Charn (@charnsb1) header
Charn (@charnsb1) profile picture
London, England
Joined July 2021
Photo by Charn (@charnsb1)Photo by Charn (@charnsb1)Photo by Charn (@charnsb1)Photo by Charn (@charnsb1)Photo by Charn (@charnsb1)Photo by Charn (@charnsb1)Photo by Charn (@charnsb1)Photo by Charn (@charnsb1)Photo by Charn (@charnsb1)Photo by Charn (@charnsb1)
Scuse me boss…
1
13
424
Pathetic second half
341
These Slavia players are a bunch of pussies
272
STOP FUCKING STUTTERING PENS FOR FUCK SAKE
1
25
644
Embarassing performances today.
1
293
Fuck whoever that drone belongs to
16
688
ARSENAL: 49 league games without losing SPURS: 49 league games without a win when conceding first
4
62
649
29,363
City's stadium if you go by their matchday revenue
98
1,078
42
17,314
283,647
3 nasty points
10
294
Still faster than the Man City case coming to an end
Meanwhile in the Caribbean Cup. the most incredible penalty you'll ever see. 😂😭
3
327
This city plastic loves to yap away, but blocks you when you go at him 😂
“Man City were trying to keep up with football’s growing expenditure!” “You want to blame everybody but yourselves!” Piers Morgan and City fan Buvey clash over Man City’s 114 charges and fans defending the club. 📺 youtu.be/6RhP302dQA8 @piersmorgan | @lawrence_bury
6
416
A bit of NFL photography today… in N17th
3
59
790
PR puppet for Sham City
I watched the F1 film with Brad Pitt the other day, and there’s a moment where his character asks to add something to the car that isn’t really in the rules. The FIA punishes it, but the team can still race with the earlier car. It made me think. In F1, the best teams live at the edge of the regulations. Sometimes the FIA allows what they’ve found, and sometimes it says that goes too far. Occasionally the rules are rewritten afterwards. Now, City. I’m not defending them. A commission found they entered into sham agreements and broke the spending limits. A sham is an arrangement that isn’t what it claims to be, so that’s a different thing from using a gap nobody had spotted. City deny it and will appeal. But I find it useful to ask/reflect on how people inside the club see it. From their point of view, PERHAPS they believe they were doing what elite competitors do: looking at the rules, finding the limits, challenging interpretations and moving faster than the regulatory system. From the outside, you might look at that and say, “That’s cheating.” From inside the organisation, they might say, “We found something nobody had thought of.” If you believe you’ve found a way to bring money in, more or less within the rules (and the commission said it was not in the rules and it was cheating), you might tell yourself you’re just being a sharp competitor. We are all asking “did City cheat?”. But I find this question interesting too: “how did City come to believe they weren’t?” And understanding a mindset, or trying to, isn’t excusing it.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Manchester City were found guilty of 114 out of 115 charges by an independent commission. The comparison made is not in the same ball park to the level of rule breaking Man City have committed. premierleague.com/en/news/472777…
2
5
409
Amazing to have been a part of the 9 fans who got to sit down with Mikel ❤️
14
154
1,384
This is what 114 slices of pizza looks like
🤖 Made with AI
10
527
They don’t like their team being called cheats, when that’s what they are 🤷‍♂️
2
11
646
😂😂😂😂
🚨 Pep Guardiola’s letter to Manchester City fans. “I want every single Man City fan to know I am here; more than ever”. “I am, always have been, always will, be behind my club, my owner, my chairman, Ferran, the players, staff, Enzo and you, our unique supporters”. “Let me be clear: we will get through this together”. “I love you all”. 🩵
251
Had to cheat to do it 🤷‍♂️
I remember watching Arsenal turn up at the Etihad and absolutely fucking destroy us in 2003. I remember just marvelling at Henry and co. They were incredible. We couldn't get near them. We have now done that to them. And it's fucking beautiful.
1
6
1,194