Neo 🟠 (@btc_matrix) header
Neo 🟠 (@btc_matrix) profile picture

Patience is a lost art. Discipline over dopamine.

Joined April 2022
Photo by Neo 🟠 (@btc_matrix)Photo by Neo 🟠 (@btc_matrix)Photo by Neo 🟠 (@btc_matrix)Photo by Neo 🟠 (@btc_matrix)Photo by Neo 🟠 (@btc_matrix)Photo by Neo 🟠 (@btc_matrix)Photo by Neo 🟠 (@btc_matrix)Photo by Neo 🟠 (@btc_matrix)Photo by Neo 🟠 (@btc_matrix)Photo by Neo 🟠 (@btc_matrix)
#bitcoin is the new discount rate at which you will assess your investments. And because #bitcoin returns are so much higher than pretty much any other option at the moment, this will demonetize other assets in favour of bitcoin.
4
1
12
613
how much Bitcoin is enough? 0.1 BTC? 0.5 BTC? 1 BTC? 3 BTC? 10 BTC?
39
for how long will @TaviCosta keep ignoring Bitcoin?
29
what people don't understand is that when the Bitcoin bull market starts, $MSTR is literally gonna print dollars to buy Bitcoin (STRC + MSTR ATMs), exactly when there are no sellers left. if you don't believe me, enjoy watching from the sidelines and HFSP.
1
91
JUST IN: Coinbase's John D'Agostino tells CNBC "we've seen over 40 countries commit to buying bitcoin in some fashion for their national balance sheets" 👀 "For those of us who have the luxury of being on the inside, all we're seeing is steady growth" 🚀
104
279
23
2,267
207,130
is that all you have, bears? -50%? we bulls will run over you soon!
29
how is @mattkratter going to complain about $MSTR today?
29
Neo 🟠 retweeted
Bitcoiners agree on the 99% that matters. We shouldn’t let the 1% divide us while nearly all global capital has yet to enter Bitcoin’s monetary network. The opportunity is bigger than the argument.
1,195
1,324
156
14,275
843,567
STRC: The Spiral is Fiction. Structure Matters People aren't thinking rationally about $STRC. They see $89, pattern-match to a “death spiral,” and reach for the one fix that makes it worse. The spiral is fiction. You must understand the structures. There is one legitimate worry, and it is self-inflicted. Before Strategy spent cash retiring $1.5bn of the 2029 converts, STRC had about 24 months of dividend coverage. Now it is roughly 7 months against $1.49bn a year of preferred dividends. $100 is not a peg - it is the ATM threshold the variable rate hovers around so the company can keep issuing accretively. Above it, the ATM funds Bitcoin accretively; below it, issuance stops. At $89 the engine is off. That is the real problem. Everything past it is mostly panic. Why it is cheap, is boring. SATA pays 13% and trades at $100, so 13% is the going rate (though SATA itself traded as low as $81 inside the last year). STRC also sits under $6.7bn of converts, so it should yield at least what the debt-free SATA does. An 11.5% coupon only reaches a 13% yield at roughly $88.46. STRC at $89 is basically dead on that arithmetic line - a coupon-too-low repricing, not the market screaming default. If it were pricing default it would be trading far below $88.46. The death spiral myth is misleading 1. No forced seller.STRC is perpetual and cumulative. Strategy can defer the dividend and it simply accrues - no default, no maturity, no acceleration. That said, suspending dividends carries horrible optics and should be avoided at nearly all costs. It can (and should) be avoided by using the equity engine to retire senior claims accretively, as outlined below, which shrinks the dividend burden without selling Bitcoin or depleting cash reserves. 2. Size is a non-event. The whole preferred stack is $1.49bn a year against a $54bn Bitcoin position - under 3% of holdings (STRC alone ~1.8%). That is $124m a month into a market that trades tens of billions daily. It does not move price, let alone trigger a spiral. BTC is sitting at the 200-week moving average, bottom of the power law, and oversold on most metrics. 3. No trigger. No margin loans, covenants, or maturity walls tied to Bitcoin price. The converts are long-dated and cheap (0.4%). 4. The link runs backwards. Below par, the rational move is to buy the $100 claim for $89 - it is accretive. The low price bears say starts the spiral is exactly what pays you to end it. A true spiral only exists if management always chooses the worst option. The better fix: Match the coupon to ~13% to clear the market today. But don’t stop there. Run the equity engine at the credit problem. Issue common stock (currently trading at a premium to CEBE ~$82) and use the proceeds to buy back and cancel STRC on the open market. $1bn issued retires ~$1.124bn of STRC par, eliminates $129m a year in dividends. Net Bitcoin per share (CEBE) actually rises from ~$81.90 to $82.93 even after dilution. Runway improves from 7.0 to 7.7 months. BTC and cash remain untouched. The trade stays accretive until MSTR falls below ~$73. Scale to $2bn for even larger impact (26% of the preferred float, $258m dividends removed). This deleverages the convert stack, shrinks the dividend burden, lifts credit quality on remaining shares, and captures the dual discount: premium equity funding a senior claim bought at 89 cents on the dollar. Add a ring-fenced, over-collateralized Bitcoin/Treasury reserve specifically for STRC (audited and named) and the coverage fears die at the source. Everyone wins: credit gets a real floor, equity gets higher CEBE and its funding engine back, Bitcoin holders give up nothing. A credible bid closes the discount naturally. Digital credit only scales into the multi-trillion income market with credibility, not by chasing ever-higher coupons in the volatile crypto-yield corner. Hold $100 at a market yield below SATA through a cleaner, deleveraged, collateralized structure and you attract real allocators.
16
14
2
165
13,111
Bear markets will bring $STRC yields up, and bull markets will bring $STRC yields down. It's not that complicated.
1
2
38
Replying to @zerohedge
True. That is why Bitcoin is based on energy: you can issue fake fiat currency, and every government in history has done so, but it is impossible to fake energy.
2,390
7,404
2,121
38,514
8,807,667
Hyperinflation is, at its core, a systematic wealth transfer from creditors to debtors, and the defining financial decision of any inflationary crisis is which side of that transfer you occupy. The mechanism is straightforward: 👇🏻
3
2
63
The trade is not complicated: fixed rate, long duration, productive assets, structured before the event, so that when the inflation arrives, the amortization schedule does the work. It has worked for four centuries. Almost nobody runs it, because almost nobody is willing to
1
34
borrow aggressively while their neighbors are paying down debt — which is, of course, exactly why the ones who do end up on the right side of the transfer every time.
22
At what price does @LukeGromen get into Bitcoin again?
1
60
This is unbelievable. Saylor buying near 6,000 in a single day using $STRC
55
at what 10y yield we see TACO? 4.5%?
1
29
Saylor is buying Bitcoin like there is no tomorrow. $STRC
37