I'm no longer just asking for deportations.
We should strip the rights, privileges and protections as people from any person who's foreign Visa permanent resident. I don't care.
If they're not a native born or born to native parents, then they should live in an existence with the rights similar to that of the spider on your wall.
Notice how the Catholic deceives you with sleight of hand.
He knows Vivek is culturally Indian, strongly prefers Indians, is not Anglo Saxon or Protestant. He is precisely the kind of alien the founding fathers would never allow to stay in the US.
Yet because of a wholly evil and very Catholic misreading of the 14th amendment, Jeremy uses the left's framing to justify Vivek.
Vivek is an anchor baby.
He was raised Hindu. He shares nothing with American culture. He made his wealth scamming the sick and dying.
Jeremy presents for all our amusement a perfect encapsulation of the depraved deceit Catholics are wont to do.
We will remember the traitors that demand we kneel to the heebs.
This Marine should be separated immediately.
You can be active duty, or you can have public political views, you can't have both.
The Commandant's answer is spot on. We follow policy, we don't make it.
Any Marine who has rotted their brain with Chinese Tik Tok videos to the point where they're publicly asking the commandant explicitly political questions has to go.
History teaches us that a military with public political allegiances ends very badly for everyone.
I've always held that Eric is the stupid one of the two.
I'm glad I have been validated yet again.
India is an extremely poor country.
But it has 1.5 billion people and it is rapidly growing.
Such a population. Were they Christian valued; were they Protestant; were they Anglo-Saxon in their traditions; would present an enormous opportunity.
However, there is a enormous blind site that cultural westerners have when it comes to dealing with India. And it is very much the same as they have when dealing with islamists or when dealing with Africans.
These countries and their societies are fundamentally different to us and how they treat their poor. They are fundamentally different to us in how they see wealth.
They are fundamentally different to us in how social order is defined, passed on, and obeyed.
In Indian culture an Indian society, it is seen as nearly disgusting to treat those beneath you with any amount of care. In fact, the only righteous and well-behaved thing to do as a higher case Indian when faced with a low-cased Indian is to abuse them to treat them poorly and to deprive them of everything you can deprive them of. This is because they see those less fortunate than them as having committed great offenses in their past life. The reincarnation cycle of Hinduism puts murderers and rapists and scammers and thieves at the bottom rung just before they become an insect. So an Indian will see those who are less privileged and out of a self-righteous concept of taste hierarchy believe that it is their duty to abuse them because the more abuse they can impart onto the less fortunate, the better life that less fortunate person will have once they die.
And if you live your life like you are not one of the less fortunate you are actually rewarded. If you are in fact at the bottom rung of society, you must live as if you are at the top. Because how you live determines how well you reincarnate..
If you murder, someone don't get caught. If you rape someone say it wasn't rape.
The assumption that we have when we deal with someone. Someone that has learned our weakness such as prime minister modi is that if we give them money, that money will be used to develop the resources and welfare and education of the least in their society.
The reality is about, however, India has no interest whatsoever at any level to bring up the bottom.
Over 80% of the population will remain in abject poverty for all of time. This is because their existence is what guarantees status quo or even elevation through reincarnation of those above them. Bringing the poor up will literally take away your opportunity at a good reincarnation.
So what's being sold to the West is that there is this enormous emerging market with billions of people to all they need is more money in order to bring them out of poverty so that they can become good capitalist consumers.
And I don't mean this as a slam against capitalism. I believe it is the most freeing and liberating instrument we've ever developed outside of Jesus Christ sacrifice on the cross, which has given us true spiritual salvation and freedom.
But they don't see it that way.
Indians often convert to Christianity. Not because they feel a desperate need for God, but because they see Christianity as a vehicle for jugaad and Izzat.
And there are absolutely hindi's who are saved by the blood of Jesus Christ, but they are very few and far between in any Christian Church.
They learn to mimic. This is a core component of their culture. For thousands of years. The Hindu people were slaves to other nations. Their culture developed a mindset, a survival mechanism, and the peoples themselves because of their rigid taste system persisted the neurological and genetic disposition to do exactly what they do today.
Just as we cannot turn off our sympathy and empathy for the poor because of centuries of Christianity, they cannot turn off their abuse and hatred of the poor.
This is why they scam they cheat. This is why they have call centers dedicated to finding AARP subscriber, phone numbers and scamming them. The most vulnerable in our society must be scammed because by scamming us, they prove their own superiority and improving their superiority. The Indian is able to secure a better reincarnation.
And even if they are atheist and do not believe in reincarnation, the concept of abusing those beneath you as a good theme is so intrinsically tied to their behavior, patterns and beliefs that it is simply as obvious to them as treating animals well is to us.
Westerners simply cannot understand how different they are at a fundamental level. Their children do not treat animals well, not because their parents told them to abuse animals but because everything in their society is built around abuse extraction, manipulation and deception.
How can such a place ever be lifted out of poverty despite having a billion and a half people? How are they? So poor that even their richest are a pale fraction of our richest. We have wealthy men who exclusively sell within our country who are wealthier than global super Giants operating out of India like Mahindra or Tata.
This is because the Indian market is worthless.
Indian companies sell to everyone in the world but not to India.
They sell to everyone because the Indian market is worthless. But we have politicians who believe and project onto others out of a sense of naive Goodwill. The same values they would project onto us the Protestant Western man.
They believe the Indians and us share the same values
We don't. We never will. We are fundamentally incompatible..
And this is why the leaders of the country's that we do business with are all educated in the west. They have all been taught to observe and to learn our ways and then use them against us.
By all measures, modi is an idiot.
Ask anyone who has met Bill Gates and also met Sachin adella to tell you which one is smarter to tell you which one clearly has mental acumen. That is not just impressive but is actually intimidating.
I don't know anyone that has met Satya nadella who felt intimidated except by his station as CEO of a company as powerful as Microsoft.
If Satya was working at your grocery store, you wouldn't even notice him.
But there are people like Bill Gates who when you talk to them you notice something different because they are operating at a mental level of discernment of pattern recognition and sharpness that pierces through every word you say and you notice it
You will never feel that from an Indian because Indians are all fundamentally morons. Their average IQ is something like 76 3/4 of their population are dumber than your average American
And while they have 1.5 billion people, they have only produced a single digit number of truly genius people per year
I don't hate Indians. I simply do not want Indians in my country because there is no reason to allow trash into my streets
There's a tremendous number of Indians in the replies thinking they're clever for understanding you can use base 10 and add to find whole roots to find another unknown root.
They will say "well I discovered this at 9".
Theyre so insecure with their intelligence that they will compete with a 12 year old.
Wild to see @SecRubio throw his 2028 bid away this early in the cycle.
Tyler is a male feminist.
Don't be like Tyler.
So essentially, all women should be prevented from voting just because some women don’t vote the way you want them to? Thank GOD you aren’t in charge of handling amendments to the constitution. I know plenty of women who vote based on their beliefs, and that’s how it should be. I will also be casting my ballots in favor of who i think will be good for the country. Both sides of the aisle are corrupt, and it’s time for the old dogs to retire and the new dogs to step up and fix this country.
Remember: Mitt Romney and John McCain were instrumental in establishing the extremely corrupt money laundering pipeline in Ukraine.
Republican scum, like Mr. Bacon, are complicit in selling citizens of these United States out. He's a traitor, and his name should be remembered.
Based. I don't use kratom, but this is how to respond to it. Using the schedule system to ban is the wrong solution.
Even for hard drugs, the solution is monitoring, tracking and, if it ever rises to criminal conduct, severe punishment for the actual crimes against others, not the substance itself.
People dealing in illicit amphetamines, opioids, or other narcotics should face the most extreme punishment law provides. But otherwise use of any mind-altering substance of any kind should carry the same stipulations as any other form of public intoxication.
Driving while on a mind altering drug should have your license revoked until you complete a treatment program.
Using heavy equipment or dangerous tools such as firearms should similarly face the same punishment as if it was being done recklessly using any other intoxicant.
But the manufacturer and distribution sale and coercion to use and distribute illicit narcotics should be a capital offense.
I have had friends lives be destroyed by these drugs but it was their choice to destroy their own lives and they committed no other underlying crime. The people who I do hold as responsible for this destruction or not, the people who were suckered into trying something that destroyed their lives, but the people who knew the dangers of the substance and still created a network of coercive recommendation, emotional manipulation, and product availability that led to the use.
Drug dealers gangs that distribute drugs and any other kind of illicit drug narcotic Network operation operator should be publicly hanged with their execution televised across the world. We should be using our military to hunt these people down wherever they are in the world and eliminate them. They're hurting American citizens. There is no higher objective and higher task more reasonable and appropriate for the military to engage in. Then the total Extinction of illicit drug trade targeting America.
Natural kratom and dangerous, enhanced opioid products are NOT the same.
HHS is following the science and drawing a clear line between the two.
HHS' new recommendation gives @DEAHQ precise, science-based thresholds to target concentrated 7-OH and MGPI products without sweeping natural botanical kratom into Schedule I.
We have some legacy PHP apps internally
We hired a Chennai body shop.
They demanded we rewrite it as a react app using their preferred spring backend.
We no longer have a Chennai body shop.
Indians are incredibly stupid, and PHP exposes it.
When Ruben Gallego speaks of “America,” “us,” or “we,” he does not mean the descendants of the settlers or of the immigrants who arrived in the early 19th and 20th centuries, integrated, became Protestants, and built the country’s industrial base of ships, planes, roads, and trains. He means first- and second-generation immigrants—welfare dependents, Muslims, Communists, and socialists. He means the base he has captured: people who remain perpetually dependent on transfers, who will support policies that harm them because their resentments run first against Protestants, then against whites, against their own ancestors, against the wealthy, and against money itself.
When he accuses others of “selling us out,” he means selling out his party and the interests that sustain it. Normalizing relations with Russia and making peace is, on its own terms, desirable. It is undesirable only for the network of corrupt investments, shell companies, and family ties that many Democrats and some Republicans maintain with Ukraine. John McCain, Barack Obama, Mitt Romney, and Joe Biden all held substantial financial interests there; the same is likely true of Lindsey Graham. Hillary Clinton’s circle held interests in both Ukraine and Haiti.
The 2020 election, stolen or not, involved documented Ukrainian interference. The Steele dossier of 2015–2016 was fabricated with the participation of Ukrainian intelligence. Ukraine is a poor, highly corrupt country that is only nominally Christian. It is not a coincidence that, shortly after touring Ukraine, Barack Obama became the Democratic nominee, or that McCain, Romney, and Biden also rose as candidates. The common thread among the frontrunners was an anti-Russia posture paired with personal or family investments in Ukraine.
These countries may collect only a few billion dollars a year in taxes, but it takes far less than that to purchase influence. The Clinton network was never supremely wealthy in its own right; international connections funneled large sums into foundations, businesses, and shell companies tied to their accounts. The same pattern holds for the others, whether the mechanism is open corruption or the kind of credulous incompetence once associated with Woodrow Wilson. A foreign actor hosts the visitor, displays factories and the appearance of capacity, shows the churches and the culture, and proposes alliance. Access is obtained, the phone number is kept, and the relationship is used.
Ukraine’s economy is small and insignificant. That makes the personal involvement of a U.S. vice president in its corruption investigations, and the CIA’s direction of the Euromaidan, harder to explain as ordinary diplomacy. Positions of public trust are used for private dealing and shadow influence; some of the participants do not even recognize that they are being manipulated. There is no ordinary reason for a mayor of a major American city to travel abroad to meet foreign NGOs, businesses, or universities. The same question applies to Gallego: why the overseas meetings with foreigners rather than meetings with the business leaders and constituents of his own district?
There are plenty of stellar talented artists in the UK, especially Brits, Celts.
This decision is either laziness to find them, lack of connections to know them, or simple thirst.
Digital "art" has become so accessible to the middle and lower class that the market for connecting patrons with artists has all but dried up. "I know a guy" is back, "there's a fine art gallery" is often out.
High street galleries are, sadly, taken over by activist women which have replaced fine art with its deconstruction, or worse, it's antithesis.
So I understand what Laurence is saying, he is saying he lacks the access to the people he would want to contract, and the cost of a native artist is, indeed, higher than a third world arts student.
However, the excuse of cost and talent here is not from the lack of fair cost or high talent in his homeland, but from the fact he is tempted away from it by people who aren't his kin. A thousand Laurences is all it would take for a revival of arts in his country. But it's a thousand Laurences who instead are selling out his kin and countrymen to foreign mercenaries. Call centers, global capacity centers, software development, factories.
Britain has been gutted, and Laurence is participating in the gutting.
Without people to buy fine art, what are the artists in his homeland to do? Starve? Or make the garbage that's passed off as art on main street?
Be part of the solution.


















