cdanny365 retweeted
The details of the rape charge Russell Brand was convicted of are as follows: A woman who had a threesome with him and put her tongue in his anus five minutes after meeting him (whilst in a relationship) later claimed that non-consensual anal sex occurred. As much as I’ve always disliked Brand, her account is dubious. There was no forensic evidence, no CCTV footage, no physical evidence of any sort and the report was made 20 years after the alleged incident took place.
A more plausible explanation is that Brand, being the degenerate he is, used the woman for his pleasure, and rudely discarded her afterwards. Regretting a sexual encounter is not the same as rape. Brand faces 10-15 years for this charge alone (if her account is true, I am gladdened by the punishment).
However, compare Brand’s case to that of Jameel Ahmed, a Pakistani in Bradford convicted of four counts of rape of a 12 year old girl. He was sentenced to just 8 years, and with the early release scheme he is likely out in a few years. In Ahmed’s case, unlike Brands, there was both forensic and physical evidence. 8 years.
Britain has a two-tier justice system. It’s as simple as that.
cdanny365 retweeted
everything is logical, all systems working exactly as intended by tories and labour
Tiktok terrorist who prayed for British soldiers to be slaughtered is being housed in £300,000 three-bed council flat in north London trib.al/JU5sgY0
cdanny365 retweeted
Are some people seriously contemplating voting Tory again? Have they lost their minds? Do they not remember the years 2010-2024 - the economic stagnation, the housing crisis, the immigration shambles, the deepening 'wokeification' of our institutions and society, the mad green zealotry, the sacrificing of our energy security? Does all that get forgotten because Kemi Badenoch can turn a decent phrase? The Tories deserve to die a slow death. They should certainly never get anywhere near power again for a good many years.
cdanny365 retweeted
They had an 80 seat majority in 2019 and could've done it at any time. Instead they opened the flood gates and decided to push this motion when in opposition.
It's all theatre. None of these people give a fuck.
🚨BREAKING: MPs have voted against a Conservative motion calling for the UK to withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights in order to deport illegal migrants
They voted 309 to 113 (a majority of 196) against the motion, which would also have condemned plans to house 1,256 unvetted male migrants at a disused Ministry of Defence site near Piddington, Oxfordshire
cdanny365 retweeted
My vote on Brexit was affected by disinformation. I voted Remain because I was told if Leave won there would be terrible consequences.
The BoE Governor told me he would raise interest rates - he lowered them.
The Chancellor said he'd have an emergency budget - he didn't.
The Treasury said unemployment would go up - it went down.
Goldman Sachs and others said they would pull out of Britain - they spent billions on new HQs
The Chief Executive of the NHS Alliance said there would be an epidemic of super-gonorrhoea.
As for foreign interference - The EU, the US and Irish Presidents etc etc all weighed in on the side of Remain.
cdanny365 retweeted
Kemi Badenoch lobbied for the Boriswave.
In 2015 the Tories promised you they'd cut immigration to the tens of thousands.
They then imported 572,000 in a single year.
For Kemi, that wasn't nearly enough.
In parliament in 2018, she declared: “I especially thank the Home Secretary for removing the annual limits on work visas and on international students: I lobbied for both on behalf of the Wellcome Sanger Institute and Anglia Ruskin university'.
She got her wish.
Her party then imported a mind-blowing 4.8 million people in less than 4 years.
Over HALF of them on the work and study visas that she lobbied to derestrict.
You cannot trust them to deal with immigration.
Reform will abolish ILR, ban all foreign nationals from all forms of welfare, and reverse the Boriswave.
cdanny365 retweeted
This is insane.
A Sudanese 'asylum seeker' was ordered to leave his hotel because of his bad behaviour.
So he set it on fire.
If the blaze were not contained, up to 170 people could have been burnt alive.
When security found him, he was sat there 'smiling at them'.
His sentence?
31 months.
That's the exact same sentence Lucy Connolly received after she posted on social media about setting fire to a hotel.
But this Sudanese man actually did it.
Yet they got the SAME SENTENCE.
We will end two tier Britain.
End the systematic discrimination against white people in British policing and justice.
We will ensure any foreign national who commits a crime on British soil is deported.
cdanny365 retweeted
i find it very difficult to read these columns. Sunak had a majority of 80, two years in power and he did nothing with either. Nothing on housing. Nothing on tax simplification. Nothing on net zero. He may have been the last Conservative PM for a generation and his time in office was an utter waste of time.
Critics said it was fantasy that we could leave the ECHR and secure our border. The real fantasy is thinking there’s an alternative thetimes.com/comment/columni…
cdanny365 retweeted
Dozens of bullets were fired by Hamas terrorists at the door of Tamar and Johnny’s safe room on October 7.
Even as they lay dying, Tamar and Johnny kept holding the door shut, trying to protect little Shahar, Arbel, and Omer until their final moments.
Tamar managed to send a text saying they had been shot and were critically wounded.
Then the terrorists set the house on fire.
Tamar, Johnny, Shahar, Arbel, and Omer all burned to death.
cdanny365 retweeted
Replying to @Lord_Sugar
Are you trolling us now?
I am a barrister. Every single barrister, judge, senior doctor, nurse, local business owner I know voted Leave.
Leave voters took the time and effort to consider their vote. To listen to the various groups (fishermen being the most obvious) it was clear that the EU was heading towards a Federal Project via the extension of remit of the ECJ. Set up as a Commercial Court to prevent anti-competition behaviour, the Maastricht and Lisbon Treaties widened the scope to Immigration, Matrimonial, Social care, Employment and Human Rights.
What’s the problem with that? You wail.
The problem is this: the laws being enforced by the ECJ are not from a democratically elected parliament, but from a body called the EU Commission.
This is an appointed body, not elected. Before you ask: No, unlike our parliament, the EU Parliament does not originate law. It rubber stamps them from the Commission.
Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on any of the EU treaties, I know them inside out.
Before I go.
Remain voters voted for the SQ. A lazy vote, just like the entire machine of the state: lazy.
Don’t you dare call me stupid for my vote.
cdanny365 retweeted
NOTE: About 30,000 (!!) Iranian nationals have been recorded as arriving in the UK by migrant dinghy. Iran is a hostile state. Why would any sane country continue to do this to its people?
cdanny365 retweeted
I spent over two decades in counterterrorism and I’m still involved in many ways, so here are my views on what I see has happened over the past 24-36 hours in the UK:
Five British men in their twenties were arrested on Sunday near RAF Fairford on suspicion of explosives offences and the preparation of a terrorist act. On Monday they were released on police bail.
That’s not what the terrorism clock looks like when the investigators are still in charge of it.
Under ordinary UK criminal law a suspect can be held for 24 hours, stretched to 36 by a superintendent, and to 96 hours by a magistrate.
But under section 41 of the Terrorism Act the first hold is 48 hours, not 24 hours. A judge can then extend it, in stages, up to 14 days without a charge. If the case merits it, it can even be pushed to 28 days. That 14-day cap exists for exactly this kind of file of vans, an airbase the United States uses, a possible foreign hand, explosives (if there were any) and interviews that are not finished on the first night.
Counter-terrorism police said the inquiry isn’t over. They said conditions apply. They said a state link has not been ruled out. Those sentences he said only make sense if the evidence trail was still live. A live trail is why Parliament built the two-week window.
But watching the guy read out the statement showed me in his body language, tone and eye movements that releasing those five men was NOT his or his department’s decision.
Walking five men after roughly a day is what you do with a pub fight, not with a suspected terrorist attack on a bomber base.
I’ve sat in enough interrogation rooms to know the difference between a custody clock and a political ceiling. Nobody had to shout an order down a phone. Someone in the political building above the investigators decided that charging British nationals on Monday, with Iran already denying it, Washington watching the runway, and a Labour conference where the main topics of discussion were prioritizing Palestinian and other refugees settling in the UK, was uglier than bail and a holding statement.
The law allowed them to keep the door shut. Yet the door opened anyway in half of the most minimum time.
That’s the story. That for me is the only story here. Not “they were innocent.” Not “the case collapsed.” The statute was not exhausted, but the appetite was.
The real question is who, and most importantly, why?
cdanny365 retweeted
I can't prove this but I 100% believe the British Home Office is entirely infiltrated by corrupt third worlders whose only job is to bring in their entire extended tribes and overlook terrorist convictions.
cdanny365 retweeted
Dale Somerville got two year in prison for throwing a plastic bottle. Can someone explain why all these people are Scot free? Two tier justice is in full throw.




























