DevilDriver (YO) 💀

We're moving to Robinhood Chain. To enable the next phase of IXS. For two years we've weighed where IXS should live to best suit future plans. This year, together with our partners, we chose Robinhood Chain: the chain Robinhood built for tokenized assets. Many of our biggest plans are with partners building on Robinhood Chain too and this move aligns IXS with them. Why Robinhood Chain? Robinhood has named tokenized stocks, pre IPO assets and institutional yield products as the defining opportunity in RWA And it is directing capital, infrastructure and users to that thesis on its chain. We are moving to where that is happening. It is where Robinhood is putting stocks onchain, and where it is giving its 28 million customers AI agents that trade and manage money. More than 150,000 customers had opened agentic accounts by late September, and agents were using Robinhood’s tools about 30 million times a day. Every agent needs somewhere to hold idle balances and earn on them. That is what IXS vaults are built for. Where this goes: a regulated onchain market for real world assets. Funds, credit and tokenized stocks in one place, where you can hold them, earn on them, and borrow & lend against them. That is what we are building towards with our partners on Robinhood Chain, and it needs one IXS in one place. Today it doesn't. IXS is split across Ethereum, Base and Polygon, three separate markets. The migration brings it into one native token on Robinhood Chain. Setting up the token for what's coming. Live today: > A $10M Pre-IPO vault for institutional investors. $10M in added TVL on day one. > 25% of vault fees now buy and burn IXS, up from 20%. What comes next: > AI-agent vaults on Robinhood Chain > New RWA vaults, built with partners on the chain > Partner launches, announced as each one goes live The token: 1 IXS on Ethereum = 10 IXS on Robinhood Chain. The symbol stays IXS. Holders get 72% of a fixed 2.5B supply. The rest is a recapitalisation for deeper liquidity and ecosystem growth, needed for what's planned: to attract TVL and investors and give token holders a better venue to trade. Migration runs 27 Oct 12:00 UTC to 21 Dec 23:59 UTC. After that, IXS on Ethereum, Base and Polygon is retired. New IXS contract: 0xDcD7FaCE6A1d0bDD0665Ea1B0842fc9CE797862b Migrate here, and only here: robinhood.ixs.finance IXS is not affiliated with Robinhood. Our Pre-IPO vault is open to eligible institutional investors only.

JUST IN: ARTHUR HAYES ASKS ANSEM WHAT HE SHOULD BUY “I FEEL SIDELINED”

Pumpfun x @HyperliquidX Perps are live on the Pumpfun app! Long or short crypto, stocks & commodities on the biggest onchain perps engine, straight from your USDC balance. No bridging required. Learn more 👇

AI creates abundance. Bitcoin enforces scarcity. One expands humanity’s ability to create value. The other lets us preserve and transfer it across time and space. Digital Intelligence and Digital Capital are complementary, Jason. The world needs both.

i ain’t too sure that kimchi feller into the ladies shown a month ago apparently he was getting back rubs and his food cut up for em by other fellers? the web he hath spun 👀

This is the future

If you ever feel bad for yourself… Just remember, some people are probably buying dips on $ANSEM Token: -85% Launchpad Revenue: -98% @blknoiz06 also disappeared

Logan Paul and Mike Majlak were left speechless after Ali G claimed Elon Musk sleeps with robots and aliens in space because he can’t get laid on Earth 😭 “ he’s boning them robots because he can’t get none down here”

Logan Paul showed Ali G a picture of his wife Nina Agdal 😭 "yeah she's alright.. It's not bad if you like that kind of thing. And she was born which gender?"

Check Franks recent perp trades on FOMO if you want to see a masterclass of what not to do Stick to insider info and bundled memecoins champ

So today you opened X and everyone is getting a Rolex (Mitch got 2) 20 Rolexes were distributed, 11 went to KOLs It's time to address those questions: > Who really got a Rolex and who is larping? > Were KOLs statistically advantaged? Check the table and the experiment 🧵

SO GOOD!!!😆🤣🤣🤣

A note on transferability. Papertrade is a complicated primitive, and managing it from a risk standpoint is a complicated problem. The PAPER token is far more integrated into the economics of the primitive than most tokens are in their respective protocols today, and, broadly, was designed to act as a counter insolvency incentive coupled with a rebate mechanism to losing traders. Market makers and exchanges are by far the two most profitable businesses in crypto, and our goal was to try and externalise as much of their margins back to users as possible. We are now just over a week into the life of papertrade and we are becoming increasingly confident that this is both possible, but also a likely outcome as agentic led software becomes the norm. As it stands, the paper token traded as a perp becomes a leveraged bet on bankroll solvency - and being able to short bankroll solvency materially changes the payoff curve of a manipulation attack. The target number goes from the bankroll, to the bankroll + short side exposure on paper. We can, and do limit bankroll size specifically to control this payoff curve and ensure it never becomes existentially problematic, but external perp markets are not something we would have any control over if left to float of their own accord. For example, if our bankroll is $10m, an attack costing $15m manipulating the price of bitcoin or ether is not viable. You simply lose money. If however you were also able to put on $10m of PAPER short side exposure, suddenly an attack costing $15m is very viable indeed. If we were to make the token transferable at this point, we are confident we would quickly enter a state too dangerous to allow any material exposure to be taken on papertrade, an end result that benefits no party beyond the wolves who have done the math on the short and are waiting in the wings with sharpened knives. We would also like to thank the various perps teams who have reached out about pre-market listings for their understanding and patience regarding this issue, and especially to the paragon team who, despite jumping the gun on us, have behaved with the utmost integrity and transparency once a dialogue was opened. Perps on PAPER will always act as a self-limiting exposure ceiling for a token with this type of utility, and we think it would be a shame to limit the growth of papertrade to the extent that allowing perps would necessitate. As such, at this juncture we do not have plans to allow off-contract token transferability. Structurally, papertrade is limited by the quality of the data it receives from hyperliquid, but we strongly believe that hyperliquid has a very large part to play in the future of global exchanges, and expect their books to continue to thicken and strengthen over time. A note on fees. Papertrade launched with a deadband fee from entry of 0.2bps. This means you don't earn anything until the price has moved by 0.002% in your favour. Over the months before launch, we played around with many different curves and fee structures affecting exclusively positions closed very close to entry price in order to try and devise a structure that removed the edge against the bankroll low time frame scalp bots have, whilst also minimally impacting the traders around which and for whom the product was devised. We were never able to find anything we were absolutely happy with and so decided to stay with the 0.2bp deadband fee through launch. This has however meant we have had to be very restrictive when it came to certain parameters, such as OI caps. Now, however, we have enough live data to fully understand exactly which strategies work, and to make the necessary changes to stop them. The changes we are making will have an on hours and off hours fee mode to account for the relative differences in liquidity the hyperliquid books see between these two time periods, and the ease with which low time frame moves are signalled. The changes we are making will only affect positions closed within 6bps of entry (0.06%) in on hours, and 10bps (0.1%) in off hours. Any trades closed above these threshold price shifts will see no change to their fees at all. On a look back to launch basis, these changes affect the profitability of bot strategies roughly 15x more than they do normal traders, for whom a very small proportion of overall winnings come from within this band. These changes should serve to flatten much of the edge our microfee structure necessarily creates on low time frames, and will help with long term exchange sustainability. This should hopefully allow us to open up parameters such as OI caps a little more so those of you who wish to can put on the size you want to, when you want to. It is possible these changes are still too lax, and that further revisions to this structure may be necessary going forwards. If so, we will notify users ahead of time. A note on paper tokenomics. In conjunction with the fee changes, we will also be implementing a change to the token issuance curve. Going forward, every $1 lost mints a fixed share of PAPER's supply at that moment, roughly 0.1% of supply per $1M lost (the exact number depends on the mint rate at the time the contracts are upgraded). PAPER minting in and near insolvency will also change, switching from a flat 100 per $1 of loss, to a time weighted multiplier on the curve growing over time, effectively acting as the house running a discounted auction on its own future cash flows. This change also removes the risk of the paper-mint-straddle-attack, temporarily pushing the protocol insolvent by closing only the winning side of a large straddle position and then attempting to mint as much paper as possible. In the immediate term these changes will only have a very subtle effect on PAPER minting, but in the long run will structurally change the outlook of the system beyond the first few weeks, serving to slowly dilute out older holders and leaving more recent users with an advantage. Reconstituting the PAPER system into something much closer to the exchange rakeback it was intended to be. We have been very reticent to touch this particular aspect of the system for obvious reasons, but ultimately we believe that these changes provide all users with the optionality to take a smaller piece of a potentially much larger pie than the current dynamic might necessarily allow. Other, miscellaneous notes. These contract upgrades will include a few other contract changes, including the addition of builder codes so that builders can utilise papertrade in whatever capacity they choose to. This will be a whitelist only to begin with and we will have more for you later in the week on where/how this will be rolled out. A small change to contract permissions on the reward distributor and a change on how below bust closes are processed by the exchange are also included, largely to block gas griefing attacks. These changes will be pushed to docs in full over the coming day, and we will further announce once the changes are queued into the timelock pending final security passes, scheduled to go live 24 hours after that point. Final note. We'd like to thank everyone that has tried out papertrade over the last 10 days. It has been a labour of love building this product and both of us have been taken aback at all of the positive feedback we have received. We'd also like to thank all those of you who have spent considerable time musing on the system we have built, and much of your advice has been taken onboard and will likely affect the colour of what papertrade becomes going forward. We know some of these changes will be unpopular with some, but we would not be making them if we did not feel them to be absolutely necessary. - blurr, jez

You Call, You Earn. Introducing Callout Reward on GMGN. You make the call. You hold the bag. You get paid when others trade through it.