Founder & CEO @pauli_group | Post-quantum cryptography for blockchains and quantum resistant money | Quantum computing | AI

Calgary, Alberta
Joined April 2009
It's really incredible what one @DARPA plot can do to enable the #QuantumComputing future.
15
43
14
216
Pierre-Luc retweeted
when nick told me that he had some interp breakthroughs, he was uh, underselling it. i think this may be remembered as a major moment in scientific history. news so good even eliezer will have to lower his pdoom. we can start making alignment into a 'normal science'
interpretability might be the most important scientific problem in the world right now, as I don't think we can solve alignment if we don't know what we're building. I think I have good news about it. I co-authored early work in mechanistic interpretability at OpenAI and came away pessimistic, because neural networks appeared to fold into arbitrary tangled knots. years later, I started openai's first large-scale automated interpretability project, finding about 2% of neurons legible with the primitive tools we had with modern agentic tools and a much closer look, the picture looks totally different. the vast majority in models up to trillions of parameters are legible, and their circuits beautiful. many famous examples of tangled neurons turned out to be misunderstood. The roadblocks I expected mostly aren't there. I now think ambitious interpretability will be solved by the time we need it most, and possibly quite soon, as automated scientists keep improving. it may be a bitter lesson for interpretability: the simple thing, at absurd scale, works already-clean.goodfire.com/
164
396
83
6,638
434,867
The company dominating software worldwide is basically led by a bunch of physicists lmao Programmoors in shambles in the face of real ontology
8
4
226
7,224
Pierre-Luc retweeted
ECDSA fails in real time.
10
4
1
51
8,844
Hard to understate the importance of getting rid of a BC NDP government to really kick start growth and investment in Canada. The western gatekeepers have been finally kicked out
18
80
9
851
13,441
Pierre-Luc retweeted
The safety theatre is making the cyber world more unsafe – at San Francisco, CA
The imbalance between what attackers can do with abliterated models (with no KYC btw) and what you are allowed to do within cyber constraints is insane. I have done a full-face scan and passport upload to Anthropic, and Claude won't even do basic defence. Feels very problematic
7
10
1
149
9,508
One thing about abliterated models is that it makes you very impatient with the non-abliterated models’ refusals to do research that they deem “unethical” for basically subjective (often bad) reasons.
12
24
1
316
13,269
Pierre-Luc retweeted
No Astra 6.2, No Fable 5.5 Come on man I'm trying to have a solid weekend of vibe coding here Put the models in the bag, big labs
47
18
745
21,324
We are living in the future now on so many margins
HOLY SHIT for the first time ever, a human has been injected with a treatment designed to rewrite their DNA directly INSIDE their body using prime editing if it works, it would be the first time prime editing has successfully corrected a genetic mutation directly inside a living human
2
5
333
Pierre-Luc retweeted
You do not need an RF jammer or a cyber exploit to knock a drone out of the sky. In 2015, security researchers proved that playing an 8.2 kHz sound wave at an unprotected flight controller forces it to drop instantaneously. This is an acoustic resonance attack, and it exploits a mechanical vulnerability in the micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) inside consumer gyroscopes and hard drives. 1. The anatomy of a vibrating silicon spring Inside a drone's flight controller sits an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU). The core of that IMU is a MEMS gyroscope measuring less than four millimeters across. Inside the chip, a microscopic silicon proof mass is suspended above a substrate by silicon micro-springs. The internal drive circuit vibrates this mass back and forth at a known drive frequency. When the drone rotates along its pitch, roll, or yaw axis, the Coriolis force deflects the proof mass toward fixed capacitive comb fingers. The deflection shifts the electrical capacitance by fractions of a femtofarad. The chip's analog front-end converts this capacitance change into voltage, feeds it through an Analog-to-Digital Converter (ADC), and passes raw angular rates to the flight controller over SPI or I2C. 2. The 8.2 kHz acoustic exploit Every physical structure suspended on micro-springs has a mechanical resonant frequency. In a 2015 USENIX Security study, researchers tested 15 commercial MEMS gyroscopes. Seven were vulnerable to acoustic resonance. Gyroscopes from STMicroelectronics (like the L3G4200D) resonated in the audible band between 2.5 kHz and 8.2 kHz along their X and Y sensing axes. When airborne sound matches that mechanical resonant frequency, the acoustic energy transfers directly into the silicon lattice. The proof mass vibrates with severe physical amplitude. The sensing comb fingers saturate the ADC to its maximum railing limits, feeding false angular rates into the flight controller. 3. Why the drone drops The drone's flight controller runs a proportional-integral-derivative (PID) loop at 500 Hz to 1,000 Hz to maintain level flight. When sound noise at 8.2 kHz hit the gyroscope, the sensor reported massive erratic rotation spikes. The PID control loop immediately tried to counteract rotation that did not exist. In real-world flight trials, the controller responded by throttling motors to their minimum and maximum limits simultaneously. The drone lost balance and dropped to the ground instantaneously on all 20 test flights. 4. The same physics in the datacenter In 2018, researchers at Michigan and Zhejiang demonstrated the same physical failure mode on enterprise hard disk drives. In a mechanical hard drive, the read/write head floats on an air bearing less than 10 nanometers above spinning magnetic platters, with track widths narrower than 75 nanometers. Playing an audible 5.0 kHz tone at 115.3 dB SPL caused tracking errors on Western Digital drives. Pumping that tone to 117.2 dB SPL forced off-track vibrations so severe that the drive firmware halted all write operations to prevent physical head crashes on the platters. With sustained acoustic noise, operating systems experienced complete I/O timeouts, remounting ext4 file systems as read-only. 5. The physical constraints and modern defenses Acoustic attacks have clear physical limitations: * Inverse square law: In the drone flight trials, researchers attached a small speaker 10 cm directly above the flight controller at 113 dB SPL. Projecting that sound pressure over 30 meters would require a 140 dB directional acoustic device (LRAD). * Axis isolation: Modern InvenSense gyroscopes resonate in the ultrasonic range (above 26 kHz) along the Z-axis only, which flight software easily counteracts by cross-checking magnetometer yaw data. * Mechanical dampening: Wrapping the IMU in dense silicone grommets or acoustic foam blocks airborne sound pressure before it hits the silicon package. * Asymmetric dual-IMU fusion: Pairing two gyroscopes with mismatched mechanical resonant frequencies (such as 8 kHz and 26 kHz) allows flight software to identify and drop the saturated outlier. Software algorithms cannot filter a corrupted sensor measurement if the silicon spring itself is physically vibrating.
34
243
22
1,456
50,169
Pierre-Luc retweeted
We’ve run trillions of simulations to test our fault-tolerant quantum architectures, thanks to our new decoder, Crevasse. We think it’s the first QLDPC decoder with both the speed and accuracy needed for utility-scale quantum computing. Release: iceberg-quantum.com/blog/rel…
2
4
3
29
1,838
Idea: Export acknowledgements. Open public meetings with a cursory summary of what pays the bills.
2
6
79
2,170
Announcing Poliwave's World Election Simulator: you can now simulate every elections on earth, on the same map, and down to neighbourhood levels poliwave.com/simulator
36
63
11
660
45,507
Pierre-Luc retweeted
i own a relatively new (2025) samsung tv. i kept getting weirdly targeted ads. i tried reversing the firmware but it was aes encrypted and no keys unless tear it apart and do uart/jtag magic. zero days it is. root shell on new samsung TVs! discovered PRIVACY HORROR. write up?
665
3,663
590
34,889
4,039,404
Pierre-Luc retweeted
Blog post: Who is John Quarmack? algassert.com/post/2605 (Two blog posts in two days?? Been a long time since that happened.)
2
3
1
20
2,963
NORTH KOREA’S HACKERS ARE ALREADY USING AMERICA’S QUANTUM-PROOF ENCRYPTION STANDARD Kaspersky just exposed a new campaign by Lazarus, North Korea’s state hacking group. Its malware uses ML-KEM-1024, the post-quantum encryption standard NIST published in August 2024, to lock down the connection back to the hackers’ servers. Kaspersky says Lazarus has been using post-quantum crypto since at least September 2024. That’s about a month after the US finalized the standard. Why would hackers bother? Security teams catch malware partly by recording and studying its traffic. If that traffic is quantum proof, even a future quantum computer can’t open it up later. The attack itself was fake résumé and portfolio websites, likely built with AI, sent to targets through phishing emails. At least three South Korean companies in software, construction and telecom equipment were hit, and Kaspersky believes the real number is much higher. Governments are giving their own agencies until 2030 to 2035 to switch to post-quantum encryption. North Korea switched in about a month. $IONQ $INFQ $BTQ $LAES
IN FOUR MONTHS, THE NSA STOPS BUYING ANYTHING THAT RUNS ON TODAY'S ENCRYPTION. THE REASON IS QUANTUM COMPUTERS. This is not a proposal, but a published directive with a date. It's called CNSA 2.0, the NSA issued it in 2022, tightened it in 2025, and almost nobody outside the agency has read it. It quietly orders every national security system in America to abandon the encryption the entire internet runs on, because a large enough quantum computer breaks all of it, and the NSA has decided that machine is coming. The schedule: January 1, 2027: every new system the government buys for classified or sensitive work must use quantum resistant encryption. 2030: all network equipment and software signing must run quantum resistant only. Legacy gear that can't be upgraded gets ripped out. 2033: operating systems, applications, cloud. Everything. 2035: full quantum resistance across all national security systems. Hard stop. The NSA gave the EARLIEST deadlines to two categories, signed software and network traffic. Their stated reason: those are most exposed to harvest-now-decrypt-later, adversaries recording encrypted data today to crack it once the quantum computer exists. Defense systems take 18 to 36 months to build. Anything designed today ships after the deadline. For much of the government, the planning window already closed. Meanwhile your bank, your hospital, and the app you're reading this on run the exact algorithms the NSA is abandoning. $INFQ $IONQ $QBTS $RGTI
11
55
13
139
13,665
Pierre-Luc retweeted
Consider rotating your mothers maiden name and the street you grew up on
22
215
13
4,205
98,184
Leveraging verifiable structure in quantum circuits to find more efficient compilations with agentic AI Tanuj Khattar, Nicholas C. Rubin, Craig Gidney, Michael Broughton, Guang Hao Low, Ryan Babbush arxiv.org/abs/2610.23832 [𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚗𝚝-𝚙𝚑]
2
2
273
I have to start collecting on bets, Λ >= 10 this decade was one of them.
2
78
Pierre-Luc retweeted
The answer was 3 years apparently, I was expecting 5.
How long before Lambda>10?
1
3
7
250