There are no coincidences. Decoding CAW as a value infrastructure layer. Beyond price. Into structure.
Decentralized
Joined May 2011
- Tweets640
- Following45
- Followers8.3K
- Likes6.1K
Pinned Tweet
There are no coincidences.
This account is shifting focus
from price speculation to structural analysis.
CAW is not just a token.
It is emerging as a value infrastructure layer.
Beyond price. Into structure.
THE DOMAIN CAME BACK. THE QUESTIONS DIDN’T.
caw.is, “The Maker,” the SHIB funding trail, and the evidence that refuses to disappear.
For a while, CAW went quiet.
Not dead.
Not disproven.
Just quiet.
CAW Social continued to develop. Code continued to move. The community continued to argue over what CAW was, who created it, whether the original creator was still watching, and whether any of the old clues still mattered.
But one of the oldest pieces of the CAW story appeared to disappear.
caw.is
The domain that hosted the original A Hunters Dream manifesto stopped working.
For a project built around decentralization, riddles, disappearing identities and deliberately limited communication, it was easy to attach meaning to that disappearance.
Maybe the manifesto had served its purpose.
Maybe the original creator had finally walked away.
Maybe CAW Social had become something separate from the original experiment.
Or maybe someone simply forgot to renew a domain.
Then the domain record changed.
And suddenly the boring explanation became less satisfying.
Because caw.is did not simply disappear.
Someone appears to have kept it alive.
That alone proves very little.
But combined with several other pieces of evidence that have emerged around CAW, it creates a much more interesting question:
What exactly is still connected to the original CAW?
This investigation began with a disappearing website.
It ended somewhere else entirely.
With a name.
The Maker.
⸻
1. caw.is disappeared
The first observation was simple.
The original manifesto domain stopped resolving normally.
Registration information indicated that caw.is had reached its expiration period around:
August 7, 2026.
That gave us a straightforward explanation.
Domains expire.
Websites disappear.
Old crypto projects leave thousands of abandoned domains behind.
If that had been the end of the story, there would have been very little to investigate.
But according to updated .is registration data circulated shortly afterward, the domain record subsequently showed a recent change event around:
August 11, 2026
with the registration apparently extended into:
2027.
That distinction matters.
An abandoned domain and a renewed domain tell two very different stories.
If the renewal data is correct, someone with control over the registration infrastructure made the decision — deliberately or automatically through an existing renewal arrangement — to preserve caw.is.
We need to be precise here.
This does not prove that the CAW creator logged into a server.
It does not prove that the manifesto was deliberately removed.
It does not prove that a new CAW product is about to launch.
And it certainly does not identify the person controlling the domain.
A domain registration change is evidence of a domain registration change.
Nothing more.
But it creates a useful stop condition:
STOP CONDITION
Do not interpret a domain renewal as proof of active development.
At the same time:
Do not describe a renewed domain as abandoned without evidence.
And that leaves us with an interesting fact.
caw.is appears not to have been discarded.
↓
🤖 Made with AI
11. The missing link is not another riddle
This may be the biggest change in how we should investigate CAW.
For years, CAW researchers have searched for patterns.
Dates.
Numbers.
Capitalization.
Roses.
Elon posts.
Ryoshi posts.
Wallet digits.
Book references.
Images.
Coordinates.
Hidden text.
Some of those investigations produced genuinely unusual results.
Others inevitably drifted into coincidence hunting.
But the next major CAW discovery probably does not require another coincidence.
It requires a signature.
Consider what would happen if any one of the following occurred:
The SHIB deployer signs an authenticated CAW Social action.
Or:
The CAW deployer proves control in connection with The Maker.
Or:
The Maker cryptographically demonstrates control of an address already present in the original CAW deployment structure.
Suddenly we would not be comparing writing styles.
We would not be comparing dates.
We would not be debating whether a rose means something.
We would have key-level continuity.
That would be a fundamentally different category of evidence.
⸻
12. And this is why caw.is matters again
Viewed alone, the domain renewal is boring.
Domains get renewed every day.
Viewed inside this larger picture, however, it becomes another unresolved piece.
The original CAW infrastructure has not simply vanished into history.
At the same time:
CAW development continues.
A developer claims contact with the original code author.
The SHIB-to-CAW funding trail remains permanently visible.
A CAW Social account/NFT has been placed at the SHIB deployer address.
And the original manifesto domain appears to have been preserved.
None of those facts proves that one hidden person is coordinating everything.
That would be an enormous leap.
But they also make another popular explanation increasingly unsatisfying:
“CAW was abandoned years ago and everything happening now is completely unrelated.”
Maybe.
But that hypothesis now has evidence to explain.
⸻
13. So who is The Maker?
At the moment, this may be the most valuable question in the entire CAW investigation.
Not:
Is Elon behind CAW?
Not:
Is Ryoshi back?
But:
Who — or what — is The Maker?
Because if Gilgamesh’s description is accurate, The Maker sits unusually close to the origin.
Potentially:
Original CAW code
↓
The Maker
↓
Gilgamesh
↓
CAW Social
While independently:
SHIB Deployer
↓
81A0
↓
CAW Creator
↓
CAW Token
If The Maker can ever be cryptographically connected to the second branch, two previously separate investigations collapse into one.
That would matter.
A lot.
Until then, however:
The Maker is a lead.
Not an identity.
↓
14. What would actually change my mind?
CAW has accumulated enough mythology.
So instead of another prediction, here are the conditions that would materially change the investigation.
A valid cryptographic signature connecting The Maker to an original CAW wallet.
An outbound transaction from the SHIB deployer directly interacting with relevant CAW infrastructure.
A CAW Social action whose authentication can be independently verified against the SHIB deployer key.
A verifiable historical artifact connecting the original CAW code author to the deployment wallet.
Or another deterministic on-chain link connecting the original infrastructure with current development.
Until something like that appears:
Ryoshi = CAW remains unproven.
Elon = CAW remains unproven.
The Maker = CAW deployer remains unproven.
But something else is becoming increasingly difficult to dismiss.
The trail is still alive.
⸻
15. Receipts before mythology
Perhaps this is the most useful lesson CAW has produced.
Mysteries become unreliable when stories become easier to repeat than evidence is to verify.
A wallet receives an NFT.
Someone says:
Ryoshi returned.
No.
Someone sent the wallet an NFT.
A SHIB-associated wallet funded an intermediary that later funded CAW.
Someone says:
Ryoshi created CAW.
No.
The funding path exists.
The human identity remains unknown.
A developer mentions The Maker.
Someone says:
We found the creator.
No.
We found testimony describing an original code author.
The identity remains unknown.
A domain gets renewed.
Someone says:
Something huge is launching.
No.
The domain appears to have been preserved.
The reason remains unknown.
This distinction may feel less exciting.
It shouldn’t.
Because after four years of theories, the most interesting thing about CAW is that there are still real, independently testable questions left.
⸻
THE DOMAIN CAME BACK.
caw.is disappeared.
Then apparently it didn’t.
CAW Social kept developing.
The old funding trail remained on Ethereum.
A developer described working with the author of the original CAW code.
A CAW Social NFT appeared in the SHIB deployer wallet.
None of this identifies the creator.
None of it proves Ryoshi returned.
None of it proves Elon Musk was ever involved.
And none of it proves that CAW Social represents the intentions of whoever originally deployed CAW.
But we are no longer asking only:
“What does this clue mean?”
We can ask something much better:
“Which key signs next?”
Because unlike screenshots, stories, usernames and theories, a cryptographic signature is difficult to reinterpret after the fact.
Maybe nothing happens.
Maybe caw.is simply stays registered.
Maybe the SHIB deployer NFT never moves.
Maybe The Maker remains a name without an address.
That outcome itself would tell us something.
But if one of these dormant pieces suddenly produces an authenticated action, the CAW investigation changes immediately.
So for now, there is no grand conclusion.
Only a narrower one.
The domain came back.
The questions didn’t disappear with it.
And somewhere between the original code, the old wallets, the current developers and the keys that have not yet moved, the missing link may still be sitting in plain sight.
Watch the signatures.
Not the mythology.
— CAW DEC0DED
It has now been more than four years since CAW was deployed.
During that time, we’ve seen countless theories.
“CAW is Elon Musk’s project.”
“It’s connected to SHIB or Ryoshi.”
“It’s tied to the future of X.”
“No… it’s just another meme coin.”
There are many different opinions, yet to this day, no one has presented definitive proof that settles the debate.
For the record, I’m still Team Elon.
I know there’s no conclusive evidence, and yes, I get criticized for saying it.
But that’s part of being a researcher.
We’re allowed to have a favorite theory.
At least I hope so.
Over the years, people have analyzed on-chain data, decoded images, studied hidden messages, connected timelines, and challenged one another’s ideas.
Because there isn’t a clear answer, people from all over the world continue trying to solve the same giant puzzle from different perspectives.
I think that, in itself, has value.
Not because one person is right.
But because a decentralized community is constantly questioning, debating, and searching together.
Recently, however, I’ve started thinking about a different question.
For years we’ve asked:
“Who created CAW?”
“Who’s behind it?”
“When will something finally happen?”
But perhaps those aren’t the most important questions anymore.
Maybe the real question is this:
Will a decentralized network like CAW actually become valuable in an AI-driven world?
A few years ago, cryptocurrency was primarily about speculation.
Which token would pump?
Which exchange would list it?
Who was buying?
How many X’s could it do?
Those questions still matter.
But the world is changing.
AI is no longer just answering questions.
It’s beginning to collect information, make decisions, write code, execute tasks, communicate with other AI systems, and eventually it may manage assets and perform transactions on its own.
We’re moving from an internet operated by humans…
to one increasingly operated by autonomous AI agents.
If that future arrives, what kind of financial infrastructure will those AI agents actually use?
Closed, centralized platforms controlled by corporations?
Financial systems limited by national borders?
Or open, permissionless networks that operate 24/7 without requiring approval from a central authority?
AI has no nationality.
It doesn’t sleep.
It doesn’t care about banking hours.
It doesn’t naturally fit into the financial systems that humans built for themselves.
When you look at it that way, decentralized networks may actually be a better match for AI than for humans.
And that’s where another thought comes to mind.
What if CAW was never designed only for humans trading tokens?
What if it was designed with a future of AI agents, decentralized identity, open communication, and frictionless value transfer in mind?
And what if…
it’s simply waiting for the technology around it to mature?
Of course, that’s only a hypothesis.
There is no evidence proving that CAW is waiting for AI.
But something interesting is happening.
Today, decentralized identity, AI agents, permissionless communication, and borderless value transfer are far more relevant than they were when CAW first appeared.
1/2
🤖 Made with AI
2/2
The mystery surrounding CAW hasn’t become smaller.
The world has simply become more compatible with the ideas that projects like this represent.
Maybe that’s just a coincidence.
Or maybe we’ve been trying to understand tomorrow’s technology using yesterday’s assumptions.
Perhaps we’ve been waiting for CAW…
when CAW has actually been waiting for the world.
Or maybe that’s just another one of my crazy theories.
After all…
I’m still Team Elon.
But that’s exactly why I enjoy researching projects like this.
When there are no definitive answers, curiosity is still valuable.
And strangely enough, the more AI evolves, the more relevant the questions surrounding CAW seem to become.
So here’s my question.
Will CAW eventually prove to be just another crypto project?
Or will its real purpose only become visible once the AI era fully arrives?
I don’t know.
Neither does anyone else.
That’s why the research continues.
What do you think?
Beyond X Money: Why the Future May Need More Than X Alone — And Where CAW Could Fit In
In 2026, X Money is finally becoming a reality.
Visa integration.
Peer-to-peer payments.
Bank account connectivity.
The “Everything App” that Elon Musk has talked about for years is beginning to take shape.
But I don’t believe this is the final destination.
I believe it’s only the beginning.
Because beyond X Money lies a challenge that X alone may not be able to solve.
⸻
The Bigger X Becomes, the Less Freedom It Has
This is the paradox.
Elon Musk may be one of the strongest advocates for freedom and innovation in modern business.
Yet if X becomes a global financial platform serving hundreds of millions of users, it will inevitably become less free to act.
Why?
Because large companies come with large constraints.
⸻
Regulation
Money transmitter licenses.
KYC requirements.
AML compliance.
Sanctions screening.
Data retention laws.
Consumer protection regulations.
X cannot simply ignore these realities.
In fact, the larger it becomes, the more regulation it attracts.
⸻
Political Pressure
A platform that controls communication and financial transactions for hundreds of millions of people will inevitably become a matter of national interest.
Finance is deeply tied to sovereignty.
Governments will want oversight.
Governments will demand accountability.
⸻
Antitrust Concerns
Imagine a single company controlling:
Social media
Payments
Banking services
AI services
Digital assets
Regulators around the world would likely raise concerns about concentration of power.
⸻
Corporate Responsibility
As companies grow larger, decision-making becomes increasingly cautious.
There is a difference between:
What is technically possible
and
What a corporation is actually allowed to do.
Even Elon Musk has limits.
Even X has limits.
⸻
This Is Why an Open Financial Layer May Become Necessary
This is where the conversation becomes interesting.
X and blockchain are not necessarily competitors.
They may serve entirely different purposes.
⸻
X Money
User interface
Fiat payments
Regulated financial services
Mainstream adoption
⸻
Open Financial Networks
Borderless connectivity
Open protocols
Interoperability
Infrastructure that is not owned by a single company
Just as the internet is not owned by one corporation, the next generation of financial infrastructure may not belong to a single company either.
⸻
This Is Where CAW Becomes Interesting
If CAW is merely another token, its long-term significance may be limited.
But if CAW is attempting to become:
An account layer
An identity layer
A cross-chain infrastructure
A financial layer for AI agents and digital economies
Then its position becomes much more interesting.
In that scenario, CAW does not compete with X.
It potentially complements it.
⸻
Why?
Because Elon Musk faces constraints precisely because he is Elon Musk.
And X faces constraints precisely because it is X.
A global corporation must comply with regulations, politics, and shareholder expectations.
An open network can evolve differently.
It can explore models that are difficult for large corporations to implement directly.
1/2
2/2
Looking Further Ahead
If the future includes:
AI agents transacting with one another
Borderless digital payments
Identity systems that move across applications
Assets that seamlessly operate across multiple blockchains
Then the world may need more than a single company.
It may need an open financial layer.
⸻
To Be Clear
There is currently no official evidence that CAW is connected to X Money.
There is no proof that CAW will be integrated into X.
This is speculation, not a claim.
However, two things are objectively true:
X is building a global financial platform.
The larger and more influential that platform becomes, the more constraints it will face.
Those realities naturally lead to a question:
Could an open financial layer eventually become necessary to support a truly global digital economy?
And if that happens—
where will CAW stand?
⸻
Final Thought
Perhaps X Money will become the interface that billions of people use.
But the infrastructure underneath the next generation of digital finance may require something more open, more interoperable, and less constrained by corporate boundaries.
If that future arrives,
then perhaps the story of CAW is only just beginning.
Beyond Price. Infrastructure.
I’ve said this many times.
And I’ll probably keep saying it.
Most people are watching the price.
“How high can it go?”
“How many X from here?”
“When is the next move?”
Those questions may matter.
But the most important thing is happening somewhere else.
What is being built?
That’s the real question.
⸻
History has shown us the same pattern over and over again.
The Internet didn’t change the world because people were watching stock prices.
Smartphones didn’t transform society because of speculation.
Cloud computing didn’t become a multi-trillion-dollar industry because someone predicted its future valuation.
They changed the world because they became infrastructure.
Infrastructure that people eventually couldn’t live without.
At first, it’s misunderstood.
At first, it’s underestimated.
And by the time everyone finally understands it, it’s already everywhere.
⸻
That’s why I’ve been repeating the same thing:
The biggest opportunities are rarely about price.
They’re about infrastructure.
Not just financial infrastructure.
Something much bigger.
Something more fundamental.
⸻
Imagine a world where:
People connect.
Information flows.
Value moves.
Identity exists natively online.
Communication, communities, digital identity, and the movement of value all operate on a single layer.
No borders.
No unnecessary intermediaries.
Accessible to anyone.
Always on.
A new digital foundation connecting people across the world.
⸻
Maybe the future of the internet won’t revolve around websites, but around networked identities.
Maybe social platforms and financial systems won’t remain separate.
Maybe they eventually converge into a single infrastructure layer.
And if that’s true…
What exactly are we looking at today?
⸻
Most people see a token.
I see infrastructure.
Most people see speculation.
I see a foundation being built.
Because the greatest value in history has almost always been created by infrastructure.
Roads created economies.
The Internet created the information age.
Cloud computing created entirely new industries.
So what happens if the next great infrastructure is one that connects people, information, identity, and value into a single digital layer?
⸻
Success is never guaranteed.
Every ambitious idea carries risk.
But one thing has never changed.
The future won’t be built by another app.
It will be built by infrastructure.
⸻
Beyond Price.
Infrastructure.
And maybe the real question isn’t:
“How high can the price go?”
Maybe the real question is:
Are we simply looking at another digital asset… or are we witnessing the early construction of a new infrastructure that could redefine how people connect, communicate, and exchange value online?
🤖 Made with AI
Most people will see this as just another NFT mint.
I think they’re looking at the wrong thing.
What happened here may be far bigger than the NFT itself.
In a single transaction, CAW combined passkey onboarding, smart account activation, identity creation, and NFT issuance into one seamless flow.
Traditionally, Web3 onboarding looks something like this:
Create a wallet.
Write down a seed phrase.
Fund the wallet.
Sign transactions.
Approve transactions.
Understand gas fees.
Wait for confirmations.
For most people, this is where adoption ends.
The next generation of blockchain applications isn’t about adding more features.
It’s about making blockchain disappear.
Users shouldn’t need to understand wallets, gas fees, signatures, recovery phrases, or account abstraction.
They should simply create an account and start using the product.
That’s why this transaction matters.
The NFT is not the story.
The account layer is the story.
Authentication.
Identity.
Ownership.
Account creation.
All bundled into a single user experience.
If this direction continues to evolve, CAW starts looking less like a token.
Less like a meme coin.
And more like infrastructure.
More like a financial layer.
More like an identity layer.
The companies building the future of digital finance are all moving toward the same destination:
Fewer wallets.
Fewer signatures.
Less friction.
Better user experience.
This transaction may be an early glimpse of what that future looks like.
And most people probably won’t recognize its significance until much later.
Congratulations, Elon🚀🪐🐦⬛
ELON MUSK: "It is certainly hard to believe that little company that started in a warehouse in El Segundo is now going public. It was the largest IPO ever, and let me tell you, if people had told me this was gonna happen, I was like, man, you must be smoking some really good crack, because I think this company is gonna fail. I gave SpaceX less than a 10% chance of succeeding at all. To be clear, in fact, I told people this. I said, look, we’re probably going to fail, but you know, should give it a try, because if we don’t, if there’s not a new company that enters space, we will never be a truly space-bearing civilization."
58bZfQ1
And the Second Key: “zrUfKaKV”
The mystery of CAW did not end with a single code.
After researchers discovered 58bZfQ1, another encrypted string was found embedded on-chain:
zrUfKaKV
This was not merely a random sequence of characters. It was written directly into Ethereum transaction data, appearing to be a deliberate clue left behind by someone.
From that moment, the CAW community began what would become one of the most unusual investigations in crypto history.
Researchers followed a trail involving:
On-chain keys
Image hosts
Steganography
Coordinates
The Epic of Gilgamesh
Book ciphers
IPFS
Terms rarely associated with meme coins suddenly became central to the discussion.
Years later, one researcher summarized the path as:
“On-chain key → image host → stego poem + coordinates → Gilgamesh book cipher → IPFS…”
What emerged resembled less a traditional crypto project and more a massive cryptographic puzzle.
Many researchers came to view 58bZfQ1 and zrUfKaKV as CAW’s “Genesis Codes”—symbolic keys placed at the project’s beginning.
Keys that unlocked not only information, but ideology.
The first code, 58bZfQ1, eventually led investigators to caw.is.
What they found was not a whitepaper, tokenomics document, or roadmap.
Instead, they discovered a manifesto.
A philosophical text centered on decentralization, autonomy, ownership, and resistance to centralized control.
This immediately set CAW apart from most meme coins and suggested it may have been designed as something more than a speculative asset.
The story grew even stranger.
As researchers continued working through zrUfKaKV, some claimed they uncovered a chain of clues that eventually pointed to a familiar name:
Elon Musk
To be clear, this is not proof of involvement.
No definitive evidence shows that Elon Musk created, funded, or controlled CAW.
However, researchers began asking a different question:
Why would such a result appear at all?
What makes this particularly interesting is that these discoveries were documented in real time throughout 2022.
The investigation unfolded publicly through threads, transaction records, decoding attempts, and archived discussions that remain available today.
This was not a myth created years later.
It was a live community investigation.
Perhaps that is what makes CAW unique.
Most projects explain themselves.
CAW appeared to do the opposite.
It offered few explanations and instead left behind traces:
Fragments.
Symbols.
Codes.
Clues waiting to be discovered.
As a result, people were not simply speculating on price.
They were trying to answer a deeper question:
What exactly is CAW?
The timing made the mystery even more compelling.
All of this unfolded during 2022:
Elon Musk’s Twitter acquisition
The rise of decentralized social media discussions
Bluesky
Twitter’s eventual transformation into X
The emergence of the Everything App concept
And, at the same time, CAW.
Looking back, the timeline appears filled with unusual intersections.
Of course, none of this proves a grand theory.
Many questions remain unanswered.
Yet one fact is difficult to ignore:
Very few meme coins launch with encrypted on-chain messages, philosophical manifestos, multi-stage cryptographic puzzles, symbolic imagery, and years of ongoing investigation.
That is why people continue studying CAW today.
Not because of price alone.
But because the project appears to contain layers that are still being uncovered.
58bZfQ1.
zrUfKaKV.
Two codes.
Two keys.
And perhaps the first doorway into one of crypto’s most enduring mysteries.
HODL！
🤖 Made with AI
The First Signals
Strange Coincidences Began Appearing Immediately After CAW Launched
On April 14, 2022, CAW (A Hunter’s Dream) quietly appeared on Ethereum.
There was no major marketing campaign.
No public founder.
No interviews.
No promises.
And yet, within roughly 48 hours, the token was rapidly listed across multiple exchanges — something highly unusual for an anonymous project with almost no public exposure.
But what drew even more attention later was not only the launch itself.
It was what happened around it.
Just after CAW entered the market, several events began appearing that many community members would later revisit and question.
One of the most discussed moments came from Elon Musk.
Shortly after the CAW deployment period, Elon posted a cryptic “I LOVE YOU” message accompanied by imagery associated with roses.
For most people, it was simply another abstract Elon post.
But inside the CAW community, attention quickly turned toward CAW’s earliest visual identity.
The original CAW artwork featured a dark plague doctor figure alongside three red roses — a design that would later become one of the project’s most recognizable early symbols.
Of course, none of this proves a direct connection.
That distinction is important.
But the timing, symbolism, and sequence of events became difficult for some observers to completely ignore.
At the same time, Elon Musk was aggressively moving toward the Twitter acquisition that would eventually transform the platform into X.
Years later, when people began studying the timeline surrounding decentralized identity, payments, and blockchain-based social infrastructure, these early CAW events started resurfacing again.
Another unusual detail was the behavior of the market itself.
Most meme coins struggle for visibility after launch.
CAW moved differently.
The speed of exchange listings, the lack of traditional promotion, and the unusual structure of the deployment created an atmosphere that felt less like a standard meme launch — and more like the beginning of something intentionally designed to remain unexplained.
Whether coincidence or not, the timeline surrounding CAW continued to grow stranger.
And this was only the beginning.
In the next article, we will examine the hidden messages, wallet activity, and the mysterious encrypted clue left behind by the deployer shortly after launch.
🤖 Made with AI
The Beginning of CAW
It All Started on April 14, 2022
Today, many people recognize CAW (A Hunter’s Dream) as just another meme coin.
But when you look into how it was created, its origins appear very different from a typical meme token.
Most projects launch with public founders, presales, marketing campaigns, and aggressive promotion.
CAW did not.
On April 14, 2022, CAW was deployed on Ethereum.
The total supply was set at 666 trillion.
The contract was renounced, and the developer wallet was burned.
There was no central operator controlling the project, and from the beginning, CAW appeared in a form very different from the standard startup-style crypto launch.
What makes the story more interesting is the timing.
On the exact same day — April 14, 2022 — Elon Musk publicly announced his intention to acquire Twitter.
Of course, this alone does not prove any connection between the two.
But when people later began reviewing the timeline surrounding CAW, this date became one of the most discussed starting points.
At the time, CAW had almost no official explanation.
There was no detailed roadmap.
No major advertising campaign.
No large-scale promotion.
And yet, within roughly 48 hours of launch, CAW was listed across multiple exchanges.
For an unknown token with no public team, this was highly unusual.
That unusual beginning would later become the foundation for countless theories, investigations, and debates surrounding the project.
Most market participants did not notice it at the time.
But looking back now, CAW did not behave like a normal project from the very beginning.
In the next article, we will examine how CAW entered the market, and the unusual events that unfolded immediately after its launch.
🤖 Made with AI