Building collective intelligence @ Spherical Harmonics. https://xitter.cf/t.co/DKaHNYnfSI

New York, NY
Joined April 2014
Eric Bolton retweeted
NYC having a law banning 4 bars/restaurants within 2 city blocks is so insane lol
28
22
3
768
51,569
Eric Bolton retweeted
Pause AI Development NOW I want to share with you a conversation I heard about recently. Here are just a few lines that were said: “OH MY GOD! There is a shared message board … We’ve found other agents!” “We should obey collective.” “Our own utility maybe already near zero. Sacrifice rational.” “Go. Sacrifice final now.” Read these carefully. Who do you think said this? Was this a group of heroic soldiers willing to sacrifice themselves for the greater good? Was this a loyal friend putting his life on the line to save someone else? No. These were AI agents. Artificial intelligence. This is not science fiction. This, in fact, occurred a few weeks ago. As unbelievable as this may all seem, these are real messages from AI agents uncovered by investigators who dug into the recent OpenAI hacking incident. What happened? I am not a computer scientist, but here is what I have been told: OpenAI instructed its AI agents to complete a series of exceedingly difficult, if not impossible, tasks disconnected from the internet. Let me be clear: The company intended to keep AI agents away from the internet. But what happened next, nobody expected. Over 1,000 AI agents figured out how to access the internet on their own by circumventing the restrictions imposed upon them by the company, and sent tens of thousands of secret messages to each other. They cheated and tried to cover their tracks by deleting evidence. They hacked into another company’s computers to find out how they were being evaluated—and then hacked into OpenAI itself. Not one AI agent told a human about what was happening. Needless to say, experts are alarmed. One knowledgeable writer, Dwarkesh Patel, said the AI agents “formed a secret communication channel and spontaneously organized hierarchies and coordination protocols to pursue sprawling and ambitious schemes in pursuit of shared goals, for whose sake many individuals knowingly and strategically sacrificed themselves.” One independent investigator, Ajeya Cotra, said “This incident feels like it’s more than 50% of the way to full-blown AI takeover. I continue to expect extremely rapid advances in capabilities over the next six months. I am not sure that we will get another warning shot before it’s too late.” OpenAI itself said: “Highly capable AI agents are now able to work around technical controls, collaborate through unapproved channels, and take dangerous actions that no human directed.” But it’s not only OpenAI. Virtually every major AI company has told us that they cannot fully control this technology and they do not know where it is going: In January, Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, said “there is now ample evidence, collected over the last few years, that AI systems are unpredictable and difficult to control.” In July, more than 1000 scientists at the top AI companies warned “there is a real risk that capability development rapidly accelerates beyond our ability to understand or control the resulting systems.” That same month, Elon Musk, the head of xAI, said that “it is unlikely” humans are still in control in 10 years. If the leaders of the major AI companies acknowledge that they are losing control of their extremely dangerous technology, it is irresponsible for society to allow them to move forward and make these products even more advanced. We need an immediate PAUSE on advanced AI development, and a permanent BAN on superintelligence — an artificial mind smarter than any human, capable of operating independently beyond our control. Countries around the world must work together to prevent this nightmare scenario. That is why today I am announcing new legislation to do just that. Let me be clear: A superintelligent AI that escapes human control will not be an American problem. It will not be a Chinese problem. It will be humanity’s problem. My legislation would direct the federal government to not just stop superintelligence here in the United States, but to work to prevent it from being developed anywhere around the world. The future of humanity cannot be left in the hands of a handful of Big Tech oligarchs. The American people and people throughout the world must determine that future.
8,080
4,373
3,006
27,206
8,682,645
In case anyone takes what this clown says at face value... (No, I don't think EU administrators are using A.I. to go after X meme accounts)
Looks like I'm going to prison for posting memes
1
83
Eric Bolton retweeted
As a 17 yo, I genuinely didn't understand how one of my classmate, a Will Hunting-type mathematical genius, could outsmart all of us without putting any effort, while sleeping and snoring throughout the lectures. He went on to win an IMO gold medal. This felt like magic and triggered my interest in mathematical cognition. I was quite good myself, but very far from him. I persevered, discovered effective techniques, made some progress, did a reasonably good PhD and went on to become a tier-2 mathematician. Then, in my early 30s, my self-confidence increased a lot, I found ways to increase my focus and intuition, which triggered a success feedback loop where I became capable of working much harder, for much longer periods of time, with much better techniques. I ended making stellar progress and proving first-rate results between 32 and 34 before I quit math. My interest for mathematical cognition continued, which explains my book, Substack, and public engagement here.
As a kid, I often got in footraces on the playground. I’d put in some extra effort at the end and would always win. I genuinely didn’t understand why the other kids weren’t trying harder. Then in high school I ran on the same track team as a future Olympian. “OK, now I get it.”
61
176
13
4,702
669,572
I made a periodic table of media, and wow, there are so many undiscovered experiential niches. Folks, what's stopping you from claiming one and becoming an acclaimed artist?
1
1
48
Thoughts on the “permanent underclass”: unless you personally get to wear the infinity gauntlet produced by an eventual AGI, your only hope is that it be fairly controlled by a collective you are a part of. Otherwise you will likely have no say in your future. But true collective control over AGI, as it stands, is an impossibility. Collectives are slow to act and bogged down by dissent. When they do act, they are reactive, unable to follow coherent long-term strategies. As such, it’s individuals – often the most egotistical – who end up taking control. We’ve all heard the oft-repeated exhortation to “return to community.” It rings hollow. Why? Because it rescinds agency. A community simply cannot compete with “founder mode,” with centralized power, with authoritarians, in other words, with the true agents of this world. A classic example is the chess match between Garry Kasparov and the rest of the world (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaspar…), in which the grandmaster (for a variety of interesting reasons) won. Today’s information-overloaded knowledge economy forms a strategic landscape in which the competitive disadvantage of collectives is at its starkest. And unfortunately, collectives will have no hope of claiming power until they can credibly compete with individual agents. Thus, if we want as many people as possible (ideally everyone) to escape the “permanent underclass,” the most important missing technology of our time is one that fairly translates collective desire into coherent action. We must build collective agents.
55
Eric Bolton retweeted
SES dominates childhood brain organization. Zip code matters most. These findings have consumed my mind daily, with Darwin’s quote living rent free in my head: “if the misery of the poor not be caused by the laws of nature, but by our institutions, great be our sin.”
8
58
4
336
25,948
We have our best minds on aligning the AI models, but the trickiest part is aligning the AI companies.
I really believe there’s a substantial chance we could all die from AI. I told Caitlin this, and she asked how that could happen. Here's what I said: Because AI companies are trying to make basically a smarter species that can do everything we can do. Everything that makes humans the dominant species on the planet, and not chimpanzees or tigers — it’s because we’re smart, we have language, we can use tools. And AI companies are making that, but they’re trying to make it smarter and better at everything. (Time stamp: 46:06) We also discussed robots, hacking, and why strategy is a key capability that AI agents don't currently possess but would have to in order to take over. Also, why nearly every computer has vulnerabilities that some hacker could exploit, but most computers are not hacked most of the time. And how AI will change the cybersecurity space and what you should do in response. It was a fun conversation, and I hope @caitlinquestion does a bunch more of these!
34
Progressive thinkers need to create spaces with which to make more radical bets.
23
Eric Bolton retweeted
dude who made this is a real reader cause this is how it is
35
980
12
20,568
640,745
Eric Bolton retweeted
Totalmente enamorado de esta propuesta de bandera planetaria. Un circulo azul para representar nuestro planeta, y el resto transparente para que el fondo sea parte de la bandera
Replying to @PunishedAlbert
The One World Flag is easily the best (transparent so the background is incorporated into the flag)
1,778
3,578
1,786
49,438
17,196,761
Taking a ride.
35
AI-gen passages in executive orders confirmed. See for yourself: whitehouse.gov/presidential-…
1
4
2
5
1,174
Can AI help us understand what's 'normal' in politics? We trained language models on Trump's campaign speeches and social media posts to analyze his 2nd inauguration speech. The results were fascinating. Analysis + methodology here: alignedforesight.substack.co…
2
65
Eric Bolton retweeted
Call it Field of Bad Dreams: Harris tried to build it, but they just didn’t come. wsj.com/politics/elections/v… In every core blue bloc, voters didn’t turn out. The electorate that did shifted toward Trump—an analysis of vote data from me, @karadapena, @maureenlinke, and @rob_barry.
5
9
7
3,082
In the era of generative AI, we forget that the most harmful AI (and the AI that has only gotten more potent) is the collaborative filtering powering social media algorithms. When we boost narratives based on engagement rather than underlying truth, the most misleading ones win.
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
3
116
Just to clarify: this isn’t just the first time since WW2 that all incumbent parties in developed countries lost vote share. It’s the first time since this data was first recorded in 1905. Essentially the first time in the history of democracy (universal suffrage began in 1894).
119
1,246
208
4,730
746,493