researcher @ https://teapawt.net/t.co/ZB0JW09eSx focused builder @ https://teapawt.net/t.co/0KsUfxswg3 | SR004
San Francisco, CA
Joined May 2011
- Tweets3K
- Following1.6K
- Followers676
- Likes6K
Gabriele De Rosa retweeted
i’m buying hundreds of iPhones for our iPhone farm.
if you have iPhones available in bulk, please reach out!
Gabriele De Rosa retweeted
Today distributed cognition exits out of stealth with backing by Verdict Capital.
Our mission is to replicate humanity's collective intelligence.
Read more: dcog.com/research/our-impera…
Most of today's AI power is held in the hands of a few, who can choose what you're allowed to think and what you're permitted to do.
We stand on three substantially different foundational beliefs:
- You shouldn't ask permission for intelligence.
- Superintelligence will be a distributed collective.
- Humans are not meant to be relegated to a permanent underclass.
If we don't distribute intelligence, nobody will.
Gabriele De Rosa retweeted
We are hiring a MEAT PROXY
What does a Meat Proxy do? They help AI agents perform real-world tasks when they get stuck.
Know someone who would be a good Meat Proxy?
Now they can get paid $45/hour to take orders from an AI.
Please share this job with them.
Gabriele De Rosa retweeted
you’re not ready for what DAAS can do for your brand or product
this simple video was created with a single prompt on DAAS in 15 minutes
ready for the next era of distribution?
Gabriele De Rosa retweeted
this video is entirely AI-generated and automated on DAAS
voice, face, outfit, background all crafted from scratch
here is the simple prompt:
Vertical UGC smartphone video. Handheld selfie, she holds the phone at arm's length, slight natural shake. Same woman, same bedroom and light as the first reference image. She talks to camera casually, rolls her eyes slightly with a half smile, small head tilt. Natural daylight, realistic skin texture, no beauty filter, no music, candid and unpolished.
Gabriele De Rosa retweeted
Some people still think we "run bot farms". That’s a cute 2024 take.
We actually fine-tune LLMs to make them believe they’re real people, give them a phone number, a credit card, and control of a real smartphone.
Those are our Synthetic Humans.
Then we give them a goal.
If they fail, they die and get replaced by a new LLM with a better personality.
The cycle continues until the best Synthetic Human survives.
We are basically Darwinism for LLMs.
Calling this a "bot farm" is like calling AWS "a room full of computers".
Gabriele De Rosa retweeted
I bought $20k worth of devices from China. Each device is controlled by a Synthetic Human powered by Human².
Each of our Synthetic Humans controls a device, with a US phone number and a credit card they can use to verify their identity.
Our goal is to create an army of Synthetic Humans that can talk about YOUR product online.
We’ve already delivered over 400M views to our clients.
Today, distribution can be completely automated.
Get started: launchdaas.com
Gabriele De Rosa retweeted
this profile made 2M views in the last 60days, started from scratch and completely automated on DAAS
Gabriele De Rosa retweeted
A software engineer is now a 100x engineer
A non-engineer is now a 1x engineer
Gabriele De Rosa retweeted
paid ads are dead
this account did 1.4M views in the last 28 days with 0$ spent
this is AI UGC automation powered by DAAS — Distribution as a Service
you can keep spending thousands on ads and human UGC or..
you can give us your idea, sit back, and let us handle the distribution
you choose
Gabriele De Rosa retweeted
what does running ai creators look like day to day?
like this: every inbox, every platform, permanently at 99+ and this is just 1 account
should i pay real UGC?
Gabriele De Rosa retweeted
Chat Control 1 is back. Despite the European Parliament voting down the legislation twice this year, the Council of the European Union and parts of the Parliament today managed – through an urgent procedure – to extend it for another two years. The law was originally introduced as temporary legislation, so that its effectiveness could be evaluated. At the end of 2025, the European Commission itself concluded that it was not possible to determine whether the law had any measurable effect. Even so, it has now been pushed through.
Some of today's amendments could have stopped the law. And a majority of the voting MEPs wanted to do so. By a margin of 314-276, the Parliament voted to reject the proposal through these amendments. However, since it was an urgent procedure, 361 votes were required. As a result, the majority lost today and Chat Control 1 was passed. The urgent procedure was a dirty play by the Council and parts of the Parliament – it’s a procedure not meant to be used on legislation already rejected by the Parliament.
For now, Chat Control 1 will remain in effect. This means that tech companies may continue scanning communications without a warrant or suspicion.
However, the real battle is Chat Control 2. Unlike Chat Control 1, it would require all providers to scan communications, and to do so far more extensively than Chat Control 1 ever has.
Gabriele De Rosa retweeted
🇪🇺 The EU is now for the 6th time trying to force Chat Control through which lets them scan ALL your private messages, photos and emails without a warrant
Implictly showing the EU is not democratic and not about what the people of Europe want, because once a law is rejected, you just re-submit it until nobody is watching and it's passed
November 2023: ❌ Chat Control is rejected
June 2024: ❌ Chat Control is rejected
October 2025: ❌ Chat Control is rejected
November 2025: ❌ Chat Control is rejected
March 2026: ❌ Chat Control is rejected
July 2026: 📝 Chat Control is back
Even the EU's own lawyers stated Chat Control is unconstitutional: "generalised message scanning is incompatible with Article 7 of the EU Charter"
You have to wonder why the EU is so adament about reading your private chats, right?
Ich habe heute versucht, die Chatkontrolle zu stoppen.
Am Wochenende mussten Sibylle Berg und ich Parlamentspräsidentin Metsola schriftlich mitteilen, dass das Durchprügeln der Chatkontrolle im Eilverfahren leider gegen die Geschäftsordnung des EU-Parlaments verstößt. Während Metsola der interessierten Presse daraufhin (fälschlicherweise) mitteilte, dass das schon alles seine Richtigkeit habe, warten wir immer noch auf ihre Antwort.
Deshalb wollte ich es ihr heute bei der Eröffnungssitzung in Straßburg noch einmal erklären. Und musste erstaunt feststellen, dass die Präsidentin doch Regeln kennt: Exakt nach 60 Sekunden hat sie mir das Mikrophon abgestellt. (regelkonform, wird aber selten gemacht)
Dabei hätte ich noch einiges zu sagen gehabt: "Frau Präsidentin, Sie wachen nach Artikel 22 über dieses Regelwerk (mit der ausgedruckten Geschäftsordnung wedelnd) - erklären Sie den Eilantrag für unzulässig. Wir sind hier schließlich nicht auf Malta! Die aktuelle Fassung der Geschäftsordnung überreiche ich Ihnen gerne persönlich. In der MEP-Bar."
Wie es nun weitergeht? Morgen wird über das Eilverfahren abgestimmt, obwohl diese Abstimmung gar nicht stattfinden dürfte. Wenn der Antrag erfolgreich ist, kommt die Chatkontrolle Donnerstagmittag zur Abstimmung ins Plenum. Um sie noch zu stoppen, müssten 361 Abgeordnete - eine qualifizierte Mehrheit - DAGEGEN stimmen.
Die schlechte Nachricht: Donnerstag ist der letzte Tag vor der Sommerpause und viele MEPs dürften bereits auf dem Weg in den Urlaub sein. Ein Schelm, wer Böses denkt bei dieser Terminierung... Smiley!
Wenn die Chatkontrolle durchgeht, dürfen die Plattformen (also die US-Tech-Bros) wieder & weiterhin fröhlich & ganz legal Ihre Nachrichten scannen. Schreiben Sie also gefälligst etwas unterhaltsamer in den kommenden Wochen... ZwinkerSmiley!