HUMAN WA$TE (@Dplanet) header
HUMAN WA$TE (@Dplanet) profile picture

TeamMatrixšŸ«”šŸ”Ž Opinions are my own, based on public records and reputable sources. All statements reflect my interpretations and are not definitive facts.

Joined October 2006
šŸšØšŸ‡¬šŸ‡§ Tommy Robinson is not a patriot. He’s a useful idiot playing with fire. While Britain’s elites sell off the country, he points at Muslims. While billionaires drain our services, he shouts about asylum seekers. Here’s the truth about his cult, and why it’s so dangerous šŸ§µšŸ‘‡
362
1,794
64
7,877
574,389
šŸšØšŸ‡¬šŸ‡§ Russell Brand r*ped one woman and s*xually assaulted three others. A jury convicted him. A judge sentenced him to 10.5 years. He denied all the charges and told police the encounters were consensual. His defenders have settled on six lines. Hearsay. No DNA. He said, she said. No CCTV. No witnesses. No evidence. These posts are all over Twitter. Put together, they set one standard: unless a r*pe is filmed, it didn’t happen. Almost no r*pe meets that standard. Most happen in private, by a man the woman knows. There’s no camera and no one else in the room. English law stopped requiring corroboration in sexual offence cases in 1994. Her testimony is evidence. It was tested under cross-examination. The jury weighed each count separately and acquitted him on three. A stitch-up doesn’t end in three acquittals. UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham says victims need the confidence to come forward. Fewer than one in six women who are r*ped report it to police. Among victims who told someone but not the police, a quarter said they didn’t expect to be believed. These ghoulish posts reinforcing r*pe myths, mainly from far-right accounts, tell them they were right.
40
71
6
223
7,570
šŸšØšŸ‡¬šŸ‡§ Last Thursday, a jury convicted Russell Brand of one r*pe and three s*xual assaults. On Monday, he was sentenced to 10.5 years. Yesterday, the Guardian and ITV News published accounts from women who say David Walliams used his celebrity to pursue teenagers and young women for sex. Walliams denies all of it. He has not been charged with any offence. The joint investigation says it heard from 30 sources with first-hand accounts. Two women say they first met him when they were 15. Others describe unsolicited messages to young models and fans, and unwanted pursuit of junior women at Britain’s Got Talent and at his former publisher, HarperCollins. Walliams says he never abused his power. In a letter to the journalists, he wrote: ā€œI am not a s*xual predator. I have not broken the law.ā€ He went to the High Court to stop publication. Mr Justice Nicklin refused. The court did not rule on whether the allegations are true. It found the journalism ā€œconcerns matters of substantial public interestā€, and that an injunction would also have silenced the women. His reputation was already part of the broadcast record. The 2004 British Comedy Awards opened with a Jonathan Ross joke linking 15-year-olds to going home with Walliams. Ross says he didn’t write it. The following year, asked on Radio 1 about his reputation as a womaniser, Walliams said he was a gentleman who loved ā€œthe company of women.ā€ The Guardian also reports what happened behind the scenes. HarperCollins ran an internal inquiry into his conduct in 2023–24. It ended with no consequences for him, and the publisher kept printing his books for almost two more years. One woman who spoke to the inquiry reportedly left with a payout and a non-disclosure agreement. The companies that make BGT say no complaint about him was ever made. The Guardian has seen WhatsApp messages in which young BGT staff warned each other about him. In 2016, his reputation lawyers sent a 19-year-old without legal representation a letter demanding, within 24 hours, an undertaking not to talk about him. The firm says it believed she was about to sell an untrue story. Brand’s case followed the same route. The Times and Channel 4’s Dispatches published in 2023. Police and internal reviews at the BBC, Channel 4, and Banijay followed. Three years later, a jury delivered its verdicts. The allegations against Walliams are untested. They are public today because a judge refused to keep them private.
1
2
14
1,246
šŸšØšŸ‡¬šŸ‡§ "I think Russell Brand's views on sex and consent are going to radically change in the next week."
3
1
1
20
1,213
šŸšØšŸ‡ŗšŸ‡ø I'd almost forgotten about our old friend Andrew Tate, rotting away in a Florida Federal SHU. I thought I'd check in to see where he stands on the Russell Brand conviction. Let's see... he thinks it's unfair. I am shocked! Six women testified against Brand on seven charges. The jury acquitted him on three. If a woman’s word were enough, they would have convicted him on all seven. Where they convicted him, the testimony was backed up: friends' testimony at the time, his own police interviews, and his own evidence falling apart under cross-examination. Testimony is evidence for every crime. A mugging victim’s word can convict a mugger. It still has to convince twelve strangers. No time limit on prosecuting r*pe? There isn’t one for murder either. A crime doesn’t stop being a crime because it’s old. Nothing becomes r*pe ā€œthe second she wants it to be.ā€ It becomes a conviction when a jury is sure. Three times in this case, they weren’t. Tick Tock Tate, your time is coming.
8
16
2
72
2,015
šŸšØšŸ‡¬šŸ‡§ Lockdown 23and1 gives insight into Russell Brand's new home - HMP Wandsworth - and the trials and tribulations he'll be facing. youtu.be/_IrMRalGbwA?si=n2Xs…
1
3
579
šŸšØšŸ‡¬šŸ‡§ The far-right today: Look at this Muslim who only got a Ā£25 fine for littering. Russell Brand got 10 years for r*pe! Two-tier justice!!
4
8
70
1,063
šŸšØšŸ‡¬šŸ‡§ Russell Brand was jailed yesterday for 10 years and 6 months. One r*pe, three s*xual assaults, four women. Tate fans should pay attention. Brand ran the same playbook. He moved to Florida, built an audience on conspiracy content, and called the allegations a Matrix hit job. A UK jury convicted him anyway. The same jury acquitted him on three other counts. A rigged system doesn’t do that. The Matrix theory can’t lose. When someone is convicted, it’s persecution. When someone isn’t charged, it’s a cover-up. Every outcome confirms it. That’s how the grooming gang scandal gets used. The failures were real. Police and councils failed those girls for years, and some officials held back for fear of being called racist. The Jay report and the Casey audit documented it. That was cowardice and incompetence. No evidence shows a coordinated plot. The same system exposed the failures and prosecuted the offenders. Last year, seven Rochdale men got between 12 and 35 years. Nor do Pakistani or Muslim men get lighter sentences. Judges in England and Wales must follow Sentencing Council guidelines unless that would be contrary to the interests of justice. The guidelines set ranges by harm and culpability. They don’t include religion or ethnicity. The UK ranks 18th of 143 on the World Justice Project’s 2026 Rule of Law Index. On the measures the Matrix theory says are missing, it ranks higher: 12th for constraints on government powers, 13th for absence of corruption, 12th for open government. Romania ranks 45th. Andrew Tate once said a big part of why he moved there was that ā€œin Eastern Europe, none of this garbage flies.ā€ He meant MeToo-era s*xual assault allegations. In the UK, the CPS has authorised 59 charges against the brothers, including r*pe and trafficking for s*xual exploitation. Andrew also faces counts relating to indecent images of a child. Court filings say the girl was 17. Both deny all charges. The same accounts calling grooming gangs the worst crime in modern Britain are defending men charged with trafficking for s*xual exploitation and child image offences. The Tates have said for years there are no victims. They could consent to extradition and take that case to a UK jury. They’ve chosen to fight it from a federal detention cell. Brand came back from Florida and faced a jury. The Tates are contesting every step that would put them in front of one. You do the maths.
44
132
7
493
19,566
šŸšØšŸ‡¬šŸ‡§ BREAKING: Russell Brand sentenced to 10 years, 6 months for r*pe and s*xual assault. He will serve two-thirds of that sentence (7 years) before being released on license.
13
39
6
237
25,510
šŸšØšŸ‡¬šŸ‡§ Russell Brand's fate is now in the judge's hands. Both arguments have been made. The judge has now adjourned to consider his sentencing decision. He will be back at 2pm UK time to deliver his remarks, which will be televised.
9
28
3
164
7,346
šŸšØšŸ‡¬šŸ‡§ RUSSELL BRAND: Prosecutors request 10-15year sentence for r*pe conviction. Riel Karmy-Jones KC has asked for a category one sentencing length for the r*pe conviction, noting the ā€œextreme impactā€ of his crimes on his victims. She went through the ā€œsevere psychological harmā€ caused by Brand, outlining how the r*pe victim feared she had contracted HIV from Brand after the attack, after he removed the condom without permission. She says Brand subjected her to further degrading treatment after the r*pe, telling her to clean up the aftermath and also getting his driver to remove her from his house. The gravity of such an offence carries a starting point of 12 years custody and a range of 10-15 years. Source: The Guardian
32
46
6
195
33,500
šŸšØšŸ‡¬šŸ‡§. Vanessa Feltz recalls (talking about Russel Brand), ā€œHe’d like to have sex with me and both my daughters, the younger one was 15 at the time.ā€
3
16
2
54
4,588
šŸšØšŸ‡¬šŸ‡§ Tommy Robinson keeps telling everyone he’s got ā€œThe number 1 bestselling book in the UKā€. Not quite. He has the bestselling book on Amazon UK, on a chart that updates every hour. One shop, one hour. The UK's real bestseller list is the Sunday Times chart. It uses Nielsen BookScan till data from about 6,500 retailers and measures a full week of sales across the whole market. That's the No.1 that counts.
113
84
7
543
111,927
Future r*pist
5
12
631
šŸšØšŸ‡®šŸ‡Ŗ Here's Tommy Robinson assaulting Mo Deen with his book about Muslim r*pe gangs.
97
7
3
65
10,006
šŸšØšŸ‡¬šŸ‡§ Seven weeks before he is sentenced for making two men fear violence, Tommy Robinson is on Twitter mocking a man for not fighting him. ā€œNo point in piping up now, you all had ya chance and ya arses went.ā€ In other words: you had your chance to have a go, and you bottled it. He posted it hours after a brawl at a boxing event in Kilkenny. Chairs and steel barricades were thrown. The show was cancelled. Here’s why that matters on 16 December - the question that decides his sentence. The big question is whether he goes to prison or gets a suspended sentence. The sentencing guidelines tell the judge what to weigh. Two factors against a suspended sentence are whether the offender poses a risk to anyone and whether he has a history of failing to comply with court orders. Robinson has that history. In 2024, he admitted ten breaches of a High Court order and was jailed for 18 months. Remorse - Lack of remorse can’t make his sentence longer. Genuine remorse can make it shorter. Taunting someone about a fight, hours after a brawl, is hard to square with it. The pre-sentence report. Before sentencing, the Probation Service will assess his risk and whether he can be managed in the community. His posts are public. The prosecution can put them before the judge. He is still on bail. His conditions haven’t been made public. The prosecution can ask the court to reconsider bail if new information comes to light. His defence at trial was that he acted out of fear, not aggression. Ten jurors didn’t accept it. If his lawyers now argue he’s changed, the judge doesn't have to look far to see that he hasn't.
9
11
48
2,635
🚨🚨 Tommy Robinson vs Mo Deen. Same playbook. Bigger stage. Last night in Kilkenny, Ireland, Tommy Robinson sat ringside at an influencer boxing event. He is seven weeks away from being sentenced for making two journalists fear violence. After winning his fight, Mo Deen leaped out of the ring towards him. That part wasn’t Robinson’s doing. What came next was. The promoters set up a face-off in the ring. Robinson walked into it, holding up his new book about Pakistani r*pe gangs. Within touching distance, it turned physical. He had to be held back. Then again. Then again. Chairs and steel barricades went flying. The crowd started fighting. The rest of the event was cancelled. Mo Deen says the confrontation was scripted and got out of hand. If so, Robinson agreed to stage a fight with a Muslim rival in front of a hostile crowd while on bail awaiting sentence. Either he was ambushed, or he signed up for it. By morning, the clip was doing its job: ā€œTommy Robinson attacked by Muslim influencer.ā€ Provoke. Film. Play the victim. Keep the book in shot. It’s the defence he gave the jury last month. The journalists started it. He was only responding. The jury heard it, and ten of them rejected it. What this might mean for Tommy's sentencing. His bail terms haven’t been made public. If they bar foreign travel, or if this breached any other condition, he can be arrested and held until sentencing. Even without a breach, the prosecution can ask the court to review his bail in light of new conduct. It won’t add time to his sentence directly. Judges sentence for what you were convicted of, not for a brawl in Ireland nobody has been charged for. But it lands at the point that matters. Whether a sentence is suspended depends partly on risk, and whether he can be trusted to stay out of trouble. Probation will assess that before December. So will the judge. He had seven weeks to show he could be trusted. He spent one of them causing a riot.
šŸšØšŸ‡¬šŸ‡§ Young Bob calls himself a free speech martyr. His modus operandi is simple: provoke, film, fundraise. In 48 hours this week, he was arrested on suspicion of affray outside UCL, posted a video asking for donations, and gained a volunteer security detail. By its own account, that group has protected Tommy Robinson and Britain First’s Paul Golding. We've all seen Bob being attacked and threatened. I’ve seen the footage. I’ll be honest about my first reaction. Watching him corner people who’ve taken racist abuse their whole lives, I understand why someone snaps. Smug, hateful provocation works. But that’s what he’s counting on, and I hate it. Every punch becomes a clip. The clip becomes proof of persecution. The proof becomes a donation link. He calls it 'civilised debate', and he models it on Charlie Kirk’s campus tables. Plato had a word for it: eristic. Arguing to win, whatever the truth. Schopenhauer wrote the manual. Make your opponent angry, because angry people argue badly. Then play to the crowd. Here’s Bob’s version. 1. Pick the ground. Speakers’ Corner. Whitechapel. Outside UCL. Camden, alongside Restore Britain canvassers. Places where the people walking past are most likely to take it personally. 2. Arrive rehearsed. The same lines, hundreds of times. The person he stops is meeting them for the first time. 3. Rig the stakes. For him, deportation is a debating topic. For the person in front of him, it’s their home and their family. One side is playing a game. The other is defending their existence. 4. Provoke. He calls immigration ā€œdemographic replacement,ā€ the language of the Great Replacement conspiracy theory. 'Remigration' is just another word for ethnic cleansing. He defends the P-word as ā€œjust an abbreviation.ā€ Ask anyone who grew up having it shouted at them whether that’s a debating point. 5. Frame the reaction. Anger becomes proof. In his latest video, he says the era of debate may be over. Then he promises to keep showing his opponents as ā€œviolent, irrational and emotional.ā€ That’s the content plan, in his own words. 6. Post the win. Every clip is a win, because he picks the clips. Wanting to win isn’t the problem. The Oxford Union prepares hard too. It also gives both sides the same notice, a neutral chair and a full record. Bob’s format strips all three out. He has now been arrested seven times without charge. An arrest is content whether or not a charge follows. The van, the cuffs, ā€œtwo-tier Britain.ā€ Then the donation link. He started this at 16. Adults built the platform around him. Rebel News flew its founder to London to meet him and promoted a ā€œSave Young Bobā€ site. He has campaigned for Restore Britain. He has talked about getting security since June. Now a group from the Robinson and Golding circuit says it will guard him. Their statement says they’re there to prevent confrontation. But a man whose format runs on a reaction now arrives with a crew. I want to live in a country where people can debate important things without being assaulted. That even includes him. The law protects him from violence. It doesn’t protect him from us seeing exactly who he is and what he's doing. He seeks out Britons who’ve lived with racism their whole lives, provokes them for the camera, and posts the reaction to his followers. I hate that, but violence plays right into his chubby little hands.
5
52
1
203
27,587
Tiny Tommy getting handled…
Tommy Robinson getting carried around like a toddler will never not be funny.šŸ’€šŸ¤£
2
9
76
1,304
šŸšØšŸ‡®šŸ‡Ŗ Not that it will matter to the judge, but MoDeen apparently provoked Tommy Robinson by jumping out of the ring to start the altercation. I’m still marvelling at the utter stupidity of Tommy Robinson getting involved in all of this while on bail awaiting sentencing after being found guilty of two counts of harassment causing fear of violence. As someone commented, ā€œTommy will do anything apart from spend time with his kids.ā€
8
9
50
3,351