Pinned Tweet
Nur falls sich jemand wundert: Mein guter Vorsatz für 2026 ist, selektiver in der Auswahl meiner Gesprächspartner hier und anderswo zu sein.
Ich führe gerne harte sachliche Auseinandersetzungen. Aber in der Sekunde, in der es persönlich wird, ist die Diskussion beendet.
Molly und ich wünschen euch einen schönen Mittwoch.
Gestern im Spürhundekurs war sie wieder im Musterschülerinnenmodus. Da kann sie mir bald beim Pilzesammeln helfen.
David Ballaschk retweeted
Interesting that some people find this counterintuitive. Male organizations are more competitive BECAUSE competition (here ideological) is less personal - it's casual. And a strong enemy overcome is potentially a strong lieutenant in the future against someone else.
Wow. FIRE data shows male students are more tolerant of ideological enemies than female students are of ideological allies. Read that again and then click the link.
expression.fire.org/p/male-s…
David Ballaschk retweeted
Meinung nach über einem Jahrzehnt im sozialen Sektor:
Gegen Jugendgewalt hilft kein weiteres Projekt und keine Strafrechtsverschärfung auf dem Papier.
Täter werden nicht durch monatelange Jugendstrafprozesse gestoppt. Was wirkt, ist die unmittelbare Konsequenz – direkt nach der Tat und im klaren inhaltlichen Bezug dazu.
Schnelligkeit und Konsequenz schlagen lange Aktenberge.
#Frankfurt #Jugendkriminalität #Prävention
rbb24.de/panorama/beitrag/20…
David Ballaschk retweeted
If labor created value, digging a hole and filling it back in would be a booming industry.
Menger sorted this out in 1871. Marxists are still digging.
David Ballaschk retweeted
The Soviet Union once single handedly drove several whale species to the brink of extinction because murdering them pointlessly was the best way to fulfil the fishing quotas set by communist bureaucrats in metric tonnes.
David Ballaschk retweeted
Dieser Kommentar von Isabella Weber in der heutigen FT kommt eloquent daher, ist aber im Kern in mehreren Punkten verfehlt:
- Sie will, dass nicht mehr die Notenbank sich um die Inflationsbekämpfung und Preisniveaustabilität kümmert (aktuell durch eine notwendige Zinserhöhung).
- Stattdessen soll der Staat in relative Preise eingreifen und diese deckeln (Energiepreise, Mieten) und das mit Sondersteuern finanzieren.
Auch wenn Weber VWL-Professorin an einer US-Uni (keine Top-Uni) ist, überrascht doch, dass sie offenbar mit Econ. 101 erhebliche Schwierigkeiten hat. Eingriffe in den Preismechanismus, welche die Signale von relativer Knappheit verfälschen und stören, führen zu Fehlallokation. Angebot und Nachfrage werden nicht mehr ausgeglichen. Es kommt z.B. bei einem Mietpreisdeckel zu zunehmender Knappheit, weil immer weniger Mietwohnungen gebaut werden.
Die normale Reaktion einer Notenbank, auf einen Inflationsschub mit höheren Leitzinsen zu reagieren, was die Kreditschöpfung bremst und die Nachfrage dämpft, bis der Preisdruck nachlässt, lehnt Weber ab, weil höhere Zinsen das Leben für die ärmeren Haushalte angeblich teurer machten und dann wählen diese Leute alle die Faschisten.
Sie will also, dass die Notenbank ihre Geldpolitik nicht mehr ausschließlich mit Blick auf die Preisniveaustabilität betreibt, sondern nach politischen Opportunitätserwägungen. Sorry, dann kann die NB gleich einpacken. Vor Wahlen darf der Leitzins dann nie erhöht werden, denn sonst würden ja die Wähler in die Arme der bösen Rechten getrieben. Es ist alles ziemlich absurd. Aber Frau Weber wird in bestimmten Kreisen gefeiert, die offenbar ökonomisch ziemlich illiterat sind.
ft.com/content/4c7afa74-96a0… via @ft
David Ballaschk retweeted
The moral case for capitalism is that your life belongs to you. Your work, your savings and your plans don’t become somebody else’s property because they have a moving speech about how they’d use them.
David Ballaschk retweeted
🇦🇹 Hayek formulierte ein starkes Argument gegen #Planwirtschaft: Niemand besitzt das Wissen, um eine ganze Wirtschaft zentral zu lenken. Spätere empirische Studien stützen zentrale Mechanismen seiner Kritik. Sie werfen auch Fragen für heutige #Preiskontrollen in sozialen Marktwirtschaften auf.
Was wo gebraucht wird und wer mehr produzieren könnte, wissen Millionen Einzelne. Preise machen dieses verstreute Wissen nutzbar: Sie signalisieren Knappheit und regen zusätzliche Produktion und sparsameren Verbrauch an.
Wer diese Koordination durch zentrale Vorgaben ersetzt, muss erklären: Wie gelangt das Wissen zur Zentrale? Und warum sollten Untergebene wahrheitsgemäß berichten, wenn schlechte Nachrichten ihrer Karriere schaden?
Drei Studien zu Chinas Hungersnot von 1959–1961 zeigen, wie verheerend solche Informationsprobleme wirken können. Was lässt sich daraus für heutige Markteingriffe lernen – und was nicht? 🧵
David Ballaschk retweeted
Bin gespannt, was alle dazu sagen, die hier immer betont haben, das sei doch einfach ein sozialdemokratischer Politiker
New low for normalized Jew-hate in the American Democratic Party. Very sad:
Painting your political opponents as puppets of Jews, as this El-Sayed ad does, and as crazed baby-killers and money-grubbing villains who are the root cause of every bad thing not just in the world, but in your life—from wars to the price of eggs to the reason you can’t have free healthcare—is not just low-grade Jew-hate. It’s pure Third Reich stuff, translated directly from the original German.
Do you remember when Jewish Democrats in Michigan explained that they would vote for El-Sayed despite his open disdain for Jews, since there are many other important issues they need him to fight for? That anything was worth it to “defeat MAGA”?
Well, here’s El-Sayed’s answer to them: Don’t worry, all those issues we agree on, like healthcare, inflation, and climate change, I’m going to make them about Jews too! I will tell the public that the Jews are the reason they can’t have those things.
David Ballaschk retweeted
You can’t make housing more affordable while limiting how much housing can be built. If supply is restricted and demand keeps rising, prices will rise.
David Ballaschk retweeted
Socialists should be banned from having takes about how capitalist economies should be ran and regulated.
They're like creationists giving their take on the subtleties of natural selection mechanisms.
David Ballaschk retweeted
This year alone, more Christians have been killed by Muslims in Nigeria than Gazans in three years of war.
Not a single Muslim or pro-Palestinian activist has protested like they do for Gaza. Weird.
David Ballaschk retweeted
„Es ist die Welt der Babyboomer – und die jungen Menschen dürfen darin allenfalls zur Miete wohnen.“
Reflections on the Revolution in France, updated for readers of @thetimes. thetimes.com/comment/columni…
David Ballaschk retweeted
Just wondering - do you have a reason for why it's Ukraine's fault that Russians are dying in Russian prisons for not being pro-war enough, @elonmusk?
Alexander Kondratov was best known for his work as an art and production designer for the 2007 post-World War II detective drama “Liquidation.”
themoscowtimes.com/2026/10/2…
David Ballaschk retweeted
That the Communist hammer and sickle isn’t commonly regarded as evil and offensive as the Nazi swastika is a failure of education.
“Dear Italian students, who today take to the streets carrying flags with the hammer and sickle and wearing T-shirts emblazoned with ‘CCCP’,” began an open letter in Italian by Lithuanian expat Neringa Budryt.
“I would like to ask you a question: do you truly know what the symbols you carry represent? And do you know what would have happened to many of you had you openly demonstrated in countries living under the oppression of communist regimes?
Let me tell you something. It is easy to display a red flag when, for you, communism is merely an abstract idea of equality, social justice, and rebellion against the system. It is easy to wear a T-shirt with "CCCP" on it when you have never experienced the reality of a communist regime.
We come from that part of Europe where communism was not a T-shirt, a symbol of rebellion, or a romanticized notion of equality. It was the system in which we lived—a system we never chose.
We know the history of Soviet repression, Stalinist purges, the Gulags, and mass deportations. Above all, we know the word "Siberia"—a place to which thousands of innocent people were forcibly deported, simply for thinking differently.
In Siberia—amidst freezing cold, starvation, and forced labor—many lost their lives; those who survived carried the scars of that experience forever. Entire families were torn apart, and generations were denied the chance to live freely in their own homeland.
In the countries of the Soviet bloc, censorship, political police, surveillance, and the suppression of dissent drastically curtailed individual freedoms.
We grew up in a system where state control permeated even our daily lives. At school, we were required to wear the red necktie of the "Pioneers." We were monitored; they tracked where we went and even whether we attended church. Even faith—a choice that should belong to an individual’s own conscience—could become a cause for suspicion.
We used to celebrate Christmas with our windows blacked out, to ensure no one would see us and report us. Because it was forbidden—just like so many other things: jeans, rock music, and all the symbols of a Western lifestyle. My mother returned from a Soviet labor camp. And do you know what happened to her? She was barred from continuing her education because she had been labeled an enemy of communism.
Under a communist regime, you could not protest. You risked arrest, imprisonment, interrogation, persecution—and, in certain historical contexts, even death. In the Soviet Union and other communist regimes, political dissent could cost you your freedom and your life.
Demonstrations independent of the authorities were not a guaranteed right; they were often suppressed by force.
That is why it strikes me to see young Italians proudly displaying the hammer and sickle—symbols associated with regimes that persecuted and imprisoned millions of people.
Today, you are free to take to the streets, shout against the government, criticize institutions, and wave your flags precisely because you live in a democracy that grants you these freedoms. Under an authoritarian regime of that kind, protesting against those in power could have landed you in prison.
This is not about denying the existence of social injustices, inequalities, or the right to fight for a better world. You are free to take to the streets to demand a more just society—but you should not idealize a system that denied so many people the very things you are free to exercise today: the right to choose, to believe, to speak, and to dissent. Before wearing a T-shirt with "CCCP" on it, listen to those who experienced that world. Talk to the deportees and their descendants; read the accounts of those who endured the gulags and forced exile to Siberia. Learn what it meant to be stripped of your freedom, your home, your loved ones—and even any prospect of a normal life—simply because of your background or your beliefs.
Before waving the hammer and sickle, please, study history thoroughly.”
David Ballaschk retweeted
there is no more money to give out, but european policymakers still have the option of deregulation to boost incomes and living standards.
David Ballaschk retweeted
Was die Debatte um die etwas dümmliche Frage, ob Preiskontrollen „faschistisch“ oder „antifaschistisch“ sind (kurzum: weder noch), offenbart, ist doch, um was für ein Instruments des letzten Jahrhunderts es sich hierbei handelt.































