Posted and turned on football. Anyways, closing thoughts: Location is a pretty blunt proxy. My data doesn’t capture most of what makes a shot "good" or "bad." Rhythm, balance, contest strength, and who’s shooting matter more than the spot. And not every three is a good three either! There’s a place for the midrange. Some guys are really good at it. Some defenses take away the rim/three and you need a counter. A good shot for one guy is a bad shot for another. That’s where coaching comes in. Know your personnel, get buy-in, and build the right habits in practice. But all things considered, the midrange usually isn’t an efficient look. Especially in college, where there’s no defensive three seconds and most guys just aren’t good enough shot creators to live there. Shot diets built around the rim and catch-and-shoot threes (paint-kicks, perimeter-swings, etc) win long term. (I paid Elon $4 to write a longer post, smh)