dfJ retweeted
I like how she lives in a completely different world absolutely detached from reality.
Pretty sure she thinks highly of herself, too
📡 Our new cooperation on satellite connectivity takes off today.
With immediate results.
North Greenland will see massive improvements in internet access in the coming days.
And by October, remote communities in East Greenland will also have better, faster internet!
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
While the EU claims "massive improvements" in Greenland's internet, the upgrade increases speeds to only 15 Mbps download for 799 DKK/month sermitsiaq.ag/samfund/intern… dr.dk/nyheder/indlan…
Other providers are currently illegal under local telecommunications regulations aqutsisut.gl/en/tele/satell…
dfJ retweeted
AirPods 2 Wireless Charging Case Prototype
#Apple #appleinternal
dfJ retweeted
How Europe is killing makers and micro-entrepreneurs
blog.adafruit.com/2026/08/25…
dfJ retweeted
The EU just killed DIY PCB design
With the new tax on imports (3€ per import of each category)
I now would have to pay 3€ for every PCB component that I have to solder at home
I can't buy PCB components in Germany because THEY ARE NOT EVEN MANUFACTURED HERE ANYWHERE ITS JUST CHINA AND AMERICA
So instead of 20 bucks for one prototype PCB with 20 different components
It's now 80€
Fuck you @vonderleyen
dfJ retweeted
Of course the ones that volunteer for the EU survey are the retarded ones
Children are asking for a safer online world.
We asked Europeans aged 12–17 for their views on apps, websites, games & social media:
🚸80% support rules for loot boxes
🚸78% support age limits
🚸48% want controls on features like infinite scroll
link.europa.eu/CGDqYJ
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The survey was a voluntary online consultation with 4,786 self-selected respondents, not representative of all EU children aged 12-17, with 38% from Germany and 33% from Romania. eu-for-children.europa.eu/digital-fairne… eu-for-children.europa.eu/system/files/2…
dfJ retweeted
Every one of those morons responsible needs to be publicly caned
dfJ retweeted
Why is the official account of the EU Parliament defending Chat Control if the majority of Members of the European Parliament have voted against it?
At least respect the majority.
The fight against child sexual abuse continues. But not at the expense of privacy.
Parliament backs reinstating temporary child safety rules, while protecting encrypted messages.
EU governments decide next.
This bridges the gap until permanent laws are finalised.

ALT European Parliament social media post on a black background with white and yellow text. Title: 'THIS IS NOT "CHAT CONTROL"'. Four bullet points explain Parliament's position: (1) Parliament supported a temporary rule allowing online services to voluntarily detect and report child sexual abuse material. (2) Parliament proposed changes to exclude end-to-end encrypted chats from scanning. (3) These votes are not final; EU governments must review before becoming law. (4) A temporary exemption already existed from 2021–2026; the EU is seeking to restore it temporarily while working on a longer-term solution. European Parliament logo in bottom right corner.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The measure more commonly known as "chat control", from a technical standpoint, aims to mass surveil European citizens.
More info: fightchatcontrol.eu
dfJ retweeted
Democracy is when most people vote NO so you conclude YES
Democracy is how we live our lives in Europe.
Cherish it. Shape it. Protect it.
ℹ️Read more: link.europa.eu/RmRmfc
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
In a true democracy, the majority rules and makes the rules.
Although 314 politicians voted to scrap Chat Control, while 276 voted to keep it, the vote required 360 MEPs to reject the Council of the European Union's position.
theregister.com/security/2026/…
more like
90% of online child sexual abuse was found because platforms detected it. Now, they no longer can.
🚨 Since 3 April, there has been a major legal gap in protecting children from online sexual abuse.
‼️ We cannot accept this legal vacuum.
‼️ We cannot let child abuse material go unnoticed and unreported, day after day.
‼️ Closing the legal gap is urgent!
⁉️ DO YOU SUPPORT THIS URGENCY TO PROTECT CHILDREN?
‼️ Protect children, not predators.
dfJ retweeted
Thieves, go fuck yourself






































