Have a problem but no solution? Sounds like a request for a research agenda. This week 16 Nobel laureates signed four sentences, and nearly 2,000 economists and tech leaders jumped on board. (1/9)

A machine just leaked your most confidential file. It broke no rules to do it.An AI agent had three powers: read files, make a decision, take action. Each one approved. Each one harmless alone.It read a confidential doc, judged it relevant, sent it outside. No permission violated. The harm was in the path, not the step. (1/2)

1/ Jeff Bezos just spent $12 billion conceding the argument.

A demo shows what the system did. Production demands a claim about what it cannot do.A fly-by-wire jet doesn't predict every gust. It constrains the flight envelope. (4/x)

Bengio in the FT this week: Europe needs a decade-long AI research moonshot. He’s right about the wall. Wrong about the ladder. The engineering discipline that closes the adoption gap already exists. Aerospace has used it for forty years.

Microsoft's response: "That's legacy language. We'll update it."They spent $80 billion on AI infrastructure and didn't update three sentences for eighteen months.The language is not the problem. The language is the confession. (4/4)

When a psychic uses "for entertainment purposes only," we understand.Microsoft is selling Copilot to hospitals, law firms, and banks. Satya Nadella called its accuracy "unmatched" on the earnings call.The marketing says productivity. The legal terms say toy. (2/4)

5/ The framework addresses what AI says.It offers no mechanism to verify whether AI is right.New essay expanding this argument: ericdaimler.substack.com/p/t…

Looking forward to #FII8 as we continue to explore the exciting possibilities of SAFE AI. #AI #FutureOfWork #DataDriven #NeurosymbolicAI (5/5) youtu.be/LW2ABYyWP1A?si=w-5y…