@cookietheft@ioc.exchange (@cookieTheft) header
@cookietheft@ioc.exchange (@cookieTheft) profile picture

Just me!

Joined March 2013
Photo by @cookietheft@ioc.exchange (@cookieTheft)Photo by @cookietheft@ioc.exchange (@cookieTheft)Photo by @cookietheft@ioc.exchange (@cookieTheft)Photo by @cookietheft@ioc.exchange (@cookieTheft)Photo by @cookietheft@ioc.exchange (@cookieTheft)Photo by @cookietheft@ioc.exchange (@cookieTheft)Photo by @cookietheft@ioc.exchange (@cookieTheft)Photo by @cookietheft@ioc.exchange (@cookieTheft)
My cli scripts are safe from any LLM interactions because even they can't figure out the correct input parameters
3
14
1,538
“So WSUS with HTTPS is secure, you said? 😂” Turns out… not really. According to the excellent research by Alexander Neff and Phil Knüfer in “Using ADCS to Attack HTTPS‑Enabled WSUS Clients,” a misconfigured ADCS environment can completely undermine HTTPS‑protected WSUS. They demonstrate how overly permissive certificate templates—especially those allowing user‑defined subject names and limited to the Server Authentication EKU—let an attacker obtain a trusted certificate and impersonate a WSUS server. Combine that with classic WSUS interception techniques, and suddenly you can push malicious updates that run with full admin privileges on Windows clients, all while the traffic looks perfectly valid and encrypted. From a defender’s point of view, the big question becomes: How do you detect if your WSUS clients have been talking to a hijacked WSUS server? 😅 Good news: it is detectable—and here’s the KQL to help you spot it. #Cyberesecurity #WSUSHiJackAttack
3
44
1
214
16,472
We did a thing
Using ADCS to Attack HTTPS-Enabled WSUS Clients: @cookieTheft and I have extended the research by @Coontzy1 on WSUS attacks and explored how to leverage misconfigured ADCS templates to gain code execution on HTTPS-enabled WSUS clients. 1/2🧵
1
1
4
585
This key takeaways from this report: - Agentic AI lowers the bar for cyber attacks (we knew this) - Dramatically increases scale (we knew this) - without a human in the loop, success rate is low (we knew this) The report itself leaves a lot to be desired from a technical aspect , I caution reporters to not read too deeply into the conclusions. If you’re an org, standard defense in depth still applies here as defense against these AI assisted attacks.
We disrupted a highly sophisticated AI-led espionage campaign. The attack targeted large tech companies, financial institutions, chemical manufacturing companies, and government agencies. We assess with high confidence that the threat actor was a Chinese state-sponsored group.
2
11
1
46
10,885
''Abusing sAMAccountName Hijacking in GPP: Local Users and Groups - Cogiceo'' #infosec #pentest #redteam #blueteam cogiceo.com/en/whitepaper_gp…
4
7
1,926
Raw NTFS parsing for SAM/SYSTEM/NTDS.dit access? github.com/kfallahi/Underlay… 400 lines Powershell - easy peasy ❤️🔥
4
85
1
309
35,090
Until now, if you lost or broke your phone, your Signal message history was *gone,* a real challenge for everyone whose most important conversations happen in Signal. So, with careful design and development, we’re rolling out opt-in secure backups. signal.org/blog/introducing-… Secure backups will let you save an archive of your Signal messages remotely in privacy-preserving form, refreshed every day. Now available in the latest Android beta release, rolling out to iOS and Desktop in the near future.
131
304
56
2,070
413,923
Opening a new chapter 📖 From tinkering with old systems to giving talks at @BlackHatEvents, it’s been a wild ride. I am thrilled to share that I’m joining @SpecterOps as a Senior Security Researcher! Time to go full-time into deep technical security research🥰
18
12
143
6,847
An attacker on your network is indistinctable from IT admins. As long as this is true, attackers win. (Loosely borrowing Lambert’s list/graph quote. Solution: tiering and clean source
That’s essentially my thesis on pentesting and low skill TA behaviors. Using known good/admin/defensive tools.
3
11
42
6,403
Releasing a side project of mine: wsuks - automating the WSUS mitm attack🔥 github.com/NeffIsBack/wsuks TL;DR: If the Windows Server Update Service (WSUS) is configured to use HTTP instead of HTTPS, it's possible to take control of any Windows machine on your local network. 1/4🧵
5
149
1
483
33,378
Use Signal. We promise, no AI clutter, no surveillance ads—whatever the rest of the industry does. We lead we don’t follow❤️
151
590
65
3,188
305,526
The feature rundown of the NetExec v1.4.0 release is now live on our wiki: netexec.wiki/news/v1.4.0-smo… Give them a read, there are so many great new features! Kali has updated NetExec to v1.4.0, so all the new changes are also available via apt🚀
NetExec v1.4.0 has been released! 🎉 There is a HUGE number of new features and improvements, including: - backup_operator: Automatic priv esc for backup operators - Certificate authentication - NFS escape to root file system And much more! Full rundown: github.com/Pennyw0rth/NetExe…
5
59
1
178
11,780
A new module has been merged into NetExec: change-password🔥 Accounts with STATUS_PASSWORD_EXPIRED aren't a problem anymore, just reset their password. You can also abuse ForceChangePassword to reset another user's password. Made by @kriyosthearcane, @mehmetcanterman and me
2
117
398
21,425
You have got a valid NTLM relay but SMB and LDAP are signed, LDAPS has got Channel Binding and ESC8 is not available... What about WinRMS ? :D Blogpost: sensepost.com/blog/2025/is-t… Tool: github.com/fortra/impacket/p… And also, big thanks to jmk (Joe Mondloch) for the collab' :D!
9
201
1
590
30,638
Together with @pavelfor, we have created the ultimate guide and tooling for configuring host-based firewalls on #ActiveDirectory domain controllers in enterprise environments. Blocks most remote command execution and authentication coercion techniques. firewall.dsinternals.com
7
70
3
228
19,771