Cris van Eijk (@crisveijk) header
Cris van Eijk (@crisveijk) profile picture

International law, the (space) commons, and how they're made | PhD @NCLLawSchool | 🇺🇸🇳🇱🏳️‍🌈 | 🔊: krɪs van aɪk | he/him Mostly active elsewhere now.

Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
Joined January 2012
Photo by Cris van Eijk (@crisveijk)Photo by Cris van Eijk (@crisveijk)Photo by Cris van Eijk (@crisveijk)Photo by Cris van Eijk (@crisveijk)Photo by Cris van Eijk (@crisveijk)Photo by Cris van Eijk (@crisveijk)Photo by Cris van Eijk (@crisveijk)Photo by Cris van Eijk (@crisveijk)Photo by Cris van Eijk (@crisveijk)Photo by Cris van Eijk (@crisveijk)
By the way, everything I've ever written, every podcast I've done, every conference paper and panel with video record - all of it's freely available at linktr.ee/crisveijk. Okay, self-plugging done, back to catching up on my inbox.
58
Basic indicator of the viability of a permanent human presence on the Moon/Mars: do a quick survey of your inter-regional travel infrastructure. Its existence, upkeep, and quality. Would you want the same people charged to build & maintain *that* to be ensuring your oxygen?
2
1
2
434
(Rare tweet to reach the space people not on BS)
1
1
236
[From 🔵☁️] Excited to share my new article, 'The Exclusive Making of Space Law', published (open access) in @LJIL_Leiden. It took me 3 weeks to write the first draft, but 3 years to finalise - and I'm grateful to everyone who helped me along the way. doi.org/10.1017/S09221565240…
1
25
3
83
5,409
This article explores a microhistory of space lawmaking from 1957-67, and in the process speaks to wider trends in the making of int'l law more generally. Factors like UN documentation procedure & US racial segregation had material impacts on who participated & the legal results.
1
8
223
Niche take: the 'intertemporal rule' aka 'principle of contemporaneity' is neither a rule nor a principle of international law - a dude named Max just said it was once, 98 years ago, and we've all just been going with it ever since.
2
259
On recent discourse about responsibility in speculating legalities of things like, for instance, genocide and extractivism, I agree with @djag2’s line of thinking here.
Replying to @CAugustElliott
I am not really up for “IHL as parlour game of thought experiments” at present, sorry. Too many IHL scholars playing that game in a way I find increasingly untenable. Take a look at Article 7 Amended Protocol II to the CCW Convention.
1
4
562
(And here:)
Replying to @djag2
then shift to the party holding the relevant information to justify their conduct. Reducing IHL to a state where the availability of any hypothetical scenario on which an attract may have been legal precludes debate only brings the field, and its scholars, into disrepute. 4/4
2
174
I’ve been vocal about critiquing the editorial decisionmaking behind iffy scholarship. But so far I’ve *only* seen criticism of the journal staff - not unwarranted!! But at some point, we’re piling on a large group of people; some uninvolved, many working un(der)paid.
According to the authors, "the [Advisory Opinion] of the ICJ has significant legal weight." Let's see how significantly they weigh such an Opinion!!
1
1
5
1,071
And crucially, I’ve barely seen critique of, for instance, the *authors themselves*. - Constructive critique of an institution’s concerning decisions is great! - Condemning a wide group of un(der)paid scholars as supporting *genocide*, but not the actual authors, is… worrying
2
172
According to the authors, "the [Advisory Opinion] of the ICJ has significant legal weight." Let's see how significantly they weigh such an Opinion!!
Just published in the LJIL: 'Postwar development of offshore energy resources: Legal and political models for developing the Gaza Marine gas field' by Elai Rettig, Shani Friedman and Benny Spanier. Click below to read it now! cambridge.org/core/journals/…
1
13
2
91
13,133
The authors (fn 32): "Despite these voices, the argument that Gaza still meets the definition of occupation after 2005 is an unorthodox position." The ICJ last July:
1
11
497
“Lex specialis” isn’t a spell to make burdensome rules go away; it’s an interpretive logic to resolve situations where 2+ mutually exclusive rules *could* apply, but cannot *both* apply. (as the full thing suggests). So which Paris Ag rule conflicts with customary env law again?
Replying to @duycks
6/🇰🇪Kenya offered a strong rebuttal of polluting States' argument that #ParisAgreement should enjoy primacy over preexisting norms of international law, incl. customary law, denouncing States that seek to "smuggle" the argument of lex specialis into these proceedings
4
386
Among other things, this is a rare chance to apply Arts 38(1) (& 59) of the ICJ Statute as actual treaty provisions, rather than a strange sort of scripture. AI isn’t ‘changing rules’; it’s applying a different (but equally nonbinding!) *practice*.
Replying to @JaninaDill
To be clear, AI does not seem to use the “only reasonable inference” (evidentiary) test. This test has received plenty of criticism other contexts. This test never implied "the only goal of the action" (substantive)! AI did not change the substantive def of genocide.
1
2
269
This myth is SO pervasive, even among excellent international lawyers!!
Replying to @AnthonyPress
A reprise of the Antarctic Treaty 2048 myth, this time from @CSIS: "While Antarctica remains a zone of peace governed by the Antarctic Treaty (AT) until 2048...". The Treaty and "peaceful governance" do not evaporate in 2048 (see this thread). csis.org/analysis/ending-str…
2
328
There was a time it would take a considerable exercise of investigative journalism to get a public figure to disavow the Geneva Conventions on record.
This quoted post is unavailable.
1
1
30
1,384
Particularly where the take is “we gotta scrap the Geneva Conventions because our enemies aren’t *white people*.”
6
175
On that note, here's my favourite headline from the Philadelphia Tribune, the US' oldest Black newspaper, on 14 November 1961. (Black newspapers really had some of the most biting, on-the-pulse critique of 1960s foreign affairs, including UN space lawmaking!)
U.N. Committee Adopts Draft Resolution against Nukes in Space nippon.com/en/news/yjj202411…
2
7
31
4,179
My silver lining moment of a hellish week: When Jacob Rees-Mogg, a multimillionaire who wears top hats and recently lost an election on *live television*, concluded the US election was a "crushing defeat for the global elite".
3
1
5
623
Though in fairness, he does have a background in crushing electoral defeats.
1
97
Many brilliant space lawyers will tell you that the most contentious words of the Moon Agreement are "common heritage of mankind". They are wrong. Try explaining the words "extra-environmental matter" in light of environmental theory. I dare you. Maybe take a paracetemol first.
1
5
316
Reminder: 1 in 6 signatory states to the Artemis Accords are also full parties to the Moon Agreement. 🇦🇺🇲🇽🇳🇱🇧🇪🇺🇾🇵🇪🇦🇲🇨🇱
3
2
9
732
This suggests these states don't consider the Accords to conflict with their MA obligations. But I've argued the Accords attempt to modify the OST via subsequent agreement of (most drafting) parties. But it's feasible the US may also someday argue they modify the Moon Agreement.
3
1
1
3
247
A return to the time-honoured American tradition of unconditional support for fascists and their interests in space. Trump's space policy is one of enclosure and exclusion. For him, space only belongs to America, and America only belongs to White rich men.
BREAKING: Former astronaut Buzz Aldrin has endorsed Donald Trump for president.
2
10
804
"Under international law, enforced disappearances are continuing offences... This means that, as long as the fate of the person remains unknown, perpetrators are still committing an offence and may still be held accountable for these continuing and ongoing wrongs." (Exec Sum, 40)
Many Indigenous children who died and were buried at Indian residential schools are not missing but disappeared, says Kimberly Murray. That means they are “victims of enforced disappearance,” a crime against humanity, Murray says in her final report. cbc.ca/news/indigenous/final…
1
1
4
917
For context, the US government previously enjoyed a close, nine-year working relationship with a UN Secretary General *while knowing he'd been an actual Nazi*.
This quoted post is unavailable.
1
9
33
1,804
"the CIA knew, not the State Dept/USUN" Waldheim became Sec-Gen after Chairing the UN Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space. Every US delegation to COPUOS from 1963-1971 included at least one CIA officer/asset with a top secret/codeword security clearance. They knew.
5
131
I'd planned to speak a huge conference this weekend in person - until 4 Oct, when my (/other) universities announced sweeping "income-saving" cuts to PhD travel funding. These cuts originate from the UKHE sector's toxic relationship of dependence/hostility to int'l students.
2
1
16
2,262
Before we have a national conversation about students 'buying a degree', how about we talk about the injustices of a system that relegates certain international students to an often-racialised second class, with added barriers to uni support & social systems we all opt to unsee?
1
3
13
544
Okay, I'm so sorry to (once *again*) RT Ntina with "And also, in SPACE-", BUT So maybe the first 'space treaties' were the hasty web of US bilateral treaties establishing space tracking stations, incl peri-decolonial Nigeria, South Africa... and (briefly) Diego Garcia.
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
1
1
16
2,215
They did not generally pay rent, but the US *very consciously* framed them as purely scientific facilities, run by NASA, the Smithsonian, or private contractors, except sometimes also the NRO. Allegedly. >_> Anyway. Uh. Great episode!!
2
169