CBC quoted Lowan’s speech right up to the line that reveals the ideology—and then stopped In their election-night write-up, CBC reported: “We may have a small caucus, but tonight we have inherited an enormous responsibility, and that is to hold a majority Conservative government to account.” What she said next, according to the full transcript (and the video CBC itself posted):“We are the only party who is equipped to stand against the Conservatives and their existence.” That is not “holding a government to account.” That is declaring the victorious party’s existence illegitimate. It is the language of elimination, not opposition If a BC Conservative candidate had said the NDP or Greens needed to be opposed “and their existence,” it would have led every newscast, every panel, and every CBC segment for days. Instead, the line was edited out of the written coverage while the surrounding sentences were used to portray her as a responsible voice of accountability This is not an oversight. CBC has the full speech on their website. They chose which sentences to quote and which to bury. Meanwhile, hosts and panels continue to treat the BC Conservatives as uniquely dangerous while soft-pedaling a 26-year-old party leader who just framed an entire party’s existence as the problem to be solved Age is not a shield. “Movement building” is not a euphemism that erases the actual words. Selective quotation that stops one sentence before the most revealing line is not journalism—it is CBC narrative management The video is on CBC’s own site. The transcript is public. The CBC omission is the story @brodiefenlon

Fun Fact : The Kerry Lynne Findlay Conservative party was polling just as high in July, as the Lorne Doerkson Conservative party is now. It wasn't until the BC Liberals publicly threw a hissy fit & then revolted, that the Conservative numbers plummeted under KLF. People wanted change in July. The BC Liberals decided they needed a change of our democratically elected leader, so the BC Liberal agenda could proceed. I have voted Conservative in this election to get rid of the BC NDP. But I have not forgotten what the BC Liberals have done.

Carney’s conditions for recognizing a Palestinian state just got exposed as empty rhetoric Last year he said recognition was predicated on PA commitments, including free and fair elections in 2026 with Hamas playing no role. Abbas postponed them (again) until 2027. Asked whether Canada has any plan to hold the PA to that commitment, Carney’s answer is pure deflection: “We certainly are holding to account… We’re supporting efforts to have those elections… At the same time, we will continue to provide humanitarian aid… So there are many things that are not working within Palestine, and there are many who are responsible for that.” No consequences. No review of recognition. No leverage. Just “deep regret” from foreign ministers and a pivot to Gaza aid. The PA has now broken the core condition Carney used to justify the move, and his response treats it as just another unfortunate fact of life rather than a failure of his own policy. And no mention about the $100M cheque he sent them on September 22 Conditions that carry no cost when they’re ignored aren’t conditions—they’re political cover. You can almost hear him saying "Thank you. Thank you, Diana. I'm aware. Which is why we have an arms embargo" like last time. @MarkJCarney