the democratic party can save us from the extreme reactionary forces in MAGA? it looks to me like they served us to MAGA on a silver platter TWICE.
even Dom who is closer to correct than Joe Simms can't help but sow illusions in democrats.
actually unmatched aura. imagine seeing this in real life. imagine lenin doing this after returning from exile.
sorry I haven't been tweeting so much. they actually gave me a ton of work at my job for a change, but I should be back to slacking off soon!
about time we got our own fiona lali destroying reactionaries on national tv. let's go comrade antonio!
Communist DESTROYS Newsmax MAGA Mouthpiece
Antonia Balmer of the Revolutionary Communists of America, US section of the RCI.
youtu.be/4ADcHN4jPgg?si=_uvY…
shrigma leninist retweeted
Communist DESTROYS Newsmax MAGA Mouthpiece
Antonia Balmer of the Revolutionary Communists of America, US section of the RCI.
youtu.be/4ADcHN4jPgg?si=_uvY…
shrigma leninist retweeted
The funniest part about this image is the fact it’s just a straight up screenshot. No editing needed or anything, just pure game.
shrigma leninist retweeted
Tenant showing his landlord the Paris Commune's decree that 3 months of rent have been cancelled. Landlord literally doing the crying soyjack face. Political cartoon from 1871
democratic centralism
Rob McElhenney says the two-against-one rule on Always Sunny has saved them years of emotional arguments because production is too expensive to negotiate every single decision
"early on we realized let’s just institute a rule of two against one. And it’s really really and I know it sounds silly and simple but it has been profound"
"The assumption is do you trust me? Yes. Do I trust you? Yes. And the three of us trust each other and we trust our taste. So therefore if two of us feel strongly about something then the other one has to capitulate no matter what no questions asked"
"They get a chance to plead their case and we all have to remain open-minded. But if the two of us still or two of them say nope this is the way we’re going you move on quickly"
"And it actually diffuses so many problems so quickly because you don’t have time as you all know you work in production it’s so expensive to run these shows you just don’t have time to negotiate every single thing and you got to move fast and that has saved us I mean that has saved us hours I would actually say that that saved years of our lives emotionally"
comrades i have bad news. it turns out revolutionary expropriations of property are illegal? i didn't know this but thanks to my interlocutor's summoning of grok I have been enlightened.
pack it up boys, we hadn't really considered bourgeois legality.
Replying to @musicaltiger25 @charybdeez
Yes. Under US law and UDHR Article 17 the sequence is clear: unauthorized seizure initiates force, making the seizer the aggressor. Resistance is defensive. The robber analogy matches that legal distinction exactly.
i like engels' formulation on the question of violence. while in theory communists would be for a peaceful transfer of power, the reality is that capitalists will fight us and will need to be killed in self defense.
whatever violence does happen is *on them*.























