caz49

Looks like Nick Barber is teaching Chris Morris a thing or two about how professional people behave in the real world - outside of echo chambers and You Tube videos. #innocencefraud

Morris never quite manages to get the right sort of 'expert', does he? From his daily video today. Noel Magee - KC apparently. #innocencefraud #Letby

Chris Morris is defending his right to spread disinformation about murdered and injured babies. It is to be hoped someone holds him to account. Nobody is disputing his right to express an opinion. The issue is his repeated presentation of claims as facts when they are directly contradicted by the evidence heard in court. Article 10 protects his right to speak. It does not exempt his claims from scrutiny, correction, or accountability. Freedom of expression is a shield against censorship, not a shield against the consequences of spreading misinformation. Although he doesn't allow correction in his echo chamber, as he hasn't got the gumption, decency or intelligence to back his claims up - that's why he needs his nodding dog followers. Hopefully what happened to the Manchester Arena conspiracist Richard Hall in 2024 will happen to Morris, and he will be required to pay significant damages. He blocked me without a single interaction, yet strangely has been searching for me on Facebook. I don't go on there, and we have no friends in common. There is zero to link me to him. What a weirdo. #innocencefraud #Letby

Here Shoo Lee describes the skin discolouration seen in Baby A almost identically to his 1989 and hastily rewritten 2025 papers - the arrogantly named Lee's sign. And then he claimed there was no evidence of air embolism. Whilst claiming non-existent clots from a condition the baby didn't inherit killed him. #innocencefraud #Letby

Really looking forward to this interview with Dr Dewi Evans and Nick Barber @NickBarberX . Nick doesn't seem to be scared of asking the difficult questions - he invited questions from everyone, both sides of the 'fence'. He doesn't appear to need an echo chamber either. He seems to be a balanced chap without an agenda, or a pre-disposed belief in a narrative. This was his first video regarding statistics. Certainly he seemed to be impartial and not starting from the ridiculous starting points of some people quoting irrelevant statistics in the debate. youtube.com/watch?v=R9G6FSGo… #innocencefraud

Letby's original expert witness - Neonatologist Dr Mike Hall - spoke to Panorama last year and was asked about his thoughts on Mark McDonald and Shoo Lee's reports which have been submitted to the CCRC. Dr Hall believes Letby didn't get a fair trial because none of her expert witnesses testified. He saw all of the evidence, and he attended the trial. This is what he said about Lee's reports. Clue: he was not impressed. It is also worth remembering that two more expert witnesses distanced themselves from McDonald's defence last month stating what he was putting forward was "demonstrably inaccurate and creates serious ethical issues...." McDonald has submitted two reports for Baby O - no doubt hoping at least one will stick. Neena Modi also makes clear at the end of this video that Lee and his panel were working on possibilities - ifs, buts, and maybes - and not the babies' medical records. #innocencefraud

Guy Rowland is never knowingly honest. Here he claims that information was withheld from the defence. But it wasn't. The CPS made the decision in 2021 - pre-trial - that the obstetric records didn't need to be disclosed. Relevant obstetric and birth information form part of a baby's medical records, and they were discussed in depth at trial where relevant. In November 2022 - after the trial was underway - the defence applied for the obstetric records for one mother - and received them. As did Dr Sandie Bohin. And from there Guy is making the huge leap of non-disclosure, relying on the fact that Letbyist won't bother to read what the CPS actually said, as he apparently didn't. #innocencefraud