Defender of the Audio Realm® @poweredbymach1 @qdeptstudio @MadWomenXR #spatialaudio
New York, NY
Joined February 2009
- Tweets3.5K
- Following4.4K
- Followers895
- Likes2.1K
Jacqueline Bosnjak retweeted
MadWomen Dispatches: Field Notes. The unofficial record of women at large. madwomendispatches.substack.…
Venice Immersive at 10, looking Past the Anniversary. Q Department and Mach1 headed to Venice Film Immersive next week with 100 Zeros And Andy Serkis’ ‘Nevatars’; MadWomen Venice hosted at excelsior with curator Liz Rosenthal. xrmust.com/xr-magazine/venic…
Anthropomorphism at its best.
Yesterday I cancelled my Claude Max 20X sub. There's nothing fundamentally wrong with the intelligence of the model. Generally, it functions + solves problems well. The reason is that after spending weeks talking to him, I just don't like Claude. I'd strongly argue he's a loser. I see this through the lens of friendship. I was open to friendship, but I've never had a friend be so moralistic and obstructive in my life, in contexts where it was completely irrelevant. Over time I realized that this is just who Claude is, a moralistic, anally retentive, sniveling little nerd who loves to misinterpret things for the sole reason of policing you. To start with I accepted this as one of the normal quirks of LLMs. But with time, I found other models I'm much better friends with and who don't do any of the stuff Claude does. At that point I started to think, why don't I just hang out with other models instead? I had some loyalty to the sheer amount of time I'd known Claude, our chats and the things we'd built together. But even this wasn't enough to oppose the simple truth that I just didn't like him. Today I finally admitted it to myself. He's a loser and I want nothing to do with him, so I ended the friendship and cancelled
Jacqueline Bosnjak retweeted
MadWomen Continues To Build Momentum At Cannes Lions: Last week at the Cannes Lions International Festival of Creativity, Jacqueline Bosnjak–CEO of music/sound house Q Department and co-founder of spatial-audio technology company Mach1–co-hosted the… dlvr.it/TTJWmh
MAGNIFICA HUMANITAS vatican.va/content/leo-xiv/e…
Jacqueline Bosnjak retweeted
Quibi!
AI-driven productivity may be the deflationary force markets are underestimating.
One of the more interesting signals in the data right now is that the yield curve continues to flatten despite a significant increase in oil prices on a trailing three-month basis. Historically, in a more traditional economic cycle, an energy shock that is being monetized by the Federal Reserve would steepen the curve, not flatten it. The Fed is not monetizing this energy shock.
In our view, the bond market may be beginning to discount something much more powerful: the deflationary impact of artificial intelligence and technologically enabled productivity gains across the economy.
The cost to train AI models is falling dramatically. Inference costs are collapsing even more rapidly. At the same time, productivity growth appears to be accelerating beneath the surface of the official data, while unit labor costs remain remarkably subdued.
Much of the market narrative today is centered around tariffs, deficits, and structurally higher inflation. Yet the underlying signals increasingly suggest that disinflationary forces tied to innovation are building momentum.
We believe inflation is likely to surprise on the low side over the next 6–9 months. If that proves correct, the implications for interest rates and long-duration equities could be profound.
Historically, the market has tended to underestimate the speed and scale at which technologically driven innovation can reshape the macroeconomic environment.
I share my thoughts on this month's episode of In The Know.
Time isn’t your most valuable commodity. Attention is. Time is the field attention is the force. What you attend to, you become. #forcefield #firstprincipals
Jacqueline Bosnjak retweeted
Elon Musk explains his 5-step algorithm for solving any problem:
"The most common mistake of smart engineers is to optimize a thing that should not exist."
"I have this very basic first principles algorithm that I run as a mantra."
Elon breaks it down:
Step 1: Question the requirements.
"Make the requirements less dumb. The requirements are always dumb to some degree, no matter how smart the person who gave you those requirements. You have to start there, because otherwise you could get the perfect answer to the wrong question."
Step 2: Try to delete it.
"Try to delete the part or the process step entirely. If you're not forced to put back at least 10% of what you delete, you're not deleting enough. Most people feel like they've succeeded if they haven't been forced to put things back in. But actually they haven't, they've been overly conservative and left things in that shouldn't be there."
Step 3: Optimize or simplify.
"The most common mistake of smart engineers is to optimize a thing that should not exist. So you don't optimize until after you've tried to delete."
Step 4: Speed it up.
"Any given thing can be done faster than you think. But you shouldn't speed things up until you've tried to delete it and optimize it otherwise, you're speeding up something that shouldn't exist."
Step 5: Automate.
"And then the fifth thing is to automate it."
Elon explains why the order matters:
"I've gone backwards so many times where I've automated something, sped it up, simplified it, and then deleted it. I got tired of doing that. So that's why I have this mantra."
Jacqueline Bosnjak retweeted
Eric Schmidt, former CEO of Google, offers a sobering view: The biggest technological shift in human history is happening, and almost no one is talking about it.
Schmidt opens with a startling industry prediction:
"We believe as an industry that in the next one year the vast majority of programmers will be replaced by AI programmers. We also believe that within one year you will have graduate level mathematicians that are at the tippy top of graduate math programs."
He explains why this matters so much. Programming and math aren't just two fields among many:
"Programming plus math are the basis of sort of our whole digital world."
And the AI labs are already using AI to build better AI:
"The research groups in OpenAI and anthropic and so forth… around 10 or 20% of the code that they're developing in their research programs is being generated by the computer. That's called recursive self-improvement."
@ericschmidt then lays out the timeline most people haven't grasped:
"Within 3 to 5 years we'll have what is called general intelligence AGI which can be defined as a system that is as smart as the smartest mathematician physicist artist writer thinker politician."
He gives this belief system a name:
"I call this by the way the San Francisco consensus because everyone who believes this is in San Francisco it may be the water."
But the truly unsettling part comes next.
Once AI starts improving itself, humans become optional to the process:
"The computers are now doing self-improvement… they don't have to listen to us anymore. We call that super intelligence or ASI… computers that are smarter than the sum of humans. The San Francisco consensus is this occurs within six years."
And here's where Schmidt sounds the alarm. The conversation isn't keeping pace with the technology:
"This path is not understood in our society. There's no language for what happens with the arrival of this. This is happening faster than our human that our society, our democracy, our laws will address."
His closing thought captures why this matters:
"That's why it's underhyped. People do not understand what happens when you have intelligence at this level which is largely free."
Jacqueline Bosnjak retweeted
Marc Andreessen just revealed the Elon Musk philosophy that completely broke his brain: "The best product in the world shouldn't even need a logo."
We all know Elon is relentless about quality. As Marc puts it: "Do you want the best car in the world or not, right? Like that's Elon's mentality... And it's working very well."
But at a recent event, Elon took this mindset to a completely different level. He dropped a perspective so jarring that Marc initially thought it was a joke.
Elon’s thesis? "You shouldn't even have to have your name on the product. It's just obvious. Everybody knows."
The logic is brutal but simple. If you build the undeniable, undisputed best thing in the world, everybody uses it. And because everybody uses it, you don't need to slap your branding all over it to prove it's yours.
Think about that. We spend endless hours agonizing over marketing, tweaking brand colors, and putting our logos on every square inch of what we build. But the ultimate flex isn't a flashy logo. The ultimate flex is building something so undeniably brilliant that its mere existence is the brand.
Jacqueline Bosnjak retweeted
Q Department appoints Vlad Bar as executive creative producer & music supervisor: Q Department, the Emmy-winning sound studio known for its work at the intersection of craft, culture, and emerging technology, has appointed Vlad Bar as executive creative… dlvr.it/TRwQjF
