we’re all supposed to just nod along like this makes perfect sense!!!!!!!
It's PURE INSANITY!!!!!!!