Assistant Professor @unimib, interested in Social Cognition and Learning

Joined October 2019
Experiments 2-4 addressed procedural concerns by showing a 'generalized' effect: repetition-induced source credibility extended to truth judgments about entirely novel statements attributed to sources previously associated with repeated (vs. new) statements.
1
52
We discuss potential mechanisms behind this effect, drawing on factors like cognitive fluency and familiarity. In highlighting the strategic value of repetition as a persuasive tool, our findings have implications for domains such as political discourse and misinformation.
45
New research helps us understand how we form and change our opinions about people in everyday life, where we often encounter multiple types of information about others. ✍️: Matteo Masi, @essematta, @fabiofas17, and @MarcoBicocca Read more in #PSPB: ow.ly/NsU850ThuKY
2
4
692
What are the consequences of positive stereotypes exposure? Our new paper, published in @irsp_rips, addresses this question. w/ Claudia Bianchi, @MarcoBicocca, and @matteomotte rips-irsp.com/articles/10.53…
1
1
1
414
Our research contributes to our understanding of the cognitive mechanisms underpinning the reinforcement of positive stereotypes, showing that increased exposure can make their negative effects worse.
64
Rejected after minor revision
The most peculiar way to lose a pole vaulting Olympic competition. Athlete Anthony Ammirati, #today. xitter.cf/i/status/1819765194244…
172
On target evaluations: Praises repeated more often led to more favorable evaluations of targets, while repeating derogations had a lesser (negative) impact.
1
78
Our findings indicate that repetition is a powerful rhetoric tool that transcends political alignment. Implications? Politicians may use repetition to shape beliefs across the political spectrum.
69